Bigfoot DNA - Page 44

I am Bigfoot · 16th July 2012, 08:06 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

http://i48.tinypic.com/54j4t0.jpg (Asafa Powell)
http://i48.tinypic.com/195n5v.jpg (Tyson Gay)
http://i47.tinypic.com/2llk31v.jpg (Asafa & Usain Bolt)

^Those are the three fastest men on the planet.

So you agree with me then? None of them have the muscle bulk to perform the extreme feats of strength attributed to bigfoot.

Also, look at their training. Your woods hobo would need to do more than them in order to be able to do all the stuff all those ~~liars~~ witnesses and "experts" claim it can do.

AttorneyTom · 16th July 2012, 08:10 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

http://i48.tinypic.com/54j4t0.jpg (Asafa Powell)
http://i48.tinypic.com/195n5v.jpg (Tyson Gay)
http://i47.tinypic.com/2llk31v.jpg (Asafa & Usain Bolt)

^Those are the three fastest men on the planet.

Well.. that well placed and thought out logic settles it for me. So.. I guess I will just thaw out my "steak" and get out the A-1 Sauce. This fur is rather hard to chew. I thought I ordered a Tenderloin ?

Jodie · 16th July 2012, 08:11 PM

Just to clarify, the bigfooters do not say that these samples are HSS, what they are claiming is that heretofore, the samples were close enough to human that they did not show anything unusual when first being screened by forensic testing, or later through BLAST.

What is more incredulous is that an asphalt engineer could use an excel spread sheet to run statistics on the mitochondrial sequences and from that determine that we have something unique when it took complex algorithms to figure out where the Neandertal DNA differed from HSS DNA.

OntarioSquatch · 16th July 2012, 08:13 PM

Originally Posted by I am Bigfoot

So you agree with me then? None of them have the muscle bulk to perform the extreme feats of strength attributed to bigfoot

^ Oh that's what you mean. Well, adult male chimps are about 100lbs yet they are stronger than any of us. They generate more strength, even though they are smaller. Now, Sasquatch don't use tools so they would evolve to rely on their physical attributes instead. Multiply that 100lb chimp by 6 or more and you've now got the strongest animal in North America.

I am Bigfoot · 16th July 2012, 08:14 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

^ Oh that's what you mean. Well, adult male chimps are about 100lbs yet they are stronger than any of us. They generate more strength, even though they are smaller. Now, Sasquatch don't use tools so they would evolve to rely on their physical attributes instead. Multiply that 100lb chimp by 6 or more and you've now got the strongest animal in North America.

So now you're saying bigfoot is a super chimp?

OntarioSquatch · 16th July 2012, 08:18 PM

I'm saying that size and strength don't correlate well between us and wild animals that don't use tools.

AttorneyTom · 16th July 2012, 08:18 PM

Originally Posted by I am Bigfoot

So now you're saying bigfoot is a super chimp?

I dont know.. they are good at card games. ie. "Lancealot Link ".. these steak fur balls are horrible !

GT/CS · 16th July 2012, 08:25 PM

HJFC, why do you continue to post here?

I am Bigfoot · 16th July 2012, 08:26 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

I'm saying that how much you know about genetics and evolution does not correlate much with how much you talk about genetics and evolution.

Fixed that for you.

OntarioSquatch · 16th July 2012, 08:34 PM

Originally Posted by GT/CS

HJFC, why do you continue to post here?

The same reasons you guys post here.

I am Bigfoot · 16th July 2012, 08:38 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

The same reasons you guys post here.

We post here to have serious discussions about usually not-so-serious topics. You come here to parrot things you've been told and just made up and can't support with facts.

OntarioSquatch · 16th July 2012, 08:40 PM

I'm not making things up here. I'm actually trying to bring some sense into this little world of scepticism.

AttorneyTom · 16th July 2012, 08:45 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

I'm not making things up here. I'm actually trying to bring some sense into this little world of scepticism.

What ? That is all you bring to this. You make up everything.. well everything that you have seen that someone else made up ? I will give you half the credit. Could you make up some more things for us ? Do they bowl or play family games for example ? What is their favorite food on fridays ? Can they fan themselves to keep cool ? Do BF prefer a certain type of coyote to hang out with ?

OntarioSquatch · 16th July 2012, 08:47 PM

^As far as I know, they have a dislike for canines.

ETA - And believe me I'm not making these up. Same goes for what I've said about Dr. Ketchum's study, Dr. Meldrum, Bill Munns ect ect
Otherwise I should change my name to LeroySquatch

GT/CS · 16th July 2012, 08:50 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

^As far as I know, they have a dislike for canines.

ETA - And believe me I'm not making these up. Same goes for what I've said about Dr. Ketchum's study, Dr. Meldrum, Bill Munns ect ect

Please post data showing why you think they dislike canines.

OntarioSquatch · 16th July 2012, 08:51 PM

^The countless reports of dogs getting killed, rocks being thrown ect

AttorneyTom · 16th July 2012, 08:55 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

^The countless reports of dogs getting killed, rocks being thrown ect

They also have bad credit scores.

GT/CS · 16th July 2012, 08:56 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

^The countless reports of dogs getting killed, rocks being thrown ect

I haven't heard of dogs being killed by bigfoots. Please post links to such articles.
Do they throw rocks at the dogs?

OntarioSquatch · 16th July 2012, 08:57 PM

Originally Posted by AttorneyTom

They also have bad credit scores.

That's true, but I consider many real.

OntarioSquatch · 16th July 2012, 08:58 PM

Originally Posted by GT/CS

I haven't heard of dogs being killed by bigfoots. Please post links to such articles.
Do they throw rocks at the dogs?

lol, I'd rather not go through so many reports again, but yeah they show aggression towards pet dogs.

GT/CS · 16th July 2012, 09:00 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

lol, I'd rather not go through so many reports again, but yeah they show aggression towards pet dogs.

So you're willing to admit to everyone here that you are just making everything up and you are a liar and/or a troll?

AttorneyTom · 16th July 2012, 09:00 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

That's true, but I consider many real.

They throw rocks at everything ! Dogs, people, bad movies at the DriveIn whatever it is that is disturbing their search for food or peace !

OntarioSquatch · 16th July 2012, 09:04 PM

Originally Posted by GT/CS

So you're willing to admit to everyone here that you are just making everything up and you are a liar and/or a troll?

Um, no. But I wouldn't go through hundreds of the same reports again.

GT/CS · 16th July 2012, 09:06 PM

Check and mate.

Any shred of respect you may have had here is now gone.
The next time you start posting on a site make sure you understand what that site is about and who your audience is.

LTC8K6 · 16th July 2012, 09:09 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

I'm not making things up here. I'm actually trying to bring some sense into this little world of scepticism.

You are just parroting things we have heard 10 times over already...

OntarioSquatch · 16th July 2012, 09:12 PM

LOL. I understand what I'm dealing with. The posts I see in PGF threads have shown me that nicely. Lets just say Leroy Blevins isn't the greatest man for debunking things. hahahaha

GT/CS · 16th July 2012, 09:14 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

LOL. I understand what I'm dealing with. The posts I see in PGF threads have shown me that nicely. Lets just say Leroy Blevins isn't the greatest man for debunking things. hahahaha

I'm not sure what you're talking about. Please elaborate.

LTC8K6 · 16th July 2012, 09:14 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

^The countless reports of dogs getting killed, rocks being thrown ect

If bigfoot killed a dog, bigfoot DNA would be all over the dog's body.

You seem very interested in bigfoot DNA.

There would also be bigfoot hairs all over the place.

If the dog scratched bigfoot, as it surely would, there'd be bigfoot tissue under the dog's nails.

The dog also likely got in a bite or two, drawing bigfoot blood.

But don't take it seriously, or anything...

Just claim bigfoot killed the dog and move on...

I am Bigfoot · 16th July 2012, 09:23 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

LOL. I understand what I'm dealing with. The posts I see in PGF threads have shown me that nicely.

You clearly freaking don't since you absolutely refuse to back up any of your claims with evidence.

Quote:

Lets just say Leroy Blevins isn't the greatest man for debunking things. hahahaha

Most here think Leroy is a kook or eccentric to one degree or another. Mocking him isn't some nail in the afigbootist coffin. You fail. Again.

Night Walker · 16th July 2012, 09:23 PM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

^I know some people have been sending in samples. I don't know which ones, but hopefully the right ones. I think they're also looking at cases of human/sasquatch hybridization.

Have those that have sent in samples got any documentation that the samples were actually received?

Do you know of any who are having trouble even getting a reply when contacting the Project? The deadline for submissions is fast approaching...

OntarioSquatch · 16th July 2012, 09:30 PM

@night walker I honestly don't know. If you join bigfootforums, there are people who will be able to answer these questions better than I can.

AttorneyTom · 16th July 2012, 09:42 PM

Originally Posted by Night Walker

Have those that have sent in samples got any documentation that the samples were actually received?

Do you know of any who are having trouble even getting a reply when contacting the Project? The deadline for submissions is fast approaching...

You are also the same.

Drewbot · 17th July 2012, 12:15 AM

Imagine the skunk in the irrigation tube scenario, why would a predator of such legend have to resort to such potentially hazardous prey? Maybe Foots remembers some herbal remedy from it's civilized past that deodorizes skunk stank or something.

dafydd · 17th July 2012, 01:20 AM

Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch

@night walker I honestly don't know. If you join bigfootforums, there are people who will be able to answer these questions better than I can.

I doubt that very much.

mikeyx · 17th July 2012, 07:05 AM

Originally Posted by dafydd

I doubt that very much.

thats okay, they say the same thing about this place and both have some funny and ironic points.

There: operate on the presumption the creature exists and can border on cultish belief in certain circles.

Here: The cultishness is dedicated to debunking not consideration of all evidence.

Both have their flaws.

GT/CS · 17th July 2012, 07:53 AM

All anyone needs to do is show us some decent evidence.

Resume · 17th July 2012, 08:16 AM

Originally Posted by mikeyx

thats okay, they say the same thing about this place and both have some funny and ironic points.

There: operate on the presumption the creature exists and can border on cultish belief in certain circles.

Here: The cultishness is dedicated to debunking not consideration of all evidence.

Both have their flaws.

Do you have a specific example of Bigfoot evidence you'd like to see considered?

I am Bigfoot · 17th July 2012, 08:17 AM

Originally Posted by mikeyx

Here: The cultishness is dedicated to debunking not consideration of all evidence.

Both have their flaws.

What evidence are we supposed to consider?

"Look I saw a bigfoot"

We can't do much with that.

"Look I got me a DNA sample. It's a match to humans. Told you bigfoot was real"

"Look here at this awful footage I got. Just pretend it ain't all shakin' about. And it's clear. And in focus. And isn't just a shadow."

"We've got us a self proclaimed expert. You can tell they're good cause the word pro is in the word proclaimed. He tells me bigfoot's real. You can trust him. He ain't ever lied. Except when he did. Lot's of times actually... But we're going to ignore those times out of convenience."

"Here's some bigfoot footprints. You can tell bigfoot made them because they're bigfoot footprints. It's right there in the name"

Do you have something that isn't this? I would like to see it.

Drewbot · 17th July 2012, 08:47 AM

I think all of Bigfootry has signed the Ketchum NDA (non-disclosure agreement), they have all agreed not to disclose any example of actual Bigfoot evidence.

mikeyx · 17th July 2012, 08:50 AM

Originally Posted by I am Bigfoot

What evidence are we supposed to consider?

"Look I saw a bigfoot"

We can't do much with that.

"Look I got me a DNA sample. It's a match to humans. Told you bigfoot was real"

"Look here at this awful footage I got. Just pretend it ain't all shakin' about. And it's clear. And in focus. And isn't just a shadow."

"We've got us a self proclaimed expert. You can tell they're good cause the word pro is in the word proclaimed. He tells me bigfoot's real. You can trust him. He ain't ever lied. Except when he did. Lot's of times actually... But we're going to ignore those times out of convenience."

"Here's some bigfoot footprints. You can tell bigfoot made them because they're bigfoot footprints. It's right there in the name"

Do you have something that isn't this? I would like to see it.

you're yelling at me for the wrong thing the debunking argument was much more generalized than just the monkey.

16th July 2012, 08:06 PM	#1721
I am Bigfoot Critical Thinker Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 307	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch http://i48.tinypic.com/54j4t0.jpg (Asafa Powell) http://i48.tinypic.com/195n5v.jpg (Tyson Gay) http://i47.tinypic.com/2llk31v.jpg (Asafa & Usain Bolt) ^Those are the three fastest men on the planet. So you agree with me then? None of them have the muscle bulk to perform the extreme feats of strength attributed to bigfoot. Also, look at their training. Your woods hobo would need to do more than them in order to be able to do all the stuff all those ~~liars~~ witnesses and "experts" claim it can do.
	Last edited by I am Bigfoot; 16th July 2012 at 08:14 PM.

16th July 2012, 08:10 PM	#1722
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch http://i48.tinypic.com/54j4t0.jpg (Asafa Powell) http://i48.tinypic.com/195n5v.jpg (Tyson Gay) http://i47.tinypic.com/2llk31v.jpg (Asafa & Usain Bolt) ^Those are the three fastest men on the planet. Well.. that well placed and thought out logic settles it for me. So.. I guess I will just thaw out my "steak" and get out the A-1 Sauce. This fur is rather hard to chew. I thought I ordered a Tenderloin ?
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883

16th July 2012, 08:11 PM	#1723
Jodie Graduate Poster Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 1,892	Just to clarify, the bigfooters do not say that these samples are HSS, what they are claiming is that heretofore, the samples were close enough to human that they did not show anything unusual when first being screened by forensic testing, or later through BLAST. What is more incredulous is that an asphalt engineer could use an excel spread sheet to run statistics on the mitochondrial sequences and from that determine that we have something unique when it took complex algorithms to figure out where the Neandertal DNA differed from HSS DNA.
Jodie Graduate Poster Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 1,892	__________________ testis unus, testis nullus quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur

16th July 2012, 08:18 PM	#1727
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883	Originally Posted by I am Bigfoot So now you're saying bigfoot is a super chimp? I dont know.. they are good at card games. ie. "Lancealot Link ".. these steak fur balls are horrible !
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883

16th July 2012, 08:25 PM	#1728
GT/CS Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 3,591	HJFC, why do you continue to post here?
GT/CS Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 3,591	__________________ SweatyYeti or Bill Munns would be my vote for looking at this - BFSleuth @ BFF I've got plenty of common sense! I just choose to ignore it. - Calvin; October 15, 1986

16th July 2012, 08:13 PM	#1724
OntarioSquatch Critical Thinker Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 485	Originally Posted by I am Bigfoot So you agree with me then? None of them have the muscle bulk to perform the extreme feats of strength attributed to bigfoot ^ Oh that's what you mean. Well, adult male chimps are about 100lbs yet they are stronger than any of us. They generate more strength, even though they are smaller. Now, Sasquatch don't use tools so they would evolve to rely on their physical attributes instead. Multiply that 100lb chimp by 6 or more and you've now got the strongest animal in North America.

16th July 2012, 08:14 PM	#1725
I am Bigfoot Critical Thinker Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 307	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch ^ Oh that's what you mean. Well, adult male chimps are about 100lbs yet they are stronger than any of us. They generate more strength, even though they are smaller. Now, Sasquatch don't use tools so they would evolve to rely on their physical attributes instead. Multiply that 100lb chimp by 6 or more and you've now got the strongest animal in North America. So now you're saying bigfoot is a super chimp?

16th July 2012, 08:18 PM	#1726
OntarioSquatch Critical Thinker Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 485	I'm saying that size and strength don't correlate well between us and wild animals that don't use tools.

16th July 2012, 08:26 PM	#1729
I am Bigfoot Critical Thinker Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 307	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch I'm saying that how much you know about genetics and evolution does not correlate much with how much you talk about genetics and evolution. Fixed that for you.
	Last edited by I am Bigfoot; 16th July 2012 at 08:34 PM.

16th July 2012, 08:34 PM	#1730
OntarioSquatch Critical Thinker Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 485	Originally Posted by GT/CS HJFC, why do you continue to post here? The same reasons you guys post here.

16th July 2012, 08:38 PM	#1731
I am Bigfoot Critical Thinker Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 307	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch The same reasons you guys post here. We post here to have serious discussions about usually not-so-serious topics. You come here to parrot things you've been told and just made up and can't support with facts.

16th July 2012, 08:40 PM	#1732
OntarioSquatch Critical Thinker Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 485	I'm not making things up here. I'm actually trying to bring some sense into this little world of scepticism.

16th July 2012, 08:45 PM	#1733
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch I'm not making things up here. I'm actually trying to bring some sense into this little world of scepticism. What ? That is all you bring to this. You make up everything.. well everything that you have seen that someone else made up ? I will give you half the credit. Could you make up some more things for us ? Do they bowl or play family games for example ? What is their favorite food on fridays ? Can they fan themselves to keep cool ? Do BF prefer a certain type of coyote to hang out with ?
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883

16th July 2012, 08:47 PM	#1734
OntarioSquatch Critical Thinker Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 485	^As far as I know, they have a dislike for canines. ETA - And believe me I'm not making these up. Same goes for what I've said about Dr. Ketchum's study, Dr. Meldrum, Bill Munns ect ect Otherwise I should change my name to LeroySquatch
	Last edited by OntarioSquatch; 16th July 2012 at 08:50 PM.

16th July 2012, 08:50 PM	#1735
GT/CS Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 3,591	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch ^As far as I know, they have a dislike for canines. ETA - And believe me I'm not making these up. Same goes for what I've said about Dr. Ketchum's study, Dr. Meldrum, Bill Munns ect ect Please post data showing why you think they dislike canines.
GT/CS Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 3,591	__________________ SweatyYeti or Bill Munns would be my vote for looking at this - BFSleuth @ BFF I've got plenty of common sense! I just choose to ignore it. - Calvin; October 15, 1986

16th July 2012, 08:51 PM	#1736
OntarioSquatch Critical Thinker Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 485	^The countless reports of dogs getting killed, rocks being thrown ect

16th July 2012, 08:55 PM	#1737
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch ^The countless reports of dogs getting killed, rocks being thrown ect They also have bad credit scores.
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883

16th July 2012, 08:56 PM	#1738
GT/CS Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 3,591	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch ^The countless reports of dogs getting killed, rocks being thrown ect I haven't heard of dogs being killed by bigfoots. Please post links to such articles. Do they throw rocks at the dogs?
GT/CS Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 3,591	__________________ SweatyYeti or Bill Munns would be my vote for looking at this - BFSleuth @ BFF I've got plenty of common sense! I just choose to ignore it. - Calvin; October 15, 1986

16th July 2012, 08:57 PM	#1739
OntarioSquatch Critical Thinker Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 485	Originally Posted by AttorneyTom They also have bad credit scores. That's true, but I consider many real.

16th July 2012, 08:58 PM	#1740
OntarioSquatch Critical Thinker Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 485	Originally Posted by GT/CS I haven't heard of dogs being killed by bigfoots. Please post links to such articles. Do they throw rocks at the dogs? lol, I'd rather not go through so many reports again, but yeah they show aggression towards pet dogs.

16th July 2012, 09:00 PM	#1741
GT/CS Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 3,591	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch lol, I'd rather not go through so many reports again, but yeah they show aggression towards pet dogs. So you're willing to admit to everyone here that you are just making everything up and you are a liar and/or a troll?
GT/CS Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 3,591	__________________ SweatyYeti or Bill Munns would be my vote for looking at this - BFSleuth @ BFF I've got plenty of common sense! I just choose to ignore it. - Calvin; October 15, 1986

16th July 2012, 09:00 PM	#1742
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch That's true, but I consider many real. They throw rocks at everything ! Dogs, people, bad movies at the DriveIn whatever it is that is disturbing their search for food or peace !
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883

16th July 2012, 09:04 PM	#1743
OntarioSquatch Critical Thinker Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 485	Originally Posted by GT/CS So you're willing to admit to everyone here that you are just making everything up and you are a liar and/or a troll? Um, no. But I wouldn't go through hundreds of the same reports again.

16th July 2012, 09:06 PM	#1744
GT/CS Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 3,591	Check and mate. Any shred of respect you may have had here is now gone. The next time you start posting on a site make sure you understand what that site is about and who your audience is.
GT/CS Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 3,591	__________________ SweatyYeti or Bill Munns would be my vote for looking at this - BFSleuth @ BFF I've got plenty of common sense! I just choose to ignore it. - Calvin; October 15, 1986

16th July 2012, 09:09 PM	#1745
LTC8K6 Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail Posts: 12,616	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch I'm not making things up here. I'm actually trying to bring some sense into this little world of scepticism. You are just parroting things we have heard 10 times over already...
	__________________ What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break?

16th July 2012, 09:12 PM	#1746
OntarioSquatch Critical Thinker Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 485	LOL. I understand what I'm dealing with. The posts I see in PGF threads have shown me that nicely. Lets just say Leroy Blevins isn't the greatest man for debunking things. hahahaha

16th July 2012, 09:14 PM	#1747
GT/CS Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 3,591	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch LOL. I understand what I'm dealing with. The posts I see in PGF threads have shown me that nicely. Lets just say Leroy Blevins isn't the greatest man for debunking things. hahahaha I'm not sure what you're talking about. Please elaborate.
GT/CS Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 3,591	__________________ SweatyYeti or Bill Munns would be my vote for looking at this - BFSleuth @ BFF I've got plenty of common sense! I just choose to ignore it. - Calvin; October 15, 1986

16th July 2012, 09:14 PM	#1748
LTC8K6 Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail Posts: 12,616	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch ^The countless reports of dogs getting killed, rocks being thrown ect If bigfoot killed a dog, bigfoot DNA would be all over the dog's body. You seem very interested in bigfoot DNA. There would also be bigfoot hairs all over the place. If the dog scratched bigfoot, as it surely would, there'd be bigfoot tissue under the dog's nails. The dog also likely got in a bite or two, drawing bigfoot blood. But don't take it seriously, or anything... Just claim bigfoot killed the dog and move on...
	__________________ What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break?

16th July 2012, 09:23 PM	#1749
I am Bigfoot Critical Thinker Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 307	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch LOL. I understand what I'm dealing with. The posts I see in PGF threads have shown me that nicely. You clearly freaking don't since you absolutely refuse to back up any of your claims with evidence. Quote: Lets just say Leroy Blevins isn't the greatest man for debunking things. hahahaha Most here think Leroy is a kook or eccentric to one degree or another. Mocking him isn't some nail in the afigbootist coffin. You fail. Again.
	Last edited by I am Bigfoot; 16th July 2012 at 09:24 PM.

16th July 2012, 09:23 PM	#1750
Night Walker Scholar Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: "Terror" Australis Posts: 116	Oxford-Lausanne Collateral Hominid Project Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch ^I know some people have been sending in samples. I don't know which ones, but hopefully the right ones. I think they're also looking at cases of human/sasquatch hybridization. Have those that have sent in samples got any documentation that the samples were actually received? Do you know of any who are having trouble even getting a reply when contacting the Project? The deadline for submissions is fast approaching...

16th July 2012, 09:30 PM	#1751
OntarioSquatch Critical Thinker Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 485	@night walker I honestly don't know. If you join bigfootforums, there are people who will be able to answer these questions better than I can.

16th July 2012, 09:42 PM	#1752
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883	Originally Posted by Night Walker Have those that have sent in samples got any documentation that the samples were actually received? Do you know of any who are having trouble even getting a reply when contacting the Project? The deadline for submissions is fast approaching... You are also the same.
AttorneyTom Muse Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 883

17th July 2012, 12:15 AM	#1753
Drewbot Illuminator Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 3,846	Imagine the skunk in the irrigation tube scenario, why would a predator of such legend have to resort to such potentially hazardous prey? Maybe Foots remembers some herbal remedy from it's civilized past that deodorizes skunk stank or something.
Drewbot Illuminator Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 3,846	__________________ "I dont call that evolution, I call that the survival of the fittest." - Bulletmaker "I thought skeptics would usually point towards a hoax rather than a group being duped." - makaya325 Kit is not a skeptic. He is a former Bigfoot believer that changed his position to that of non believer.- Crowlogic

17th July 2012, 01:20 AM	#1754
dafydd Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Belgium (Flatland) Posts: 31,443	Originally Posted by OntarioSquatch @night walker I honestly don't know. If you join bigfootforums, there are people who will be able to answer these questions better than I can. I doubt that very much.
	__________________ Yesterday upon the stairs I met a man who wasn't there He wasn't there again today I wish that he would go away.

17th July 2012, 07:05 AM	#1755
mikeyx Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 3,570	Originally Posted by dafydd I doubt that very much. thats okay, they say the same thing about this place and both have some funny and ironic points. There: operate on the presumption the creature exists and can border on cultish belief in certain circles. Here: The cultishness is dedicated to debunking not consideration of all evidence. Both have their flaws.
mikeyx Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 3,570