No Planer calls for scientific study - Page 57

yankee451 · 16th February 2013, 12:28 PM

Originally Posted by DGM

I hate to say it but people are not as stupid as the group you put yourself in. Hell, you think anyone that can calculate this must be on the payroll.

You lost me.

DGM · 16th February 2013, 12:33 PM

Originally Posted by yankee451

You lost me.

You said:

Quote:

It is much more realistic to assume most people are just as stupid as the rest of us

"Us" would be the operative word. Do you have a different meaning for "us" when you are the one making the statement? It's odd you are the only one of "us" that figured it out but are also part of the group that couldn't.

yankee451 · 16th February 2013, 12:34 PM

Originally Posted by DGM

You said:

"Us" would be the operative word. Do you have a different meaning for "us" when you are the one making the statement. It's odd you are the only one of "us" that figured it out but are also part of the group that couldn't.

Scuse me for not thinking any of us are all that special.

The Platypus · 16th February 2013, 12:39 PM

Originally Posted by yankee451

Repeating rumor doesn't change the evidence; the writing on the wall, as it were.

Oh the irony coming from the guy repeating the same rumor over and over...

DGM · 16th February 2013, 12:43 PM

Originally Posted by yankee451

Scuse me for not thinking any of us are all that special.

What are you talking about? I never claimed anyone was special, or stupid for that matter (that was you). You claim that everyone capable of understanding and actually acknowledging this simple math must be a government agent or an obedient sheep.

DGM · 16th February 2013, 12:57 PM

Yankee451:

Answer this as it is the heart of this thread.

The basis for your belief that the planes could not do the seen damage to the buildings is based on your belief that you must have been told a lie by the government.

A simple yes or no will do.

If no, what is your basis for this belief?

yankee451 · 16th February 2013, 12:59 PM

Originally Posted by DGM

Yankee451:

Answer this as it is the heart of this thread.

The basis for your belief that the planes could not do the seen damage to the buildings is based on your belief that you must be being told a lie by the government.

A simple yes or no will do.

If no, what is your basis for this belief?

No.

The damage evidence.

DGM · 16th February 2013, 01:01 PM

Originally Posted by yankee451

No.

The damage evidence.

What's wrong with it? Why don't you believe what people with the ability to explain it tell you?

Back to the original question.

The Platypus · 16th February 2013, 01:04 PM

Originally Posted by yankee451

No.

The damage evidence.

More like, some conspiracy website's misinterpretation of the damage evidence...

LashL · 16th February 2013, 01:07 PM

This thread is closed until a Moderator has the time to go through it and clean out all of the rule breaches and bickering nonsense. As always, do not start another thread on the topic while this one is closed. You will have to wait until this one is reopened.

Posted By:LashL

16th February 2013, 12:28 PM	#2241
yankee451 Graduate Poster Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 1,215	Originally Posted by DGM I hate to say it but people are not as stupid as the group you put yourself in. Hell, you think anyone that can calculate this must be on the payroll. You lost me.
	__________________ www.yankee451.com www.911crashtest.org

16th February 2013, 12:33 PM	#2242
DGM #4 Join Date: May 2007 Location: West of Northshore MA Posts: 14,350	Originally Posted by yankee451 You lost me. You said: Quote: It is much more realistic to assume most people are just as stupid as the rest of us "Us" would be the operative word. Do you have a different meaning for "us" when you are the one making the statement? It's odd you are the only one of "us" that figured it out but are also part of the group that couldn't.
	__________________ Join the team, Show us what your machine can do (or just contribute to a good cause)Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232 "Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley Last edited by DGM; 16th February 2013 at 12:34 PM.

16th February 2013, 12:34 PM	#2243
yankee451 Graduate Poster Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 1,215	Originally Posted by DGM You said: "Us" would be the operative word. Do you have a different meaning for "us" when you are the one making the statement. It's odd you are the only one of "us" that figured it out but are also part of the group that couldn't. Scuse me for not thinking any of us are all that special.
	__________________ www.yankee451.com www.911crashtest.org

16th February 2013, 12:39 PM	#2244
The Platypus Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 1,787	Originally Posted by yankee451 Repeating rumor doesn't change the evidence; the writing on the wall, as it were. Oh the irony coming from the guy repeating the same rumor over and over...
	__________________ I'll go with the qualified experts, over some ranting guy on the internet that claims he has "the truth". Always beware of those that overuse, capitalize and blanket themselves in them word "truth". I may not always know the truth, but i do know when i'm being lied too.

16th February 2013, 12:43 PM	#2245
DGM #4 Join Date: May 2007 Location: West of Northshore MA Posts: 14,350	Originally Posted by yankee451 Scuse me for not thinking any of us are all that special. What are you talking about? I never claimed anyone was special, or stupid for that matter (that was you). You claim that everyone capable of understanding and actually acknowledging this simple math must be a government agent or an obedient sheep.
	__________________ Join the team, Show us what your machine can do (or just contribute to a good cause)Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232 "Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley

16th February 2013, 12:57 PM	#2246
DGM #4 Join Date: May 2007 Location: West of Northshore MA Posts: 14,350	Yankee451: Answer this as it is the heart of this thread. The basis for your belief that the planes could not do the seen damage to the buildings is based on your belief that you must have been told a lie by the government. A simple yes or no will do. If no, what is your basis for this belief?
	__________________ Join the team, Show us what your machine can do (or just contribute to a good cause)Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232 "Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley Last edited by DGM; 16th February 2013 at 12:59 PM.

16th February 2013, 12:59 PM	#2247
yankee451 Graduate Poster Join Date: Jan 2013 Posts: 1,215	Originally Posted by DGM Yankee451: Answer this as it is the heart of this thread. The basis for your belief that the planes could not do the seen damage to the buildings is based on your belief that you must be being told a lie by the government. A simple yes or no will do. If no, what is your basis for this belief? No. The damage evidence.
	__________________ www.yankee451.com www.911crashtest.org

16th February 2013, 01:01 PM	#2248
DGM #4 Join Date: May 2007 Location: West of Northshore MA Posts: 14,350	Originally Posted by yankee451 No. The damage evidence. What's wrong with it? Why don't you believe what people with the ability to explain it tell you? Back to the original question.
	__________________ Join the team, Show us what your machine can do (or just contribute to a good cause)Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232 "Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley

16th February 2013, 01:04 PM	#2249
The Platypus Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 1,787	Originally Posted by yankee451 No. The damage evidence. More like, some conspiracy website's misinterpretation of the damage evidence...
	__________________ I'll go with the qualified experts, over some ranting guy on the internet that claims he has "the truth". Always beware of those that overuse, capitalize and blanket themselves in them word "truth". I may not always know the truth, but i do know when i'm being lied too.