Palin's Popularity Dropping Even Among Conservatives

Walter Ego · 12th February 2010, 01:10 PM

A recent Washington Post-ABC News poll shows Sarah Palin's positives are nosediving even among republicans. The general feeling is she is just not qualified for national office.

Quote:

Although Palin is a tea party favorite, her potential as a presidential hopeful takes a severe hit in the survey. Fifty-five percent of Americans have unfavorable views of her, while the percentage holding favorable views has dipped to 37, a new low in Post-ABC polling.

There is a growing sense that the former Alaska governor is not qualified to serve as president, with more than seven in 10 Americans now saying she is unqualified, up from 60 percent in a November survey. Even among Republicans, a majority now say Palin lacks the qualifications necessary for the White House.

Palin has lost ground among conservative Republicans, who would be crucial to her hopes if she seeks the party's presidential nomination in 2012. Forty-five percent of conservatives now consider her as qualified for the presidency, down sharply from 66 percent who said so last fall.

Among all Republicans polled, 37 percent now hold a "strongly favorable" opinion of Palin, about half the level recorded when she burst onto the national stage in 2008 as Sen. John McCain's running mate.

Among Democrats and independents, assessments of Palin also have eroded. Six percent of Democrats now consider her qualified for the presidency, a drop from 22 percent in November; the percentage of independents who think she is qualified fell to 29 percent from 37 percent

Sword_Of_Truth · 12th February 2010, 01:37 PM

Looks like the democrats better come up with a game plan for dealing with a real candidate.

EDIT: 5000th post! Where's my cookie!?

fullflavormenthol · 12th February 2010, 01:40 PM

I don't think anyone ever really believed Sarah Palin would be a serious candidate. Lets be honest the only reason she was ever a candidate for VP was so she could say all the controversial crap that plays to the base so that when people called her on it the campaign could claim sexism.

Skeptic · 12th February 2010, 01:41 PM

Quote:

A recent Washington Post-ABC News poll shows Sarah Palin's positives are nosediving even among republicans. The general feeling is she is just not qualified for national office.

That might well be true, as many conservatives say. I myself think her achievements might be a good start... but first, please, a completed tenure as governor, or a few of them, or a term as a senator.

lomiller · 12th February 2010, 01:46 PM

How can this be, when she clearly has the Republican platform in the palm of her hand?

dudalb · 12th February 2010, 02:01 PM

Originally Posted by Skeptic

That might well be true, as many conservatives say. I myself think her achievements might be a good start... but first, please, a completed tenure as governor, or a few of them, or a term as a senator.

And a better knowledge of foreign affairs, and stop using the "Just Plain Folks" routine when asked about foreign affairs.

Thunder · 12th February 2010, 02:21 PM

Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth

Looks like the democrats better come up with a game plan for dealing with a real candidate.

yeah? like who?

either way, Sarah Palin is a quitter. And a moron.

what would she do when things got crazy as President? resign?

how about the Republicans stop worrying about the 2012 election, and get to solving America's problems.

dudalb · 12th February 2010, 03:54 PM

In the end, you need a candidate who can attract the middle of the road voters in order to win....as much as the hard liners on both sides refuse to beleive this and Palin is damaged goods to the Moderate voters.

Brainster · 12th February 2010, 04:29 PM

Originally Posted by dudalb

In the end, you need a candidate who can attract the middle of the road voters in order to win....as much as the hard liners on both sides refuse to beleive this and Palin is damaged goods to the Moderate voters.

Dingdingding! If there's one thing I've learned paying close attention to the last 11 presidential elections, it's that the US is a 40-20-40 nation, where 40% of the population will vote for the Republican even if he's a red-headed dwarf albino, and 40% of the population will vote for the Democrat even if he's an inbred alcoholic wife-beater. It's that 20% in the middle that determines things.

That's not to say that Palin has no chance; but she'd have to have a terrific tailwind. Let's face it, ten years ago if I'd said the president today would be a black man with only 4 years experience as a US senator, everybody would have laughed.

Sword_Of_Truth · 12th February 2010, 04:32 PM

Originally Posted by parky76

yeah? like who?

either way, Sarah Palin is a quitter. And a moron.

what would she do when things got crazy as President? resign?

how about the Republicans stop worrying about the 2012 election, and get to solving America's problems.

You're really taking this thing hard, Parky.

Thunder · 12th February 2010, 04:34 PM

Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth

You're really taking this thing hard, Parky.

naaa...I just write with feeling. I'm a drama king.

Sword_Of_Truth · 12th February 2010, 04:38 PM

This is for you, Parky:

YouTube Video This video is not hosted by the JREF. The JREF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.

I AGREE

Thunder · 12th February 2010, 04:39 PM

she's a cutey.

mhaze · 12th February 2010, 04:42 PM

Pay attention, Parky...at 1:30!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yy2_p...eature=related

MarkCorrigan · 12th February 2010, 04:56 PM

Originally Posted by dudalb

And ~~a better~~ knowledge of foreign affairs, and stop using the "Just Plain Folks" routine when asked about foreign affairs.

Fixed it for you.

The Fool · 12th February 2010, 11:59 PM

The best fun Palin has provided is the fun of watching intelligent members here force themselves to keep options open in case they have to believe she is the best person for potus at some time in the future..

guys, relax. It will never happen.

applecorped · 13th February 2010, 04:46 PM

Originally Posted by The Fool

It will never happen.

Dr. Emmett Brown: Then tell me, "Future Boy", who's President in the United States in 1985?
Marty McFly: Ronald Reagan.
Dr. Emmett Brown: Ronald Reagan? The actor?
[chuckles in disbelief]

fullflavormenthol · 13th February 2010, 04:52 PM

Originally Posted by applecorped

Dr. Emmett Brown: Then tell me, "Future Boy", who's President in the United States in 1985?
Marty McFly: Ronald Reagan.
Dr. Emmett Brown: Ronald Reagan? The actor?
[chuckles in disbelief]

Hell, imagine being in 1985 California and telling them who their governor was going to be. I could see them sending me to the asylum over than one.

applecorped · 13th February 2010, 04:54 PM

Originally Posted by fullflavormenthol

Hell, imagine being in 1985 California and telling them who their governor was going to be. I could see them sending me to the asylum over than one.

Don't forget the Governator! Cali loves its actors.

MattusMaximus · 13th February 2010, 07:02 PM

Originally Posted by Skeptic

That might well be true, as many conservatives say. I myself think her achievements might be a good start... but first, please, a completed tenure as governor, or a few of them, or a term as a senator.

This is the thing that will really kill her in the GOP primaries or, if she makes it, the 2012 general election. The "quitter" meme is going to be a major deal-killer for a lot of people.

MattusMaximus · 13th February 2010, 07:06 PM

Originally Posted by Brainster

Dingdingding! If there's one thing I've learned paying close attention to the last 11 presidential elections, it's that the US is a 40-20-40 nation, where 40% of the population will vote for the Republican even if he's a red-headed dwarf albino, and 40% of the population will vote for the Democrat even if he's an inbred alcoholic wife-beater. It's that 20% in the middle that determines things.

Bingo, on the nosey, Brainster. The more extreme folks from both parties would be wise to remember this fact.

Quote:

That's not to say that Palin has no chance; but she'd have to have a terrific tailwind. Let's face it, ten years ago if I'd said the president today would be a black man with only 4 years experience as a US senator, everybody would have laughed.

Agreed. I think if the GOP wanted to have any real chance of beating Obama in 2012, they'd have to go with someone other than Palin. The only trouble is that she's the one on the Republican side getting all the attention & press, so by default she's like the public face of the GOP. Kind of a sticky situation, if you ask me, but then it's a long way until November 2012.

Btw, if you'd told me three years ago that we'd have a black president I'd have said you were crazy.

MattusMaximus · 13th February 2010, 07:08 PM

Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth

Looks like the democrats better come up with a game plan for dealing with a real candidate.

Yup, if they rest on their laurels and count on the GOP having a crappy candidate in 2012, they're asking for trouble. Hubris has toppled more than one politician... I think the most recent example was in... Massachusetts, perhaps?

MattusMaximus · 13th February 2010, 07:16 PM

Hypothetical scenario: Palin loses in the GOP primaries, and decides to run for POTUS as the "Tea Party" independent candidate. Plausible?

After seeing how she's been received by the TP-movement, I think it's entirely plausible.

Thunder · 13th February 2010, 07:31 PM

Originally Posted by MattusMaximus

Hypothetical scenario: Palin loses in the GOP primaries, and decides to run for POTUS as the "Tea Party" independent candidate. Plausible?

now THAT....would be my dream come true!!!

in fact, ANY Tea Party candidate would be beautiful.

Orly Taitz would be even better.

Skeptic · 13th February 2010, 10:52 PM

Not likely. Remember Nader essentially getting Bush into office?

Skeptic · 14th February 2010, 12:52 AM

Originally Posted by MattusMaximus

This is the thing that will really kill her in the GOP primaries or, if she makes it, the 2012 general election. The "quitter" meme is going to be a major deal-killer for a lot of people.

Agreed. Once again: Sarah Palin would make a bad president, probably, since she's simply not qualified enough for the job. This is no insult to Palin -- 99% of people don't have the qualification for the job. But "Sarah Palin would be a bad president" is one thing; "huh huh, stupid hick bitch!!!" face-twisting foam-spitting criticism quite another.

I'm not talking about merely making fun of her -- any candidate that can't take that surely shouldn't run (and obviously, whatever you say about her, she can take being made fun of). I'm talking about professors claiming that Palin is "deceiving" people into thinking she is a woman, or people on this very forum admitting they'd like to violently murder her (h'm -- there's no such thing as a non-violent murder, now is there?).

Tebtenri · 14th February 2010, 02:39 AM

Originally Posted by MattusMaximus

Hypothetical scenario: Palin loses in the GOP primaries, and decides to run for POTUS as the "Tea Party" independent candidate. Plausible?

After seeing how she's been received by the TP-movement, I think it's entirely plausible.

Oh well all the Dog Whistling, not bad at it either, one way to go as a "Nu Revolutionary" but will have to stage a coup on all those hangers or better yet arrest the entire legislature or both.

DJW · 14th February 2010, 05:18 AM

I wonder if the country is ready for a Mormon, moose killing ticket? Even by 2012, Sarah isn't going to be ready to be president, but she'll be ready for the VP position. Romney is ready now. If the TP backs Palin in the primaries, then Romney may be forced to align with her. The TP won't select its own candidate IMHO (Perot and Nader pretty much assure that).

12th February 2010, 01:10 PM	#1
Walter Ego Graduate Poster Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Savannah, Ga. Posts: 1,288	Palin's Popularity Dropping Even Among Conservatives A recent Washington Post-ABC News poll shows Sarah Palin's positives are nosediving even among republicans. The general feeling is she is just not qualified for national office. Quote: Although Palin is a tea party favorite, her potential as a presidential hopeful takes a severe hit in the survey. Fifty-five percent of Americans have unfavorable views of her, while the percentage holding favorable views has dipped to 37, a new low in Post-ABC polling. There is a growing sense that the former Alaska governor is not qualified to serve as president, with more than seven in 10 Americans now saying she is unqualified, up from 60 percent in a November survey. Even among Republicans, a majority now say Palin lacks the qualifications necessary for the White House. Palin has lost ground among conservative Republicans, who would be crucial to her hopes if she seeks the party's presidential nomination in 2012. Forty-five percent of conservatives now consider her as qualified for the presidency, down sharply from 66 percent who said so last fall. Among all Republicans polled, 37 percent now hold a "strongly favorable" opinion of Palin, about half the level recorded when she burst onto the national stage in 2008 as Sen. John McCain's running mate. Among Democrats and independents, assessments of Palin also have eroded. Six percent of Democrats now consider her qualified for the presidency, a drop from 22 percent in November; the percentage of independents who think she is qualified fell to 29 percent from 37 percent
	__________________ Visit My 9-11 Video Blog Visit My YouTube Channel

12th February 2010, 01:37 PM	#2
Sword_Of_Truth Philosopher Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 6,577	Looks like the democrats better come up with a game plan for dealing with a real candidate. EDIT: 5000th post! Where's my cookie!?
	Last edited by Sword_Of_Truth; 12th February 2010 at 01:39 PM.

12th February 2010, 01:41 PM	#4
Skeptic Sum, ergo cogito Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Behind the chessboard Posts: 15,751	Quote: A recent Washington Post-ABC News poll shows Sarah Palin's positives are nosediving even among republicans. The general feeling is she is just not qualified for national office. That might well be true, as many conservatives say. I myself think her achievements might be a good start... but first, please, a completed tenure as governor, or a few of them, or a term as a senator.
	__________________ "Please provide an example of someone in the Warsaw Ghetto uprising who was individually wronged by the Nazis." - Thunder (Parky76) "What was the point of Israel, again?" -- Gangularis

12th February 2010, 01:46 PM	#5
lomiller Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 3,509	How can this be, when she clearly has the Republican platform in the palm of her hand?
lomiller Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 3,509	__________________ War, war never changes...

12th February 2010, 02:21 PM	#7
Thunder Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 22,563	Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth Looks like the democrats better come up with a game plan for dealing with a real candidate. yeah? like who? either way, Sarah Palin is a quitter. And a moron. what would she do when things got crazy as President? resign? how about the Republicans stop worrying about the 2012 election, and get to solving America's problems.
	__________________ And now, Mr. Conway Twitty. Last edited by Thunder; 12th February 2010 at 02:23 PM.

12th February 2010, 01:40 PM	#3
fullflavormenthol Master Poster Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,141	I don't think anyone ever really believed Sarah Palin would be a serious candidate. Lets be honest the only reason she was ever a candidate for VP was so she could say all the controversial crap that plays to the base so that when people called her on it the campaign could claim sexism.

12th February 2010, 02:01 PM	#6
dudalb Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 17,471	Originally Posted by Skeptic That might well be true, as many conservatives say. I myself think her achievements might be a good start... but first, please, a completed tenure as governor, or a few of them, or a term as a senator. And a better knowledge of foreign affairs, and stop using the "Just Plain Folks" routine when asked about foreign affairs.

12th February 2010, 03:54 PM	#8
dudalb Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 17,471	In the end, you need a candidate who can attract the middle of the road voters in order to win....as much as the hard liners on both sides refuse to beleive this and Palin is damaged goods to the Moderate voters.

12th February 2010, 04:29 PM	#9
Brainster Philosopher Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 7,609	Originally Posted by dudalb In the end, you need a candidate who can attract the middle of the road voters in order to win....as much as the hard liners on both sides refuse to beleive this and Palin is damaged goods to the Moderate voters. Dingdingding! If there's one thing I've learned paying close attention to the last 11 presidential elections, it's that the US is a 40-20-40 nation, where 40% of the population will vote for the Republican even if he's a red-headed dwarf albino, and 40% of the population will vote for the Democrat even if he's an inbred alcoholic wife-beater. It's that 20% in the middle that determines things. That's not to say that Palin has no chance; but she'd have to have a terrific tailwind. Let's face it, ten years ago if I'd said the president today would be a black man with only 4 years experience as a US senator, everybody would have laughed.
Brainster Philosopher Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 7,609	__________________ 1960s Comic Book Nostalgia Check out my (Republican-oriented) Political Blog. Visit the Screw Loose Change blog.

12th February 2010, 04:32 PM	#10
Sword_Of_Truth Philosopher Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 6,577	Originally Posted by parky76 yeah? like who? either way, Sarah Palin is a quitter. And a moron. what would she do when things got crazy as President? resign? how about the Republicans stop worrying about the 2012 election, and get to solving America's problems. You're really taking this thing hard, Parky.

12th February 2010, 04:34 PM	#11
Thunder Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 22,563	Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth You're really taking this thing hard, Parky. naaa...I just write with feeling. I'm a drama king.
	__________________ And now, Mr. Conway Twitty.

12th February 2010, 04:39 PM	#13
Thunder Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 22,563	she's a cutey.
	__________________ And now, Mr. Conway Twitty.

12th February 2010, 04:42 PM	#14
mhaze Philosopher Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Woo*(+-1.10)^20=AGWwoo Posts: 9,197	Pay attention, Parky...at 1:30! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yy2_p...eature=related
	__________________ Get your climate widget Climategate - History's Biggest Scam Poptech's List Climate Acronyms

12th February 2010, 04:56 PM	#15
MarkCorrigan Venerate the Immortal Emperor Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Middle of nowhere, UK. Posts: 2,641	Originally Posted by dudalb And ~~a better~~ knowledge of foreign affairs, and stop using the "Just Plain Folks" routine when asked about foreign affairs. Fixed it for you.
	__________________ "The beauty of a living thing is not the atoms that go into it, but the way those atoms are put together." - Carl Sagan "Choose your next words with exceptional care." - Commissar Holt to Planetary Governor Pachenka

12th February 2010, 11:59 PM	#16
The Fool Philosopher Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 9,911	The best fun Palin has provided is the fun of watching intelligent members here force themselves to keep options open in case they have to believe she is the best person for potus at some time in the future.. guys, relax. It will never happen.
	__________________ And what is good, Phaedrus,and what is not good. Need we ask anyone to tell us these things? R. M. Pirsig. (Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance) Lose half your IQ....Ask me how.

13th February 2010, 04:46 PM	#17
applecorped Rotten to the core Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Boston, MA Posts: 6,693	Originally Posted by The Fool It will never happen. Dr. Emmett Brown: Then tell me, "Future Boy", who's President in the United States in 1985? Marty McFly: Ronald Reagan. Dr. Emmett Brown: Ronald Reagan? The actor? [chuckles in disbelief]
	__________________ It's all in the mind.

13th February 2010, 04:52 PM	#18
fullflavormenthol Master Poster Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,141	Originally Posted by applecorped Dr. Emmett Brown: Then tell me, "Future Boy", who's President in the United States in 1985? Marty McFly: Ronald Reagan. Dr. Emmett Brown: Ronald Reagan? The actor? [chuckles in disbelief] Hell, imagine being in 1985 California and telling them who their governor was going to be. I could see them sending me to the asylum over than one.

13th February 2010, 04:54 PM	#19
applecorped Rotten to the core Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Boston, MA Posts: 6,693	Originally Posted by fullflavormenthol Hell, imagine being in 1985 California and telling them who their governor was going to be. I could see them sending me to the asylum over than one. Don't forget the Governator! Cali loves its actors.
	__________________ It's all in the mind.

13th February 2010, 07:02 PM	#20
MattusMaximus Intellectual Gladiator Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: In the midst of a vast, beautiful & uncaring universe Posts: 8,636	Originally Posted by Skeptic That might well be true, as many conservatives say. I myself think her achievements might be a good start... but first, please, a completed tenure as governor, or a few of them, or a term as a senator. This is the thing that will really kill her in the GOP primaries or, if she makes it, the 2012 general election. The "quitter" meme is going to be a major deal-killer for a lot of people.
	__________________ Visit my blog: The Skeptical Teacher Women Thinking Free Foundation (WTFF) Critical Thinking Education Group (CTEG) Everybody wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die...

13th February 2010, 07:06 PM	#21
MattusMaximus Intellectual Gladiator Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: In the midst of a vast, beautiful & uncaring universe Posts: 8,636	Originally Posted by Brainster Dingdingding! If there's one thing I've learned paying close attention to the last 11 presidential elections, it's that the US is a 40-20-40 nation, where 40% of the population will vote for the Republican even if he's a red-headed dwarf albino, and 40% of the population will vote for the Democrat even if he's an inbred alcoholic wife-beater. It's that 20% in the middle that determines things. Bingo, on the nosey, Brainster. The more extreme folks from both parties would be wise to remember this fact. Quote: That's not to say that Palin has no chance; but she'd have to have a terrific tailwind. Let's face it, ten years ago if I'd said the president today would be a black man with only 4 years experience as a US senator, everybody would have laughed. Agreed. I think if the GOP wanted to have any real chance of beating Obama in 2012, they'd have to go with someone other than Palin. The only trouble is that she's the one on the Republican side getting all the attention & press, so by default she's like the public face of the GOP. Kind of a sticky situation, if you ask me, but then it's a long way until November 2012. Btw, if you'd told me three years ago that we'd have a black president I'd have said you were crazy.
	__________________ Visit my blog: The Skeptical Teacher Women Thinking Free Foundation (WTFF) Critical Thinking Education Group (CTEG) Everybody wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die...

13th February 2010, 07:08 PM	#22
MattusMaximus Intellectual Gladiator Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: In the midst of a vast, beautiful & uncaring universe Posts: 8,636	Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth Looks like the democrats better come up with a game plan for dealing with a real candidate. Yup, if they rest on their laurels and count on the GOP having a crappy candidate in 2012, they're asking for trouble. Hubris has toppled more than one politician... I think the most recent example was in... Massachusetts, perhaps?
	__________________ Visit my blog: The Skeptical Teacher Women Thinking Free Foundation (WTFF) Critical Thinking Education Group (CTEG) Everybody wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die...

13th February 2010, 07:16 PM	#23
MattusMaximus Intellectual Gladiator Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: In the midst of a vast, beautiful & uncaring universe Posts: 8,636	Hypothetical scenario: Palin loses in the GOP primaries, and decides to run for POTUS as the "Tea Party" independent candidate. Plausible? After seeing how she's been received by the TP-movement, I think it's entirely plausible.
	__________________ Visit my blog: The Skeptical Teacher Women Thinking Free Foundation (WTFF) Critical Thinking Education Group (CTEG) Everybody wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die... Last edited by MattusMaximus; 13th February 2010 at 07:17 PM.

13th February 2010, 07:31 PM	#24
Thunder Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 22,563	Originally Posted by MattusMaximus Hypothetical scenario: Palin loses in the GOP primaries, and decides to run for POTUS as the "Tea Party" independent candidate. Plausible? now THAT....would be my dream come true!!! in fact, ANY Tea Party candidate would be beautiful. Orly Taitz would be even better.
	__________________ And now, Mr. Conway Twitty.

13th February 2010, 10:52 PM	#25
Skeptic Sum, ergo cogito Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Behind the chessboard Posts: 15,751	Not likely. Remember Nader essentially getting Bush into office?
	__________________ "Please provide an example of someone in the Warsaw Ghetto uprising who was individually wronged by the Nazis." - Thunder (Parky76) "What was the point of Israel, again?" -- Gangularis

14th February 2010, 12:52 AM	#26
Skeptic Sum, ergo cogito Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Behind the chessboard Posts: 15,751	Originally Posted by MattusMaximus This is the thing that will really kill her in the GOP primaries or, if she makes it, the 2012 general election. The "quitter" meme is going to be a major deal-killer for a lot of people. Agreed. Once again: Sarah Palin would make a bad president, probably, since she's simply not qualified enough for the job. This is no insult to Palin -- 99% of people don't have the qualification for the job. But "Sarah Palin would be a bad president" is one thing; "huh huh, stupid hick bitch!!!" face-twisting foam-spitting criticism quite another. I'm not talking about merely making fun of her -- any candidate that can't take that surely shouldn't run (and obviously, whatever you say about her, she can take being made fun of). I'm talking about professors claiming that Palin is "deceiving" people into thinking she is a woman, or people on this very forum admitting they'd like to violently murder her (h'm -- there's no such thing as a non-violent murder, now is there?).
	__________________ "Please provide an example of someone in the Warsaw Ghetto uprising who was individually wronged by the Nazis." - Thunder (Parky76) "What was the point of Israel, again?" -- Gangularis

14th February 2010, 02:39 AM	#27
Tebtenri Student Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 33	Originally Posted by MattusMaximus Hypothetical scenario: Palin loses in the GOP primaries, and decides to run for POTUS as the "Tea Party" independent candidate. Plausible? After seeing how she's been received by the TP-movement, I think it's entirely plausible. Oh well all the Dog Whistling, not bad at it either, one way to go as a "Nu Revolutionary" but will have to stage a coup on all those hangers or better yet arrest the entire legislature or both.
Tebtenri Student Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 33

14th February 2010, 05:18 AM	#28
DJW Critical Thinker Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Boston, MA Posts: 272	I wonder if the country is ready for a Mormon, moose killing ticket? Even by 2012, Sarah isn't going to be ready to be president, but she'll be ready for the VP position. Romney is ready now. If the TP backs Palin in the primaries, then Romney may be forced to align with her. The TP won't select its own candidate IMHO (Perot and Nader pretty much assure that).