| JREF Homepage | Swift Blog | Events Calendar | $1 Million Paranormal Challenge | The Amaz!ng Meeting | Useful Links | Support Us |
![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,545
|
The Watseka Wonder
This thread was supposed to be about alleged cases of reincarnation as put forth by Ian Stevenson. It became, partly due to me, a discussion about the Watseka Wonder. Rodney claims that my minimalized debunking (copied from my post on another forum) were both inaccurate and unsubstantiated. Ordinarily I would continue to insist (as I began to do in that other thread) that Rodney make some specific claims first as Rodney is in the habit of throwing out claim after claim without providing any real specifics, insisting that skeptics play whack-a-psychic. But as I had done nearly all the work required when I wrote my original post on the other forum, I decided to go ahead.
This is my response to Rodney: ----------------------------- The spiritualist physician who saw Lurancy Vennum (after being recommended and introduced by Mr. Roff) was E. Winchester Stevens. In 1878 he published a lengthy pamphlet detailing the Watseka case. All quotations below are from that pamphlet, the text of which I got from this website. (The pdf versions won’t download for me, so I got the full text version which indicates page breaks but has none of the illustrations I gather are in the original.) This version has quite a few errors in spelling and possibly in transcription. What you see below is uncorrected from the download. Comments in [brackets] are mine. The dashes (-) in the middle of some words were apparently in the original pamphlet to demonstrate word breaks. They make sense in the download but make for very short lines. I therefore have made the lines longer but left the dashes in to show the original line breaks. Some paragraph breaks are mine to add clarity.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
There were no episodes of possession prior to Dr. Stevens seeing her. There were episodes of trances, during none of which did Lurancy manifest any other personality. It was not until she was seen by two ardent spiritualists looking for signs of possession (or mediumship) that she showed any such signs.
Quote:
Quote:
Rodney also asks “how does this debunk the story?” For a general answer: It shows quite conclusively that the circumstances surrounding the case were more conducive to wishful thinking than to actual reincarnation. For a specific answer, keep reading. The next section is long but follow directly on the previous quotation. It is the entirety of the first session with Lurancy Vennum as conducted by Dr. Stevens and facilitated by Mr. Roff.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Come to think of it, I may have misspoken earlier. I said Vennum made several visits to the Roffs. What I should have said was Vennum actually lived with the Roffs during all the time of her amazing hits. I think I’m done now. |
|
__________________
My kids still love me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
RSL Acolyte
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,749
|
Interesting story. I can see how the supposed hits are well explained, but psychologically speaking, has anyone speculated on why the girl then went on to live a normal life? According to the link, once she returned home, she was "fine," so I'm curious if anyone has figured out the psychology behind what might have happened. If you subtract out the woo, what type of psychological condition does this describe? Was she hallucinating? Pretending? Perhaps it happened so long ago, it's impossible to know.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,545
|
|
|
__________________
My kids still love me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Illuminator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,942
|
That is very helpful, Garrette.
You stated on the other thread that the "Roffs were long-time neighbors of the Vennums." Dr. Stevens states that they lived close to one another only during the spring and summer of 1871 and "the only acquaintance ever had between the two families during the season, was simply one brief call of Mrs. Roff, for a few minutes, on Mrs. Vennum, which call was never returned; and a formal speaking acquaintance between the two gentlemen." Why do you conclude that the two families were close? And why do you suppose that Lurancy Vennum did not begin to have her trances in 1871, when the families lived close to one another, but rather began to have them in 1877, when the families lived "on extreme opposite limits of the city"? So I guess the following episodes described by Dr. Stevens don't count for anything: A few days before the following incidents took place, she said to her family: "There were persons in my room last night, and they called 'Rancy I Rancy I ' and I felt their breath on my face." The very next night she arose from her bed, saying that she could not sleep, that every time she tried to sleep, persons came and called "Rancy I Rancy I " to her. Her mother went to bed with her, after which she rested and slept the rest of the night. On the 11th day of July, 1877, Lurancy had been sewing carpet a part of the afternoon, when, at about six o'clock she laid by her work, as her mother said: "Lurancy, you had better commence getting supper." The girl replied: "Ma, I feel bad; I feel so queer,' and placing her hand to her left breast, she immediately went into what seemed like a fit, falling heavily on the floor, lying apparently dead, every muscle becoming suddenly rigid. Thus she lay five hours. On returning to consciousness she said she felt "very strange and queer." The remainder of the night she rested well. The next day the rigid state returned, and passing beyond the rigidity, her mind took cognizance of two states of being at the same time. Lying as if dead, she spoke freely, telling the family what persons and spirits she could see, describing them and calling some of them by name. Among those mentioned were her sister and brother, for she exclaimed, "Oh, mother! can't you see little Laura and Bertie? They are so beautiful!" etc., etc. Bertie died when Lurancy was but three years old. She had many of these trances, describing Heaven and the spirits, or the angels as she called them. Sometime in September she became free from them and seemed to the family to be quite well again. On the 27th day of November, 1877, she was attacked with a most violent pain in her stomach, some five or six times a day; for two weeks she had the most excruciating pains. In these painful paroxysms, she would double herself back until her head and feet actually touched. At the end of two weeks, or about the 11th of December, in these distressed attacks, she became unconscious and passed into a quiet trance, and, as at former times, would describe Heaven and spirits, often calling them angels. From this time on until the 1st of February, 1878, she would have these trances and sometimes a seemingly real obsession, from three to eight and sometimes as many as twelve times a day, lasting from one to eight hours, occasionally passing into that state of ecstasy, when, as Lurancy, she claimed to be in heaven. Dr. Stevens' account puts a completely different slant on the situation: There were in the city of Watseka at this time, persons who had more humanity than bigotry; persons who believe, in the language of Bishop A. Beals, that "disease has a dynamic or spiritual origin;" persons claiming to understand something of the occult forces and phenomena of mind, and the diseases incident to a false conception of, and opposition to, its potencies; persons who believe, God being " no respecter of persons " and "without variableness or shadow of turning," that power exists today, as in the days of the Nazarene, to cast out devils. Among this class were Asa B. Roff and his wife, who, with others, became thoroughly aroused to the importance of arresting the movement, to take a lovely child from the bosom of an affectionate family, to imprison her among maniacs, to be ruled and cared for by ignorant and bigoted strangers, who know less of catalepsy than a blind materialist does of immortality. These good people ventured in the most gentle and Christian spirit, to counsel with the parents and advise other treatment, different from any that had been administered. These earnest, self-sacrificing souls, imbued with the conviction that uncultivated spirits had something to do with the case, plead with the many friends of the child, to withhold her from the asylum until it could be better shown whether the girl was really insane, or her unfortunate condition might be attributable to foreign minds. The account that I referenced was silent on this issue, but, okay, Mr. Roff was there, according to Dr. Stevens' account. I still don't see any support for your contention that "Stevens had treated Mary Roff." You're glossing over all the hits Dr. Stevens describes, including some that did not involve the Roffs. For example: Some days after Mary [Lurancy] was settled in her new home, Mrs. Parker, who lived neighbor to the Roff's in Middleport in 1852, and next door to them in Watseka in 1860, came in with her daughter-in-law, Nellie Parker. Mary immediately recognized both of the ladies, calling Mrs. Parker "Auntie Parker," and the other "Nellie," as in the acquaintance of eighteen years ago. In conversation with Mrs. Parker, Mary asked, "Do you remember how Nervie and I used to come to your house and sing?" Mrs. Parker says that was the first allusion made to that matter, nothing having been said by any one on that subject, and says that Mary and Minerva used to come to their house and sit and sing, "Mary had a little lamb," etc. Mrs. Dr. Alter (Minerva) says she remembers it well. This was when Mr. Roff kept the postoffice, and could not have been later than 1852, and twelve years before Lurancy was born. __________________________________________________ ____________________________ Further, do you assume that the Roffs simply lied about the hits they say they experienced? For example: One evening in the latter part of March, Mr. Roff was sitting in the room waiting for tea, and reading the paper, Mary being out in the yard. He asked Mrs. Roff if she could find a certain velvet head-dress that Mary used to wear the last year before she died. If so, to lay it on the stand and say nothing about it, to see if Mary would recognize it. Mrs. Roff readily found and laid it on the stand. The girl soon came in, and immediately exclaimed as she approached the stand: "O, there is my head-dress I wore when my hair was short !" She then asked, "Ma, where is my box of letters ? Have you got them yet?" Mrs. Roff replied, "Yes, Mary, I have some of them." She at once got the box with many letters in it. As Mary began to examine them she said, O, "Ma, here is a collar I tatted! Ma, why, did you not show to me my letters and things before?" The collar had been preserved among the relics of the lamented child as one of the beautiful things her fingers had wrought before Lurancy was born; and so Mary continually recognized every little thing and remembered every little incident of her girlhood. It will be remembered that the family moved to Texas in 1857. Mr. Roff asked Mary if she remembered moving to Texas or anything about it. "Yes, pa, and I remember crossing Red river and of seeing a great many Indians, and I remember Mrs. Reeder's girls, who were in our company,' and other incidents and facts. And thus she from time to time made first mention of things that transpired thirteen to twenty-five years ago. On the 19th of February Mr. Roff addressed the writer as follows : "You know how we took the poor, dear girl Lurancy (Mary). Some appreciate our motives, but the many, without investigation and without a knowledge of the facts, cry out against us and against that angel girl. Some say she pretends; others that she is crazy; and we hear that some say it is the devil. * * * Mary is perfectly happy; she recognizes everybody and everything that she knew when in her body twelve or more years ago. She knows nobody nor anything whatever that is known by Lurancy. * * * Mr. Vennum has been to see her, and also her brother Henry, at different times, but she don't know anything about them. Mrs. Vennum is still unable to come and see her daughter. She has been nothing but Mary since she has been here, and knows nothing but what Mary knew. Before you leave this subject, consider that Lurancy Vennum lived to the ripe old age of 88. To my knowledge, she never confessed to having participated in a hoax. Why not, do you suppose? |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|