| JREF Homepage | Swift Blog | Events Calendar | $1 Million Paranormal Challenge | The Amaz!ng Meeting | Useful Links | Support Us |
![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
|
|
#41 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 2,239
|
Did you not read the title clip? Andrews AFB ATC audio. Source: Me
ETA: I kept all of these audios online for years. But finally I realized I was an idiot spending hundreds of dollars a year in bandwidth just to keep them online. I put a lot of them on MegaUploads, but drats, the federal government put an end to that. So, if you need the source files, they can still be downloaded in a bulk package here. |
|
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In Space
Posts: 2,030
|
I'm not sure why Tom is questioning the authenticity this audio file. Cheney said he gave a shoot down authorization at around 10:15 (he gave it to the Secret Service who were communicating with Andrews AFB). The audio tape time is 10:16.
We also know that the Andrews Fighters had shoot down authority when they launched, as well, based on their statements. They did not receive the NORAD frequencies and eventually fall under the control of NORAD until sometime in the 10:45 - 11:00 time frame. The Langley Fighters were overhead DC at this time, but as far as I know they did not receive this information thru NORAD. They eventually had shoot down authorization some time later. (Exact time is unknown to me) |
|
__________________
Debunking the North of Citgo Theory |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 2,239
|
Here ya go. Uploaded the source file for you just so there will be no misunderstandings
|
|
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,978
|
I appreciate what you've provided.
I simply asked for the source & vetting. You can't be the source, BC, because you didn't make the recording. I see (& saw) that you say that it came from Andrews ATC. I assume your post means that you got if from somebody. Perhaps as a part of an FOIA request. That would be the info that I was asking for. I said that it doesn't sound authentic to me. I didn't say that it wasn't authentic. I was asking simply because it is always good to check. I don't mind if truthers use crappy, unverified, falsified recordings (with sounds of explosions added, for example). I do mind if debunkers start getting sloppy with our info. You have clearly got authentic recordings here. Having heard the rest of the recording, now I'm sure. Thank you. ___ By way of explanation... The thing that sounds strange is that it sounds too clean, no chatter of any sort in the background, nobody stepping on his transmission, no loss of squelch, etc. This is very unusual for any ATC that I've ever heard in any high traffic, urban area. Especially on the east coast, in the Washington - Boston corridor. Usually you've got 4 - 10 pilots waiting for someone to take a breath so that they can break in & state their requests. The same warning starting at 37:25 sounds like the transmissions that I'm used to hearing. Messy. But the thing that fooled me is that all of my experience has been with civilian ATCs at civilian airfields. Listening to the source file you then posted (preceding post), I can tell that the recording is authentic. What is clear from listening to the file that you posted is that Andrews dealt with far, far fewer planes than any of the civilian airports in the Washington area on that date & time. I can also tell that there is far more dead air on the tower frequencies than I am used to. There is simply far, far fewer military aircraft operating than civilian. ___ BTW, one transmission (starting @ 20:05) sounds like it says that "Bully 1 & 2 will be parking on Echo & Army with Live". Reheat, does "... with Live" refer to armaments? Later (@31:28 ), Bully 1 has returned, and the tower says "Bully 1, taxi to arm. Echo is closed." Same question. What is "arm"? ___ Also, anyone who thinks that there was a stand-down should start listening at @ 20:50. At about 21:50, Bully-1 gets order to take off to intercept a plane. It is imminently clear from the recording that there is zero dickaround factor in getting him off the ground. Again at 25:00, a second flight (CAPS 1) requests permission to depart. There is ZERO hesitation. He's gone. tom |
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 2,239
|
|
|
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In Space
Posts: 2,030
|
Tom, echo taxiway was apparently being used for arming the fighters. Perhaps it was temporary for some reason....maybe closer to the armament storage area, perhaps...
Yea, arming live is referring to arming the aircraft with real live weapons. They began arming the fighters returning from NC immediately upon their return from that mission except for Bully 1, then began arming him after his short excursion over the Pentagon and up the river a bit... Caps was Sasserville and Penny a separate flight of two that were only partially armed. If you listened later the Wild flight was maybe the same aircraft as the returning Bully 2 & 3 rearmed and refueled. If so they did the refueling and rearming in about 45 minutes or so... Amazing! They can refuel and load weapons at he same time if necessary (If it was the same aircraft, they did do that). It's dangerous, but they do practice that. They can also refuel and load weapons with the engines running. Now, that is really dangerous, but the capability exists. A-10's do that routinely in order to generate sorties more rapidly... One of the most impressive things about this in my view that's not on the tape is that Bully 1 launched with very little fuel, taking-off with no afterburner and then returning with Emergency Fuel, no doubt. He sounds calm, but he was extremely short on fuel and flew a straight-in approach. He also went to the arming area and was being regenerated to fly again... Once they made the decision to go the folks at Andrews really hustled in generating aircraft. There was no "foot dragging" and they did a phenomenal job of getting it all together... The ANG has mostly very experienced and capable people who enjoy what they do and are very good at it... They don't have the discipline problems and some of the other extraneous issues that plagues the active force. All military airfields are not as slow as Andrews was on the tape.. But, they generally don't have the same amount of traffic as a busy civilian airport. It's sporadic and not consistent like busy civilian ones... Regarding the radio clarity... Most military towers transmit on both VHF and UHF simultaneously, so maybe that makes a difference combined with less busy radio traffic... You probably noted that both Ground and Tower were being handled by the same controller. That is not normal as they are usually separate, but obviously they were not busy, so they combined the two during the period of the tape... |
|
__________________
Debunking the North of Citgo Theory |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,978
|
BC, No, you didn't make the recording that I wanted to validate, unless you knew about 9/11 ahead of time & managed to talk your way into the Andrews AFB ATC with a recorder & plug into their radios. which I certainly doubt. I was not trying to validate the authenticity of a YouTube recording. That is irrelevant to me & I'll go out on a limb by saying "irrelevant to anyone". I was trying to validate the authenticity of the voice & the events represented in the recording from Andrews ATC. The original recording that you provided could easily have been a hoax. It is my responsibility (IMO) to verify that the info that I spread to others is valid, is not a hoax. If I ever cite your recording, it is my obligation to make sure that it is not a hoax. There are a couple of ways to do that. One is to check on the paper trail of the ORIGINAL information. This is: person speaking, identified by name and/or occupation was recorded by: exact group on: exact date It was obtained by: person directly from: organization on: date Along with some reasonable statement of the path that the info took to your hands. This is the same process that one goes thru validating ANY info. A second way to get a very good indication of its veracity is by listening to more of the recording. This method is not foolproof, but in this case, is good enough to be conclusive. In my opinion. Probably not in some Truthers' opinions, who believe that da gubbamint can fake any recording that it wants. The point here is that you know the big picture associated with all of your info (if you've done your homework). I don't. Asking for validation of all information is not only reasonable. It is (again, IMO) obligatory. It is not questioning your honesty. That is EXACTLY the knee jerk, soap opera, theatrical response that charlatans like Steven Jones, Chandler, Harrit, et al. take. You'll note that Millette, whenever asked detail questions about his methods does not get offended, fly off the handle & storm out of the conversation. He simply answers the questions. Contrast that response to the responses of Jones & Harrit & Chandler. Thanks for the recording. tom |
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 145
|
Yet,you're claiming they used the TSD to 'track' aircraft they KNEW were off course and NOT following their filed flight plan ! Then turn round & say everyone did a bang up,good job on 911. Lol,it's extreme incompetence at the very least,yet not a single head rolled ! How do you explain that? Certainly THEY KNOW how THEIR OWN system works,don't they?
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 2,239
|
|
|
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 180
|
Just wanted to bump this thread to add some more documentation and references for the future when the subject gets rehashed again. Belger claimed he did not talk to Mineta about the plane that struck the Pentagon.
Monte Belger interview with commission staff.
Quote:
This may be the same source with a little different wording.
Quote:
Page 5: http://www.scribd.com/doc/17183201/t...-42004-Mfr-835 Mineta stating that Mrs. Cheney was also in the PEOC when he arrived. (3:45) http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=u-5PKQTUz5o "AUTHOR" (codename for Mrs. Cheney) was logged into the PEOC at 9:52. According to Aidan Monaghan's book, page 41. Secret Service agent says he does not move the vice president until after AA77 made its turn to the south.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 9,735
|
That's the turn south to begin the 330° loop, right?
According to the NTSB Flight Path Study, that was at 09:34, and AA77 was about 3.5 miles west-southwest of the Pentagon. The claim that they didn't start moving Cheney out of his White House office until after this time, 9:34, would be at odds with the Secret Service log in Aidan Monaghan's book, page 41, which has the Cheney group entering the PEOC at 9:33. But either way, Cheney would have been too late to the PEOC to be told AA77 was out 50 miles, and Mineta would have been too late for that twice over. |
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 180
|
You are correct.
Quote:
Quote:
I'm currently looking for more verification of Mrs. Cheney's arrival time to add to the reasons why Mineta was wrong. |
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 180
|
Finally, after six years of existence the pilots for 9/11 truth forum has made itself useful for something.
Quote:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/i...howtopic=22200 Or this link for direct download: http://www.mediafire.com/?vydb4nxdmyy#! |
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,123
|
remember what belger said:
Belger learned of the crash into the Pentagon shortly after it happened. He and Garvey got on the phone with Norm Mineta who decided to bring everything down (around 9:45)which was implemented. Belger continued to monitor the system as it executed this order. All aircraft were down and the system grounded by 12:15. from mineta's commission record: "within a few minutes, american flight 77 crashed into the pentagon. at this time, as we discussed the situation with the north american aerospace defense (norad) commander and his staff, we considered implementing an emergency system of coordinated air traffic management to allow maximum use for defensie activities. it was clear that we had to clear the airspace as soon as possible to stop any further attacks and ensure domestic airspace was available for emeregency and defensive use. so, at approximately 9:45am less than one hr after i had first been notified of an airplane crash in new york, i gave the faa the final order for all civil aircraft to land at the nearest airport as soon as possible. it was the first shutdown of civil aviation in the history of the united states." see how belger is right on target with what mineta says. |
|
__________________
OPERATION GLADIO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio STRATEGY OF TENSION http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategy_of_tension OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 180
|
Belger has also said that the order to land all aircraft came from the ATCSCC (I'll try to dig up the quote when I have more time).
He also said he does not recall talking to Mineta about the "high-speed VFR" that was first reported east of Dulles, the aircraft that eventually crashed into the Pentagon. Also, Mineta said that Mrs. Cheney was already in the PEOC when he arrived. The Secret Service did not take her there until after the Pentagon crash. |
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Space for Rent
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sunny blue sky, cold water.
Posts: 4,461
|
|
|
__________________
"Yes. I often wonder why it is that the nutjobs, who clearly think they're among a tiny handful of people who "get it", are wholly incapable of communicating effectively enough so that other people can understand them and "get it", too." Gee Mack, JREF 5/15/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,123
|
ok so? belger puts mineta saying that at 945.
the plane coming down the river approach that berger was relaying to mineta was probably NOT what crashed into the pentagon. so berger was correct in saying that. berger probably saw the radar tracks after it happened. mineta said he also saw the radar tracks after it happened. from those tracts, berger probably felt that the down the river approacing aircraft (or whatever it was) was in fact not 77. so belger did not talk to mineta about what hit the pentagon. i think you got the hots for mrs cheney!! mineta has a series of events that take place that makes sense. even belger states he gave the order at 945. it makes sense. period. |
|
__________________
OPERATION GLADIO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio STRATEGY OF TENSION http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategy_of_tension OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 180
|
Not necessarily. We don't know if the "(9:45)" was a note made by the person interviewing him or if Belger actually said it himself. We'll know for sure when they release the recordings of the interview.
Let's say he did say 9:45. That still does not put Mineta in the PEOC as flight 77 approached DC, it only puts him there before the commission's claimed time. Others agree that Mineta thinks he ordered ATC zero when he actually didn't:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Mrs. Cheney is irrelevant. However, what the Secret Service says is. |
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,123
|
to me, it reads as though belger said 945 and then the person writing the memo just paraphrased or gave a quick synopsis of the event. so when are they suppose to release the interview? it would be nice if someone could interview belger!
even if the down the river approaching target was not what hit the pentagon, it happened very close to when the pentagon got hit. there is a whole logical flow about mineta's timeline: mineta: "Then they came in and said it was 10 miles out. Soon after that, I was talking to the deputy director of the FAA, and he told me they had lost the target off the screen. Soon after that, then, the vice president was informed that there was an explosion at the Pentagon. So I was trying to relate with the air traffic controllers where that plane went to see whether it was close to the Pentagon. The radar is very difficult to pinpoint it to a ground location. But while I was talking to the FAA, someone broke into the conversation and said, 'Mr. Secretary, we have just had confirmation from the Arlington County Police Department that they saw a commercial airliner-an American airline-go into the Pentagon. Well, its like anything else, if you see one of something occur you consider that an accident. But when you see two of the same thing occur then you know that there is a pattern or a trend. In this instant we had three of the same thing occur, and that is a program or a plan. So I then informed the FAA to bring all the airplanes down." http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Norman_Mineta that story you linked reads like fiction. from the link- "although FAA officials had begged him to maintain the fiction..." who are these unnamed faa officials so we can ask them. haha... what we can debate is what that "bogey" was coming from the down the river approach. was it a wargame "input". from blogger: NORAD OPERATIONS CENTER ASKS FOR 'EXERCISE INPUTS' TO BE STOPPED At 10:12 a.m., an officer at the NORAD operations center, "Captain Taylor," called NEADS and spoke to Captain Brian Nagel, the chief of live exercises there. After introducing himself, Taylor said, "What we need you to do right now is to terminate all exercise inputs coming into Cheyenne Mountain." Nagel gave Taylor an extension number and asked him to call it to get the exercise inputs stopped. Taylor replied, "I'll do that." [4] "Inputs," according to an article in Vanity Fair, are simulated scenarios that are put into play by a simulations team during training exercises. [5] link please. so now in you mind, when mineta was speaking about the DRA bogey, was he speaking before or after belger knew about the "high-speed primary" and got on the phone with mineta? i cant follow your logic with that above sentence. yep. about the same time too. so when would you like that mineta/belger conversation to take place? lol. as oystein pointed out, those SS people have times all over the place. |
|
__________________
OPERATION GLADIO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio STRATEGY OF TENSION http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategy_of_tension OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Space for Rent
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sunny blue sky, cold water.
Posts: 4,461
|
|
|
__________________
"Yes. I often wonder why it is that the nutjobs, who clearly think they're among a tiny handful of people who "get it", are wholly incapable of communicating effectively enough so that other people can understand them and "get it", too." Gee Mack, JREF 5/15/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 9,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Devilish Dictionarian
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: An elusive house at Bachelor's Grove Cemetery
Posts: 4,490
|
|
|
__________________
"Things that never happened before happen all the time." (Scott Sagan, 1993) "Put down the Wite-Out and step away from the dictionary." (000063, 2012) "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof." (John Kenneth Galbraith, 1971) |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 180
|
I'm not sure when it's supposed to happen, but Miles Kara has said on his blog that the National Archives plan on releasing them eventually.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,123
|
right here:
have you read all the way through aiden FOIA paper. page 5 of 18 reads that: "upon arrival at the shelter, the VP, mrs cheney, and saic zotto, vp protective divison were present. VP cheney was taking on the telephone. SAIC truscott said that he advised the group to move to the PEOC." do you think this took place at 0933? the timeline is where the 0933 is(page 6 of 18). the timeline put the event above with mrs cheney at 0930. |
|
__________________
OPERATION GLADIO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio STRATEGY OF TENSION http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategy_of_tension OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,123
|
cool
so i now know why you want to discredit mineta! sliney said he had input from many people when he have the order. belger said mineta gave the order too around 0945. so no biggie about sliney. he was not looking at a TSD. get that through your head. they dont call tsd tracks a "target or bogey" as mineta described. ive even asked cheapshot about that. ok. belger got on the phone with mineta...ok. he didnt speak to mineta about the high speed VFR. he spoke to him about the bogey or target going the down the river approach. i know that is where you are trying to steer mineta. good luck with that!! lol what your trying to say is mineta didnt know about the pentagon attack until after 1028? after the pentagon is hit is when the whole series of events take place for him to give his "stand down" order. also, that reporter you linked to said mineta was 15mins behind on the stand down order. this 1028 time would place his order WAY later. i think your playing smoke and mirrors. mineta describes the whole series of events very well. also, when do you think belger spoke with mineta about the pentagon strike? this puts her closer. page 5 of 18 reads that: "upon arrival at the shelter, the VP, mrs cheney, and saic zotto, vp protective divison were present. VP cheney was taking on the telephone. SAIC truscott said that he advised the group to move to the PEOC." the timeline is where the 0933 is for the VP to enter the peoc (page 6 of 18). the timeline put the event above with mrs cheney at 0930. |
|
__________________
OPERATION GLADIO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio STRATEGY OF TENSION http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategy_of_tension OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 180
|
It's not about discrediting Mineta, it's about discrediting you and others who claim, with absolutely no proof, that another aircraft was approaching Washington DC from the northwest at the same time as flight 77. It never happened and I'll tell you why.
Reagan National was running North operations on the morning of 9/11. No controller has ever come forward saying there was an aircraft coming down the DRA on the morning of 9/11. It's not heard anywhere in the recordings and is not anywhere in any of the radar data. Aircraft departing from Reagan fly up the river for noise abatement just like aircraft coming down the river. The controllers would have been throwing a fit if what you claim happened.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Belger spoke with Mineta sometime after the Pentagon impact.
Quote:
ETA: let's say the Secret Service's time of 9:33 is correct. And let's also say by some miracle that the young man reporting the aircraft position to Cheney was already there and had the unknown aircraft located. If Mineta also miraculously arrived there minute later at 9:34, flight 77 was already less than 20 miles away from the White House. Mineta first reported the aircraft as 50 miles out (80 miles in one interview). The timing simply does not work out for you. |
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,123
|
since belger was telling him about the "targert" or "bogey", i would guess it came from the faa HQ.
not if the said bogey was in "input" from the wargames and it only confused people at faa HQ and the people their communications linked up with. the NMCC was linked up with the faa at 920. anyone else that you know of? sounds good. belger gives the order by mineta at 0945. not when he was speaking about the DRA plane that was a "target" or a "bogey". yes, but you are trying to push back his series of events to start at 1028 with the plane being 50 miles out. that makes zero sense. he would have known the pentagon was hit by then and would not have had to go threw those series of events to get to the 945 planes down order. lol....its interesting that one secret service record says she didnt arrive until 0952. then another says 0930. maybe the cheneys had doubles running around to confuse everyone!! your assuming that the track they say is 77 is what belger and mineta was talking about. i think something (maybe nothing but an "input") was coming in from DRA and it confused some people. isnt that a good way to attack someone. make them think they are coming from one direction but turns out they came from another. |
|
__________________
OPERATION GLADIO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio STRATEGY OF TENSION http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategy_of_tension OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In Space
Posts: 2,030
|
|
|
__________________
Debunking the North of Citgo Theory |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 180
|
No proof = pure fantasy.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It all ended at 10:28 when the TSD flight 93 landed at Reagan. Mineta and Belger's conversation took place before 10:28 when the unknown aircraft was 80/50/30/10 miles out from the White House. How could you possibly come to the conclusion that I meant after 10:28?
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,123
|
?where do you think belger was?
did i say that? nope. others were though. he probably saw mrs cheney in the hall or something since the SS records show her outside at 0930. notice below he does not say on the TSD screen. he says on radar! from mineta- "I started to establish a direct line to the FAA to find out what was going on, and the Vice President and I were across from each other on the conference room table in the PEOC, and about this time someone came in and said this was -- when I finally got in there, it was probably about 9:27, is what I recall. And a little later on, someone said, "Mr. Vice President, there's a plane 50-miles out." So I was talking to Monte Belger, the Deputy Director of the FAA, and I said, "Monte, what do you have 50-miles out?" He said, "Well, we have a target, bogey, on the radar, but the transponder's been turned off, so we have no identification of this aircraft. We don't know who it is. We don't know what altitude it's at, speed or anything else. All we're doing is watching with the sweep of the radar, the dot moving from position to position." So then someone came in, the same person came in and said, "Mr. Vice President, it -- the plane's 30-miles out." So I said, "Monte, can you see it, and where is it in relationship to the ground?" He said, "Well, that's difficult to really determine. I would guess it's somewhere between Great Falls and National Airport, coming what they call the DRA, the down river approach." And so then the person came in and said, "Mr. Vice President, the plane's ten-miles out," and so I said, "Monte, where is it?" and he said, "Well, I'm not really sure but I'd be guessing somewhere maybe between the USA Today building and, and National Airport." And then pretty soon he said, "Oh-oh, we just lost the target." And so a few moments later, someone came in and said, "Mr. Vice President, there's been an explosion at the Pentagon." So I said, "Monte, is there something -- can you identify it as being at the Pentagon?" He said, "No, we can't really pinpoint it like that." Then about that time someone broke into our phone conversation and said, "Mr. Secretary, we've had a call from an Arlington County police officer saying that he saw an American Airlines airplane go into the Pentagon." At that point I said, "Monte, bring all the airplanes down," http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Norman_Mineta from the above quote from mineta. sorry but it looks as though NO TSD was there: "The TSD was not available in the Aviation Crisis Center that day. The capability existed but they did not display it." http://911myths.com/images/1/10/Team...eikert-MFR.pdf your getting desperate! mineta said about 0927 from the above quote. the SS logs show her there at 0930. he probably saw her in the hallway or something. good god man. here is something interesting i found: He thinks secret service was on his primary net - Chuck Green - He does not know from the WOC log if notification meant they were asked to join the net. State; FBI; USSS; DOD for a short period of time; White House Situation Room; NMCC was brought in as a "listening mode". NMCC is the conduit to the Special Operations groups. He doesn't recall a male or a female voice, or DOD identifying themselves. We were trying to raise them when we were tracking the plane that crashed in the Pentagon. Belger was in the room at the time. He was monitoring both nets. http://911myths.com/images/1/10/Team...eikert-MFR.pdf could this be more info dealing with the bogey going the down the river approach! |
|
__________________
OPERATION GLADIO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio STRATEGY OF TENSION http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategy_of_tension OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 2,239
|
You know, I never seen so much dancing around a moot point since the CIT days.
1) The evacuation of the White House grounds did not take place until 9:35 at the earliest. We have a video record of that evacuation (the press was part of it). 2) Mineta arrived (by his own testimony) after the evacuation began. 3) AAL77 did not follow the path described by Mineta. However, even if all of that is not true and Mineta was in the PEOC during the approach of AAL77, so what? Changes nothing. Big deal. Who gives a crap? |
|
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 | ||
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,123
|
dancing around? i think you should say that about boone 870...not me.
look at page 10 of 18. second paragraph. .......first family locator board that the VP was the only one on complex and in the west wing. I heard ___ on the phone at his dest acknowledging that we were activating the emergency evacualtion plan. that is when they picked up cheny and ran him down to the peoc. i believe some records say he was on the phone for 10 mins before even entering the peoc. the record says cheney went in at 933. the vp and mrs cheney outside the peoc at 0930. so go a few mins back to when they activated the evacuation plan and you get 0920ish. sounds like mineta timeframe to me! look above no **** sherlock. that is what we have been discussing.
2 things 1. do the orders still stand 2. the DRA "target" or "bogey" |
||
|
__________________
OPERATION GLADIO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio STRATEGY OF TENSION http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategy_of_tension OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird |
|||
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 2,239
|
Means absolutely nothing since nobody has a clue what 'order' is referred to. Except that most likely it is the "shootdown authority" eventually given to the Andrews AFB fighters (BULLY).
As already noted, there was a UAL93 "target" in the system approaching along the "track" described by Mineta. Those two things alone seriously discredit your suggestion that Mineta was in the PEOC at the time of AAL77's approach. However, nothing about those 2 items change the record of events one iota. |
|
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,123
|
ok...what time was that? well somebody has a clue, that guy that took the order and was giving him the X miles out. cochran i think was his name. if remember, he has a classified account of the situation that we cant get access too.
that was a TSD track supposedly. from what i already posted to boone 870: "The TSD was not available in the Aviation Crisis Center that day. The capability existed but they did not display it." thats if you belive it was a shoot down order instead of something else and if they actually had access to a tsd machine which the ACC did not. |
|
__________________
OPERATION GLADIO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio STRATEGY OF TENSION http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategy_of_tension OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 2,239
|
Then they were looking at cartoons on TV, because they did not have radar at FAA HQ. They have TSD's.
Then the "order" could just have well been for Pepperoni pizza. All they was asking Cheney is whether or not he wanted sausage instead. Since they did not have radar and you claim they had no TSD, reckon that is all that is left
|
|
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 180
|
He was in the FAA HQ. You made the claim that another aircraft was approaching from the northwest at about the same time as Flight 77. You made the claim, now back it up or else you are just making stuff up.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The "nets" are phone nets, not radar or TSD. Belger has repeatedly claimed he was not talking to Mineta about the plane that crashed into the Pentagon. |
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,123
|
you dont believe mineta but here is another guy describing posibily the same plane. also look who he shared the info with...the ACC and secret service. didnt the SS provide the VP with the info in the PEOC. no we just need to find out where griffith got his info.
"There was a fast-mover 30 miles west of Dulles moving east bound - he did not know it was AAL 77 at the time. Griffith said he got the information on flight 77. He recalls that he had this information and he shared it with the people in the ACC. He doesn't know where the information came from. He recalls that there is a requirement at Washington National Airport to report all unusual aircraft situations to Secret Service. Someone told him we did contact the Secret Service, so he was satisfied." ive already linked it. its in jeffgriffith's pdf. also from belgers pdf: Belger was receiving "almost constant communication" with the Air Traffic group though Jeff Griffith. i didnt say that. wargames were going on. faa was not running wargames as far as i know. but info from others that were playing wargames could have got into the system. thats what im trying to figure out. so who lied. the SS that put her there at 0930 or the SS people that said she didnt arrive until 0952. its not wishfull thinking if mineta showed up around 0927. mrs cheney would have been outside with her hubby making that phone call. the TSD in the ACC was not up. i found out there was one in the WOC (which is on the same floor as the ACC) but belger said this about the TSD. belger: "Belger commented that he believes the only Traffic Situational Display (TSD) at FAA Headquarters was in the WOC. He does not know of any other TSD locations. [Note: Commission staff has learned that there are numerous TSD displays at FAA Headquarters, including the one referred to by Belger.] According to Belger, someone with air traffic experience would never use a TSD for precise data. When the airspace was cleared, the WOC used the TSD to monitor the number of aircraft still airborne. look above. he was all over the place. the ACC is in the same area as the WOC. from mike weikert's file who was in the ACC: "We were trying to raise them when we were tracking the plane that crashed in the Pentagon. Belger was in the room at the time. He was monitoring both nets." her times keep changing. first it was 0952. then we have her there at 0930. what time would you like for her to be there? i know that. like i said before, he probably found that out afterward when they showed him the offical flight path. if not, didnt someone impersonate cheapshot before 911 during one of the wargame exercises. i remember reading about that somewhere. ill try and find it. |
|
__________________
OPERATION GLADIO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio STRATEGY OF TENSION http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategy_of_tension OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 180
|
Again, the plane they were describing came from the west of Dulles, not from the northwest as Mineta has described. Belger said he did not discuss this plane with Mineta. No matter how hard you try and spin it, Belger was not talking to Mineta as Flight 77 approached the Pentagon.
Quote:
Quote:
Again, let's go with the 9:33 arrival time in the PEOC and put Mineta's arrival 1 min. later at 9:34. American 77 was less than 20 miles away from the White House, whereas Mineta says the plane was 80/50 miles out when he was there. The times and distances simply do not work out.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 9,735
|
Again, where did I say the SS was "all over the place"? I didn't.
I said that two log entries were at odds with each other. Which they were by a few minutes. Which doesn't mean they were "all over the place". It merely means they are not both entirely accurate - as anyone would find easy to understand, given the chaotic and improvised nature of the event. I said either log entry, if about correct, would make it impossible for Mineta's statements to be both about correct: That he arrived in the PEOC after both Mr and Mrs Cheney, and to have overheard someone announcing AA77 flying in from 50 miles out. Given Mineta's own personal timeline:
What his timeline and the SS logs (all of them) and the statements made by others (Cheney, Belger...) all converge on is that Mineta's recollection was faulty - he was in the PEOC after the Pentagon crash, and witnessed another plane being tracked on another route. Everything is consistent with everything else, if only you realize that Mineta errs on one, only one, detail, of which he only heard second hand and had to make sense of in retrospect. A very typical situation where memory gets confused. |
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 2,239
|
All I want to know is what kind of pizza Cheney ordered.
|
|
__________________
"Is your claim that the level of penetration is only governed by distance and not the material that is being penetrated?" - DGM |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|