AE911Truth to be at AIA, Washington DC July 14-16

BigAl · 6th July 2009, 04:19 AM

It appears that AIA is having a meeting in D.C.

Quote:

http://www.ae911truth.org/events/dcconvention/

... We will host a 10' x 10' exhibit booth at the DC Convention of the American Institute of Architects (AIA) – July 14, 15, and 16. We will be speaking to several hundred architects over the three-day period and giving them DVDs and brochures. We hope to sign up at least one hundred more architects on our website! Consider flying/driving to DC and helping us in our booth if you are in the area. You would need to competently convey the essential points of the explosive evidence at the 3 World Trade Center high-rises - while wearing professional attire. To find out more or RSVP, contact Dave Slesinger at 410-499-5403 and/or davidslesinger (at) yahoo.com.

We will also host room #141 in the Convention Center where our new 30-minute version of 9/11: Blueprint for Truth - Companion Edition will be playing every hour on the hour followed by live Q&A. We are making major inroads into the building professional community with these AIA conventions. ...

fitzgibbon · 6th July 2009, 04:25 AM

Major what? Considering the numbers he claims for membership could be a rounding error, you'll pardon me if I laugh. Nice to see someone doing a fantastic imitation of a snakeoil salesman.

peteweaver · 6th July 2009, 04:26 AM

If anything, it'll give real architects something to laugh at.

~enigma~ · 6th July 2009, 04:28 AM

Has Jref become AE911Truth east or something? I mean they get almost as much advertising here.

ETA - Just looking at 2 sites, LCF has 1 thread with 0 replies and 911 blogger has 1 post with 3 replies. Jref already has 3 and I bet by the time I get home from work it will be about 20.

Justin39640 · 6th July 2009, 08:26 AM

is Heiwa gonna be there?
im sure many of the "29" (lol) would want to be at an event such as this

if they come to NY i would want to go to see the reaction in a more public forum than a private lecture
esp surrounded by their peers

Bobert · 6th July 2009, 03:24 PM

Wow I give credit to RG for at least being able to afford a spot.
Those booths at some conventions aint cheap!

cyclonic · 6th July 2009, 06:53 PM

"And if you haven't yet, please join the family of Sustaining Members as well, so that we can continue the winning streak that we are on. We must have an average of $35/month per member to realize our goals toward the awakening of the A/E profession and a real WTC investigation. Where do you fit into the picture? $10/mo? $100/mo? or more? Please find your giving level and claim it!
DON'T KEEP US CRAWLING TOWARD THE FINISH LINE OF A REAL INVESTIGATION WHEN WE CAN RUN IN TRIUMPHANTLY AND SEIZE IT"

http://www.ae911truth.org/events/dcconvention/

Go on twoofers give more money, i want to see tricky dick run and seize it!

BigAl · 12th July 2009, 01:18 PM

Juts a bump to remind people of this AIA meeting.

Sword_Of_Truth · 12th July 2009, 01:21 PM

Originally Posted by ~enigma~

Has Jref become AE911Truth east or something? I mean they get almost as much advertising here.

ETA - Just looking at 2 sites, LCF has 1 thread with 0 replies and 911 blogger has 1 post with 3 replies. Jref already has 3 and I bet by the time I get home from work it will be about 20.

I don't think anyone participates more while enjoying less, the discussions in the 9/11 forum than you, Enigma.

deep · 12th July 2009, 02:36 PM

Originally Posted by peteweaver

If anything, it'll give real architects something to laugh at.

Unless they're one of the many "real architects" who have already signed the petition.

triforcharity · 12th July 2009, 08:38 PM

Deep,

I think a saw a Haywood J Blome on there, please tell me he is real!!! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!! TOOO FUNNNNYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

R.Mackey · 12th July 2009, 08:46 PM

My personal favorite was Mills M. Kay Mackey, of Colorado (naturally).

No, it wasn't me.

Predictably, deep44 fled for the hills the last time this little charlie foxtrot was explained to him. Nonetheless, he'll still harp about their membership... Seems to be his entire M.O., judging by his other recent posts here, which are indistinguishable from posts made years ago.

rikzilla · 13th July 2009, 12:39 AM

What a colossal waste of time! The essential points of the explosives evidence @ WTC is that there isn't any. Unless of course it was the sooper secret stealth explosives that make no sound. God what a joke!

-z

deep · 13th July 2009, 05:50 AM

Originally Posted by R.Mackey

Predictably, deep44 fled for the hills the last time this little charlie foxtrot was explained to him. Nonetheless, he'll still harp about their membership... Seems to be his entire M.O., judging by his other recent posts here, which are indistinguishable from posts made years ago.

Yes, as long as people in this forum make factually inaccurate statements regarding AE911Truth, I'll point out that they're wrong.

As for "running for the hills" - if that's what you want to believe, fine with me.

Justin39640 · 13th July 2009, 06:32 AM

Originally Posted by deep44

Yes, as long as people in this forum make factually inaccurate statements regarding AE911Truth, I'll point out that they're wrong.

As for "running for the hills" - if that's what you want to believe, fine with me.

ae911truth is entirely factually inaccurate

cardboard boxes do not react the same way as buildings do

i guess you beg to differ?

R.Mackey · 13th July 2009, 07:57 AM

Originally Posted by deep44

Yes, as long as people in this forum make factually inaccurate statements regarding AE911Truth, I'll point out that they're wrong.

As for "running for the hills" - if that's what you want to believe, fine with me.

After it was explained to you that Mills M. Kay Mackey, who was named in the press release by AE911T, is a fictional character based on South Park and would have been detected by even the clumsiest attempt at verification, you made no further comment in that thread -- one started by you -- despite it running another two and a half pages. The historical record demonstrates that you, in fact, did run for the hills.

And that you learned nothing from that experience, since you're falling for the same con all over again, a year later.

deep · 13th July 2009, 08:14 AM

Originally Posted by R.Mackey

After it was explained to you that Mills M. Kay Mackey, who was named in the press release by AE911T, is a fictional character based on South Park and would have been detected by even the clumsiest attempt at verification, you made no further comment in that thread -- one started by you -- despite it running another two and a half pages. The historical record demonstrates that you, in fact, did run for the hills.

They made a mistake, corrected it, learned form it, and moved on. That doesn't invalidate their entire organization.

Oh, and believe it or not, not everybody in the world watches South Park.

Disbelief · 13th July 2009, 08:54 AM

Originally Posted by deep44

They made a mistake, corrected it, learned form it, and moved on. That doesn't invalidate their entire organization.

Oh, and believe it or not, not everybody in the world watches South Park.

But would they not verify someone who they are touting in a press release? They conned you by claiming to verify members, yet put out information that demonstrates clearly that they do not (or did not).

AZCat · 13th July 2009, 08:58 AM

Originally Posted by deep44

They made a mistake, corrected it, learned form it, and moved on. That doesn't invalidate their entire organization.

No, their organization is invalidated by the poor quality of their arguments, not by the quality of their membership.

deep · 13th July 2009, 09:22 AM

Originally Posted by Disbelief

But would they not verify someone who they are touting in a press release? They conned you by claiming to verify members, yet put out information that demonstrates clearly that they do not (or did not).

Yes, he was a verified member. It was a mistake that has since been corrected.

You don't know what lengths this guy went to in order to get verified, so how can you comment on the integrity of AE911Truth's verification process? You can't -- at least not in the form of a sound argument.

Mr.Herbert · 13th July 2009, 02:34 PM

Originally Posted by deep44

Yes, he was a verified member. It was a mistake that has since been corrected.

You don't know what lengths this guy went to in order to get verified, so how can you comment on the integrity of AE911Truth's verification process? You can't -- at least not in the form of a sound argument.

Well, I am still proud to be on their advertised list of engineers. As some of you know, my faux name Dr. Cameron Porter PHD. was one of the first listed on his site.

Cameron Porter is the name of the two doctors from the Brady Bunch.

I wrote to Gage several times telling him that it was fake. To this day, it's still on his main page:

http://www.ae911truth.org/

UNLoVedRebel · 13th July 2009, 02:43 PM

Originally Posted by Mr.Herbert

Well, I am still proud to be on their advertised list of engineers. As some of you know, my faux name Dr. Cameron Porter PHD. was one of the first listed on his site.

Cameron Porter is the name of the two doctors from the Brady Bunch.

I wrote to Gage several times telling him that is was fake. To this day, it still on his main page:

http://www.ae911truth.org/

http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o...Fox/porter.jpg

deep · 13th July 2009, 02:46 PM

Originally Posted by Mr.Herbert

Well, I am still proud to be on their advertised list of engineers. As some of you know, my faux name Dr. Cameron Porter PHD. was one of the first listed on his site.

'Cameron Porter' is not listed on the petition. Assuming it was there at some point (sounds to me like it was), this would be another example of AE911Truth scrubbing the frauds off their list.

I personally have no problem with that, but everyone is obviously entitled to their own opinion.

beachnut · 13th July 2009, 02:51 PM

Originally Posted by deep44

'Cameron Porter' is not listed on the petition. Assuming it was there at some point (sounds to me like it was), this would be another example of AE911Truth scrubbing the frauds off their list.

I personally have no problem with that, but everyone is obviously entitled to their own opinion.

I wonder if they got rid of all the names that are fantasy, or place on the petition without the person knowing? Are all the name verified? Does it matter if a bunch of fringe professionals, I should say professionals with delusions on 911 issues, believe in Gage's delusions which are equal to believing in a flat earth or Bigfoot!?

It is frauds getting fantasy people off their list of people who support fantasy fraud ideas on 911. Gage is a liar who spends money from people fooled by him on his travel to spread the word so more people will give him money so he can spread the word more.

Your failed ideas are now past 7 years and they stink as bad now as they did when you first made the first failed idea to support delusions.

Mr.Herbert · 13th July 2009, 02:53 PM

DEEP... learn to read and please notice the word that is in bold lettering. ADVERTISED!

That scrolling list of names is used as an advertisement on other web-pages including his own.

Try to keep up, genius.

deep · 13th July 2009, 02:58 PM

Originally Posted by beachnut

I wonder if they got rid of all the names that are fantasy, or place on the petition without the person knowing? Are all the name verified? Does it matter if a bunch of fringe professionals, I should say professionals with delusions on 911 issues, believe in Gage's delusions which are equal to believing in a flat earth or Bigfoot!?

I would suggest visiting the site and familiarizing yourself with the petition itself. That way, you'll actually know what they believe (i.e., what they signed), whether or not they are verified, etc.

If you actually have any names that you believe are fantasy, please post them.

beachnut · 13th July 2009, 03:06 PM

Originally Posted by deep44

I would suggest visiting the site and familiarizing yourself with the petition itself. That way, you'll actually know what they believe (i.e., what they signed), whether or not they are verified, etc.

If you actually have any names that you believe are fantasy, please post them.

Better yet name one fact Gage got right on 911 besides the date.

You have LESS than 0.0087 percent of engineers to support something close to your failed delusion on 911 and you need help finding fantasy petition signers? Do you 911 failed movement people do anything for yourselves? You can't figure out 911 how and you fail to find one fact to support your moronic story of CT; why?

Here is a sample of the failed ideas of your coveted band of Gage followers who can't figure out 911 with over 7 years to work on it.

Quote:

I am convinced beyond any shadow of doubt that:
1- NORAD could not have been rendered worthless by anyone or any organization but persons in or close to the U.S. government.
2- No passenger plane hit the pentagon.
3- The two towers could not have come down in near-free fall speed if explosives were not scientifically planted and distributed throughout the structures and sequentially exploded through computer control. Explosions occurred ahead of the advancing debris so that the near-free fall speed can be achieved.
4- The 9/11 wars and war on terror were pre-planned and executed according to these plans.

Every single point a failed delusion backed only with hearsay, moronic opinions and failed ideas. You can't support anything you conclude on 911 with rational evidence; just hearsay, opinions and lies.

Gage will put up a booth and sell his lies to a pathetic few who fail to think past some paranoid delusions on 911. Gage will tell his lies and fail to make a difference save collecting money from people too challenged to think for themselves on 911 issues.

You failed to support anything Gage presents with facts or evidence; you talk but do not have substance to support Gage. All you have to do is have some knowledge and sound judgment to see Gage is making up delusions and those nut case ideas fool a few people out of millions who should know better after earning a degree. This is call failure; at least it may be on one issue.

deep · 13th July 2009, 03:14 PM

Originally Posted by Mr.Herbert

DEEP... learn to read and please notice the word that is in bold lettering. ADVERTISED!

That scrolling list of names is used as an advertisement on other web-pages including his own.

Yes, it was quite clear. You'll notice that I was referring to the petition, which serves as the member list. 'Cameron Porter' is not on that list, so he's no longer a member (if he ever was one).

I don't care about the "advertised list", because we're talking about AE911Truth members.

Arus808 · 13th July 2009, 03:25 PM

nice dodge there deep. isn't your back tired from all the goal post moving you've done in this thread?

deep · 13th July 2009, 03:32 PM

Originally Posted by Arus808

nice dodge there deep. isn't your back tired from all the goal post moving you've done in this thread?

This was my first post in this thread:

Unless they're one of the many "real architects" who have already signed the petition.

From R. Mackey:

Predictably, deep44 fled for the hills the last time this little charlie foxtrot was explained to him. Nonetheless, he'll still harp about their membership...

Feel free to quote my posts directly in order to demonstrate all this goalpost moving you're referring to.

Arus808 · 13th July 2009, 03:51 PM

anyone can sign a petition deep, in fact, there websites that are created to flood petitions with fake signups all for the purpose of showing that petitions are worthless.

this a group that says they CONFIRM everyone in their "membership" are who they say they are (and if they are listed on the Web Site, they in essence are in support of any petition being passed around).

We've proven that they NEVER confirm their members, and have pointed this out since DAY 1 of the site. THEY continue to list fake members, despite BEING TOLD they are fake.

deep · 13th July 2009, 04:28 PM

Wait, what happened to 'moving the goalposts'? You made the accusation - now let's see the evidence.

Sword_Of_Truth · 13th July 2009, 05:43 PM

Originally Posted by deep44

Unless they're one of the many "real architects" who have already signed the petition.

There are no "real architects" who have signed that petition. A persomn who signs that petition stops being an architect or an engineer in the same way that a brain surgeon who suddenly decides to try shrinking tumors by dangling crystals over peoples heads is no longer able to effectively work in his field.

The AE911Truth petition isn't an expression of political dissent. It is a confession of professional incompetence.

Were I a property developer looking to hire people to put buildings up on my land, and I noticed the names of one or more job applicants on a "petition" which states; "We the undersigned haven't got a frakking clue how fire affects various materials and have no understanding of the forces which can cause or result from structural failure" then I will not hire them. In fact I would fire such persons for incompetence if they were already hired.

"Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth" is a scientific impossibility and an oxymoron.

Mr.Herbert · 13th July 2009, 05:47 PM

Originally Posted by deep44

Yes, it was quite clear. You'll notice that I was referring to the petition, which serves as the member list. 'Cameron Porter' is not on that list, so he's no longer a member (if he ever was one).

I don't care about the "advertised list", because we're talking about AE911Truth members.

Did you bother to read the advertisement?

Watch it again, then tell me if someone would be led to believe that the Brady Bunch doctors are a part Dick's delusions.

deep · 13th July 2009, 06:01 PM

Originally Posted by Mr.Herbert

Did you bother to read the advertisement?

Watch it again, then tell me if someone would be led to believe that the Brady Bunch doctors are a part Dick's delusions.

Again, I don't care about the "advertised list". Go find someone who claims the "advertised list" is an authoritative list of AE911Truth members and take it up with them.

UNLoVedRebel · 13th July 2009, 06:03 PM

Originally Posted by deep44

Wait, what happened to 'moving the goalposts'? You made the accusation - now let's see the evidence.

Originally Posted by deep44

Yes, he was a verified member. It was a mistake that has since been corrected.

You don't know what lengths this guy went to in order to get verified, so how can you comment on the integrity of AE911Truth's verification process? You can't -- at least not in the form of a sound argument.

No criteria set for petition members only. Mr. Herbert exposes the "verification process" as a fraud.

Originally Posted by Mr.Herbert

Well, I am still proud to be on their advertised list of engineers. As some of you know, my faux name Dr. Cameron Porter PHD. was one of the first listed on his site.

Cameron Porter is the name of the two doctors from the Brady Bunch.

I wrote to Gage several times telling him that it was fake. To this day, it's still on his main page:

http://www.ae911truth.org/

Originally Posted by deep44

'Cameron Porter' is not listed on the petition. Assuming it was there at some point (sounds to me like it was), this would be another example of AE911Truth scrubbing the frauds off their list.

I personally have no problem with that, but everyone is obviously entitled to their own opinion.

Now after Mr. Herbert exposes the 'verification process' as a fraud, deep44 sets the criteria for the petition and not the advert.

That would be 'moving the goalposts'.

Arus808 · 13th July 2009, 06:06 PM

Originally Posted by UNLoVedRebel

No criteria set for petition members only. Mr. Herbert exposes the "verification process" as a fraud.

Now deep44 sets the criteria for the petition and not the advert.

That would be 'moving the goalposts'.

and remember, the SITE started off as being the "petition" itself. By joining the site as a member, you essentially were agreeing with the notion that you wanted a new investigation.

the petition (actual signing of petition) didn't come till way later when all of their FRAUDULENT confirmation procedures were shown to be nothing more than "hey we got a new member, lets add them"

deep · 13th July 2009, 06:23 PM

Originally Posted by UNLoVedRebel

No criteria set for petition members only. Mr. Herbert exposes the "verification process" as a fraud.

I've been talking about the petition since my very first post, because that's where verified members are listed.

Unless they're one of the many "real architects" who have already signed the petition.

'Cameron Porter' is not listed on the petition. He is not a verified member.

UNLoVedRebel · 13th July 2009, 06:32 PM

Originally Posted by deep44

I've been talking about the petition since my very first post, because that's where verified members are listed.

Unless they're one of the many "real architects" who have already signed the petition.

'Cameron Porter' is not listed on the petition. He is not a verified member.

There is nothing of substance in that post, just another sad attempt by a truther to "get the last word." The "verification process" has been exposed as a fraud. It's best not to dig yourself deeper into a hole. "I, uh, didn't mean the verification process for advertisements, just uh, petitions uh, yeah. That's good enough too relieve my cognitive dissonance."

Mr. Herbert exposed them as frauds and they are performing an illegal activity. And you are defending these liars and frauds. What's your demarcation for false advertising? Just make sure it's good enough to protect the frauds of your choice. Because you failed miserably last time with the whole 'I don't care about the "advertised list".'

deep · 13th July 2009, 07:05 PM

Originally Posted by UNLoVedRebel

There is nothing of substance in that post, just another sad attempt by a truther to "get the last word." The "verification process" has been exposed as a fraud. It's best not to dig yourself deeper into a hole. "I, uh, didn't mean the verification process for advertisements, just uh, petitions uh, yeah. That's good enough too relieve my cognitive dissonance."

You're claiming that the verification process has been exposed as a fraud, but you haven't offered any evidence related to the verification process.

Please post that evidence if you want to be taken seriously. Until you do so (or retract the claim), I will not waste any more of my time responding to you.

6th July 2009, 04:19 AM	#1
BigAl Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 5,398	AE911Truth to be at AIA, Washington DC July 14-16 It appears that AIA is having a meeting in D.C. Quote: http://www.ae911truth.org/events/dcconvention/ ... We will host a 10' x 10' exhibit booth at the DC Convention of the American Institute of Architects (AIA) – July 14, 15, and 16. We will be speaking to several hundred architects over the three-day period and giving them DVDs and brochures. We hope to sign up at least one hundred more architects on our website! Consider flying/driving to DC and helping us in our booth if you are in the area. You would need to competently convey the essential points of the explosive evidence at the 3 World Trade Center high-rises - while wearing professional attire. To find out more or RSVP, contact Dave Slesinger at 410-499-5403 and/or davidslesinger (at) yahoo.com. We will also host room #141 in the Convention Center where our new 30-minute version of 9/11: Blueprint for Truth - Companion Edition will be playing every hour on the hour followed by live Q&A. We are making major inroads into the building professional community with these AIA conventions. ...
BigAl Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 5,398	__________________ ------ Eric Pode of Croydon Chief Assistant to the Assistance Chief, Dept of Redundancy Dept.

6th July 2009, 04:25 AM	#2
fitzgibbon Master Poster Join Date: May 2007 Location: Just west of the centre of the universe Posts: 2,548	Major what? Considering the numbers he claims for membership could be a rounding error, you'll pardon me if I laugh. Nice to see someone doing a fantastic imitation of a snakeoil salesman.
	__________________ "Television is a circus, a carnival, a traveling troupe of acrobats, storytellers, dancers, singers, jugglers, side-show freaks, lion tamers, and football players. We're in the boredom-killing business! So if you want the truth... Go to God!" Howard Beale, "Network"

6th July 2009, 04:28 AM	#4
~enigma~ Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Center of the universe Posts: 7,954	Has Jref become AE911Truth east or something? I mean they get almost as much advertising here. ETA - Just looking at 2 sites, LCF has 1 thread with 0 replies and 911 blogger has 1 post with 3 replies. Jref already has 3 and I bet by the time I get home from work it will be about 20.
	Last edited by ~enigma~; 6th July 2009 at 04:36 AM.

6th July 2009, 08:26 AM	#5
Justin39640 Illuminator Join Date: May 2009 Location: New York Posts: 3,646	is Heiwa gonna be there? im sure many of the "29" (lol) would want to be at an event such as this if they come to NY i would want to go to see the reaction in a more public forum than a private lecture esp surrounded by their peers
	__________________ "I joined this forum to learn about the people who think that 9/11 was an inside job. I've learned that they believe nutty things and are not very good at explaining them." - FineWine "The agencies involved with studying the WTC collapse no more needed to consider explosives than the police need to consider brain cancer in a shooting death." - ElMondoHummus

6th July 2009, 03:24 PM	#6
Bobert Government Loyalist Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Kennesaw GA Posts: 4,146	Wow I give credit to RG for at least being able to afford a spot. Those booths at some conventions aint cheap!
	__________________ CIT CULT founder Ranke responding to where Flight 77 is"I'm not aware of any "theories" nor am I interested in theorizing about what method was used to murder them ." CIT CULT MEMEMBER ROUNDHEAD Suck on one weenie, you are a weenie sucker for life CIT CULT founder Aldo Marquis :You're going to regret. Don't forget we have your info too pal. Think about your kid and family

6th July 2009, 04:26 AM	#3
peteweaver Graduate Poster Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: UK Posts: 1,005	If anything, it'll give real architects something to laugh at.

6th July 2009, 06:53 PM	#7
cyclonic Muse Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Australia Posts: 977	"And if you haven't yet, please join the family of Sustaining Members as well, so that we can continue the winning streak that we are on. We must have an average of $35/month per member to realize our goals toward the awakening of the A/E profession and a real WTC investigation. Where do you fit into the picture? $10/mo? $100/mo? or more? Please find your giving level and claim it! DON'T KEEP US CRAWLING TOWARD THE FINISH LINE OF A REAL INVESTIGATION WHEN WE CAN RUN IN TRIUMPHANTLY AND SEIZE IT" http://www.ae911truth.org/events/dcconvention/ Go on twoofers give more money, i want to see tricky dick run and seize it!

12th July 2009, 01:18 PM	#8
BigAl Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 5,398	Juts a bump to remind people of this AIA meeting.
BigAl Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 5,398	__________________ ------ Eric Pode of Croydon Chief Assistant to the Assistance Chief, Dept of Redundancy Dept.

12th July 2009, 01:21 PM	#9
Sword_Of_Truth Penultimate Amazing Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 11,497	Originally Posted by ~enigma~ Has Jref become AE911Truth east or something? I mean they get almost as much advertising here. ETA - Just looking at 2 sites, LCF has 1 thread with 0 replies and 911 blogger has 1 post with 3 replies. Jref already has 3 and I bet by the time I get home from work it will be about 20. I don't think anyone participates more while enjoying less, the discussions in the 9/11 forum than you, Enigma.

12th July 2009, 02:36 PM	#10
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367	Originally Posted by peteweaver If anything, it'll give real architects something to laugh at. Unless they're one of the many "real architects" who have already signed the petition.
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367

12th July 2009, 08:38 PM	#11
triforcharity Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: The South! Posts: 12,210	Deep, I think a saw a Haywood J Blome on there, please tell me he is real!!! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!! TOOO FUNNNNYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

12th July 2009, 08:46 PM	#12
R.Mackey Philosopher Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: The armpit of L.A. Posts: 7,857	My personal favorite was Mills M. Kay Mackey, of Colorado (naturally). No, it wasn't me. Predictably, deep44 fled for the hills the last time this little charlie foxtrot was explained to him. Nonetheless, he'll still harp about their membership... Seems to be his entire M.O., judging by his other recent posts here, which are indistinguishable from posts made years ago.
	__________________ "Nothing real can defeat us. Nothing unreal exists." -B. Banzai VT VENIANT OMNES

13th July 2009, 12:39 AM	#13
rikzilla Ninja wave: Atomic fire-breath ninja Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 5,001	What a colossal waste of time! The essential points of the explosives evidence @ WTC is that there isn't any. Unless of course it was the sooper secret stealth explosives that make no sound. God what a joke! -z
	__________________ "You have not experienced Shakespeare until you have read him in the original Klingon." -Chancellor Gorkon "inside Mr .Skinny lives a big man" -pillory (18 Jan 2007)

13th July 2009, 05:50 AM	#14
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367	Originally Posted by R.Mackey Predictably, deep44 fled for the hills the last time this little charlie foxtrot was explained to him. Nonetheless, he'll still harp about their membership... Seems to be his entire M.O., judging by his other recent posts here, which are indistinguishable from posts made years ago. Yes, as long as people in this forum make factually inaccurate statements regarding AE911Truth, I'll point out that they're wrong. As for "running for the hills" - if that's what you want to believe, fine with me.
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367

13th July 2009, 06:32 AM	#15
Justin39640 Illuminator Join Date: May 2009 Location: New York Posts: 3,646	Originally Posted by deep44 Yes, as long as people in this forum make factually inaccurate statements regarding AE911Truth, I'll point out that they're wrong. As for "running for the hills" - if that's what you want to believe, fine with me. ae911truth is entirely factually inaccurate cardboard boxes do not react the same way as buildings do i guess you beg to differ?
	__________________ "I joined this forum to learn about the people who think that 9/11 was an inside job. I've learned that they believe nutty things and are not very good at explaining them." - FineWine "The agencies involved with studying the WTC collapse no more needed to consider explosives than the police need to consider brain cancer in a shooting death." - ElMondoHummus

13th July 2009, 07:57 AM	#16
R.Mackey Philosopher Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: The armpit of L.A. Posts: 7,857	Originally Posted by deep44 Yes, as long as people in this forum make factually inaccurate statements regarding AE911Truth, I'll point out that they're wrong. As for "running for the hills" - if that's what you want to believe, fine with me. After it was explained to you that Mills M. Kay Mackey, who was named in the press release by AE911T, is a fictional character based on South Park and would have been detected by even the clumsiest attempt at verification, you made no further comment in that thread -- one started by you -- despite it running another two and a half pages. The historical record demonstrates that you, in fact, did run for the hills. And that you learned nothing from that experience, since you're falling for the same con all over again, a year later.
	__________________ "Nothing real can defeat us. Nothing unreal exists." -B. Banzai VT VENIANT OMNES

13th July 2009, 08:14 AM	#17
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367	Originally Posted by R.Mackey After it was explained to you that Mills M. Kay Mackey, who was named in the press release by AE911T, is a fictional character based on South Park and would have been detected by even the clumsiest attempt at verification, you made no further comment in that thread -- one started by you -- despite it running another two and a half pages. The historical record demonstrates that you, in fact, did run for the hills. They made a mistake, corrected it, learned form it, and moved on. That doesn't invalidate their entire organization. Oh, and believe it or not, not everybody in the world watches South Park.
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367

13th July 2009, 08:54 AM	#18
Disbelief Master Poster Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,272	Originally Posted by deep44 They made a mistake, corrected it, learned form it, and moved on. That doesn't invalidate their entire organization. Oh, and believe it or not, not everybody in the world watches South Park. But would they not verify someone who they are touting in a press release? They conned you by claiming to verify members, yet put out information that demonstrates clearly that they do not (or did not).
Disbelief Master Poster Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,272	__________________ Zensmack (LastChild, Laughing Assassin, RazetheFlag, Wastrel, TruthbyDecree) - Working his way up the sock puppet chain, trying to overtake P'Doh. Or, are they the same? Quote me where I said conspiracists use evidence. - mchapman

13th July 2009, 08:58 AM	#19
AZCat Graduate Poster Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: where the grass is greener. Posts: 1,618	Originally Posted by deep44 They made a mistake, corrected it, learned form it, and moved on. That doesn't invalidate their entire organization. No, their organization is invalidated by the poor quality of their arguments, not by the quality of their membership.

13th July 2009, 09:22 AM	#20
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367	Originally Posted by Disbelief But would they not verify someone who they are touting in a press release? They conned you by claiming to verify members, yet put out information that demonstrates clearly that they do not (or did not). Yes, he was a verified member. It was a mistake that has since been corrected. You don't know what lengths this guy went to in order to get verified, so how can you comment on the integrity of AE911Truth's verification process? You can't -- at least not in the form of a sound argument.
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367

13th July 2009, 02:34 PM	#21
Mr.Herbert Graduate Poster Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Massachusetts Posts: 1,357	Originally Posted by deep44 Yes, he was a verified member. It was a mistake that has since been corrected. You don't know what lengths this guy went to in order to get verified, so how can you comment on the integrity of AE911Truth's verification process? You can't -- at least not in the form of a sound argument. Well, I am still proud to be on their advertised list of engineers. As some of you know, my faux name Dr. Cameron Porter PHD. was one of the first listed on his site. Cameron Porter is the name of the two doctors from the Brady Bunch. I wrote to Gage several times telling him that it was fake. To this day, it's still on his main page: http://www.ae911truth.org/
	__________________ Please go to www.curedfoundation.org and make a donation of only a dollar to help find a cure for a rare autoimmune disease that my son is currently battling called Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Learn more about EOE here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eosinophilic_esophagitis Last edited by Mr.Herbert; 13th July 2009 at 02:47 PM.

13th July 2009, 02:43 PM	#22
UNLoVedRebel Hard Knocks Doctorate Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: School of Hard Knocks Posts: 5,507	Originally Posted by Mr.Herbert Well, I am still proud to be on their advertised list of engineers. As some of you know, my faux name Dr. Cameron Porter PHD. was one of the first listed on his site. Cameron Porter is the name of the two doctors from the Brady Bunch. I wrote to Gage several times telling him that is was fake. To this day, it still on his main page: http://www.ae911truth.org/ http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o...Fox/porter.jpg
	__________________ "All the Officialiers here typically have rancid alien avatars or else some kind of violent military-type avatar. Once again affirming my contention that 9/11 Officialiers are the most violent, murderous, group of people in the United States. Both statistically confirmed, but also anecdotally affirmed in almost every case of active pro-Officialers." - FloydGoethe

13th July 2009, 02:46 PM	#23
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367	Originally Posted by Mr.Herbert Well, I am still proud to be on their advertised list of engineers. As some of you know, my faux name Dr. Cameron Porter PHD. was one of the first listed on his site. 'Cameron Porter' is not listed on the petition. Assuming it was there at some point (sounds to me like it was), this would be another example of AE911Truth scrubbing the frauds off their list. I personally have no problem with that, but everyone is obviously entitled to their own opinion.
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367

13th July 2009, 02:51 PM	#24
beachnut Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Dog House Posts: 19,902	Originally Posted by deep44 'Cameron Porter' is not listed on the petition. Assuming it was there at some point (sounds to me like it was), this would be another example of AE911Truth scrubbing the frauds off their list. I personally have no problem with that, but everyone is obviously entitled to their own opinion. I wonder if they got rid of all the names that are fantasy, or place on the petition without the person knowing? Are all the name verified? Does it matter if a bunch of fringe professionals, I should say professionals with delusions on 911 issues, believe in Gage's delusions which are equal to believing in a flat earth or Bigfoot!? It is frauds getting fantasy people off their list of people who support fantasy fraud ideas on 911. Gage is a liar who spends money from people fooled by him on his travel to spread the word so more people will give him money so he can spread the word more. Your failed ideas are now past 7 years and they stink as bad now as they did when you first made the first failed idea to support delusions.

13th July 2009, 02:53 PM	#25
Mr.Herbert Graduate Poster Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Massachusetts Posts: 1,357	DEEP... learn to read and please notice the word that is in bold lettering. ADVERTISED! That scrolling list of names is used as an advertisement on other web-pages including his own. Try to keep up, genius.
	__________________ Please go to www.curedfoundation.org and make a donation of only a dollar to help find a cure for a rare autoimmune disease that my son is currently battling called Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Learn more about EOE here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eosinophilic_esophagitis

13th July 2009, 02:58 PM	#26
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367	Originally Posted by beachnut I wonder if they got rid of all the names that are fantasy, or place on the petition without the person knowing? Are all the name verified? Does it matter if a bunch of fringe professionals, I should say professionals with delusions on 911 issues, believe in Gage's delusions which are equal to believing in a flat earth or Bigfoot!? I would suggest visiting the site and familiarizing yourself with the petition itself. That way, you'll actually know what they believe (i.e., what they signed), whether or not they are verified, etc. If you actually have any names that you believe are fantasy, please post them.
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367

13th July 2009, 03:06 PM	#27
beachnut Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Dog House Posts: 19,902	Originally Posted by deep44 I would suggest visiting the site and familiarizing yourself with the petition itself. That way, you'll actually know what they believe (i.e., what they signed), whether or not they are verified, etc. If you actually have any names that you believe are fantasy, please post them. Better yet name one fact Gage got right on 911 besides the date. You have LESS than 0.0087 percent of engineers to support something close to your failed delusion on 911 and you need help finding fantasy petition signers? Do you 911 failed movement people do anything for yourselves? You can't figure out 911 how and you fail to find one fact to support your moronic story of CT; why? Here is a sample of the failed ideas of your coveted band of Gage followers who can't figure out 911 with over 7 years to work on it. Quote: I am convinced beyond any shadow of doubt that: 1- NORAD could not have been rendered worthless by anyone or any organization but persons in or close to the U.S. government. 2- No passenger plane hit the pentagon. 3- The two towers could not have come down in near-free fall speed if explosives were not scientifically planted and distributed throughout the structures and sequentially exploded through computer control. Explosions occurred ahead of the advancing debris so that the near-free fall speed can be achieved. 4- The 9/11 wars and war on terror were pre-planned and executed according to these plans. Every single point a failed delusion backed only with hearsay, moronic opinions and failed ideas. You can't support anything you conclude on 911 with rational evidence; just hearsay, opinions and lies. Gage will put up a booth and sell his lies to a pathetic few who fail to think past some paranoid delusions on 911. Gage will tell his lies and fail to make a difference save collecting money from people too challenged to think for themselves on 911 issues. You failed to support anything Gage presents with facts or evidence; you talk but do not have substance to support Gage. All you have to do is have some knowledge and sound judgment to see Gage is making up delusions and those nut case ideas fool a few people out of millions who should know better after earning a degree. This is call failure; at least it may be on one issue.
	Last edited by beachnut; 13th July 2009 at 03:11 PM.

13th July 2009, 03:14 PM	#28
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367	Originally Posted by Mr.Herbert DEEP... learn to read and please notice the word that is in bold lettering. ADVERTISED! That scrolling list of names is used as an advertisement on other web-pages including his own. Yes, it was quite clear. You'll notice that I was referring to the petition, which serves as the member list. 'Cameron Porter' is not on that list, so he's no longer a member (if he ever was one). I don't care about the "advertised list", because we're talking about AE911Truth members.
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367

13th July 2009, 03:25 PM	#29
Arus808 Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 6,202	nice dodge there deep. isn't your back tired from all the goal post moving you've done in this thread?
Arus808 Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 6,202	__________________ Back home with a new sunburn...I look like a tomato. “Life may begin at 30, but it doesn’t get real interesting until about 150.” “Most motorcycle problems are caused by the nut that connects the handlebars to the saddle.”

13th July 2009, 03:32 PM	#30
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367	Originally Posted by Arus808 nice dodge there deep. isn't your back tired from all the goal post moving you've done in this thread? This was my first post in this thread: Unless they're one of the many "real architects" who have already *signed the petition. From R. Mackey: Predictably, deep44 fled for the hills the last time this little charlie foxtrot was explained to him. Nonetheless, he'll still harp about their membership*... Feel free to quote my posts directly in order to demonstrate all this goalpost moving you're referring to.
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367

13th July 2009, 03:51 PM	#31
Arus808 Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 6,202	anyone can sign a petition deep, in fact, there websites that are created to flood petitions with fake signups all for the purpose of showing that petitions are worthless. this a group that says they CONFIRM everyone in their "membership" are who they say they are (and if they are listed on the Web Site, they in essence are in support of any petition being passed around). We've proven that they NEVER confirm their members, and have pointed this out since DAY 1 of the site. THEY continue to list fake members, despite BEING TOLD they are fake.
Arus808 Philosopher Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 6,202	__________________ Back home with a new sunburn...I look like a tomato. “Life may begin at 30, but it doesn’t get real interesting until about 150.” “Most motorcycle problems are caused by the nut that connects the handlebars to the saddle.”

13th July 2009, 04:28 PM	#32
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367	Wait, what happened to 'moving the goalposts'? You made the accusation - now let's see the evidence.
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367

13th July 2009, 05:43 PM	#33
Sword_Of_Truth Penultimate Amazing Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 11,497	Originally Posted by deep44 Unless they're one of the many "real architects" who have already signed the petition. There are no "real architects" who have signed that petition. A persomn who signs that petition stops being an architect or an engineer in the same way that a brain surgeon who suddenly decides to try shrinking tumors by dangling crystals over peoples heads is no longer able to effectively work in his field. The AE911Truth petition isn't an expression of political dissent. It is a confession of professional incompetence. Were I a property developer looking to hire people to put buildings up on my land, and I noticed the names of one or more job applicants on a "petition" which states; "We the undersigned haven't got a frakking clue how fire affects various materials and have no understanding of the forces which can cause or result from structural failure" then I will not hire them. In fact I would fire such persons for incompetence if they were already hired. "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth" is a scientific impossibility and an oxymoron.

13th July 2009, 05:47 PM	#34
Mr.Herbert Graduate Poster Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Massachusetts Posts: 1,357	Originally Posted by deep44 Yes, it was quite clear. You'll notice that I was referring to the petition, which serves as the member list. 'Cameron Porter' is not on that list, so he's no longer a member (if he ever was one). I don't care about the "advertised list", because we're talking about AE911Truth members. Did you bother to read the advertisement? Watch it again, then tell me if someone would be led to believe that the Brady Bunch doctors are a part Dick's delusions.
	__________________ Please go to www.curedfoundation.org and make a donation of only a dollar to help find a cure for a rare autoimmune disease that my son is currently battling called Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Learn more about EOE here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eosinophilic_esophagitis

13th July 2009, 06:01 PM	#35
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367	Originally Posted by Mr.Herbert Did you bother to read the advertisement? Watch it again, then tell me if someone would be led to believe that the Brady Bunch doctors are a part Dick's delusions. Again, I don't care about the "advertised list". Go find someone who claims the "advertised list" is an authoritative list of AE911Truth members and take it up with them.
deep Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,367