Ron Paul Comes Out of The Glass Closet - Page 4

carlitos · 21st January 2010, 03:47 PM

It really bugs me that one of the fiscally-responsible, libertarian Republicans in Congress is this wacky. Perhaps with the breed being so rare, it is more subject to anomalies? Like albino pandas?

dudalb · 22nd January 2010, 12:52 PM

Don't look now, but Paul's son, Rand, is running for the Senate in Tennesee......
And he is just as screwy as his dad.

Alferd_Packer · 22nd January 2010, 01:39 PM

Originally Posted by dudalb

Don't look now, but Paul's son, Rand, is running for the Senate in Tennesee......
And he is just as screwy as his dad.

Doesn't he also hae a daughter anmed, "Ru?"

JackDaniels · 24th January 2010, 03:27 PM

Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth

Yeah that's right, we all see you in there, Ron. Have been for months now. [video URL snipped] has surprised absolutely no one.

The man is beneath contempt.

That video shows nothing. He's leaving some sort of auditorium space, he's tired, there's some loud music blaring, and he may not even know what the question is supposed to mean. There are reasonable questions about 9/11, the commission, the not-under-oath testimony of Bush (who wouldn't appear without Cheney), the various intelligence agencies, what they knew etc. RP may have thought that's what she's asking about. Who knows? There's no way to tell from that brief video.

Sword_Of_Truth · 24th January 2010, 03:57 PM

Originally Posted by JackDaniels

That video shows nothing. He's leaving some sort of auditorium space, he's tired, there's some loud music blaring, and he may not even know what the question is supposed to mean. There are reasonable questions about 9/11, the commission, the not-under-oath testimony of Bush (who wouldn't appear without Cheney), the various intelligence agencies, what they knew etc. RP may have thought that's what she's asking about. Who knows? There's no way to tell from that brief video.

Ya gotta love how these truthers rise do the defense of Ron Paul by insisting that he isn't one of them. How this man for whom they'd crawl through broken glass and bear his love-children is technically a "sheeple".

It's funnier still how they don't recognize what they're saying before, or even after, they say it.

Sword_Of_Truth · 25th January 2010, 01:14 AM

Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth

Ya gotta love how these truthers rise do the defense of Ron Paul by insisting that he isn't one of them. How this man for whom they'd crawl through broken glass and bear his love-children is technically a "sheeple".

It's funnier still how they don't recognize what they're saying before, or even after, they say it.

It appears that I must withdraw this statement. I have read over all four of your posts and it appears you are not a quite a truther. I apologize for the confusion.

My beliefs about Ron Paul remain, however. Despite the loud music and distractions you referred to, he obviously picked up the first question (about the IMF and the Fed) quite easily. I doubt he suddenly had a hearing failure in that environment that was coincidentally timed with the 9/11 twoof question. His answer to that question makes perfect sense in context as well.

His answer was also almost exactly what we hear from the twoofers who post here when we ask them why don't they do something about it. Either it's too much hassle, or its too hard or there's no point in bringing it up with prosecutors and law enforcement who work for the government or their are washing their hair that night or some other lame excuse.

Ron Paul is just as paranoid, divorced from reality and downright chicken@#$% as his tinfoiler followers.

eromitlab · 25th January 2010, 03:02 AM

RP just wants troofers to continue throwing money at Campaign for Liberty and thinking he's a double-secret troofer and can't admit to the troof right now... which gets Paul heaps of admiration when it would get anyone else a preemptive conviction for treason that would be enforced if the revolution ever happens. A good politician never cuts ties with a reliable fundraising outlet. Pretty much every time I've heard Paul on Alex Jones, he answers the nuttier stuff that AJ throws out with similarly crafted placating non-answers and tries to pull it back to "the Fed sucks" and "Campaign for Liberty needs your money!"

22nd January 2010, 01:39 PM	#123
Alferd_Packer Philosopher Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 7,211	Originally Posted by dudalb Don't look now, but Paul's son, Rand, is running for the Senate in Tennesee...... And he is just as screwy as his dad. Doesn't he also hae a daughter anmed, "Ru?"
	__________________ No laws of physics were broken in the writing of this post

24th January 2010, 03:27 PM	#124
JackDaniels Scholar Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 51	Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth Yeah that's right, we all see you in there, Ron. Have been for months now. [video URL snipped] has surprised absolutely no one. The man is beneath contempt. That video shows nothing. He's leaving some sort of auditorium space, he's tired, there's some loud music blaring, and he may not even know what the question is supposed to mean. There are reasonable questions about 9/11, the commission, the not-under-oath testimony of Bush (who wouldn't appear without Cheney), the various intelligence agencies, what they knew etc. RP may have thought that's what she's asking about. Who knows? There's no way to tell from that brief video.
JackDaniels Scholar Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 51

25th January 2010, 03:02 AM	#127
eromitlab Muse Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: north Alabama Posts: 921	RP just wants troofers to continue throwing money at Campaign for Liberty and thinking he's a double-secret troofer and can't admit to the troof right now... which gets Paul heaps of admiration when it would get anyone else a preemptive conviction for treason that would be enforced if the revolution ever happens. A good politician never cuts ties with a reliable fundraising outlet. Pretty much every time I've heard Paul on Alex Jones, he answers the nuttier stuff that AJ throws out with similarly crafted placating non-answers and tries to pull it back to "the Fed sucks" and "Campaign for Liberty needs your money!"
	__________________ With my reputation, I do expect everyone to take what I say at face value. -Galileo

21st January 2010, 03:47 PM	#121
carlitos "más divertido" Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 11,517	It really bugs me that one of the fiscally-responsible, libertarian Republicans in Congress is this wacky. Perhaps with the breed being so rare, it is more subject to anomalies? Like albino pandas?

22nd January 2010, 12:52 PM	#122
dudalb Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 22,811	Don't look now, but Paul's son, Rand, is running for the Senate in Tennesee...... And he is just as screwy as his dad.

24th January 2010, 03:57 PM	#125
Sword_Of_Truth Penultimate Amazing Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 11,497	Originally Posted by JackDaniels That video shows nothing. He's leaving some sort of auditorium space, he's tired, there's some loud music blaring, and he may not even know what the question is supposed to mean. There are reasonable questions about 9/11, the commission, the not-under-oath testimony of Bush (who wouldn't appear without Cheney), the various intelligence agencies, what they knew etc. RP may have thought that's what she's asking about. Who knows? There's no way to tell from that brief video. Ya gotta love how these truthers rise do the defense of Ron Paul by insisting that he isn't one of them. How this man for whom they'd crawl through broken glass and bear his love-children is technically a "sheeple". It's funnier still how they don't recognize what they're saying before, or even after, they say it.

25th January 2010, 01:14 AM	#126
Sword_Of_Truth Penultimate Amazing Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 11,497	Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth Ya gotta love how these truthers rise do the defense of Ron Paul by insisting that he isn't one of them. How this man for whom they'd crawl through broken glass and bear his love-children is technically a "sheeple". It's funnier still how they don't recognize what they're saying before, or even after, they say it. It appears that I must withdraw this statement. I have read over all four of your posts and it appears you are not a quite a truther. I apologize for the confusion. My beliefs about Ron Paul remain, however. Despite the loud music and distractions you referred to, he obviously picked up the first question (about the IMF and the Fed) quite easily. I doubt he suddenly had a hearing failure in that environment that was coincidentally timed with the 9/11 twoof question. His answer to that question makes perfect sense in context as well. His answer was also almost exactly what we hear from the twoofers who post here when we ask them why don't they do something about it. Either it's too much hassle, or its too hard or there's no point in bringing it up with prosecutors and law enforcement who work for the government or their are washing their hair that night or some other lame excuse. Ron Paul is just as paranoid, divorced from reality and downright chicken@#$% as his tinfoiler followers.