Why can't I see CIT's witness interviews?

1337m4n · 3rd August 2008, 08:24 PM

I would like to see them; where are they? There's supposed to be 13 but I can only find 4.

Smackety · 3rd August 2008, 08:32 PM

If you haven't been able to form an irreducible delusion from seeing the first 4, why do you think the other 9 will work any better?

twinstead · 3rd August 2008, 08:43 PM

Because 9 is bigger than 4?

Dr Adequate · 3rd August 2008, 08:47 PM

Originally Posted by 1337m4n

I would like to see them; where are they? There's supposed to be 13 but I can only find 4.

Truther math. 13 is 1 and 3. 1 and 3 is 4.

I shall now demonstrate truther physics. For this I will need two matchboxes and an egg.

OldTigerCub · 3rd August 2008, 11:04 PM

Originally Posted by Dr Adequate

Truther math. 13 is 1 and 3. 1 and 3 is 4.

I shall now demonstrate truther physics. For this I will need two matchboxes and an egg.

....and some cardboard boxes...and a few misquotes from eyewitnesses, and a rabbit cage...don't forget the rabbit cage!!!

eromitlab · 3rd August 2008, 11:46 PM

I'll bring the billiard balls.

Caustic Logic · 4th August 2008, 12:51 AM

I've kind of lost track, but let me see if i can remember the 13

Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York...

No wait...

Okay, the original 3 explicit NoC witnesses - Lagasse, Brooks, Turcios. You can see them in too much detail affirm north, north, north despite all evidence.

Terry Morin is one of them, isn't he? He couldn't possibly see it pass NoC from where he was... but Over Navy Annex (ONA) now = NoC, so he's a NoC witness. That's "4" - can't see his new account, it's CIT's word, off-the-record and stupid in so many ways.

Because ONA = NoC, maybe they finally upgraded Paik to explicit rather than implied NoC? Either that all they always called him one, I forget. He couldn't see that area either. But it IS implied... That's "5" -you can see him drawing a path ONA plain as day.

Levi Stephens is off the record, IMP not in a good spot to judge where 77 was relative to the Citgo but is said to place it north. Can't see this one, that's "6."

Sean Boger was in a great spot to see and CIT says he says it was NoC. Can't see it but I think they have a direct quote. "7."

Uh... off the top of my head, one of the NEITs. Very misread, will have to dig it up but she's a decent south path-low impact witness in reality land. That's "8" I believe.

The ret are supposed to be in that new movie i suppose I should see sometime. Thee may be another somewhere... and since they've set the precedent of X=NoC meaning non-NoC witness can be called NoC, it's only a hopnskip to calling "all" witnesses NoC.

Another hopnskip - since NoC is "PROVEN" by all these witnesses, it happened in the real world, so all people who are in reality are NoC witnesses. The very cosmos is a NoC witness. Whoa...

It's really quite simple.

lee5 · 4th August 2008, 01:11 AM

Originally Posted by 1337m4n

I would like to see them; where are they? There's supposed to be 13 but I can only find 4.

Can you link to those 4 please?

Caustic Logic · 4th August 2008, 01:32 AM

Originally Posted by lee5

Can you link to those 4 please?

By 13 I presume the stick man means thei recently touted "13" north path witnesses, as presumed above. Correct?

He probably has at least three of the four on this video included in his four. Correct? This is pre-101-level stuff BTW.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...80169348087802

The expansion of this list from there is the sticky part. A 300% growth in claims with no corresponding growth in actual north-path testimony they can or will share with us (until their latest video anyway).

3rd August 2008, 08:24 PM	#1
1337m4n Alphanumeric Anonymous Stick Man Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 3,499	Why can't I see CIT's witness interviews? I would like to see them; where are they? There's supposed to be 13 but I can only find 4.
	__________________ http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting...2b728514ea.gif "The evidence that the attacks of 9/11 were an inside job just keeps not coming in." --pomeroo

3rd August 2008, 08:43 PM	#3
twinstead Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Big corner office in NWO Towers Posts: 11,577	Because 9 is bigger than 4?
	__________________ You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison

3rd August 2008, 11:04 PM	#5
OldTigerCub Striped Shapeshifting Reptoid Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Steeler Nation, Pa. Posts: 1,633	Originally Posted by Dr Adequate Truther math. 13 is 1 and 3. 1 and 3 is 4. I shall now demonstrate truther physics. For this I will need two matchboxes and an egg. ....and some cardboard boxes...and a few misquotes from eyewitnesses, and a rabbit cage...don't forget the rabbit cage!!!
	__________________ "Nuts!" - General Anthony C. McAuliffe

3rd August 2008, 11:46 PM	#6
eromitlab Muse Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: north Alabama Posts: 921	I'll bring the billiard balls.
	__________________ With my reputation, I do expect everyone to take what I say at face value. -Galileo

4th August 2008, 01:11 AM	#8
lee5 Critical Thinker Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 305	Originally Posted by 1337m4n I would like to see them; where are they? There's supposed to be 13 but I can only find 4. Can you link to those 4 please?
lee5 Critical Thinker Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 305

3rd August 2008, 08:32 PM	#2
Smackety Graduate Poster Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 1,145	If you haven't been able to form an irreducible delusion from seeing the first 4, why do you think the other 9 will work any better?

3rd August 2008, 08:47 PM	#4
Dr Adequate Banned Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Waiting Long Enough By The River Posts: 17,897	Originally Posted by 1337m4n I would like to see them; where are they? There's supposed to be 13 but I can only find 4. Truther math. 13 is 1 and 3. 1 and 3 is 4. I shall now demonstrate truther physics. For this I will need two matchboxes and an egg.

4th August 2008, 12:51 AM	#7
Caustic Logic Illuminator Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 3,979	I've kind of lost track, but let me see if i can remember the 13 Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York... No wait... Okay, the original 3 explicit NoC witnesses - Lagasse, Brooks, Turcios. You can see them in too much detail affirm north, north, north despite all evidence. Terry Morin is one of them, isn't he? He couldn't possibly see it pass NoC from where he was... but Over Navy Annex (ONA) now = NoC, so he's a NoC witness. That's "4" - can't see his new account, it's CIT's word, off-the-record and stupid in so many ways. Because ONA = NoC, maybe they finally upgraded Paik to explicit rather than implied NoC? Either that all they always called him one, I forget. He couldn't see that area either. But it IS implied... That's "5" -you can see him drawing a path ONA plain as day. Levi Stephens is off the record, IMP not in a good spot to judge where 77 was relative to the Citgo but is said to place it north. Can't see this one, that's "6." Sean Boger was in a great spot to see and CIT says he says it was NoC. Can't see it but I think they have a direct quote. "7." Uh... off the top of my head, one of the NEITs. Very misread, will have to dig it up but she's a decent south path-low impact witness in reality land. That's "8" I believe. The ret are supposed to be in that new movie i suppose I should see sometime. Thee may be another somewhere... and since they've set the precedent of X=NoC meaning non-NoC witness can be called NoC, it's only a hopnskip to calling "all" witnesses NoC. Another hopnskip - since NoC is "PROVEN" by all these witnesses, it happened in the real world, so all people who are in reality are NoC witnesses. The very cosmos is a NoC witness. Whoa... It's really quite simple.

4th August 2008, 01:32 AM	#9
Caustic Logic Illuminator Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 3,979	Originally Posted by lee5 Can you link to those 4 please? By 13 I presume the stick man means thei recently touted "13" north path witnesses, as presumed above. Correct? He probably has at least three of the four on this video included in his four. Correct? This is pre-101-level stuff BTW. http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...80169348087802 The expansion of this list from there is the sticky part. A 300% growth in claims with no corresponding growth in actual north-path testimony they can or will share with us (until their latest video anyway).