| JREF Homepage | Swift Blog | Events Calendar | $1 Million Paranormal Challenge | The Amaz!ng Meeting | Useful Links | Support Us |
![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
|
|
#1 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woo*(+-1.10)^20=AGWwoo
Posts: 7,850
|
Global Warming Scam or Scare of the Week
This is a thread for discussing Scams and Scares which are based on misstated science or logical fallacies of the sciences of climatology, and which then may be used for monetary gain, political purposes, or simply to scare people about Global Warming.
It is NOT a thread for discussing subjects on which the science is incomplete and thus on which reasonable discussion can be had with differing points of view. Three examples, all of which appear to be currently marketed scams based on incorrect or misstated science - (go on my chartered expedition to...) "Warming Island" (give us your money and we'll supply...)"Carbon Offsets" (give my greenie company your hard earned cash to)..."Plant trees to save the planet" "Katrina is Bush's Fault" (because he didn't do enough to prevent AGW and AGW was a factor in Katrina) Have fun! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Cythraul Enfys
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 15,903
|
Your fourth, humorously, is both laughably stupid and absolutely correct. Laughably stupid, because nothing Bush could have done re:GlW could have had any effect on stopping/preventing Katrina as a storm (insufficient time even if all possible things had been done in the US). But, if you eliminate the formation and movement of Katrina and concentrate on what most people mean when they blame Bush for Katrina - that he did much too little to back up/aid evac and then recovery, they are perfectly correct. He is and always has been a vindictive piece of crap so his people helped republicker Mississippi et al. and left Democrats in Louisiana to swing in the wind.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woo*(+-1.10)^20=AGWwoo
Posts: 7,850
|
Yep, it's the part where it is (not uncommonly, either) alleged that his actions in "not doing enough to prevent AGW" helped increase the intensity of Katrina-
I think we can conclude that was a scam. How did the twisted logic go - it was either from Robert Kennedy or Daily Kos, or Kennedy on Kos - something like "Katrina was Bush's fault because he didn't sign the Kyoto Protocal!" Stuck on Stupid? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woo*(+-1.10)^20=AGWwoo
Posts: 7,850
|
#5. Scare by Bruce Sterling re Chinese Miners Deaths
5. Bruce Sterling's piece in Wired where he actually alleges the fault for the Chinese miners drowning is the Western World's fault, due to their production of greenhouse gases.
(((There's not a coal mine in the world that could avert nine inches of sudden Greenhouse rain. Those miners were digging their own graves.))) Yep, sure Brucie....wait....you ever heard of rainy seasons? Monsoons? Pumps that nobody bothered to turn on? No? Didn't think so. A complete fabrication, a lie, a scare tactic. Not a scam that involves the tranfer of money, though! |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woo*(+-1.10)^20=AGWwoo
Posts: 7,850
|
#6. Mobiot! Always good for a scam and a scare!
Monbiot! Always good for a scam or a scare!
"in this case our moral responsibility is incontestable, if somewhat difficult to comprehend: every time you turn on your kettle in Birmingham, you’re helping to flood Bangladesh" Uhhh....yes, it is a bit difficult to comprehend there... ![]() Probably because it isn't Comprehendable. No, it must be our problem, we are all just stupid and you, Monbiot, are really smart? Wait...Monbiot isn't even a scientist but is just a lame journalist? He doesn't even know this stuff? Ok, just wild ravings. A scare. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Draco Tavern
Posts: 2,555
|
Just post links to all the other threads on global warming...
glenn
|
|
__________________
Intellectual brilliance is no guarantee against being dead wrong. Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 1,250
|
The Open University's excellent course on climate change spells it out for you:
http://openlearn.open.ac.uk/mod/reso....php?id=172101
Quote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008...india.flooding
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woo*(+-1.10)^20=AGWwoo
Posts: 7,850
|
Yes, Pixel42, there are several unproven hypotheses in this grouping of possible cause and possible effects of (possible) causes. Even if everything lined up exactly as alleged in your Open Univ rundown, then we would be using grossly exaggerated hyperbole in a scare tactic.
So this is apparently an acknowledged scare tactic, taught as a textbook example. By the way. Obviously a student who considered that the kettle being switched on might have no effect on Bangladesh because upstream power might be from wind, solar, or nuclear would get a failing grade. A scare tactic. Not a scam until it is used to justify taxation, fines or penalties based on the purported "science". Who funded that Open Univ. document? The British Government, right? Hmm....may be a scam, after all. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woo*(+-1.10)^20=AGWwoo
Posts: 7,850
|
#7. Island lost due to Global Warming! Media Scare.
Very interesting, thanks. It would appear this is a clear example of scare tactics in the media. I say this after examining a bit of the science, but others have done so. Not only Desmogblog but Tim Lamberg also say this isn't an example of global warming but sensational and irresponsible reporting.
Unbelievable-something I agree with them on! Tim Lambert (bold mine) - Did Global Warming claim an inhabited island? Category: Global Warming Posted on: December 31, 2006 10:09 AM, by Tim Lambert "... sea level rise was just one of the factors. And sea level rise can also be caused by land sinking as well as the ocean rising. I found a scientific paper on the topic by Gopinath and Seralathan in Environmental Geology. (Yes, the same journal that published Khilyuk and Chilingar's tripe.) Gopinath and Seralathan studied Sagar island which is just 1 km from where Lohachara used to be, so their conclusions apply to Lohachara as well. They found that reduced flows in the river were causing sediments to be deposited further upstream instead of replacing erosion at Sagar island. Furthermore, the major cause of the relative sea level rise which made for more erosion, was land subsidence, not global warming. So it is wrong to blame Global Warming for the disappearance of Lohachara island." |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 1,250
|
Every step is simple high school physics.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Incidentally I thought this thread was for 'scare' stories of the week? There must be very few of them indeed if you are reduced to digging up an eight-year-old article. And the idea that the loss of 72 square miles of land in the Ganges delta has nothing whatever to do with the fact that 67% of Himalyan glaciers are retreating rapidly is simply laughable. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/hi...report2005.pdf |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Muse
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Thornton, CO, USA
Posts: 955
|
Yawn. More tiresome posts by someone whose total education in meteorology/climatology is limited to reading newspaper articles and GW denier blogs.
|
|
__________________
"Facts are stupid things." Ronald Reagan |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woo*(+-1.10)^20=AGWwoo
Posts: 7,850
|
Note this thread is "scams and scares", so it is quite likely to draw heavily on print, TV and other pop media.
Originally Posted by Pixel42
Two questions.
Examining scientific findings and evidence to reach conclusions is the method.
Originally Posted by Pixel42
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sitting in the ghostly glow of an LCD screen
Posts: 26,944
|
Is it too much to take in all at once? Maybe you should just read them one at a time. Even if only half of them are correct, things are changing, often for the worse.
Rooftop Bars? Yes, all these open air dining areas have been opening up in Melbourne, which I thought was insane when I first saw it because Melbourne is usually cold, wet and Miserable. As the author notes, we are now getting milder weather, so it's a viable option. What exactly is your point? That AGW couldn't possibly cause so many issues? It's global change, that is, it affects the whole globe, at the same time, and it's affecting our climate. Everything depends on climate. How could it be any other way? |
|
__________________
"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." SH Roberts " Tell people something they know already and they will thank you for it. Tell them something new and they will hate you for it." Monbiot "I am not the fine man you take me for" |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 1,250
|
An average of about 2.5 mm per year since the 1950s
http://www.survas.mdx.ac.uk/pdfs/3dikshas.pdf
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Decoy
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A magical land full of pink fluffy sheeps and bunnies
Posts: 9,624
|
I think I'm with Mhaze on the general idea of the thread, although not necessarily on the specifics. The fact is, there are a lot of cases of people blaming things on global warming where there just isn't evidence, and often where such claims are blatantly silly. There can also be little argument that this is often done for personal, political or economic gain.
Things like fuel magnets to reduce car emissions are an obvious example. These have been around since well before global warming was thought about, but the modern versions certainly use the public awareness of CO2 to try to cash in. And there can be little doubt that politicians love to use the whole "This disaster was caused by X, and my policies would have prevented it. Vote for me." argument, and that global warming is often used as the X. I think it is important to point out the false cries of global warming, otherwise people become jaded and when there is a real problem, they no longer take any notice. Unfortunately I think we may have already reached this point, and it often seems that many deniers are in that camp not because of the science, but simply because they've got fed up of people constantly blaming global warming for pretty much everything. |
|
__________________
++Rationality Error++ :Unexpected BREAD in C:\Bible\New\Matthew\14.mat line:15-21 Anyone who thinks the LHC will destroy the world is a ****. - Professor Brian Cox |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woo*(+-1.10)^20=AGWwoo
Posts: 7,850
|
Latest Global Warming Scare Tactic:
"America Will Become Colonized by Giant Snakes" By Debbie Schlussel They tried horror movies designed to scare you. Then they tried horror movies designed to scare your kids into scaring you. Now the shrieking global warming crowd has a far more effective new scare tactic. They're taking advantage of the most common phobia: fear of snakes. Pythons could squeeze lower third of USA By Elizabeth Weise, USA TODAY As climate change warms the nation, giant Burmese pythons could colonize one-third of the USA, from San Francisco across the Southwest, Texas and the South and up north along the Virginia coast, according to U.S. Geological Survey maps released Wednesday. The pythons can be 20 feet long and 250 pounds. They are highly adaptable to new environments. Two federal agencies — the USGS and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service — are investigating the range of nine invasive snakes in Florida..... examined Burmese pythons first and, based on where they live in Asia, estimated where they might live here. One map shows where the pythons could live today, an area that expands when scientists use global warming models for 2100. "We were surprised.....They are moving northward, there's no question." |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
+5 Goatee of Pedantry
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 844
|
Over-sensationalised reports of the effects or predicted effects of global warming are the bane of my existence as an atmospheric scientist. The media does what it always does and latches onto the biggest and best headline grabbers out there and when they are later revealed to be exaggerated or baseless, it makes the science as a whole look bad in the eyes of the general public. The truth is that the more measured outlooks have already become boring in the press' eye.
That's not to say everything you read in the papers is bunk - there are plenty of reports out there that could be described as a fair representation of the state of the science. It's just that even in the supposedly reputable news sources, it can be difficult for an untrained person to tell the difference. Can't say I agree with buying trees to offset your carbon footprint either. This is akin to buying indulgences in medieval churches. A privileged few planting a couple of trees is hardly going to make a difference and it's not as if every fossil fuel using person in the world can afford to pay people to plant trees on their behalf. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
+5 Goatee of Pedantry
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 844
|
Case and point. My understanding was that the Burmese Python thing was more to do with people's pets escaping rather than global warming, but someone (no idea who) puts an AGW sticker on it and next thing you know, people have turned it around and are using it to undermine climate science in general.
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 5,063
|
Odin help me, now you're citing Debbie f'in Schlussel, a whack job and a half if there ever was one. For what purpose? Surely not to shed light.
Quote:
|
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woo*(+-1.10)^20=AGWwoo
Posts: 7,850
|
Quote:
![]() Relax. It's just the "GW Scam or Scare of the Week" Thread. No one said you are ....not Entitled to Believe in the Scam or Scare! Be my guest! ![]() Wait... Better not relax. Them'er big snakes. |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woo*(+-1.10)^20=AGWwoo
Posts: 7,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Muse
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 680
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 5,063
|
|
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sitting in the ghostly glow of an LCD screen
Posts: 26,944
|
|
|
__________________
"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." SH Roberts " Tell people something they know already and they will thank you for it. Tell them something new and they will hate you for it." Monbiot "I am not the fine man you take me for" |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 1,250
|
The irony is that I was had assumed that there were lots of exaggerated stories about global warming in the gutter press, given how happy they usually are to increase their circulation by telling scary lies about anything from the level of immigration to the "dangers" of getting your children vaccinated. But our resident deniers seem to be having great difficulty finding any examples. Why would that be? One possible explanation springs to mind.
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,697
|
Good! That's a very good example... let's look at what that 484 word article has to say about global warming:
"Another contributory factor to the location of shark attacks could be global warming and rising sea temperatures. 'You'll find that some species will begin to appear in places they didn't in the past with some regularity,' he said." That's it... However, in the editor's mind, the best headline had to include global warming. Quite pathetic, really. |
|
__________________
Stupid is depressing... ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
+5 Goatee of Pedantry
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 844
|
That's exactly my point. Global warming has become one of the stock scare phrases used by journos worldwide. A bit like blaming <insert social problem here> on immigration or gypsies. The annoying thing about this is that it is routinely used with the dreaded phrase "scientists think", so all of a sudden, it is scientists' fault in general rather than the crappy reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woo*(+-1.10)^20=AGWwoo
Posts: 7,850
|
Global Warming to Kill 4,500,000,000 by 2012?
Over 4.5 Billion people could die from Global Warming-related causes by 2012."
The author claims 4,500,000,000 dead in four years! Commentary by Accuweather on this alarmist-- Think about that. The world's current population is a few ticks over 6.5 Billion, so this author is claiming that in a mere 5 years, almost three quarters of the world's population will have succumbed. |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woo*(+-1.10)^20=AGWwoo
Posts: 7,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 5,063
|
OK, I'll take my notebook over to the hammock ... that's better! Now, for the 3rd time...
Originally Posted by varwoche
Meaning, the only aspect of the story that is a scam/scare of the week is loony Debbie Schlussel's strawman. When you pile straw like this, the informative content of your thread reaches homeopathic levels. |
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woo*(+-1.10)^20=AGWwoo
Posts: 7,850
|
From the OP, which either you didn't read or understand -
This is a thread for discussing Scams and Scares which are based on misstated science or logical fallacies of the sciences of climatology, and which then may be used for monetary gain, political purposes, or simply to scare people about Global Warming.Now that you are safe in your hammock - Ready for them twenty foot snakes? (I know you believe they are coming! )Hmm....Are you actually suggesting that a lot of the scare and scam stories come from left wing media and left wing organizations, and a lot of the ridicule or exposure of the scams and scares are going to come from right wing? I hadn't even thought of that, and hate to think of what it means.... Wait a minute...you don't have to worry. See post #29, we'll all be dead before it gets to lowdown scuffles with big snakes. |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woo*(+-1.10)^20=AGWwoo
Posts: 7,850
|
AP article in the Washington Post, seriously warming Arctic:
The Arctic ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from Consul Ifft, at Bergen, Norway.OOPS. I may have goofed. We're trying to do current scares and scams. Is this one recent enough? 1922. Thanks to moonbattery.com for this! Click through the link to the original 1922 article. |
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,106
|
|
|
__________________
Quality never goes begging. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
+5 Goatee of Pedantry
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 844
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 5,063
|
|
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Prime Minister of Hell
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 963
|
Today I heard the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Chile on local TV. He was blaming specifically AGW for the eruption of the Chaiten Volcano in his country.
|
|
__________________
AGW is the Democrat's war on terror. The "precautionary principle" is a favourite Greenie idea -- but isn't that what George Bush was doing when he invaded Iraq? Wasn't that a precaution against Saddam getting or having any WMDs? So Greenies all agree with the Iraq intervention? If not, why not? -John Ray Help Us to find Waldo! http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1999#comments |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
+5 Goatee of Pedantry
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 844
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Prime Minister of Hell
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 963
|
No logic, just attributions. I'm quoting from memory :
"The recent climate change is causing damages to thid world countries like the recent disaster in Myanmar and the eruption of the Chaiten volcano in our country. We should focus on sustainable development and CO2 reduction to avoid tragedies like those, or our world has no future". |
|
__________________
AGW is the Democrat's war on terror. The "precautionary principle" is a favourite Greenie idea -- but isn't that what George Bush was doing when he invaded Iraq? Wasn't that a precaution against Saddam getting or having any WMDs? So Greenies all agree with the Iraq intervention? If not, why not? -John Ray Help Us to find Waldo! http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1999#comments |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woo*(+-1.10)^20=AGWwoo
Posts: 7,850
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|