[Split]Psychic Sarah- split from: Interesting...

psychic sarah · 11th February 2008, 07:41 AM

Ms shortcake...

1) I did NOT emerge from the woodwork....I am already well established and respected in my profession (never mind what the skeptics think)

2) I do NOT ramble

3) I do NOT have NPD.....thanks very much.

Alice...where do you get off diagnosing this, especially re someone you have never met and know nothing about? NOT very professional of you; nor very rational either....a classic case of pure PROJECTION me thinks....

(I am in fact the opposite of just about everything on that list above....)

Terry · 11th February 2008, 07:46 AM

So it took three months for your psychic powers to detect that someone was talking about you here? Welcome to the forum, anyway

Locknar · 11th February 2008, 07:51 AM

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

Ms shortcake...

1) I did NOT emerge from the woodwork....I am already well established and respected in my profession (never mind what the skeptics think)

2) I do NOT ramble

3) I do NOT have NPD.....thanks very much.

Alice...where do you get off diagnosing this, especially re someone you have never met and know nothing about? NOT very professional of you; nor very rational either....a classic case of pure PROJECTION me thinks....

(I am in fact the opposite of just about everything on that list above....)

Humm...and what profession would that be? Being a ~~fraud~~ psychic?

So why do you believe you have psychic powers since you have yet to find Madeleine McCann; how's that going anyway? Got an update you'd like to share?

Odd you claim not to have NPD, yet your actions seem to demonstrate otherwise don't you think?

Garrette · 11th February 2008, 07:54 AM

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

Ms shortcake...

I'm not her, but I'll take a stab at answering, especially since you've dredged up a dead thread.

Couldn't possibly be a Narcissistic searching of the internet for references to self, could it?

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

1) I did NOT emerge from the woodwork....I am already well established and respected in my profession (never mind what the skeptics think)

Respected by other psychics? The psychics who have, like yourself, failed to find Madeleine McCann?

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

2) I do NOT ramble

Now that is a quality I truly do admire, though your postings linked by Alice on other boards do not support your contention.

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

3) I do NOT have NPD.....thanks very much.

There is more evidence that you have NPD than there is evidence that you have psychic abilities. I am, of course, open to being proven wrong.

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

Alice...where do you get off diagnosing this, especially re someone you have never met and know nothing about?

The same place you get off claiming to help in finding Madeleine when you have no such ability. Of the two actions, yours if far more reprehensible than Alice's.

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

NOT very professional of you

Who in your profession has found Madeleine McCann?

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

nor very rational either....

Oh, it is.

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

a classic case of pure PROJECTION me thinks....

youthinks wrongly or not at all.

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

(I am in fact the opposite of just about everything on that list above....)

Found Madeleine yet?

KateHL · 11th February 2008, 08:05 AM

Originally Posted by Garrette

Couldn't possibly be a Narcissistic searching of the internet for references to self, could it?

This is what I was thinking. Not only did you search for references of yourself but you registered at a skeptics forum for the sole purpose of resurrecting a fairly ancient topic about yourself. And for the record, Alice wasn't diagnosing anything so much as posing a possible explanation for your posting style. Thanks for confirming her suspicions, by the way. :)

Cuddles · 11th February 2008, 08:09 AM

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

3) I do NOT have NPD.....thanks very much.

I wonder if searching for references to yourself on internet mesage boards is a symptom of NPD.

real american · 18th February 2008, 08:06 AM

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

Ms shortcake...

1) I did NOT emerge from the woodwork....I am already well established and respected in my profession (never mind what the skeptics think)

2) I do NOT ramble

3) I do NOT have NPD.....thanks very much.

Alice...where do you get off diagnosing this, especially re someone you have never met and know nothing about? NOT very professional of you; nor very rational either....a classic case of pure PROJECTION me thinks....

(I am in fact the opposite of just about everything on that list above....)

This post is proof you ramble. I am a beliver in god. However, I am skeptical to the people in "your feild" you mock god's name by playing the role of god, people who say they see event that will happen are full of it. God gave man free will, meaning that nothing is writen in stone so how could people see event to happen?

chillzero · 21st February 2008, 04:38 AM

Split from: http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=99026 as it was off-topic for that thread.

Posted By:chillzero

Hi Sarah!! Remember me??

FarSideOfTheMoon · 21st February 2008, 04:57 AM

Oh God, this feels like Groundhog day.....

Alice Shortcake · 21st February 2008, 08:43 AM

Sarah, just stick to writing for trashy tabloids and fantasizing about Bono. We're simply not interested in you anymore, and I for one am putting you on my short but select Ignore list.

Ocelot · 21st February 2008, 10:21 AM

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

3) I do NOT have NPD.....thanks very much.

Well I don't know about that but I do know that you're a congenital liar. The lies you've told are plain for everyone to see.

http://www.skeptics.org.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=1153&page=14

The times you've acknowledged the corrections I made when you lied about me are equally plain for everyone to see. The truth of the matter is plain for everyone to see. As are the subsequent times you've repeated your lies.

Repeating deliberate falsehoods whilst fully aware that they are false is lying. It's not being mistaken, it's not fibbing or telling little white porky pies. It lying. So when you later insisted that you weren't a liar that in itself was a lie. Experience should have told you that you'd be caught out in your lies. But no. You continued to lie despite this. That makes you a congenital liar. You just don't seem to be able to help yourself.

I championed your claim and tried to help you formulate testing protocols. I thought you were being given a tough time by some of the skeptics and defended you. Then, you took my friendship and twisted it to your advantage. You acknowledged my posts when I said that your continued misrepresentation of facts, personally involving me, was upsetting. It really was very personally upsetting. You didn't apologise. You didn't acknowledge that upset. You just carried one repeating your lies. And you call yourself sensitive! Liar. Way to lose a friend, girl. Way to lose a friend.

I don't know what label a professional psychologist would give you. I've certainly experienced you displaying most if not all of those NPD symptoms. I do know this for certain. You're sick. You're not healthy, you harm the people around you and you don't care.

So Sarah, what's with still calling yourself Psychic Sarah. I thought is was going to be Mystic Sarah from now on?

Can you imagine folks, a person who whilst posting under the name psychic Sarah has the audacity to say "I've never claimed to be psychic!" congenital liar. Can't stop herself.

FarSideOfTheMoon · 22nd February 2008, 04:50 AM

It's not lying when a 'psychic' or 'mystic' is caught out. There are many other words to use to describe the process, but you can't possibly accuse them of being a liar.

Often it is us skeptics who have just remembered wrongly what has previously been said, or we just interpreted it wrongly. Even if you find a prediction in a newspaper website the day before it became a psychic prediction, that doesn't mean the psychic is lying. Psychics don't read newspapers, especially British ones when the psychic is based in Ireland. Oh no, definately not.

psychic sarah · 25th February 2008, 07:21 AM

Originally Posted by Alice Shortcake

Sarah, just stick to writing for trashy tabloids and fantasizing about Bono. We're simply not interested in you anymore, and I for one am putting you on my short but select Ignore list.

Excuse me?...I do not fantasize about Bono...he is a long term friend of mine; we were close at one point...so what?

NOR do I write trash for trashy tabloids....

yes feelings mutual I will also ignore you....

psychic sarah · 25th February 2008, 07:22 AM

Originally Posted by Cuddles

I wonder if searching for references to yourself on internet mesage boards is a symptom of NPD.

I wasn't ...I happened upon the insiduous remark and I have the right of reply

okay?

psychic sarah · 25th February 2008, 07:24 AM

Originally Posted by real american

This post is proof you ramble. I am a beliver in god. However, I am skeptical to the people in "your feild" you mock god's name by playing the role of god, people who say they see event that will happen are full of it. God gave man free will, meaning that nothing is writen in stone so how could people see event to happen?

I too am a believer in GOD..indeed this work has consolidated my faith BIG time

I also believe we have free will...you are perhaps simply not understanding what I do; (which is a lot of writing ...plus helping people out when I can and when I am asked to do so....)

Garrette · 25th February 2008, 07:26 AM

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

I wasn't ...I happened upon the insiduous remark and I have the right of reply

okay?

Of course you have the right of reply, but that doesn't address how you "happened upon" the remark. (I don't think "insiduous" is the word that best describes it nor the word you are looking for). I think it far more likely you actively search(ed) for references to your name.

Likewise, we have the right to question you for evidence supporting your claims.

Still likewise, you have the right not to provide the requested evidence.

Finally likewise, we have the right to conclude from your refusal/inability to provide such evidence that your claims are hollow.

psychic sarah · 25th February 2008, 07:29 AM

[quote=Ocelot;3457998]

Well I don't know about that but I do know that you're a congenital liar. The lies you've told are plain for everyone to see.

-------------

Really not sure what on earth you mean? I never lied about you; I don't remember you and were you ever my friend?

I am not being rude now...just do not remember any such interchange

I am sorry ...wish you all the best..

but no I am absolutely NOT a congential anything...

(the names on sky changed from Psychic Sarah to Mystic Sarah because of a computer crash one fine day; nothing mysterious about it)

Anyway.....I wish you all well cos I don't want to get into all this again

I just wanted to exercise the right of replay with some one sneakily 'diagnosing' for me all over again on yet another skeptics forum...

God bless....xxx

chillzero · 25th February 2008, 07:32 AM

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

(the names on sky changed from Psychic Sarah to Mystic Sarah because of a computer crash one fine day; nothing mysterious about it)

I think that maybe the reference was to the fact that you still sign on as 'psychic sarah', when you repeatedly insisted you never claimed yourself as psychic.

Ocelot · 26th February 2008, 04:17 AM

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

Originally Posted by Ocelot

Well I don't know about that but I do know that you're a congenital liar. The lies you've told are plain for everyone to see.

Really not sure what on earth you mean? I never lied about you; I don't remember you and were you ever my friend?

On UK Skeptics I'm known as Matt.

You were certainly grateful for my efforts on UK Skeptics. You said you repsected my approach and appreciated it.

http://www.skeptics.org.uk/forum/sho...&postcount=442

In my ealrier post I linked to one of the many posts on UK Skeptics where I later detailed your lies.

To cut a long story short, you offered some lottery numbers you thought would come up. It turns out that those lottery numbers did indeed come up on the very next draw. On the face of it a 500 to one shot. After that I said that picking lottery numbers might form the basis of an interesting test and tried to negotiate a protocol with you.

It seems that negotiating a protocol and attempting to pass such a test was not what you had in mind.

I was alerted that on various message boards around the internet you were proclaiming that you had been set a test by Matt of UK Skeptics and had passed. You were informed that I was merely a contributor to a message board and not a representative of UK Skeptics. You were politely reminded that the demonstration was of your own device and any prospective test that I have mentioned was still in the protocol negotiation stage. You continued to post on site around the internet that you'd been set a test by Matt of UK Skeptics and passed it. You were politely corrected again and again even at one stage acknowledgeing the correction and saying you'd double check. The lies continued unabated.

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

I am not being rude now...just do not remember any such interchange

I am sorry ...wish you all the best..

Appology accepted

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

but no I am absolutely NOT a congential anything...

But Sarah, you have been caught repeating what you knew were lies. If you do this then that's what you'll be called. You brought in on yourslef.

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

(the names on sky changed from Psychic Sarah to Mystic Sarah because of a computer crash one fine day; nothing mysterious about it)

I was refering to you saying you didn't like the word psychic like here.

http://www.skeptics.org.uk/forum/sho...&postcount=311

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

Anyway.....I wish you all well cos I don't want to get into all this again

I just wanted to exercise the right of replay with some one sneakily 'diagnosing' for me all over again on yet another skeptics forum...

God bless....xxx

It's a shame you can't see how you invite this.

Good luck in your future endeavours. I hope that if you find people in the future prepared to analyse your abilities, you restrain yourself from the sort of behaviour which burnt your bridges with UK Skeptics. That way we might very well learn something amazing and at the very least you'll learn something special about yourself.

Cuddles · 26th February 2008, 04:47 AM

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

I wasn't ...I happened upon the insiduous remark and I have the right of reply

okay?

Sure, but as Garrette points out, the question is how you happened upon it. The thread in question had not been posted in for 3 months. I can think of no way, other than specifically searching for "psychic sarah", that you could have just "happened upon" it. Unless of course you are in the habit of reading old threads in forums which you do not participate on, and purely by chance found one of just a couple of threads that happen to mention you.

Locknar · 26th February 2008, 05:18 AM

Originally Posted by psychic sarah

but no I am absolutely NOT a congential anything...

I dunno know about that...I think congential liar, fraud, etc. fit the bill. Prove me wrong.

Hey, how is the Madeleine McCann case going these days eh? I must admit, I've missed the news flash that she's been found thanks to your efforts....

Though in today's news...seems you and some fraud Maggie Giono have a lot in common, both of you claim to solve cases yet show no results.

11th February 2008, 07:41 AM	#1
psychic sarah New Blood Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5	[Split]Psychic Sarah- split from: Interesting... Ms shortcake... 1) I did NOT emerge from the woodwork....I am already well established and respected in my profession (never mind what the skeptics think) 2) I do NOT ramble 3) I do NOT have NPD.....thanks very much. Alice...where do you get off diagnosing this, especially re someone you have never met and know nothing about? NOT very professional of you; nor very rational either....a classic case of pure PROJECTION me thinks.... (I am in fact the opposite of just about everything on that list above....)
psychic sarah New Blood Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5	Last edited by psychic sarah; 11th February 2008 at 07:45 AM. Reason: addition...nothing to get paranoid about....

11th February 2008, 07:51 AM	#3
Locknar Sum of all evils ^tm Deputy Admin Join Date: May 2007 Location: 25.50 N, 77.54 W Posts: 14,253	Originally Posted by psychic sarah Ms shortcake... 1) I did NOT emerge from the woodwork....I am already well established and respected in my profession (never mind what the skeptics think) 2) I do NOT ramble 3) I do NOT have NPD.....thanks very much. Alice...where do you get off diagnosing this, especially re someone you have never met and know nothing about? NOT very professional of you; nor very rational either....a classic case of pure PROJECTION me thinks.... (I am in fact the opposite of just about everything on that list above....) Humm...and what profession would that be? Being a ~~fraud~~ psychic? So why do you believe you have psychic powers since you have yet to find Madeleine McCann; how's that going anyway? Got an update you'd like to share? Odd you claim not to have NPD, yet your actions seem to demonstrate otherwise don't you think?
	__________________ Member Simpson 15 and Ex-defendant in Simpson v. Randi, et al. \| StopSylvia.com \| JREF Forum Twitter Last edited by Locknar; 11th February 2008 at 08:17 AM.

11th February 2008, 07:54 AM	#4
Garrette Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 10,557	Originally Posted by psychic sarah Ms shortcake... I'm not her, but I'll take a stab at answering, especially since you've dredged up a dead thread. Couldn't possibly be a Narcissistic searching of the internet for references to self, could it? Originally Posted by psychic sarah 1) I did NOT emerge from the woodwork....I am already well established and respected in my profession (never mind what the skeptics think) Respected by other psychics? The psychics who have, like yourself, failed to find Madeleine McCann? Originally Posted by psychic sarah 2) I do NOT ramble Now that is a quality I truly do admire, though your postings linked by Alice on other boards do not support your contention. Originally Posted by psychic sarah 3) I do NOT have NPD.....thanks very much. There is more evidence that you have NPD than there is evidence that you have psychic abilities. I am, of course, open to being proven wrong. Originally Posted by psychic sarah Alice...where do you get off diagnosing this, especially re someone you have never met and know nothing about? The same place you get off claiming to help in finding Madeleine when you have no such ability. Of the two actions, yours if far more reprehensible than Alice's. Originally Posted by psychic sarah NOT very professional of you Who in your profession has found Madeleine McCann? Originally Posted by psychic sarah nor very rational either.... Oh, it is. Originally Posted by psychic sarah a classic case of pure PROJECTION me thinks.... youthinks wrongly or not at all. Originally Posted by psychic sarah (I am in fact the opposite of just about everything on that list above....) Found Madeleine yet?
	__________________ My kids still love me.

11th February 2008, 08:09 AM	#6
Cuddles Decoy Moderator Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: A magical land full of pink fluffy sheeps and bunnies Posts: 16,597	Originally Posted by psychic sarah 3) I do NOT have NPD.....thanks very much. I wonder if searching for references to yourself on internet mesage boards is a symptom of NPD.
	__________________ I am not a little teapot.

18th February 2008, 08:06 AM	#7
real american Critical Thinker Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: The Good Ol' U.S. of A Posts: 265	Originally Posted by psychic sarah Ms shortcake... 1) I did NOT emerge from the woodwork....I am already well established and respected in my profession (never mind what the skeptics think) 2) I do NOT ramble 3) I do NOT have NPD.....thanks very much. Alice...where do you get off diagnosing this, especially re someone you have never met and know nothing about? NOT very professional of you; nor very rational either....a classic case of pure PROJECTION me thinks.... (I am in fact the opposite of just about everything on that list above....) This post is proof you ramble. I am a beliver in god. However, I am skeptical to the people in "your feild" you mock god's name by playing the role of god, people who say they see event that will happen are full of it. God gave man free will, meaning that nothing is writen in stone so how could people see event to happen?
	Last edited by real american; 18th February 2008 at 08:33 AM.

11th February 2008, 07:46 AM	#2
Terry Zeitgeist-impaired Technical Moderator Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: logged in to the server Posts: 6,450	So it took three months for your psychic powers to detect that someone was talking about you here? Welcome to the forum, anyway

11th February 2008, 08:05 AM	#5
KateHL Alleged Skeptic Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: climbing Mount Cleverest Posts: 1,701	Originally Posted by Garrette Couldn't possibly be a Narcissistic searching of the internet for references to self, could it? This is what I was thinking. Not only did you search for references of yourself but you registered at a skeptics forum for the sole purpose of resurrecting a fairly ancient topic about yourself. And for the record, Alice wasn't diagnosing anything so much as posing a possible explanation for your posting style. Thanks for confirming her suspicions, by the way. :)

21st February 2008, 04:57 AM	#9
FarSideOfTheMoon Critical Thinker Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Peoples Republic of Larbert Posts: 291	Oh God, this feels like Groundhog day.....

21st February 2008, 08:43 AM	#10
Alice Shortcake Muse Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: York, England Posts: 750	Sarah, just stick to writing for trashy tabloids and fantasizing about Bono. We're simply not interested in you anymore, and I for one am putting you on my short but select Ignore list.
	__________________ Proud member of the Debunkly Skerricks Pack

21st February 2008, 10:21 AM	#11
Ocelot Illuminator Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: London Posts: 3,016	Originally Posted by psychic sarah 3) I do NOT have NPD.....thanks very much. Well I don't know about that but I do know that you're a congenital liar. The lies you've told are plain for everyone to see. http://www.skeptics.org.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=1153&page=14 The times you've acknowledged the corrections I made when you lied about me are equally plain for everyone to see. The truth of the matter is plain for everyone to see. As are the subsequent times you've repeated your lies. Repeating deliberate falsehoods whilst fully aware that they are false is lying. It's not being mistaken, it's not fibbing or telling little white porky pies. It lying. So when you later insisted that you weren't a liar that in itself was a lie. Experience should have told you that you'd be caught out in your lies. But no. You continued to lie despite this. That makes you a congenital liar. You just don't seem to be able to help yourself. I championed your claim and tried to help you formulate testing protocols. I thought you were being given a tough time by some of the skeptics and defended you. Then, you took my friendship and twisted it to your advantage. You acknowledged my posts when I said that your continued misrepresentation of facts, personally involving me, was upsetting. It really was very personally upsetting. You didn't apologise. You didn't acknowledge that upset. You just carried one repeating your lies. And you call yourself sensitive! Liar. Way to lose a friend, girl. Way to lose a friend. I don't know what label a professional psychologist would give you. I've certainly experienced you displaying most if not all of those NPD symptoms. I do know this for certain. You're sick. You're not healthy, you harm the people around you and you don't care. So Sarah, what's with still calling yourself Psychic Sarah. I thought is was going to be Mystic Sarah from now on? Can you imagine folks, a person who whilst posting under the name psychic Sarah has the audacity to say "I've never claimed to be psychic!" congenital liar. Can't stop herself.
	Last edited by Ocelot; 21st February 2008 at 10:22 AM.

22nd February 2008, 04:50 AM	#12
FarSideOfTheMoon Critical Thinker Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Peoples Republic of Larbert Posts: 291	It's not lying when a 'psychic' or 'mystic' is caught out. There are many other words to use to describe the process, but you can't possibly accuse them of being a liar. Often it is us skeptics who have just remembered wrongly what has previously been said, or we just interpreted it wrongly. Even if you find a prediction in a newspaper website the day before it became a psychic prediction, that doesn't mean the psychic is lying. Psychics don't read newspapers, especially British ones when the psychic is based in Ireland. Oh no, definately not.

25th February 2008, 07:21 AM	#13
psychic sarah New Blood Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5	ground hog Originally Posted by Alice Shortcake Sarah, just stick to writing for trashy tabloids and fantasizing about Bono. We're simply not interested in you anymore, and I for one am putting you on my short but select Ignore list. Excuse me?...I do not fantasize about Bono...he is a long term friend of mine; we were close at one point...so what? NOR do I write trash for trashy tabloids.... yes feelings mutual I will also ignore you....
psychic sarah New Blood Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5	Last edited by psychic sarah; 25th February 2008 at 07:30 AM.

25th February 2008, 07:22 AM	#14
psychic sarah New Blood Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5	oh please... Originally Posted by Cuddles I wonder if searching for references to yourself on internet mesage boards is a symptom of NPD. I wasn't ...I happened upon the insiduous remark and I have the right of reply okay?
psychic sarah New Blood Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5

25th February 2008, 07:24 AM	#15
psychic sarah New Blood Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5	agree Originally Posted by real american This post is proof you ramble. I am a beliver in god. However, I am skeptical to the people in "your feild" you mock god's name by playing the role of god, people who say they see event that will happen are full of it. God gave man free will, meaning that nothing is writen in stone so how could people see event to happen? I too am a believer in GOD..indeed this work has consolidated my faith BIG time I also believe we have free will...you are perhaps simply not understanding what I do; (which is a lot of writing ...plus helping people out when I can and when I am asked to do so....)
psychic sarah New Blood Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5

25th February 2008, 07:26 AM	#16
Garrette Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 10,557	Originally Posted by psychic sarah I wasn't ...I happened upon the insiduous remark and I have the right of reply okay? Of course you have the right of reply, but that doesn't address how you "happened upon" the remark. (I don't think "insiduous" is the word that best describes it nor the word you are looking for). I think it far more likely you actively search(ed) for references to your name. Likewise, we have the right to question you for evidence supporting your claims. Still likewise, you have the right not to provide the requested evidence. Finally likewise, we have the right to conclude from your refusal/inability to provide such evidence that your claims are hollow.
	__________________ My kids still love me.

25th February 2008, 07:29 AM	#17
psychic sarah New Blood Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5	what? [quote=Ocelot;3457998] Well I don't know about that but I do know that you're a congenital liar. The lies you've told are plain for everyone to see. ------------- Really not sure what on earth you mean? I never lied about you; I don't remember you and were you ever my friend? I am not being rude now...just do not remember any such interchange I am sorry ...wish you all the best.. but no I am absolutely NOT a congential anything... (the names on sky changed from Psychic Sarah to Mystic Sarah because of a computer crash one fine day; nothing mysterious about it) Anyway.....I wish you all well cos I don't want to get into all this again I just wanted to exercise the right of replay with some one sneakily 'diagnosing' for me all over again on yet another skeptics forum... God bless....xxx
psychic sarah New Blood Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 5	Last edited by psychic sarah; 25th February 2008 at 07:29 AM.

25th February 2008, 07:32 AM	#18
chillzero Domestic Godless Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Top of the world, ma! Posts: 15,235	Originally Posted by psychic sarah (the names on sky changed from Psychic Sarah to Mystic Sarah because of a computer crash one fine day; nothing mysterious about it) I think that maybe the reference was to the fact that you still sign on as 'psychic sarah', when you repeatedly insisted you never claimed yourself as psychic.

26th February 2008, 04:17 AM	#19
Ocelot Illuminator Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: London Posts: 3,016	Originally Posted by psychic sarah Originally Posted by Ocelot Well I don't know about that but I do know that you're a congenital liar. The lies you've told are plain for everyone to see. Really not sure what on earth you mean? I never lied about you; I don't remember you and were you ever my friend? On UK Skeptics I'm known as Matt. You were certainly grateful for my efforts on UK Skeptics. You said you repsected my approach and appreciated it. http://www.skeptics.org.uk/forum/sho...&postcount=442 In my ealrier post I linked to one of the many posts on UK Skeptics where I later detailed your lies. To cut a long story short, you offered some lottery numbers you thought would come up. It turns out that those lottery numbers did indeed come up on the very next draw. On the face of it a 500 to one shot. After that I said that picking lottery numbers might form the basis of an interesting test and tried to negotiate a protocol with you. It seems that negotiating a protocol and attempting to pass such a test was not what you had in mind. I was alerted that on various message boards around the internet you were proclaiming that you had been set a test by Matt of UK Skeptics and had passed. You were informed that I was merely a contributor to a message board and not a representative of UK Skeptics. You were politely reminded that the demonstration was of your own device and any prospective test that I have mentioned was still in the protocol negotiation stage. You continued to post on site around the internet that you'd been set a test by Matt of UK Skeptics and passed it. You were politely corrected again and again even at one stage acknowledgeing the correction and saying you'd double check. The lies continued unabated. Originally Posted by psychic sarah I am not being rude now...just do not remember any such interchange I am sorry ...wish you all the best.. Appology accepted Originally Posted by psychic sarah but no I am absolutely NOT a congential anything... But Sarah, you have been caught repeating what you knew were lies. If you do this then that's what you'll be called. You brought in on yourslef. Originally Posted by psychic sarah (the names on sky changed from Psychic Sarah to Mystic Sarah because of a computer crash one fine day; nothing mysterious about it) I was refering to you saying you didn't like the word psychic like here. http://www.skeptics.org.uk/forum/sho...&postcount=311 Originally Posted by psychic sarah Anyway.....I wish you all well cos I don't want to get into all this again I just wanted to exercise the right of replay with some one sneakily 'diagnosing' for me all over again on yet another skeptics forum... God bless....xxx It's a shame you can't see how you invite this. Good luck in your future endeavours. I hope that if you find people in the future prepared to analyse your abilities, you restrain yourself from the sort of behaviour which burnt your bridges with UK Skeptics. That way we might very well learn something amazing and at the very least you'll learn something special about yourself.

26th February 2008, 04:47 AM	#20
Cuddles Decoy Moderator Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: A magical land full of pink fluffy sheeps and bunnies Posts: 16,597	Originally Posted by psychic sarah I wasn't ...I happened upon the insiduous remark and I have the right of reply okay? Sure, but as Garrette points out, the question is how you happened upon it. The thread in question had not been posted in for 3 months. I can think of no way, other than specifically searching for "psychic sarah", that you could have just "happened upon" it. Unless of course you are in the habit of reading old threads in forums which you do not participate on, and purely by chance found one of just a couple of threads that happen to mention you.
	__________________ I am not a little teapot.

26th February 2008, 05:18 AM	#21
Locknar Sum of all evils ^tm Deputy Admin Join Date: May 2007 Location: 25.50 N, 77.54 W Posts: 14,253	Originally Posted by psychic sarah but no I am absolutely NOT a congential anything... I dunno know about that...I think congential liar, fraud, etc. fit the bill. Prove me wrong. Hey, how is the Madeleine McCann case going these days eh? I must admit, I've missed the news flash that she's been found thanks to your efforts.... Though in today's news...seems you and some fraud Maggie Giono have a lot in common, both of you claim to solve cases yet show no results.
	__________________ Member Simpson 15 and Ex-defendant in Simpson v. Randi, et al. \| StopSylvia.com \| JREF Forum Twitter Last edited by Locknar; 26th February 2008 at 05:39 AM.