"Why Bushco should be prosecuted for 9/11"

NWO Sentryman · 8th April 2010, 04:23 AM

http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot...d-for-911.html

Credit to Len Hart

Okay, i'm going to fisk this big wall of text. I'm probably going to need to get some brain bleach after wading through this stoopid.

Quote:

There is not a shred of credible and/or admissible evidence to support the Bush administration's official conspiracy theory of 911.

What about the NIST report or these sites?

Quote:

The theory is ludicrous on its face

No, it is the most viable and the most probable one as well as the "theory" with the most evidence, compared to laser thermite.

Quote:

that 19 Arab Hijackers, coordinated from deep inside a cave in the mountains of Tora Bora managed to hijack four commercial airliners with which

Yeah, evyer action by such a lage multinational terrorist organisation has to be co-ordinated from its nerve centre.

No it was co-ordinated form Cells in Hamburg and New York.

Quote:

it is theorized --they attacked the United States. There is absolutely no evidence to support that ludicrous, stupid theory. It's utterly baseless.

No, it was confirmed, by Bin Laden himself, numerous Al-Qaeda operatives who tried to give the lame excuse that us support for israle justified their actions as well as numerous CIA reports.

Quote:

Right wing partisans concocted it knowing that Americans have been conditioned by previous GOP regimes to swallow ********!

So Rush Limbaugh Engineered 9/11!

And Democrats were honest and only told the truth by your logic.

Quote:

At first, it was enough to marginalize critics: just call them 'conspiracy theorists'. Ludicrous!

Or maybe that was calling a spade a spade, Len Hart.

Quote:

That's just desperate name-calling, a tactic with which they are practiced.

*facepalm* what ould you call someone who believed that the US Govt is so powerful and nigh omnipotent as to stage terror attacks and blame it on a patsy?

Quote:

The conclusion consistent with a growing body of peer-reviewed science is this: nothing said by Bush about 911 is true.

OMFG, that's going to the stundies.

Quote:

Secondly, Bushco's ludicrous cover story is the looniest conspiracy since Ali Baba and his 40 thieves!

Em, if Bushco was lying, what is your theory? back it up with proof, and not big timecube esque walls of text.

Quote:

They, too, were 'co-ordinated' from inside a cave but without cell phones! Ali Baba was a thief! Bush is a mass murdering traitor to the people of the United States.

Ladies and Gentlemen, i think we have a double stundie here and when ahs bush ever adhered to enemies of the United states and given them aid and comfort.

Any theory -especially an 'official' one -must meet certain minimum criteria:

Quote:

* It must be verifiable!

As it has been with these links:
http://www.911myths.com/

http://wtc.nist.gov/

Quote:

* Unless it is a revolutionary discovery in the field of physics (like Einstein's Relativity, for example) it must be consistent with the established science of physics.

It is consistent, as numerous investigations have shown.

Quote:

* It must be consistent with Occam's razor, that is, it must explain rather than raise additional issues or insoluble problems. That's why Einstein's theory survived. It explained. It did not obfuscate. It simplified much of our understanding of the universe by equating gravity with a curvature of space-time.

It is consistent with occam's razor. what else would cause a tower to collapse after a boeing 757 slammed into it with a lot of fuel and other flammible materials?

Quote:

* It must articulate the 'probable cause' that a crime was committed and the 'probable cause' to begin a specific investigation of suspects not upon 'reasonable suspicion' but 'probable cause'.

What about Al-Qaeda's admissions? The numerous investigations (9/11 commission etc.)?

that's about as far as i am going to go here people because this is hurting my brain.

twinstead · 8th April 2010, 06:16 AM

The stupid. It burns.

bynmdsue · 8th April 2010, 09:50 AM

well,he's passionate and incredulous. and also just not telling the truth.

sylvan8798 · 8th April 2010, 10:01 AM

Quote:

That's why Einstein's theory survived. It explained. It did not obfuscate. It simplified much of our understanding of the universe by equating gravity with a curvature of space-time.

Probably the first time I've seen Einstein's Theory of Relativity and the word "simplified" in the same sentence. Has he studied that stuff?

sheeplesnshills · 8th April 2010, 12:56 PM

Originally Posted by sylvan8798

Probably the first time I've seen Einstein's Theory of Relativity and the word "simplified" in the same sentence. Has he studied that stuff?

Probably not but he thinks it makes him sound intelligent and thus make his story more plausible to even dumber truthers. Is there anything new in what this guys says?

MikeW · 8th April 2010, 01:00 PM

No, there's nothing new here, quite the opposite - Hart is pulling out ancient nonsense, even going on about Olmsted's "autopsy list" as though it proves something. What a clown.

NWO Sentryman · 8th April 2010, 01:47 PM

Originally Posted by sheeplesnshills

Probably not but he thinks it makes him sound intelligent and thus make his story more plausible to even dumber truthers. Is there anything new in what this guys says?

nope. He's just a necromancer.

NWO Sentryman · 10th April 2010, 08:21 AM

might i also add that Len Hart never really adds new information. It's just copypasta from previous stories with some new spin.

twinstead · 10th April 2010, 08:33 AM

Originally Posted by NWO Sentryman

might i also add that Len Hart never really adds new information. It's just copypasta from previous stories with some new spin.

Mmmmmm. Copypasta with a little marinara sauce and some nice garlic bread. Now I'm hungry.

8th April 2010, 04:23 AM	#1
NWO Sentryman Proud NWO Gatekeeper Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Quantum Gate to the NWO Posts: 3,863	"Why Bushco should be prosecuted for 9/11" http://existentialistcowboy.blogspot...d-for-911.html Credit to Len Hart Okay, i'm going to fisk this big wall of text. I'm probably going to need to get some brain bleach after wading through this stoopid. Quote: There is not a shred of credible and/or admissible evidence to support the Bush administration's official conspiracy theory of 911. What about the NIST report or these sites? Quote: The theory is ludicrous on its face No, it is the most viable and the most probable one as well as the "theory" with the most evidence, compared to laser thermite. Quote: that 19 Arab Hijackers, coordinated from deep inside a cave in the mountains of Tora Bora managed to hijack four commercial airliners with which Yeah, evyer action by such a lage multinational terrorist organisation has to be co-ordinated from its nerve centre. No it was co-ordinated form Cells in Hamburg and New York. Quote: it is theorized --they attacked the United States. There is absolutely no evidence to support that ludicrous, stupid theory. It's utterly baseless. No, it was confirmed, by Bin Laden himself, numerous Al-Qaeda operatives who tried to give the lame excuse that us support for israle justified their actions as well as numerous CIA reports. Quote: Right wing partisans concocted it knowing that Americans have been conditioned by previous GOP regimes to swallow *******! So Rush Limbaugh Engineered 9/11! And Democrats were honest and only told the truth by your logic. Quote: At first, it was enough to marginalize critics: just call them 'conspiracy theorists'. Ludicrous! Or maybe that was calling a spade a spade, Len Hart. Quote: That's just desperate name-calling, a tactic with which they are practiced. facepalm* what ould you call someone who believed that the US Govt is so powerful and nigh omnipotent as to stage terror attacks and blame it on a patsy? Quote: The conclusion consistent with a growing body of peer-reviewed science is this: nothing said by Bush about 911 is true. OMFG, that's going to the stundies. Quote: Secondly, Bushco's ludicrous cover story is the looniest conspiracy since Ali Baba and his 40 thieves! Em, if Bushco was lying, what is your theory? back it up with proof, and not big timecube esque walls of text. Quote: They, too, were 'co-ordinated' from inside a cave but without cell phones! Ali Baba was a thief! Bush is a mass murdering traitor to the people of the United States. Ladies and Gentlemen, i think we have a double stundie here and when ahs bush ever adhered to enemies of the United states and given them aid and comfort. Any theory -especially an 'official' one -must meet certain minimum criteria: Quote: * It must be verifiable! As it has been with these links: http://www.911myths.com/ http://wtc.nist.gov/ Quote: * Unless it is a revolutionary discovery in the field of physics (like Einstein's Relativity, for example) it must be consistent with the established science of physics. It is consistent, as numerous investigations have shown. Quote: * It must be consistent with Occam's razor, that is, it must explain rather than raise additional issues or insoluble problems. That's why Einstein's theory survived. It explained. It did not obfuscate. It simplified much of our understanding of the universe by equating gravity with a curvature of space-time. It is consistent with occam's razor. what else would cause a tower to collapse after a boeing 757 slammed into it with a lot of fuel and other flammible materials? Quote: * It must articulate the 'probable cause' that a crime was committed and the 'probable cause' to begin a specific investigation of suspects not upon 'reasonable suspicion' but 'probable cause'. What about Al-Qaeda's admissions? The numerous investigations (9/11 commission etc.)? that's about as far as i am going to go here people because this is hurting my brain.
	__________________ If I now say "dominoes", you won't think "pizza". Will you? - FireGarden on the Middle East Last edited by NWO Sentryman; 8th April 2010 at 04:25 AM.

8th April 2010, 06:16 AM	#2
twinstead Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Big corner office in NWO Towers Posts: 11,596	The stupid. It burns.
	__________________ You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison

8th April 2010, 01:00 PM	#6
MikeW Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 1,911	No, there's nothing new here, quite the opposite - Hart is pulling out ancient nonsense, even going on about Olmsted's "autopsy list" as though it proves something. What a clown.
MikeW Graduate Poster Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 1,911

8th April 2010, 01:47 PM	#7
NWO Sentryman Proud NWO Gatekeeper Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Quantum Gate to the NWO Posts: 3,863	Originally Posted by sheeplesnshills Probably not but he thinks it makes him sound intelligent and thus make his story more plausible to even dumber truthers. Is there anything new in what this guys says? nope. He's just a necromancer.
	__________________ If I now say "dominoes", you won't think "pizza". Will you? - FireGarden on the Middle East

10th April 2010, 08:21 AM	#8
NWO Sentryman Proud NWO Gatekeeper Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Quantum Gate to the NWO Posts: 3,863	might i also add that Len Hart never really adds new information. It's just copypasta from previous stories with some new spin.
	__________________ If I now say "dominoes", you won't think "pizza". Will you? - FireGarden on the Middle East

8th April 2010, 09:50 AM	#3
bynmdsue Graduate Poster Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,385	well,he's passionate and incredulous. and also just not telling the truth.

8th April 2010, 10:01 AM	#4
sylvan8798 Graduate Poster Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 1,528	Quote: That's why Einstein's theory survived. It explained. It did not obfuscate. It simplified much of our understanding of the universe by equating gravity with a curvature of space-time. Probably the first time I've seen Einstein's Theory of Relativity and the word "simplified" in the same sentence. Has he studied that stuff?

8th April 2010, 12:56 PM	#5
sheeplesnshills Illuminator Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 3,706	Originally Posted by sylvan8798 Probably the first time I've seen Einstein's Theory of Relativity and the word "simplified" in the same sentence. Has he studied that stuff? Probably not but he thinks it makes him sound intelligent and thus make his story more plausible to even dumber truthers. Is there anything new in what this guys says?

10th April 2010, 08:33 AM	#9
twinstead Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Big corner office in NWO Towers Posts: 11,596	Originally Posted by NWO Sentryman might i also add that Len Hart never really adds new information. It's just copypasta from previous stories with some new spin. Mmmmmm. Copypasta with a little marinara sauce and some nice garlic bread. Now I'm hungry.
	__________________ You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison