JREF Homepage Swift Blog Events Calendar $1 Million Paranormal Challenge The Amaz!ng Meeting Useful Links Support Us
James Randi Educational Foundation JREF Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   JREF Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
Click Here To Donate

Notices


Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.

Tags detect , possible

Reply
Old 18th September 2003, 06:46 AM   #1
Ian
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Possible ways to detect antimatter

Hi. I think that there might be a way to detect antimatter in the universe if you can detect the type of electromagnetic radiation that's released when antimatter collides with normal matter. If antimatter exists out there in the cosmos at all besides being artificailly created in partical accelerators. What kinds of energy could be released when antimatter and normal matter collide?
  Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th September 2003, 08:40 AM   #2
Walter Wayne
Wayne's Words
 
Walter Wayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 2,450
Re: Possible ways to detect antimatter

Quote:
Originally posted by Ian
What kinds of energy could be released when antimatter and normal matter collide?
My undestanding, when one gets total annihilation any products whose energies sum to same value as the energy involved in the initial collision. Most of the products will be short lived and decay to other new things. My impression is the only radiation that reached earth from such a collision would be the long lived type stuff, so a few photons and garbage that could not be distinguished from background.

In particle accerators, collisions of anything other than fundamental matter-antimatter particles are inefficient. In a proton antiproton collision one doesn't necessarily get total annihilation because the two particle require a certain orientation of the quarks in order to collide with correct quark-antiquark contacting.

I don't know of any natural phenomenon that would yield a large amount antimatter-matter collisions, so while energy density might be high, total energy of most collision would be small. Once you spread that energy out over lightyears it would disappear into the background noise most likely.

Walt
Walter Wayne is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th September 2003, 08:46 AM   #3
Ian
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Antimatter detection

If one galaxy is made entirely of antimatter and another
galaxy collides with it, than the antimatter explosion should be visible for a short time, then whatever "short-lived" radiation could be detected by a very sensitive detector that could detect
it even though it would be extremely far away. Could whole
stars and planets and galaxies out there somewhere
be made of antimatter instead of normal matter?
  Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th September 2003, 09:51 AM   #4
Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
 
Ziggurat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 26,284
Re: Antimatter detection

Quote:
Originally posted by Ian
If one galaxy is made entirely of antimatter and another
galaxy collides with it, than the antimatter explosion should be visible for a short time, then whatever "short-lived" radiation could be detected by a very sensitive detector that could detect
it even though it would be extremely far away.
Matter-antimatter anihilation will release photons - lots of them, and very high energy ones at that. If a matter galaxy collided with an antimatter galaxy, the collision would last a very long time (at least on a human scale), as in tens of thousands of years.

Quote:

Could whole stars and planets and galaxies out there somewhere be made of antimatter instead of normal matter?
That does not appear to be the case. There apears to be a fundamental asymmetry between matter and antimatter (which is why the universe is mainly the former), and that shouldn't have allowed for such large regions of space to be dominated by antimatter while the rest of the universe tipped to the matter side. The idea suggests interesting possibilities for science fiction (and I recall even reading a story along those lines), of course, but we're fairly sure all the galaxies and stars out there are matter and not antimatter.
__________________
"As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose -- that it may violate property instead of protecting it -- then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder. Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious." - Bastiat, The Law
Ziggurat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th September 2003, 10:01 AM   #5
Correa Neto
Philosopher
 
Correa Neto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hunting rocks somewhere in Brazil
Posts: 7,232
One of the most intrigant things about our universe is why matter dominates. One would expect a symmetry to exist, at least on some degree. Some cosmologists made hypothesis that there was at the very first moments of the big bang roughly the same ammounts of matter and antimatter, with a small (infinitesimal) extra ammount of "ordinary" matter. After matter/antimatter anihilation, what remained, that dx of mater became the universe as we know.

Matter/antimatter collisions result in massive release of energy, as gamma rays. Years ago, matter/antimatter reactions were ocasionally used as a possible explanation for gamma ray bursts.

I remember some years ago a group of astronomers claimed to have found a "cloud" of antimatter above our galaxy (no, I am not mixing reality with a Star Trek episode ).
__________________
Racism, sexism, ignorance, homophobia, intolerance, extremism, authoritarianism, environmental disasters, politically correct crap, violence at sport stadiums, slavery, poverty, wars, people who disagree with me:
Together we can find the cure
Oh, and together we can find a cure to religion too…
Correa Neto is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th September 2003, 10:07 AM   #6
Tez
Graduate Poster
 
Tez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London
Posts: 1,104
The problem ian is that all of those photons could have arisen from other processes involving only normal matter. Thus it takes more than simply observing a whole bunch of high energy radiation to conclude antimatter was involved...
__________________
"There's two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the hypothesis, then you've made a discovery. If the result is contrary to the hypothesis, then you've made a discovery.” --Enrico Fermi

www.physicsnerd.com
Tez is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th September 2003, 11:39 AM   #7
The Bad Astronomer
Muse
 
The Bad Astronomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Boulder
Posts: 835
There is a fountain of antimatter erupting from the center of our own Galaxy. When the electrons and anti-electrons collide, they give off gamma rays at the signature energy of 511 keV. Evidently this is from a rash of star formation some time ago. High-mass stars went supernovae quite often, creating positrons, and the fountain is the result of a pressure blowout from the expanding gas.

Here is a press release about it. You can also read the journal paper.
The Bad Astronomer is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd September 2003, 09:04 AM   #8
Agammamon
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,385
Some research indicates that Charge, Parity, Time symmetry may be conserved only if you reverse all 3 (rather than 1 0r 2), meaning that for anti-matter some reactions may not be time-reversable the same way for matter reactions. If this is the case all you have to do is contact the aliens you r suspect galaxy, have them run some tests, and then send them to you to compare with the results expected for matter. Obviously this approach has many technical hurdles to overcome so I am set up to receive any donations you care to make to study the issue.

Otherwise photons is photons. Outside of throwing matter at whatever you think might be antimatter and looking for the explosion, AM galaxies would be indistinguishable from M galaxies.
__________________
It will be a great day when the US Air Force has all the bombs it needs and the NEA has to hold a bake sale in order to pay its lobbyists.
Agammamon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th September 2003, 04:55 PM   #9
a_unique_person
Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning
 
a_unique_person's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Mt Disappointment
Posts: 33,457
If you stick your hand in some and your hand disappears, you have found some.
__________________
Continually pushing the boundaries of mediocrity.
Everything is possible, but not everything is probable.
For if a man pretend to me that God hath spoken to him supernaturally, and immediately, and I make doubt of it, I cannot easily perceive what argument he can produce to oblige me to believe it. Hobbes
a_unique_person is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

JREF Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:39 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2001-2012, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.