| JREF Homepage | Swift Blog | Events Calendar | $1 Million Paranormal Challenge | The Amaz!ng Meeting | Useful Links | Support Us |
![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
|
|
#1 |
|
Scholar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 102
|
The Boy and His Egg
The Boy and His Egg When going out to check the mail the other day, I crossed paths with a school-aged child walking down the street in front of my house, carrying an egg. I always tried to be friendly to the little ones, so I stopped to show interest in what was obviously an object of immense pride for him. “Whoa,” I said. “Cool egg!” “Thanks!” he beamed. “Where’d you get it?” “I just found it in the woods.” He seemed so happy, I decided not to bother him about the fact that he had basically killed a baby bird. Instead I knelt down next to him and asked playfully, “Do you know what’s inside it?” “Nope. But I’m pretty sure it might be a baby robot.” “A baby robot? Wow, who’s ever heard of such a thing?” “A bunch of people. Ten of my friends all said they’ve seen baby robots. Tommy drew a picture of one during math class.” I chuckled and shook my head. “You children have the most active imaginations.” “It’s not imagination.” The boy started into a defiant tone, and I felt the first pangs of skeptical irritation. “They did see baby robots. And I really think there might be one in here.” “Well, don’t put too much stock in what a few friends say. It’s probably more likely there’s a baby bird in there.” “Prove it!” Breaking the egg was obviously out of the question. So instead I said, “Well, isn’t it more likely to be a bird? I mean, we see birds all the time – ” “Not all the time. I don’t see one right now.” “But I mean we see them regularly. They’re a part of our everyday experience, whereas baby robots – ” “Define everyday experience.” “Uhh… I don’t want to start splitting hairs with you. Let’s instead just agree that it’s far more likely to be a bird – ” “You keep saying that, but where’s your proof?” “I’m not saying I can prove it’s a bird. It might be a lizard, I guess, or a snake. But – ” “Or a baby robot.” “Highly unlikely, but – ” “So where’s your proof that it’s a bird?” “I can’t prove that it’s a bird, and I’m not trying to. I just mean that if people rarely see baby robots, and there’s so little basis for believing that a baby robot would be inside an egg, then it’s far more likely to be a bird.” “But WHERE’S YOUR PROOF that it’s a bird?” “I don’t have proof, and I’m NOT TRYING TO PROVE it’s a bird.” By now my face had turned red and I was forcing myself not to grab the kid by the collar and shake him. He pulled a piece of paper out of his pocket and unfolded it. It was a picture of a robot. “See, this is a baby robot standing next to Tommy’s house.” Even from the childish drawing, I could roughly estimate the size of the baby robot based on perspective and relative size. And I saw a problem. “But that thing’s way too big to fit inside an egg,” I said. “And not only that, but robots couldn’t grow from babies to adults, because they’re made out of metal. Not only is your idea unlikely, it’s totally impossible.” “Maybe - according to society’s current ideas of science.” Apparently this brat had gained a vocabulary without the knowledge to complement it. “But the egg is this size,” I held my fingers an inch a part, “and the robot is this size.” I held out my hands with about two feet between them. “It just doesn’t work!” “The scientific ideas of today indicate that a large robot will not fit into a small egg. But isn’t it closed-minded to think that will never change when we make new discoveries? That someday we won’t learn strange new things we can’t imagine right now?” I knew kids could be ignorant. But such elaborate ignorance blew my mind. It was almost impressive – in an utterly wasteful, depressing way. “No but there are some things that are just so implausible that it doesn’t benefit you to theorize – ” “That still doesn’t prove it’s a bird!” I threw up my hands and screamed, then ran down the street to my house. ***************************** I had resolved never again to speak a word to the little snot-nosed devil. But sitting on the couch, thinking of all the stupid things he said, I got restless. I shifted back and forth, then paced across the living room, all the while telling myself, “Don’t go back out there. Don’t go back out there…” But then, through the window, I saw the boy parading his “robot egg” up and down the street, and I just needed to… “DON’T GO OUT THERE!!!” My conscious reasoning screamed to my base impulses. I tried to stay strong. But then… Then I thought of a brilliant point I could make to him – one so clear and concise that the logic was unavoidable, even to that hellish punk. There was no way he could get around something so obvious!!! So I ran outside and spelled it all out for him – explained the difference between trying to prove it was a bird and using the possibility of being a bird as an alternate explanation that made the “robot hypothesis” infinitely less likely by comparison – then waited in anticipation. He looked at me for a minute, cocked his head as if thinking, then said: “That still doesn’t prove it’s a bird.” “But I wasn’t TRYING to prove it’s a bird!!!” “Yes you were.” “NO!!! I WASN’T!!!” I was now screaming into the face of this deep, dark logic vacuum, this epic failure of the public school system, this… “Then why did you say it was a bird.” “I didn’t! I was just said that was a POSSIBILITY!” “But if you can’t prove it, then – ” “AHHHHHHHH!!!!!!” I ran back into my house and slammed the door behind me. ***************************** I had resolved never again to speak a word to that depraved spawn of outer darkness. But sitting on the couch, thinking of all the stupid things he said, I got restless… * All people mentioned in this work are fictional. Certain connections to real life people or debates may be made by some, but such interpretation is entirely the responsibility of the reader. Adjectives used to describe the boy are solely those of the narrator, representing HIS feeling about the boy, and are not meant as an insult to any living person. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Muse
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: A small planet named for it's dirt. You'll find it filed under 'mostly harmless'
Posts: 578
|
|
|
__________________
"Everyone takes the limits of his own vision for the limits of the world." - Arthur Schopenhauer "New and stirring things are belittled because if they are not belittled, the humiliating question arises, 'Why then are you not taking part in them?' " - H. G. Wells |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: A forest in Georgia, US
Posts: 211
|
Rofl
|
|
__________________
I'm not defective, disabled, or handicapped. I'm different. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Certified Castlevania Fanboy
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Clock Tower Boss Room
Posts: 3,819
|
Nominated.
|
|
__________________
"What is a man? Just a miserable little pile of secrets!" - Dracula, Castlevania ![]() "The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head." - Terry Pratchett, Hogfather |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Daydreamer
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,049
|
Nominated as well.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Porvoo, Finland
Posts: 595
|
Absolutely brilliant. Bravo!
|
|
__________________
Think for yourself, question authority Question yourself, think for authority |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Land That Time Forgot
Posts: 670
|
So, I don't get it... was it a bird or a baby robot?
![]() OK - I know the egg was classified as a UFO (unidentified frying object) |
|
__________________
It's only my madness that stops me from going insane! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 136
|
This hits very close to home for me. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Not Bandiagara
Posts: 1,555
|
3. Why would the boy believe that a known and extant creature such as a bird, the proximity of which there is ample and irrefutable evidence near the site under discussion, is an equally plausible explanation for the contents of the egg as a baby robot, for which we have no physical, unambiguous, non-hoaxable evidence whatsoever?
Mental illness? Raw, unadulterated stupidity? Perhaps it's a pretense of believing for the purpose of trolling a web forum [when he grows up]? Maybe the |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Porvoo, Finland
Posts: 595
|
|
|
__________________
Think for yourself, question authority Question yourself, think for authority |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,391
|
The solution is easy : clasp both hand of the child over the
|
|
__________________
Omnes Blessant Ultima necat One doesn't necessarily need evidence to back up arguments. Interresting Ian own's words. Plus that is an old skeptic game, to ask for evidence. Historian's take on skepticism |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Not Bandiagara
Posts: 1,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Trevose, PA
Posts: 1,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,391
|
|
|
__________________
Omnes Blessant Ultima necat One doesn't necessarily need evidence to back up arguments. Interresting Ian own's words. Plus that is an old skeptic game, to ask for evidence. Historian's take on skepticism |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Trevose, PA
Posts: 1,656
|
I am bored today, don't mind me
![]() He admitted that he didn't know what was in the egg. you, on the other hand, Ok, well, that is a fine assumption, but if someone wants you to back up your assumption..... I don't think it is very effective to argue it with your premise So, it is more likely to be a bird because it is more likely to be a bird? And we see a lot of robots nowadays...... Wow, still trying to get him to accept your premise without proof, and dodging the argument by saying you don't want to get into it. You should have walked away right there, you were defeated. You just created a strawman here. He is asking proof on your premise, never saying that he wants proof that it IS ACTUALLY A BIRD! And then offers his alternate theory again. After all, it could even be Schroedinger's cat in that egg. Right, sorry kid. Great, now the kid is confused with the argument. Why do these things always happen when someone starts creating strawmen? Oh, now that the whole topic is derailed you offer an intelligent basis for your premise? Too late, if this was a thread on JREF, it would be in the AAH bucket by now |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Trevose, PA
Posts: 1,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Land That Time Forgot
Posts: 670
|
And we shouldn't overlook the possibility that it's a baby robot BIRD either.
|
|
__________________
It's only my madness that stops me from going insane! |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Trevose, PA
Posts: 1,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Scholar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 102
|
That would seem conclusive to us. But I've learned it would only scratch the surface of the rationalization process. "Current science teaches us that if you break an egg with a baby robot inside, you should see a baby robot and not egg yoke. But isn't it a little closed-minded to assume..." "Have you seen a baby robot in an egg? No? So how do you know what a baby robot in an egg would look like if you've never seen it before? It's outside your realm of comprehension." Ugggh... That's as far as I can go. I'm becoming ill. |
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Scholar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 102
|
He tried with all his might to establish that premise from the start, but the Surely some of you here have gone through something similar enough that you can relate? |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,070
|
Of course not. The baby robot is made of nano-bots, which, when hatched, would have assembled themselves into a baby robot form. But you had to go and squash them before they could assemble, and in this non-organized state, they just happen to resemble an uncooked egg. Prove me wrong!
|
|
__________________
One can't break the laws of physics, but you can be civilly disobedient towards them. - Dr. Tiki And yea, the Lord did text unto the Philistines... U guys have to stop s1nnig. I totaly <3 U guys 4ever but I will pwn U when I CUL8ER and U will be all OMG! and WTF! and I be LOL!!! - Psiload |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: High Wycombe, UK
Posts: 207
|
Enjoyed this immensely, Thanks Jer_j.
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,391
|
|
|
__________________
Omnes Blessant Ultima necat One doesn't necessarily need evidence to back up arguments. Interresting Ian own's words. Plus that is an old skeptic game, to ask for evidence. Historian's take on skepticism |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Scholar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 62
|
Great story
Two things came to mind while reading the story on what might work as 'proof' without breaking the egg. Candling, could work to see the shadow of what's inside (depending on thickness of the egg). This will likely just be seen as something is inside of the egg, such as a baby robot. Magnet, as most kids know robots have some metal parts. This will likely be seen as this robot is not made out of metal or is made of some non-magnetic metal. Great, now I'll be avoiding omelets till i can figure out whether or not I'll end up as part of the robot insurrection of 2018. |
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
The gap in the plot
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: BFE
Posts: 2,037
|
Great post jer-j!
|
|
__________________
A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.-William James. www.StopVisionFromFeeling.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Scholar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 102
|
Thanks everybody, for the feedback/complements.
It was fun to write.
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 162
|
I can't wait for "The Cad vs The Kid" round two......next time take some help, give me a call and we will sort out this little Pipsqueak Plato.
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,269
|
Funny story.
I'm surprised this kid didn't respond to you pointing out that robots don't grow the way humans or living creatures do. I think I might have asked, when he showed me the picture of the robot at Tommy's house, if he had actually personally seen the robot standing there. That might have led to a lively discussion about what kind of evidence he had that any of these robots actually existed, beyond his friends claiming they did. Good luck! |
|
__________________
www.stopsylvia.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 9,129
|
Get back at him by taking a potato out to him and claim it is also a robot egg and force him to disprove it. Revenge - the sweetest emotion.
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Government Loyalist
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Virgo Supercluster
Posts: 2,599
|
|
|
__________________
Nature abhors a moron. -H.L. Mencken |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,269
|
Ahh, I missed the fictional part in the fine print.
Good story. |
|
__________________
www.stopsylvia.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,371
|
If at all possible, I would have suggested we allow the egg to hatch naturally so that we could both learn something.
M. |
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rachel, KS
Posts: 4,566
|
|
|
__________________
"For people involved in the War on Stupid, it's hard to resist the call to battle." - Darth Rotor |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Scholar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 102
|
Yes... But when pressed for details he said it didn't matter. He laughed condescendingly at the idea anyone would wonder about his credentials, and insisted that the narrator drop the whole thing and judge the the baby robot hypothesis on its own (cough, cough) merits. He then reiterated the fact that the burden of proof was on the narrator for claiming the egg contained a bird, denied half the claims he'd made earlier, and blamed the narrator for bringing the whole thing up. The narrator ran back into his house and locked the door, wondering whether the child even cared about whether or not the egg contained a robot. Even a coherent but illogical discussion would have been nice - but instead the boy had lowered himself to making and retracting/denying the existence of various random claims so quickly that it became clear he was purposefully wasting the narrator's time. Does that answer your question? |
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rachel, KS
Posts: 4,566
|
|
|
__________________
"For people involved in the War on Stupid, it's hard to resist the call to battle." - Darth Rotor |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Scholar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 102
|
Good point. In the same way, I suggest that we wait for aliens to land on the White House lawn. That too would be a very educational experience. ![]() Of course one of the limits of this story's analogy is that an egg is bound to hatch (unless a child takes it out of its nest ), whereas there's no set timeline for the UFO question to be settled.
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Scholar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 102
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Muse
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Land That Time Forgot
Posts: 670
|
|
|
__________________
It's only my madness that stops me from going insane! |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Government Loyalist
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Virgo Supercluster
Posts: 2,599
|
It seems the boy still thinks that the baby robot is a more plausible theory. Why? Because a local ordinance forbids exotic birds as pets.
|
|
__________________
Nature abhors a moron. -H.L. Mencken |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|