| JREF Homepage | Swift Blog | Events Calendar | $1 Million Paranormal Challenge | The Amaz!ng Meeting | Useful Links | Support Us |
![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Not so much a medium as a large
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 5,004
|
AUTODYN-3D modelling of N Tower collapse (2002)
I can't find any reference on the forums to the below-linked PDF (from "Century Dynamics Inc"), so thought you guys might be interested. I'm not up enough on the subject these days to know whether the contents are so outdated as to be useless (as I would imagine they might be after 6 years).
http://hsrlab.gatech.edu/AUTODYN/papers/paper142.pdf |
|
__________________
"Feeling you’ve done something is not quite the same as the empirical scientific proof." -Stephen Fry The BS Historian |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,010
|
Interesting. Never seen this one before.
There's a few errors that jump out at me though. They give the plane a total weight of 186 tons - probably an overestimate by approx 55 tons. The fuel is given as 94 tons, approx 3 times the probable value. They have the plane coming in wings level, when it was banked to 25 degrees IIRC. They also state the engines weigh 31 tons each, which is bizarre. The impact part is certainly made redundant by later simulations. The collapse analysis looks interesting though, I'll let more qualified people (anyone else) comment on that bit. |
|
__________________
R.I.P Dr. Adequate |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|