JREF Homepage Swift Blog Events Calendar $1 Million Paranormal Challenge The Amaz!ng Meeting Useful Links Support Us
James Randi Educational Foundation JREF Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   JREF Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
Click Here To Donate

Notices


Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.

Tags astronomy , comets , science controversy , water

Reply
Old 26th February 2008, 08:59 AM   #41
RecoveringYuppy
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,851
Originally Posted by BeAChooser View Post
So what's the probability of the space station being hit during its life by one of these?
Originally Posted by Dancing David View Post
I don't know take the surface area of the space station, devide by the surface area of the earth's atmosphere and fudge for gravitational attraction.

The space station is more likely to get holed by space junk, especially stuff that escapes from the station.
If I suppose the space station to be five hundred feet (a tenth of a mile) across it has a cross section of 1/100 square miles. The cross section of the Earth is about 50 million square miles. So, not fudging for gravity, the station is 5 billion times less likely to be hit.

If I assume that the Earth being hit "every couple of seconds" works out to 40,000 hits a day or 14.6 million a year.

So the station would be hit once every 300 years or so.

That's assuming these things survive to the altitude of the space station.
__________________
REJ (Robert E Jones) posting anonymously under my real name for 30 years.

Make a fire for a man and you keep him warm for a day. Set him on fire and you keep him warm for the rest of his life.

Last edited by RecoveringYuppy; 26th February 2008 at 09:00 AM.
RecoveringYuppy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th February 2008, 09:15 AM   #42
BenBurch
Gatekeeper of The Left
 
BenBurch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Universe 35.2 ms ahead of this one.
Posts: 32,177
Originally Posted by RecoveringYuppy View Post
How do you know they would contain solids? Especially buckshot sized?
All comets we have looked at in detail have been of the "dirty snowball" model, and some appear to have a crust that almost totally covers the internal ice. But we knew there were solids long ago as there are two tails to almost any comet; The gas tail and the dust tail, and many meteor showers are associated with current and extinct periodic comets. And I did not mean buckshot sized; at those speeds a grain of sand has more energy in it than a 00 buckshot taken at close range.

And if I recall correctly, the Mir space station was hit by a micrometeorite during a known meteor shower, and it blew a fist-sized hole through one of the solar panels. And Endeavor had one of its windows hit.
BenBurch is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th February 2008, 01:07 PM   #43
robinson
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,136
I'm still wondering about this figure.

Originally Posted by BenBurch View Post
As pointed out above, it DOES get bigger over time. About 50 tons a day of in-falling meteoric material.
50 tons a day of solid meteoric material. Where does that come from? How come it doesn't hit satellites, shuttles, the space station? How come we don't see it hitting the moon?

Fluffy ice balls that turn to water vapor 600 miles out I can almost believe, but 50 tons of rock and metal every day? What is that all about?
robinson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 26th February 2008, 04:14 PM   #44
BenBurch
Gatekeeper of The Left
 
BenBurch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Universe 35.2 ms ahead of this one.
Posts: 32,177
That is based on radio and visual observations of infall rates, and data from the Pegasus satellite and high-altitude aircraft dust capturing missions.

The trouble with fluffy iceballs is that they do not exist.

Last edited by BenBurch; 26th February 2008 at 04:14 PM.
BenBurch is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

JREF Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:17 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2001-2012, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.