| JREF Homepage | Swift Blog | Events Calendar | $1 Million Paranormal Challenge | The Amaz!ng Meeting | Useful Links | Support Us |
![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
|
|
#1 | ||||||
|
Scholar and a Gentleman
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Uncanny Valley
Posts: 6,128
|
Amazing twist on the sawing-someone-in-half trick!
I'm absolutely floored by this routine by one Kevin James... I have no idea how this is even remotely possible, but kudos to whoever built his props. Is this his own trick or did someone else invent it? |
||||||
|
__________________
- ""My tribe has a saying: 'If you're bleeding, look for a man with scars'" - Leela, Doctor Who 'Robots of Death'. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Illuminator
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The House on the Hill
Posts: 4,096
|
Absolutely amazing. And this was before a live audience? So they couldn't just have removed the guy with a dummy in-between shots?
We are allowed to speculate in here, right? Pardon me if we aren't. |
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Muse
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 783
|
The first video is edited. The second one is what you would see live.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Master of my Domain
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Largo, FL
Posts: 2,389
|
Everything in magic is obvious to some people. It's still magic to others- obviously it wasn't obvious to the OP. There's really no need to show how smart you are by trying to explain it to everyone just because it's obvious to you.
I've seen Kevin do this live several times and he reattaches the halves, so it obvious to me that edits aren't required and weren't done to hide the method. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Muse
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 783
|
I agree edits are not required as he does it live, but there was an obvious edit in the first video that probably skipped a very important element of the method. I wish it was the full video so that I could be more amazed by it. And I also wonder why he didn't do the reattachment in the second video.. maybe it doesn't look good on TV?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Master of my Domain
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,472
|
I'm not a magician and have zero expertise in the matter.
But, I am frequently amazed at some of the the "magic" is see. I really do love this stuff and enjoy trying to figure out how it's done. But, when there's an obvious edit (ala everything you see on "Mindfreak") then I like to speculate. The first vid was great but it had an obvious edit. The second vid didn't use the edit which made the trick easier to spot. Is "speculating" the same as revealing secrets? Since I've been modded (is that a word?...) should I take this to Forum Management for discussion? |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Illuminator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Yorkshire,Uk
Posts: 4,171
|
|
|
__________________
"I achieve these results through a mixture of magic,misdirection,suggestion and showmanship"-Derren Brown Photography here
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Illuminator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,438
|
It's that Prof. Snape in the second vid?
(Sorry, I have a house full of kids and I've been "Potter'd" to insanity today.) |
|
__________________
MOVE!!!! SCIENCE IS COMING!!!!! I like yelling that as if science is a rampaging monster because it makes the Christians scatter... I'm kidding! I'm a christian! Shakes head while mouthing "No I'm not." ~Dr. KaBoom! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,085
|
The rest of the world can speculate. We can speculate anywhere else. Not being able to speculate makes this forum less interesting (in that respect) than the local pub.
Exposing secrets because you are in the know is one thing. Talking about effects and speculating on their method is what everyone does after they've seen a trick. Why bother to restrict it here? It's not going to make any difference to anything. Seems silly. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Illuminator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Yorkshire,Uk
Posts: 4,171
|
Er..I dunno.
Maybe if speculating hits on the real method? |
|
__________________
"I achieve these results through a mixture of magic,misdirection,suggestion and showmanship"-Derren Brown Photography here
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,085
|
How does that change what I said previously?
Guessing is not exposure. If it was then almost anyone who's ever watched a magic trick and discussed it or guessed at it's method is guilty of it and that cannot be true. People do it all the time in person and on 100s of forums, blogs and websites. Restricting people from doing it at a skeptical thinking website makes no difference or sense IMO. Anyway, if we don't know and we hit on the right method, we are still guessing and still don't KNOW the method. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Muse
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 783
|
Speculation might not be exposure, but in my opinion it cheapens the illusions just the same. Just because some sites and forums guess things doesn't make it ok. I always find it pretty annoying that people on Youtube keep trying to guess the method they see in the videos, instead of keeping the illusion alive and just enjoy it. Which in my opinion is what magic is all about. If people want do that then it would be better in private and not where every child can read.
Not to mention that more often than not the guessing IS the correct solution, which is what happened with the previous post by Colcas that was edited. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Master of my Domain
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Muse
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 783
|
If you posted an incorrect method with specific details why you think that way, then in my opinion it should be removed as well. Mostly because it could lead people to believe it is the correct method, and that would not be fair toward the magician who worked so hard to keep it mysterious. Guessing or not, I don't understand why people should ruin the illusion. This is the most important part of magic.
There used to be a Russian site made about Copperfield's secrets, and many of the things there were false. But that sill made him very angry and threatened to sue the creator of the website, who eventually took it down. Copperfield couldn't care less if the secrets were just by guessing or not, it still showed disrespect for his hard work. I'm not saying people can't speculate about the magic effects, I do the same with other people. But in my opinion it should be kept private. |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Scholar and a Gentleman
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Uncanny Valley
Posts: 6,128
|
Midgets?
|
|
__________________
- ""My tribe has a saying: 'If you're bleeding, look for a man with scars'" - Leela, Doctor Who 'Robots of Death'. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |||
|
Muse
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 734
|
Unfortunately, the gentleman who gets sawed in half in the video passed away earlier this year.
Kevin James' version is nice, but to this day, the master of presenting the sawing-in-half illusion is still Richiardi:
|
|||
|
__________________
Grey Matters:
Blog | Videos | Mental Gym | Presentation | Original Products | Recommended Products Train and Strain Your Brain to Entertain! |
||||
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Largo, FL
Posts: 2,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Muse
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 734
|
His name is Kurtis Walker, and he died on March 31st, 2007 from a tumor under his heart. He was only 24.
Here's Kevin James' rememberance of him (written on April 12th):
Quote:
|
|
__________________
Grey Matters:
Blog | Videos | Mental Gym | Presentation | Original Products | Recommended Products Train and Strain Your Brain to Entertain! |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Largo, FL
Posts: 2,389
|
Okay- different guy then.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|