FREE TAPATALK APP

Alareth · 12th July 2008, 10:10 PM

So I was perusing my daily list of tech and science blogs and find an entry that leads me to this article about the creation of synthetic DNA.

Almost immediately in the blogs comment section the paranoia begins:

Quote:

Do you people have any idea what this means?? Once this procedure becomes the norm, the government will use it to frame who ever they want in any criminal case. Can’t find the murderer of these two girls and have a frustrated public? Quick grab that guy and lets synthesis a match of his DNA then throw it all over the crime scene. This is scary.

Just wait till some of our favorite loons get word of this breakthrough. Because we all know that all new discoveries are retroactively applied to past events as if they have always existed and they will claim all DNA evidence was faked using this technique.

TheDaver · 14th July 2008, 05:18 AM

Quote:

Do you people have any idea what this means?? Once this procedure becomes the norm, the government will use it to frame who ever they want in any criminal case. Can’t find the murderer of these two girls and have a frustrated public? Quick grab that guy and lets synthesis a match of his DNA then throw it all over the crime scene. This is scary.

Oh, that’s just hilarious!

Why go to the trouble of synthesizing someone’s DNA – which would involve obtaining a sample of it – when you could just plant the sample itself?

Honeslty, how STUPID can someone be, and still think he has it all figured out?

WildCat · 14th July 2008, 05:24 AM

You beat me to it TheDaver!

Kthulhut Fhtagn · 23rd July 2008, 02:12 PM

I'd figure people would be more alarmed about how easy it is to obtain and recreate someone's finger-prints. Consider taking someone's beer after they finished drinking out of it compared to walking into a bar and politely asking for a hair or saliva sample.

PhantomWolf · 23rd July 2008, 03:18 PM

Originally Posted by Kthulhut Fhtagn

I'd figure people would be more alarmed about how easy it is to obtain and recreate someone's finger-prints. Consider taking someone's beer after they finished drinking out of it compared to walking into a bar and politely asking for a hair or saliva sample.

Well these days that'd give you a DNA sample and fingerprints

Furi · 24th July 2008, 02:18 AM

Wouldn't it just be easier for the all powerful NWO to just fake the tests, to show that the evidence matched the chosen subjects. Why they would even need to when they can control our every act from space or HAARP or mobile phone signals.

BenBurch · 24th July 2008, 11:28 AM

PhantomWolf, yes, they can get DNA from epithelial cells in fingerprints now.

And you know, there have been machines that could assemble DNA sequences for YEARS now, but you have to know what to assemble.

SpaceMonkeyZero · 24th July 2008, 11:43 AM

Originally Posted by Furi

Wouldn't it just be easier for the all powerful NWO to just fake the tests, to show that the evidence matched the chosen subjects. Why they would even need to when they can control our every act from space or HAARP or mobile phone signals.

It's easier to crack a program to always return true when it checks to see if it is registered than it is to decrypt and decode a synthetic serial number.

This would be in the same vein as: it's easier to bribe or black mail a security guard than to avoid guard dogs, hop a fence, and pick a lock.

But of course the more convoluted and prone to massive failure, the more mysteriously the NWO is involved. After all, they're so all-powerful they can create synthetic DNA... What's to stop them from running the world through a shadowy organization!

timhau · 25th July 2008, 07:30 AM

Originally Posted by Furi

Wouldn't it just be easier for the all powerful NWO to just fake the tests, to show that the evidence matched the chosen subjects. Why they would even need to when they can control our every act from space or HAARP or mobile phone signals.

Someone hasn't read Chapter 1 of The Handbook of Evil. Just because it's simpler and more effective, doesn't mean it's the way we do it.

Furi · 25th July 2008, 07:54 AM

Originally Posted by timhau

Someone hasn't read Chapter 1 of The Handbook of Evil. Just because it's simpler and more effective, doesn't mean it's the way we do it.

*Spang* of course it was Hi explosives backed up with Thermite, with a micro nuke, EMP generator, whilst a simultaneous strike with holgraphic planes fired real missles at the same time that the hurricane powered exotic energy device fires from space, whilst real time advanced CGI feed straight into everyones brain overwriting the data coming in from cameras etc

Look it wasn't my fault, It wasn't my decision to use ******** powerpoint to print the script, I wanted to use XL or Project, or even just notepad but nooo mangement cant handle XL so wanted PPT just cause the BBC script had a box moved to the front when you editted it, didn't mean you had to demote me to stealing socks to further our nefarious plans for 10 years

1 Steal odd socks from all over the world
2 ?
3 Profit

Travis · 26th July 2008, 01:19 AM

As part of my application for a grant to continue this research into synthetic DNA I would like to point out some of the potential benefits. These include:

Micro surgery
Complex tissue regeneration
Refined gene splicing
Framing enemies of the NWO
Increased understanding of Bio-Genesis
Testing the feasibility of Panspermia

Ranb · 26th July 2008, 09:11 PM

I guess they did not figure out that when we figure out how to fake a fingerprint or DNA, they will no longer be the cold hard evidence they used to be.

Ranb

12th July 2008, 10:10 PM	#1
Alareth Expert Expertologist Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Florida Posts: 6,809	Scientists create artificial DNA, NWO excited about new method to frame the innocent. So I was perusing my daily list of tech and science blogs and find an entry that leads me to this article about the creation of synthetic DNA. Almost immediately in the blogs comment section the paranoia begins: Quote: Do you people have any idea what this means?? Once this procedure becomes the norm, the government will use it to frame who ever they want in any criminal case. Can’t find the murderer of these two girls and have a frustrated public? Quick grab that guy and lets synthesis a match of his DNA then throw it all over the crime scene. This is scary. Just wait till some of our favorite loons get word of this breakthrough. Because we all know that all new discoveries are retroactively applied to past events as if they have always existed and they will claim all DNA evidence was faked using this technique.
	__________________ Pixelated Reality \| Alareth Does Art! Light travels faster than sound, which is why some people appear bright, until you hear them speak

23rd July 2008, 03:18 PM	#5
PhantomWolf Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base Posts: 10,004	Originally Posted by Kthulhut Fhtagn I'd figure people would be more alarmed about how easy it is to obtain and recreate someone's finger-prints. Consider taking someone's beer after they finished drinking out of it compared to walking into a bar and politely asking for a hair or saliva sample. Well these days that'd give you a DNA sample and fingerprints
	__________________ It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. -- JayUtah I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. -- Charles Babbage (1791-1871) My Apollo Page. 1 on 1 Debating Forum for Skeptics and sceptics.

24th July 2008, 02:18 AM	#6
Furi Felix Sapiens Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Living life in the bus lane Posts: 2,006	Wouldn't it just be easier for the all powerful NWO to just fake the tests, to show that the evidence matched the chosen subjects. Why they would even need to when they can control our every act from space or HAARP or mobile phone signals.
	__________________ =^..^= Felix Sapiens,Drink Beer! It is big, and it is clever, There’s a man with a mullet going mad with a mallet in Millets The chances of anything coming from mars are a million to one they say.

24th July 2008, 11:28 AM	#7
BenBurch Gatekeeper of The Left Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: The Universe 35.2 ms ahead of this one. Posts: 32,500	PhantomWolf, yes, they can get DNA from epithelial cells in fingerprints now. And you know, there have been machines that could assemble DNA sequences for YEARS now, but you have to know what to assemble.
	__________________ Are you IN? Join the IN crowd now!

24th July 2008, 11:43 AM	#8
SpaceMonkeyZero Graduate Poster Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: hi Barb!!!!! Posts: 1,287	Originally Posted by Furi Wouldn't it just be easier for the all powerful NWO to just fake the tests, to show that the evidence matched the chosen subjects. Why they would even need to when they can control our every act from space or HAARP or mobile phone signals. It's easier to crack a program to always return true when it checks to see if it is registered than it is to decrypt and decode a synthetic serial number. This would be in the same vein as: it's easier to bribe or black mail a security guard than to avoid guard dogs, hop a fence, and pick a lock. But of course the more convoluted and prone to massive failure, the more mysteriously the NWO is involved. After all, they're so all-powerful they can create synthetic DNA... What's to stop them from running the world through a shadowy organization!
	__________________ "NOBODY expects the Truther Movement! Our chief weapon is speculation, speculation and conjecture, conjecture and speculation. Our two weapons are conjecture and speculation, and youtube videos. Our three weapons are conjecture, speculation, and youtube videos, and an almost fanatical devotion to the "Truth". Our four. No. Amongst our weapons. Amongst our weaponry, are such elements as conjecture, speculation."

14th July 2008, 05:18 AM	#2
TheDaver hairy farting brute Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Montréal Posts: 972	Quote: Do you people have any idea what this means?? Once this procedure becomes the norm, the government will use it to frame who ever they want in any criminal case. Can’t find the murderer of these two girls and have a frustrated public? Quick grab that guy and lets synthesis a match of his DNA then throw it all over the crime scene. This is scary. Oh, that’s just hilarious! Why go to the trouble of synthesizing someone’s DNA – which would involve obtaining a sample of it – when you could just plant the sample itself? Honeslty, how STUPID can someone be, and still think he has it all figured out?

14th July 2008, 05:24 AM	#3
WildCat NWO Master Conspirator Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Albany Park, Chicago Posts: 49,475	You beat me to it TheDaver!

23rd July 2008, 02:12 PM	#4
Kthulhut Fhtagn Graduate Poster Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Somewhere in time and space... Posts: 1,939	I'd figure people would be more alarmed about how easy it is to obtain and recreate someone's finger-prints. Consider taking someone's beer after they finished drinking out of it compared to walking into a bar and politely asking for a hair or saliva sample.

25th July 2008, 07:30 AM	#9
timhau NWO Litter Technician Join Date: May 2004 Location: East of Sweeden Posts: 9,755	Originally Posted by Furi Wouldn't it just be easier for the all powerful NWO to just fake the tests, to show that the evidence matched the chosen subjects. Why they would even need to when they can control our every act from space or HAARP or mobile phone signals. Someone hasn't read Chapter 1 of The Handbook of Evil. Just because it's simpler and more effective, doesn't mean it's the way we do it.
	__________________ When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I realised that the Lord, in his wisdom, doesn't work that way. I just stole one and asked Him to forgive me. - Emo Philips

25th July 2008, 07:54 AM	#10
Furi Felix Sapiens Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Living life in the bus lane Posts: 2,006	Originally Posted by timhau Someone hasn't read Chapter 1 of The Handbook of Evil. Just because it's simpler and more effective, doesn't mean it's the way we do it. Spang of course it was Hi explosives backed up with Thermite, with a micro nuke, EMP generator, whilst a simultaneous strike with holgraphic planes fired real missles at the same time that the hurricane powered exotic energy device fires from space, whilst real time advanced CGI feed straight into everyones brain overwriting the data coming in from cameras etc Look it wasn't my fault, It wasn't my decision to use ******** powerpoint to print the script, I wanted to use XL or Project, or even just notepad but nooo mangement cant handle XL so wanted PPT just cause the BBC script had a box moved to the front when you editted it, didn't mean you had to demote me to stealing socks to further our nefarious plans for 10 years 1 Steal odd socks from all over the world 2 ? 3 Profit
	__________________ =^..^= Felix Sapiens,Drink Beer! It is big, and it is clever, There’s a man with a mullet going mad with a mallet in Millets The chances of anything coming from mars are a million to one they say.

26th July 2008, 01:19 AM	#11
Travis Misanthrope of the Mountains Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Tuolumne City, CA Posts: 18,106	As part of my application for a grant to continue this research into synthetic DNA I would like to point out some of the potential benefits. These include: Micro surgery Complex tissue regeneration Refined gene splicing Framing enemies of the NWO Increased understanding of Bio-Genesis Testing the feasibility of Panspermia
	__________________ "Because WE ARE IGNORANT OF 911 FACTS, WE DEMAND PROOF" -- Douglas Herman on Rense.com Zingiber Officinale The Humor blog of some not crazy guy

26th July 2008, 09:11 PM	#12
Ranb Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: WA USA Posts: 4,208	I guess they did not figure out that when we figure out how to fake a fingerprint or DNA, they will no longer be the cold hard evidence they used to be. Ranb