|
Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
24th April 2014, 03:50 AM | #1 |
Scholar
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 58
|
Open minds?
I'm a long term lurker, on this site, with very few posts so excuse me if this thread is in the wrong section. It is obvious that a great many posters have a high level of intelligence and knowledge, mostly way above my own. I would like to know if there have been many instances when a regular with a strongly held opinion on a subject has changed that opinion due to the arguments of others here.
|
24th April 2014, 04:12 AM | #2 |
Nasty Brutish and Tall
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
|
|
24th April 2014, 04:17 AM | #3 |
Scholar
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 58
|
Cheers for the reply but I was thinking more about strongly held opinions, not ones you never really thought about.
|
24th April 2014, 04:19 AM | #4 |
Confusion Reactor
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 25,141
|
Randfan comes to mind. I've changed my stance on a few issues over the years and in fact my opinions have often been shaped by what I read here.
|
24th April 2014, 04:20 AM | #5 |
Confusion Reactor
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 25,141
|
|
24th April 2014, 04:30 AM | #6 |
Scholar
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 58
|
That's interesting. The reason I asked is from reading the forums I have seen so many initial statements being blindly adhered to despite what I would consider well reasoned and referenced rebuttals. I do appreciate the value of defending your opinions, but in most cases it appears to be wilfully ignoring reality rather than admit to a mistaken belief. After a few pages of reply it regularly decends into a chest beating exercise, nitpicking replacing debate.
|
24th April 2014, 04:33 AM | #7 |
Scholar
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 58
|
What was the subject of Randfan change of opinion, could you direct me to the thread?
|
24th April 2014, 04:37 AM | #8 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,768
|
I've said this before on the forum. I have changed my mind about polygraphs. I was responsible for their use in one investigation and supported their findings in many others. This forum made me regret every one of those decisions.
|
__________________
My kids still love me. |
|
24th April 2014, 04:42 AM | #9 |
Nasty Brutish and Tall
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,691
|
|
24th April 2014, 04:43 AM | #10 |
Confusion Reactor
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 25,141
|
|
24th April 2014, 04:47 AM | #11 |
Confusion Reactor
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 25,141
|
This. He spent many years here as a hardcore Republican. Gradually his mind changed enough for him to abandon the GOP both because of his participation here and because he felt the party abandoned him and basic conservative principles.
But he's always been a good guy and that hasn't changed. |
24th April 2014, 04:52 AM | #12 |
Confusion Reactor
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 25,141
|
For myself I'll say that I was raised to hate guns by a pacifist hippie.
My mind was changed over the course of many debates here wherein the pro and anti gun sides made their respective cases, and it became clear to me that one side has reason and facts largely on their side while the other had hysterics and appeals to emotion. |
24th April 2014, 05:03 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Guilford
Posts: 13,037
|
It is not easy to admit you are wrong in public. The culture here does not exactly make it any easier, with a good deal of mockery and sarcasm attending any sloppy or unreasonable thinking.
Out in the real world, this trait can have profound consequences. The topic that brought me here, Amanda Knox, is one which probably would not exist without the deep reluctance of the cops to admit or face up to error and since getting into that case I have come across many more in which people just dig in in the face of mounting contrary evidence. Many subjects here do not lend themselves to 'rightness' and 'wrongness' but, of those that do, I frequently see people being corrected and accepting the correction. The less invested they are the easier it is. I think it helps to try not to stick your neck out too far into areas above your pay grade because there is bound to be somebody who knows whatever the subject is way better than you. |
24th April 2014, 05:14 AM | #14 |
Butterbeans and Breadcrumbs
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Emily's shop
Posts: 17,709
|
Didn't chillzero come here initially as someone who believed she was psychic?
|
__________________
Sponsor me please! http://www.justgiving.com/Catherine-Kiernan http://www.justgiving.com/Catherine-Kiernan1 My blog |
|
24th April 2014, 05:30 AM | #15 |
Confusion Reactor
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 25,141
|
We have a few ex-passionate-9/11 Truthers too.
|
24th April 2014, 05:43 AM | #16 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: As far away from casebro as possible.
Posts: 7,070
|
|
__________________
There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda |
|
24th April 2014, 05:56 AM | #17 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,768
|
|
__________________
My kids still love me. |
|
24th April 2014, 06:13 AM | #18 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lenoir City, TN/Mineral Bluff, GA
Posts: 7,870
|
Not necessarily this site, but over time I changed my views on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars due largely to the drip, drip, drip of online debates.
|
24th April 2014, 06:45 AM | #19 |
Fiend God
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In a post-fact world
Posts: 96,875
|
|
24th April 2014, 06:55 AM | #20 |
Philosophile
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 35,980
|
Indeed. A few people here were Truthers and got talked round. One of them is still very, very passionate but is now a very big supporter of the NWO.
Others used to be religious but have now changed. Not sure if Wolfman was a Christian missionary when he joined but he has let us know that he was very passionate (and I believe it), but has changed his mind. Another two or three posters here used to be Christian but now they have been cured!!! As for me, I used to be an opponent of paedophilia and anti-semitism. |
__________________
Слава Україні! **** Putin! |
|
24th April 2014, 07:04 AM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Guilford
Posts: 13,037
|
Actually, don't tell him this, but the guy in my sig was persuaded to change his position before forgetting that he did and reverting back to his previous stance, which is why I thought a permanent reminder necessary
This suggests not only a problem with changing one's mind but, beyond that, an inability to keep it from slipping back to its previous wrongness. |
24th April 2014, 07:09 AM | #22 |
Troublesome Passenger
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 21,844
|
I think I used to be more open-minded in regard to the sincerity of woo-slingers. Now I pretty much cast a jaundiced, unsympathetic eye to the ******** they sling unless they're clearly mentally unstable, and sometimes not even then.
|
24th April 2014, 07:13 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Guilford
Posts: 13,037
|
In which direction? I think I have become a frothing, ultra-left anarchist during my time here with respect to these issues although I was already well on the way before so I'm not sure what the effect discussion has had. I now consider every pronouncement by the US/UK on foreign affairs to be a bare-faced lie until the contrary is proved.
|
24th April 2014, 07:19 AM | #24 |
Philosophile
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 35,980
|
|
__________________
Слава Україні! **** Putin! |
|
24th April 2014, 07:56 AM | #25 |
Muse
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 785
|
I don't hate or love guns, but which side uses hysterics and appeals to emotion, because I see that on both sides of the issue, as well as reason and rationality? A lot of people pretend that there isn't a sane middle ground that could satisfy the majority, and keep in line with the 2nd amendment. That is why I don't generally get into debates on gun restrictions. Too much hysterics and bullying, without much reason.
|
24th April 2014, 08:04 AM | #26 |
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lenoir City, TN/Mineral Bluff, GA
Posts: 7,870
|
|
24th April 2014, 08:12 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Guilford
Posts: 13,037
|
|
24th April 2014, 08:25 AM | #28 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,438
|
In my experience, it is most frequently the people saying "you need to keep an open mind" who are least likely to be open to evidence and fact based discussion.
|
24th April 2014, 08:30 AM | #29 |
Illuminator
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,139
|
I think this was the forum where I had a conversation with someone who had a background in atomospheric sciences that convinced me my resistance to accepting AGW was largely misplaced. I still have reservations about the accuracy of some of the models and predictions, but I certainly don't think it's a science panic any longer.
|
24th April 2014, 08:38 AM | #30 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: central Illinois
Posts: 39,700
|
|
__________________
I suspect you are a sandwich, metaphorically speaking. -Donn And a shot rang out. Now Space is doing time... -Ben Burch You built the toilet - don't complain when people crap in it. _Kid Eager Never underestimate the power of the Random Number God. More of evolutionary history is His doing than people think. - Dinwar |
|
24th April 2014, 08:42 AM | #31 |
Merchant of Doom
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Not in Hell, but I can see it from here on a clear day...
Posts: 15,112
|
My problem seems to be that whenever someone asks me to keep my mind open, it's because they want to start throwing trash in it.
My mind is not closed, but neither is it a dumpster for whatever unevidenced nonsense someone wants to fill it with. A bar to entry (your idea must be this That being said, and more directly to the OP, I've had gradual changes on quite a few beliefs. I don't think anything major, but when I came to the board I had recently abandoned a lot of deeply held beliefs (came from a very religious family), so there wasn't a whole lot left to work with |
24th April 2014, 09:06 AM | #32 |
Scholar
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 58
|
My reason for joining this forum related to the 911 conspiracy. A friend of mine sent me some links, youtube and blogs etc. I found them quite convincing at first (not having looked much into it). I came here to get links and evidence against the CT view so I could weigh up both sides. In truth it only took a little research to realise the conspiracy angle was nonsense. What scares me is that my friend, a reasonably intelligent guy, still clings to the conspiracy angle, regardless of any argument. I have had to refuse to discuss it anymore for fear of losing respect for such a good friend. As far as I'm now concerned it's his new religion and nothing will change his view.
|
24th April 2014, 10:20 AM | #33 |
I would save the receptionist.
Moderator Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 28,352
|
|
__________________
I have the honor to be Your Obdt. St L. Leader |
|
24th April 2014, 10:38 AM | #34 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,768
|
Yes. Definitely my experience, too.
Which is a variation on what jond said above. Point out these things about magic tricks or point out sincere people being fooled by someone that the current believer says is a charlatan, and the response is along the lines of "Yes, but that wouldn't fool me; I can tell the difference." Of course, they can never outline the means by which they tell the difference. I likely do not have as much experience as you, but my experience is still extensive, and I will hold it up against yours any day as qualification to make judgments on what mediums/psychics do and how they do it. And you misrepresent Randi. He does not say that cold reading is the only thing that they do. Nor do I say it. I could go into much detail, but it would be a derail, so if you want to continue your side trip into how your experiences are legitimate, please start another thread, and I will join. Otherwise, I'm done with the topic here. |
__________________
My kids still love me. |
|
24th April 2014, 11:52 AM | #35 |
Eats shoots and leaves.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 8,217
|
I have actually softened my stance on gun restrictions after participating in many debates here. I guess you could say I have moved to that sane middle ground. I used to think that law-abiding citizens should have unfettered access to the guns of their choosing. Now I am for more sensible regulations than we have now. I'm not going to go into details for fear of derailing the thread. It's a small change but one that I have noticed. There may be others. Mostly, I have been educated.
|
__________________
"Truth does not contradict truth." - St. Augustine "Faith often contradicts faith. Therefore faith is not an indication of truth." - RenaissanceBiker |
|
24th April 2014, 01:32 PM | #36 |
Muse
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 828
|
|
24th April 2014, 01:42 PM | #37 |
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,768
|
Yes to the education. JREF was not the only factor, but it was definitely a prime factor in making me realize that I am not the astounding infallible and towering intellect I sometimes used to think I was.
It is rewardingly humbling to find out that I may be smart and informed, but regardless of the topic there is always one or a thousand others who are smarter and better informed. |
__________________
My kids still love me. |
|
24th April 2014, 01:56 PM | #38 |
Troublesome Passenger
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 21,844
|
|
24th April 2014, 02:00 PM | #39 |
Bow Tie Daddy
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the twilight, singing all the old lullabies
Posts: 7,599
|
I used to be annoyed by people who were involved in politics.
Now I absolutely loathe them. That's what the JREF did for me. Hell, I don't even vote or watch the news anymore because of this place. Made my life much more enjoyable with zero downsides. I also used to be firmly on the fence about Bigfoot. Now I'm pretty sure I'm in the non-believer camp. |
__________________
"Don't be too offended by the likes of him - I hear he doesn't even own ascots." -JoeyDonuts "I must be more tired than I thought. Howie, you are starting to make sense." -MG1962 "You're a mean old evil cynic. And mean." Halfcentaur "...wing collars are like an ocular violation."-TubbaBlubba |
|
24th April 2014, 06:56 PM | #40 |
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Blasphemy St.
Posts: 409
|
Although not a longtime member here, i've also been a lurker for quite sometime. .. As for whether my opinion on any particular subject matter has been changed due to the arguments between others here on JREF, well, I would have to say its done more to reinforce them rather than change anything. .. The primary reason I became a member here, was to help sort out all the theoretical viewpoints surrounding 911. Being somewhat against most all conspiracies or CT'rs (because they all too often fall short of logic and evidence), I found it a relief to find others who could finally put into perspective what i've always known and felt all along, but as yet myself the abilty to emphasize on. .. That is, the truth or best explanation based upon clear logic and evidence. .. Might I add, my level of intellect does fall short here. Lets just say, sometimes it can take me only seconds to type a paragraph like this out, other times, its a 2-4 hour struggle just to express the little bit I posted here. .. Rayheno, I hope you feel at home here. .. I know I do, even though i'm not quite convinced there doesn't exist some greater being .
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|