| JREF Homepage | Swift Blog | Events Calendar | $1 Million Paranormal Challenge | The Amaz!ng Meeting | Useful Links | Support Us |
 |
|
| JREF Homepage | Swift Blog | Events Calendar | $1 Million Paranormal Challenge | The Amaz!ng Meeting | Useful Links | Support Us |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
|
Advertisement
|
| Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
21st November 2010, 02:20 PM
|
#1 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Kent, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,336
|
The Royal We.
One must admit that after an innocent typo on the Bilderberg podcast discussion we have rather enjoyed intentionally repeating the use of archaic form of self address, the Windsor We so to speak, if only because a certain colonial of limited faculties deems it an embugerance and has to grasp its simple meaning. We are amused, if you will pardon the vulgar jape. But have we been too cruel? The poor fellow seems to wallow in laudinum dream levels of paranoia?
I think I just invented talk like a dandy day. |
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
