| JREF Homepage | Swift Blog | Events Calendar | $1 Million Paranormal Challenge | The Amaz!ng Meeting | Useful Links | Support Us |
![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 154
|
WHat caused the collapse of WTC. Question to Heiwa.
Ok, IŽll feed your ego here Heiwa. You refuse to answer what caused the collapse of WTC. But you have no problem claiming that planes, fires and structural collapse wasn't enough to bring down the towers. So far your official reason has been that the question is off topic and doesnŽt belong in whatever thread suchlike questions are asked.
So here it is. Your very own thread to answer our questions and follow-up questions. There is one rule. You donŽt get to call what is O.T or not. And I know this is hard, but please do not answer by telling us to read you paper or that the answer is somewhere on the internet. Please put forth facts and suchlike here. 1. If crashing planes and raging fires wasnŽt enought to cause the structural. What did and how did it get there. In as much detail as possible. IE: there were explosives hidden in the towers is not a detalied answers. Schematics, logistics, blueprints things like that. 2. You have earlier stated that no planes hit the Pentagon or the WTC-towers. Is this still your viewpoint? Here we go, the questions are not O.T and therefore I see no obstacle for you to clear up a thing or two. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,866
|
I have a better question:
Heiwa, why should anyone care what you, a supposed naval architect (with some profoundly woo beliefs concerning the sinking of the Estonia) with a proven inability to grasp basic design principles of on-shore construction, believes when it is contrary the established belief of professionals who actually design multistorey steel framed structures for a living? don't bother answering because the answer is obvious to all: we shouldn't care and we don't |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dog House
Posts: 19,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 154
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|