Dr. Steven Jones' "independent varification of therm?te"

DGM · 4th January 2009, 03:49 PM

About a year ago Dr. Steven Jones claimed to have sent his samples out for "independent verification". I have spent some time (that I will never get back) trying to find the results. So far I've turned up zilch. Now I admit I'm not the best "googleinvestigator" in the world I usually can find what I'm looking for.

So what gives? Did I miss his earth shattering confirmation or would they "rather not say" the results they got?

Anyone know?

UNLoVedRebel · 4th January 2009, 06:13 PM

It's not in the Journal of 911 Stundies, so I'm guessing they tapped out.

Sizzler · 4th January 2009, 07:07 PM

Originally Posted by DGM

About a year ago Dr. Steven Jones claimed to have sent his samples out for "independent verification". I have spent some time (that I will never get back) trying to find the results. So far I've turned up zilch. Now I admit I'm not the best "googleinvestigator" in the world I usually can find what I'm looking for.

So what gives? Did I miss his earth shattering confirmation or would they "rather not say" the results they got?

Anyone know?

Last I heard he submitted a paper on his red/grey chips to a journal. My guess is that the paper will be published in JONES if it is rejected. I caught this bit in a post by Jones on 911blogger sometime back.

If you go to 911 blogger, Ryan has submitted as video of the red/grey chips. I haven't checked it out yet.

4th January 2009, 03:49 PM	#1
DGM #4 Join Date: May 2007 Location: West of Northshore MA Posts: 14,303	Dr. Steven Jones' "independent varification of therm?te" About a year ago Dr. Steven Jones claimed to have sent his samples out for "independent verification". I have spent some time (that I will never get back) trying to find the results. So far I've turned up zilch. Now I admit I'm not the best "googleinvestigator" in the world I usually can find what I'm looking for. So what gives? Did I miss his earth shattering confirmation or would they "rather not say" the results they got? Anyone know?
	__________________ Join the team, Show us what your machine can do (or just contribute to a good cause)Join the JREF Folders ! Team 13232 "Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution" Jay Windley

4th January 2009, 06:13 PM	#2
UNLoVedRebel Hard Knocks Doctorate Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: School of Hard Knocks Posts: 5,507	It's not in the Journal of 911 Stundies, so I'm guessing they tapped out.
	__________________ "All the Officialiers here typically have rancid alien avatars or else some kind of violent military-type avatar. Once again affirming my contention that 9/11 Officialiers are the most violent, murderous, group of people in the United States. Both statistically confirmed, but also anecdotally affirmed in almost every case of active pro-Officialers." - FloydGoethe

4th January 2009, 07:07 PM	#3
Sizzler Graduate Poster Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 1,562	Originally Posted by DGM About a year ago Dr. Steven Jones claimed to have sent his samples out for "independent verification". I have spent some time (that I will never get back) trying to find the results. So far I've turned up zilch. Now I admit I'm not the best "googleinvestigator" in the world I usually can find what I'm looking for. So what gives? Did I miss his earth shattering confirmation or would they "rather not say" the results they got? Anyone know? Last I heard he submitted a paper on his red/grey chips to a journal. My guess is that the paper will be published in JONES if it is rejected. I caught this bit in a post by Jones on 911blogger sometime back. If you go to 911 blogger, Ryan has submitted as video of the red/grey chips. I haven't checked it out yet.
Sizzler Graduate Poster Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 1,562