It's been 2450 days Troothers - What's taking so long?

applecorped · 27th May 2008, 07:12 AM

http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/...min=&sec=&p0=0

It's been:
2450 days
58814 hours
3528849 minutes
211730978 seconds

since 9/11. Troothers, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof to authorities?

Furi · 27th May 2008, 07:38 AM

Lack and Fail probably,

Patriot4life · 27th May 2008, 07:50 AM

God, these types of threads are getting old

1. There is no undeniable proof
2. If there was what authorities would they take it to?

OldSchool · 27th May 2008, 08:01 AM

Originally Posted by applecorped

http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/...min=&sec=&p0=0

It's been:
2450 days
58814 hours
3528849 minutes
211730978 seconds

since 9/11. Troothers, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof to authorities?

If the truth movement is searching for such concrete proof they are doomed to fail.

Classified Documents perhaps? Black Magic Marker? Who needs undeniable proof when the obvious is apparent?

What ever happened to those water-boarding tapes?

Childlike Empress · 27th May 2008, 08:02 AM

You are complying to the original madness for how many days?

uk_dave · 27th May 2008, 08:03 AM

Originally Posted by Patriot4life

God, these types of threads are getting old

1. There is no undeniable proof
2. If there was what authorities would they take it to?

So it's hopeless then?

T.A.M. · 27th May 2008, 08:04 AM

I thought you were banned Oldschool? Funny I had you on ignore, but removed you. Probably because you haven't posted here in so long...oh well.

As for the OP, what is taking them so long is that they are not looking for undeniable proof. They really could care less about that kind of proof. They would much rather play around with "what ifs" and "Thats pecular" and other vague statements that sew seeds of doubt in the unprepared, naive average joe...thats all.

TAM

Björn Toulouse · 27th May 2008, 08:05 AM

Originally Posted by OldSchool

....
What ever happened to those water-boarding tapes?

They got wet.

T.A.M. · 27th May 2008, 08:06 AM

Originally Posted by uk_dave

So it's hopeless then?

Not really. They are all preparing for the Alex Jones lead revolution...grab yer guns boyz.

TAM

OldSchool · 27th May 2008, 08:12 AM

Originally Posted by T.A.M.

I thought you were banned Oldschool? Funny I had you on ignore, but removed you. Probably because you haven't posted here in so long...oh well.

As for the OP, what is taking them so long is that they are not looking for undeniable proof. They really could care less about that kind of proof. They would much rather play around with "what ifs" and "Thats pecular" and other vague statements that sew seeds of doubt in the unprepared, naive average joe...thats all.

TAM

If a member of this forum had me ignore, I have met my goal. My words strike at the heart of which you can not respond to.

applecorped · 27th May 2008, 08:13 AM

I'll respond....LOL!!!!!!

Dave Rogers · 27th May 2008, 08:14 AM

Originally Posted by OldSchool

If a member of this forum had me ignore, I have met my goal.

Your purpose in life is to get people not to listen to you?

Dave

T.A.M. · 27th May 2008, 08:16 AM

Originally Posted by OldSchool

If a member of this forum had me ignore, I have met my goal. My words strike at the heart of which you can not respond to.

don't mistake fear for what is actually annoyance. Most people I put on ignore go there because they have annoyed me to the point of avoidance. You were in that group.

TAM

cyclonic · 27th May 2008, 08:19 AM

Originally Posted by T.A.M.

Not really. They are all preparing for the Alex Jones lead revolution...grab yer guns boyz.

TAM

Alex jones has given up on the present and now talks to "future people"

YouTube Video This video is not hosted by the JREF. The JREF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.

I AGREE

defaultdotxbe · 27th May 2008, 08:20 AM

Originally Posted by OldSchool

Who needs undeniable proof when the obvious is apparent?

if the obvious is so apparent why is it taking 2450+ days to get anything done?

TexasJack · 27th May 2008, 08:26 AM

Originally Posted by applecorped

http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/...min=&sec=&p0=0

It's been:
2450 days
58814 hours
3528849 minutes
211730978 seconds

since 9/11. Troothers, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof to authorities?

and counting...

Patriot4life · 27th May 2008, 08:32 AM

Originally Posted by uk_dave

So it's hopeless then?

I guess it depends on what you consider the objective to be.

If the objective is to prove a CD in the WTC buildings that collapsed, or that there actually weren't planes that hit the trade center and pentagon, or that it really wasn't an act of terrorism by foreigners. then it is hopeless, yes.

You wanna know why?

because planes hijacked by foreign terrorists did fly into the wtc 1 and 2, and the general concensus amongst people that actually know what they are talking about conclude that this could have caused collapse (a reality that I, incidentally, never questioned until coming across the "truth movement" and after consideration continue to not question).

basically my point is the truth movement should forget about all the fringe conspiracy "theory" rhetoric and focus their energies on investigating and discussing theories that are more grounded in reality.

Of course this would shift the focus to more of a political context.

TruthByDecree · 27th May 2008, 09:00 AM

Originally Posted by applecorped

http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/...min=&sec=&p0=0

It's been:
2450 days
58814 hours
3528849 minutes
211730978 seconds

since 9/11.

I don't know I was wondering the same thing. When will that WTC-7 report be out?

Drudgewire · 27th May 2008, 09:04 AM

Originally Posted by OldSchool

If a member of this forum had me ignore, I have met my goal.

Yeah, being a stupid bug buzzing around the ears of non-crazy people does seem to be the primary goal of the truth movement. How noble.

Anyway, consider your day made.

*adds OldSchool to ignore list*

negativ · 27th May 2008, 11:32 AM

Originally Posted by Patriot4life

2. If there was what authorities would they take it to?

Any journalist working for a major-league newspaper (NYT, Guardian, etc. etc.) would instantly become famous, prestigious, and Pulitzer-encumbered. Woodward and Bernstein would look like gossip columnists for the student council newsletter by comparison.

T.A.M. · 27th May 2008, 01:10 PM

Originally Posted by TruthByDecree

I don't know I was wondering the same thing. When will that WTC-7 report be out?

Why? If the release is tomorrow, or in the fall, you and others in the TM will cry "Fraud! NIST is in on the inside job" anyway (unless that 1:1,000,000,000,000 chance occurs and they come out on the side of the TM).

TAM

Cobalt · 27th May 2008, 01:36 PM

Originally Posted by applecorped

http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/...min=&sec=&p0=0

It's been:
2450 days
58814 hours
3528849 minutes
211730978 seconds

since 9/11. Troothers, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof to authorities?

No gas money?

Pato2747 · 27th May 2008, 02:28 PM

Wrong. It's

2450 days
58821 hours
3529286 minutes
211757196 seconds

since 9/11.

(Something unrelated, why didn't you put 9:03/9:04 on the time, instead of 00:00:00? Sorry to be such a puntuality nitpicker, buuuuuut...)

applecorped · 27th May 2008, 03:13 PM

Originally Posted by Pato2747

Wrong. It's

2450 days
58821 hours
3529286 minutes
211757196 seconds

since 9/11.

(Something unrelated, why didn't you put 9:03/9:04 on the time, instead of 00:00:00? Sorry to be such a puntuality nitpicker, buuuuuut...)

You're right, my bad.

dudalb · 27th May 2008, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Classified Documents perhaps? Black Magic Marker? Who needs undeniable proof when the obvious is apparent?

So you admit there is no proof or solid evidence to back up the 9/11 conspiracy theories,and that your belief in these theories is based exclusively on your hatred of the Bush Adminsitration and "The Establishment" (whatever the hell that is)?
Thanks for making things clear.

HENTAI DOUKYUSEI JP · 27th May 2008, 06:14 PM

Originally Posted by Cobalt

No allowance money?

fix it for you!

1337m4n · 27th May 2008, 06:22 PM

Originally Posted by Childlike Empress

You are complying to the original madness for how many days?

"Madness"...?

DC · 28th May 2008, 01:27 AM

It's been:
2450 days
58814 hours
3528849 minutes
211730978 seconds

since 9/11. NIST, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof for WTC7?

defaultdotxbe · 28th May 2008, 05:17 AM

Originally Posted by Dictator Cheney

It's been:
2450 days
58814 hours
3528849 minutes
211730978 seconds

since 9/11. NIST, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof for WTC7?

when did NIST start working on the WTC7 report?

Almo · 28th May 2008, 11:54 AM

Originally Posted by OldSchool

If a member of this forum had me ignore, I have met my goal. My words strike at the heart of which you can not respond to.

Things I read on the Internet never cease to amaze me.

Pardalis · 28th May 2008, 12:02 PM

Originally Posted by Childlike Empress

You are complying to the original madness for how many days?

And you've been complaining about our complaining for how many days?

jaydeehess · 28th May 2008, 08:30 PM

Originally Posted by OldSchool

If the truth movement is searching for such concrete proof they are doomed to fail.

Classified Documents perhaps? Black Magic Marker? Who needs undeniable proof when the obvious is apparent?

What ever happened to those water-boarding tapes?

The PfT claim that they have analyzed the DFDR data and that it shows that the plane did not travel along the generally accepted flightpath. When will they produce an objective paper or article and submit it to a journal or magazine instead of complaining that no one will 'debate' them on TV>

The CIT claim that their research definitively illustrates that the plane seen approaching the Pentagon was not on the generally accepted flightpath. When will they calculate whether or not the flightpath they say their witnesses have the plane on is physically possible?

Judy Woods claims a directed energy weapon took down the towers. When will she be telling us what type of beam weapon could do this?

Morgan Reynolds actually took his no-planes contention to a court of law and failed miserably to show it to be true.

When will you realize that 'it looks like' is a really bad way to make a determination of the cause of a highly complex situation? (my guess, never)

What do you believe would be on those water boarding tapes that would prove anything about what happened on 9/11/01? Does this administration lie and cheat and destroy evidence of their wrong doing? Yes, they do. How does that prove they committed mass murder of their own constituents?

applecorped · 28th May 2008, 08:50 PM

Originally Posted by jaydeehess

The PfT claim that they have analyzed the DFDR data and that it shows that the plane did not travel along the generally accepted flightpath. When will they produce an objective paper or article and submit it to a journal or magazine instead of complaining that no one will 'debate' them on TV>

The CIT claim that their research definitively illustrates that the plane seen approaching the Pentagon was not on the generally accepted flightpath. When will they calculate whether or not the flightpath they say their witnesses have the plane on is physically possible?

Judy Woods claims a directed energy weapon took down the towers. When will she be telling us what type of beam weapon could do this?

Morgan Reynolds actually took his no-planes contention to a court of law and failed miserably to show it to be true.

When will you realize that 'it looks like' is a really bad way to make a determination of the cause of a highly complex situation? (my guess, never)

What do you believe would be on those water boarding tapes that would prove anything about what happened on 9/11/01? Does this administration lie and cheat and destroy evidence of their wrong doing? Yes, they do. How does that prove they committed mass murder of their own constituents?

Ditto.

DC · 28th May 2008, 09:23 PM

Originally Posted by defaultdotxbe

when did NIST start working on the WTC7 report?

when did i start doubting 9/11 ?

beachnut · 28th May 2008, 10:57 PM

Originally Posted by Dictator Cheney

when did i start doubting 9/11 ?

The 7th year of 9/11 truth, void of facts and evidence, you must be new to this not to see the false information 9/11 truth spreads. If some 9/11 truth members had ideas about 9/11 6 years ago, they could have earned a masters in engineering and not be ignorant of the concepts needed to understand 9/11.

Why do you blindly follow 9/11 truth and parrot their failed ideas? If I had questions, I would gain the knowledge to understand the events of 9/11 and answer those questions myself. Not blindly quote sources with zero understanding of what I post. Like your sig. You looked it up, but failed to explain when and where it is possible. You blindly believe 9/11 truth in the same lack of understanding way, or is it something else?

Why is taking over 6 years for 9/11 truth to publish one piece of evidence to support their conclusions?

Some of 9/11 truth is made up of lies. They claim they have "ample evidence" to blame others for 9/11, our own people, yet they fail to use this evidence. They are liars.

defaultdotxbe · 29th May 2008, 05:41 AM

Originally Posted by Dictator Cheney

when did i start doubting 9/11 ?

you do not comprise the entirety of the truth movement, some of the supposed "big guns" like alex jones have been "investigating" since day 1

Pato2747 · 29th May 2008, 04:48 PM

Originally Posted by 1337m4n

http://www.incompetech.com/movie/images/300.jpg

"Madness"...?

THIS... IS...

Oh, no. This is a respetable forum. I'm not doing it.

Thunder · 29th May 2008, 05:58 PM

whats taking soo long?

its called an utter and hilarious lack of public support.

Furi · 5th June 2008, 03:38 AM

Originally Posted by Pato2747

THIS... IS...

Oh, no. This is a respetable forum. I'm not doing it.

I Will... (I have no shame)

27th May 2008, 07:12 AM	#1
applecorped Rotten to the Core Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Boston, MA Posts: 10,661	It's been 2450 days Troothers - What's taking so long? http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/...min=&sec=&p0=0 It's been: 2450 days 58814 hours 3528849 minutes 211730978 seconds since 9/11. Troothers, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof to authorities?

27th May 2008, 07:38 AM	#2
Furi Felix Sapiens Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Living life in the bus lane Posts: 2,006	Lack and Fail probably,
	__________________ =^..^= Felix Sapiens,Drink Beer! It is big, and it is clever, There’s a man with a mullet going mad with a mallet in Millets The chances of anything coming from mars are a million to one they say.

27th May 2008, 07:50 AM	#3
Patriot4life Scholar Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 93	God, these types of threads are getting old 1. There is no undeniable proof 2. If there was what authorities would they take it to?
Patriot4life Scholar Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 93

27th May 2008, 08:03 AM	#6
uk_dave Philosopher Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 7,866	Originally Posted by Patriot4life God, these types of threads are getting old 1. There is no undeniable proof 2. If there was what authorities would they take it to? So it's hopeless then?
uk_dave Philosopher Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 7,866

27th May 2008, 08:05 AM	#8
Björn Toulouse Cavitus Rectum Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: miles from Nowhere Posts: 1,406	Originally Posted by OldSchool .... What ever happened to those water-boarding tapes? They got wet.
	__________________ The most complete and happy victory is this: to compel one's enemy to give up his purpose, while suffering no harm oneself. Belisarius

27th May 2008, 08:01 AM	#4
OldSchool Critical Thinker Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 304	Originally Posted by applecorped http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/...min=&sec=&p0=0 It's been: 2450 days 58814 hours 3528849 minutes 211730978 seconds since 9/11. Troothers, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof to authorities? If the truth movement is searching for such concrete proof they are doomed to fail. Classified Documents perhaps? Black Magic Marker? Who needs undeniable proof when the obvious is apparent? What ever happened to those water-boarding tapes?

27th May 2008, 08:02 AM	#5
Childlike Empress Ewige Blumenkraft Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Ivory Tower Posts: 7,836	You are complying to the original madness for how many days?

27th May 2008, 08:04 AM	#7
T.A.M. Keeper of the Kool-Vax Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The Far East...of Canada Posts: 20,816	I thought you were banned Oldschool? Funny I had you on ignore, but removed you. Probably because you haven't posted here in so long...oh well. As for the OP, what is taking them so long is that they are not looking for undeniable proof. They really could care less about that kind of proof. They would much rather play around with "what ifs" and "Thats pecular" and other vague statements that sew seeds of doubt in the unprepared, naive average joe...thats all. TAM

27th May 2008, 08:06 AM	#9
T.A.M. Keeper of the Kool-Vax Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The Far East...of Canada Posts: 20,816	Originally Posted by uk_dave So it's hopeless then? Not really. They are all preparing for the Alex Jones lead revolution...grab yer guns boyz. TAM

27th May 2008, 08:12 AM	#10
OldSchool Critical Thinker Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 304	Originally Posted by T.A.M. I thought you were banned Oldschool? Funny I had you on ignore, but removed you. Probably because you haven't posted here in so long...oh well. As for the OP, what is taking them so long is that they are not looking for undeniable proof. They really could care less about that kind of proof. They would much rather play around with "what ifs" and "Thats pecular" and other vague statements that sew seeds of doubt in the unprepared, naive average joe...thats all. TAM If a member of this forum had me ignore, I have met my goal. My words strike at the heart of which you can not respond to.

27th May 2008, 08:13 AM	#11
applecorped Rotten to the Core Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Boston, MA Posts: 10,661	I'll respond....LOL!!!!!!

27th May 2008, 08:14 AM	#12
Dave Rogers Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through a scribbled morning waving necessary ankles Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: In a world lit only by fire. Posts: 17,894	Originally Posted by OldSchool If a member of this forum had me ignore, I have met my goal. Your purpose in life is to get people not to listen to you? Dave
	__________________ "We will punish the murderer together. Our punishment will be more generosity, more tolerance and more democracy." - Fabian Stang, Mayor of Oslo SSKCAS, covert member

27th May 2008, 08:16 AM	#13
T.A.M. Keeper of the Kool-Vax Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The Far East...of Canada Posts: 20,816	Originally Posted by OldSchool If a member of this forum had me ignore, I have met my goal. My words strike at the heart of which you can not respond to. don't mistake fear for what is actually annoyance. Most people I put on ignore go there because they have annoyed me to the point of avoidance. You were in that group. TAM
	Last edited by T.A.M.; 27th May 2008 at 08:17 AM.

27th May 2008, 08:20 AM	#15
defaultdotxbe Drunken Shikigami Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The Dark Side of the Sun Posts: 7,482	Originally Posted by OldSchool Who needs undeniable proof when the obvious is apparent? if the obvious is so apparent why is it taking 2450+ days to get anything done?
	__________________ I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. -Albert Einstein

27th May 2008, 08:26 AM	#16
TexasJack Penultimate Amazing Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 10,881	Originally Posted by applecorped http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/...min=&sec=&p0=0 It's been: 2450 days 58814 hours 3528849 minutes 211730978 seconds since 9/11. Troothers, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof to authorities? and counting...

27th May 2008, 08:32 AM	#17
Patriot4life Scholar Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 93	Originally Posted by uk_dave So it's hopeless then? I guess it depends on what you consider the objective to be. If the objective is to prove a CD in the WTC buildings that collapsed, or that there actually weren't planes that hit the trade center and pentagon, or that it really wasn't an act of terrorism by foreigners. then it is hopeless, yes. You wanna know why? because planes hijacked by foreign terrorists did fly into the wtc 1 and 2, and the general concensus amongst people that actually know what they are talking about conclude that this could have caused collapse (a reality that I, incidentally, never questioned until coming across the "truth movement" and after consideration continue to not question). basically my point is the truth movement should forget about all the fringe conspiracy "theory" rhetoric and focus their energies on investigating and discussing theories that are more grounded in reality. Of course this would shift the focus to more of a political context.
Patriot4life Scholar Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 93

27th May 2008, 09:00 AM	#18
TruthByDecree Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 138	Originally Posted by applecorped http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/...min=&sec=&p0=0 It's been: 2450 days 58814 hours 3528849 minutes 211730978 seconds since 9/11. I don't know I was wondering the same thing. When will that WTC-7 report be out?
TruthByDecree Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 138

27th May 2008, 09:04 AM	#19
Drudgewire Critical Doofus Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 9,434	Originally Posted by OldSchool If a member of this forum had me ignore, I have met my goal. Yeah, being a stupid bug buzzing around the ears of non-crazy people does seem to be the primary goal of the truth movement. How noble. Anyway, consider your day made. adds OldSchool to ignore list
	__________________ "You post a lie, it is proven 100% false, you move the goalposts and post yet another lie and it continues on around till we're back to the original lie as if it will somehow become true if it's re-iterated again. The same misquotes over and over again. The same hindsight bias, appeals to authority, etc." -lapman describing every twoofer on the internet

27th May 2008, 11:32 AM	#20
negativ Graduate Poster Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: the land of make-believe Posts: 1,905	Originally Posted by Patriot4life 2. If there was what authorities would they take it to? Any journalist working for a major-league newspaper (NYT, Guardian, etc. etc.) would instantly become famous, prestigious, and Pulitzer-encumbered. Woodward and Bernstein would look like gossip columnists for the student council newsletter by comparison.
	__________________ A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals. Eternal salvation or TRIPLE your money back!

27th May 2008, 01:10 PM	#21
T.A.M. Keeper of the Kool-Vax Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The Far East...of Canada Posts: 20,816	Originally Posted by TruthByDecree I don't know I was wondering the same thing. When will that WTC-7 report be out? Why? If the release is tomorrow, or in the fall, you and others in the TM will cry "Fraud! NIST is in on the inside job" anyway (unless that 1:1,000,000,000,000 chance occurs and they come out on the side of the TM). TAM

27th May 2008, 01:36 PM	#22
Cobalt Tobikan Judan Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 1,631	Originally Posted by applecorped http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/...min=&sec=&p0=0 It's been: 2450 days 58814 hours 3528849 minutes 211730978 seconds since 9/11. Troothers, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof to authorities? No gas money?
Cobalt Tobikan Judan Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 1,631	__________________ professional griefer

27th May 2008, 02:28 PM	#23
Pato2747 DEFINITELY not a paid disinfo agent Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 259	Wrong. It's 2450 days 58821 hours 3529286 minutes 211757196 seconds since 9/11. (Something unrelated, why didn't you put 9:03/9:04 on the time, instead of 00:00:00? Sorry to be such a puntuality nitpicker, buuuuuut...)

27th May 2008, 03:13 PM	#24
applecorped Rotten to the Core Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Boston, MA Posts: 10,661	Originally Posted by Pato2747 Wrong. It's 2450 days 58821 hours 3529286 minutes 211757196 seconds since 9/11. (Something unrelated, why didn't you put 9:03/9:04 on the time, instead of 00:00:00? Sorry to be such a puntuality nitpicker, buuuuuut...) You're right, my bad.

27th May 2008, 04:03 PM	#25
dudalb Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 22,843	Quote: Classified Documents perhaps? Black Magic Marker? Who needs undeniable proof when the obvious is apparent? So you admit there is no proof or solid evidence to back up the 9/11 conspiracy theories,and that your belief in these theories is based exclusively on your hatred of the Bush Adminsitration and "The Establishment" (whatever the hell that is)? Thanks for making things clear.

27th May 2008, 06:14 PM	#26
HENTAI DOUKYUSEI JP Critical Thinker Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 460	Originally Posted by Cobalt No allowance money? fix it for you!

27th May 2008, 06:22 PM	#27
1337m4n Alphanumeric Anonymous Stick Man Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 3,499	Originally Posted by Childlike Empress You are complying to the original madness for how many days? "Madness"...?
	__________________ http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting...2b728514ea.gif "The evidence that the attacks of 9/11 were an inside job just keeps not coming in." --pomeroo

28th May 2008, 01:27 AM	#28
DC dedicated aphilatelist Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Switzerland Posts: 21,674	It's been: 2450 days 58814 hours 3528849 minutes 211730978 seconds since 9/11. NIST, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof for WTC7?
	__________________ AGW is a fact, including the A, face it

28th May 2008, 05:17 AM	#29
defaultdotxbe Drunken Shikigami Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The Dark Side of the Sun Posts: 7,482	Originally Posted by Dictator Cheney It's been: 2450 days 58814 hours 3528849 minutes 211730978 seconds since 9/11. NIST, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof for WTC7? when did NIST start working on the WTC7 report?
	__________________ I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. -Albert Einstein

28th May 2008, 11:54 AM	#30
Almo Masterblazer Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Montreal, Quebec Posts: 6,407	Originally Posted by OldSchool If a member of this forum had me ignore, I have met my goal. My words strike at the heart of which you can not respond to. Things I read on the Internet never cease to amaze me.
	__________________ Almo! My Blog "No society ever collapsed because the poor had too much." — LeftySergeant "It may be that there is no body really at rest, to which the places and motions of others may be referred." –Issac Newton in the Principia

28th May 2008, 12:02 PM	#31
Pardalis Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Montréal Posts: 25,831	Originally Posted by Childlike Empress You are complying to the original madness for how many days? And you've been complaining about our complaining for how many days?

28th May 2008, 08:30 PM	#32
jaydeehess Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: I beedunk 40 miles from the border Posts: 10,810	Originally Posted by OldSchool If the truth movement is searching for such concrete proof they are doomed to fail. Classified Documents perhaps? Black Magic Marker? Who needs undeniable proof when the obvious is apparent? What ever happened to those water-boarding tapes? The PfT claim that they have analyzed the DFDR data and that it shows that the plane did not travel along the generally accepted flightpath. When will they produce an objective paper or article and submit it to a journal or magazine instead of complaining that no one will 'debate' them on TV> The CIT claim that their research definitively illustrates that the plane seen approaching the Pentagon was not on the generally accepted flightpath. When will they calculate whether or not the flightpath they say their witnesses have the plane on is physically possible? Judy Woods claims a directed energy weapon took down the towers. When will she be telling us what type of beam weapon could do this? Morgan Reynolds actually took his no-planes contention to a court of law and failed miserably to show it to be true. When will you realize that 'it looks like' is a really bad way to make a determination of the cause of a highly complex situation? (my guess, never) What do you believe would be on those water boarding tapes that would prove anything about what happened on 9/11/01? Does this administration lie and cheat and destroy evidence of their wrong doing? Yes, they do. How does that prove they committed mass murder of their own constituents?

28th May 2008, 08:50 PM	#33
applecorped Rotten to the Core Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Boston, MA Posts: 10,661	Originally Posted by jaydeehess The PfT claim that they have analyzed the DFDR data and that it shows that the plane did not travel along the generally accepted flightpath. When will they produce an objective paper or article and submit it to a journal or magazine instead of complaining that no one will 'debate' them on TV> The CIT claim that their research definitively illustrates that the plane seen approaching the Pentagon was not on the generally accepted flightpath. When will they calculate whether or not the flightpath they say their witnesses have the plane on is physically possible? Judy Woods claims a directed energy weapon took down the towers. When will she be telling us what type of beam weapon could do this? Morgan Reynolds actually took his no-planes contention to a court of law and failed miserably to show it to be true. When will you realize that 'it looks like' is a really bad way to make a determination of the cause of a highly complex situation? (my guess, never) What do you believe would be on those water boarding tapes that would prove anything about what happened on 9/11/01? Does this administration lie and cheat and destroy evidence of their wrong doing? Yes, they do. How does that prove they committed mass murder of their own constituents? Ditto.

28th May 2008, 09:23 PM	#34
DC dedicated aphilatelist Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Switzerland Posts: 21,674	Originally Posted by defaultdotxbe when did NIST start working on the WTC7 report? when did i start doubting 9/11 ?
	__________________ AGW is a fact, including the A, face it

28th May 2008, 10:57 PM	#35
beachnut Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Dog House Posts: 19,903	Originally Posted by Dictator Cheney when did i start doubting 9/11 ? The 7th year of 9/11 truth, void of facts and evidence, you must be new to this not to see the false information 9/11 truth spreads. If some 9/11 truth members had ideas about 9/11 6 years ago, they could have earned a masters in engineering and not be ignorant of the concepts needed to understand 9/11. Why do you blindly follow 9/11 truth and parrot their failed ideas? If I had questions, I would gain the knowledge to understand the events of 9/11 and answer those questions myself. Not blindly quote sources with zero understanding of what I post. Like your sig. You looked it up, but failed to explain when and where it is possible. You blindly believe 9/11 truth in the same lack of understanding way, or is it something else? Why is taking over 6 years for 9/11 truth to publish one piece of evidence to support their conclusions? Some of 9/11 truth is made up of lies. They claim they have "ample evidence" to blame others for 9/11, our own people, yet they fail to use this evidence. They are liars.

29th May 2008, 05:41 AM	#36
defaultdotxbe Drunken Shikigami Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The Dark Side of the Sun Posts: 7,482	Originally Posted by Dictator Cheney when did i start doubting 9/11 ? you do not comprise the entirety of the truth movement, some of the supposed "big guns" like alex jones have been "investigating" since day 1
	__________________ I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. -Albert Einstein