JREF Homepage Swift Blog Events Calendar $1 Million Paranormal Challenge The Amaz!ng Meeting Useful Links Support Us
James Randi Educational Foundation JREF Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   JREF Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
Click Here To Donate

Notices


Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.

Reply
Old 22nd October 2003, 02:42 AM   #1
TomStockholm
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 205
The future of neo natal care

I am the proud father of a 3 year old (healthy) boy. He was born very prematurely in the 25th week, weighing 680 grams.

Being in this position as a father made me very quickly learn the rudiments of neo natal care, and I was very impressed by what they could do to save my son's life.

Nobody seemed to be able to answer these questions though (although admittedly at the time I probably wasn't in the greatest frame of mind to register their answers, so I may be wrong).

Why was my son born so prematurely? My (now ex) wife had earlier borne a child in the 28th week who died, but has also two other children who were born after a full pregnancy. Is it possibly genetic, or is there any research out there showing other reasons why children are born so early?

Why exactly are twins more likely to be born prematurely? I know they are smaller and all that, but that seems to me to be a reason for them to want to hang on in their a little bit longer so to speak. Does one of the twins somehow try and force the other out or something?

I am also interested in what the future holds in this area. What are the possibilities of building some kind of heart and lung machine that could save even more premature children? Is it hindered because of technological reasons or is it to do with ethics?

How early could you reasonably expect to save premature kids in the future?

Thanks

Tom
TomStockholm is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd October 2003, 03:31 AM   #2
Flame
Muse
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 584
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/preemie-list/

This site was a lifeline for me during the weeks my son was still in hospital and even helpful in retrospect when my 30 weeker daughter was already 2.

Hope you get some info there.

Toni
__________________
'And God said, Let us make man in our own image, but woe many came out like Spitting Image' - The Bible According to Spike Milligan
Flame is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd October 2003, 03:40 AM   #3
TomStockholm
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 205
Quote:
Originally posted by Flame
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/preemie-list/

This site was a lifeline for me during the weeks my son was still in hospital and even helpful in retrospect when my 30 weeker daughter was already 2.

Hope you get some info there.

Toni
Thanks for the link. I will join and see what is there. I have been on similar sites here in Sweden but they were more geared to support rather than the scientific element behind it.

I gather from what you wrote that you have two premature kids. Am I correct?

I thought going through this once was bad enough, it must have been absolutely awful for you...

Did you get any explanation as to why you bore two children prematurely?

Tom
TomStockholm is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd October 2003, 03:45 AM   #4
Flame
Muse
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 584
We have four children. two full termers, although with Nick I started contracting at 31 weeks and was hospitalised until the end.

Anna was born at 30 weeks due to PROM
(preterm rupture of membranes) and James was born at 32+ weeks for the same reason.
There is no information as to why this happened. I smoked cigarettes while pregnant with Anna, but hadn't for 2 years when having James.

On that site there is a lot of 'support' and 'introduction' type threads. There are also doctors, nurses and very educated parents who will and have already answered many technical questions.
I have found it to be quite informative regarding high risk pregnancy, NICU issues and even many issues that can arise later in preemie life.

My two preemies born 1400gm and 4lbs 15 oz (yes he was huge and dates were correct)
are grand now and seem to have no issues but we did deal with apnea of prematurity with James up until a few months ago.

Toni
__________________
'And God said, Let us make man in our own image, but woe many came out like Spitting Image' - The Bible According to Spike Milligan
Flame is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

JREF Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:07 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2001-2012, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.