Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

 JREF Forum I am the first in the world

 Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.

 Tags consciousness

 23rd November 2010, 11:27 AM #1 alfa1 Banned   Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 331 I am the first in the world I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality. The most important question: Who am I? I found the answer: I am a WAVE and the wave function is: |ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3> + c4|Φ4> + c5|Φ5> + c6|Φ6> + c7|Φ7> are 7 states |Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers.
 23rd November 2010, 11:29 AM #2 Mister Earl Master Poster     Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 2,116 That and fifty cents might get you a bag of chips, I suppose.
 23rd November 2010, 11:29 AM #3 GreenLines Critical Thinker     Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Minnesota, USA Posts: 370 I'm a high school drop out, and this looks like a math equation. Mind breaking this down so I could understand it? __________________ Smikes, ja.
 23rd November 2010, 11:35 AM #4 alfa1 Banned   Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 331 Short: You have 7 quantum states, the superposition of those states multiplied with the probability to be on each state give you the wave function...
 23rd November 2010, 11:37 AM #5 Giggywig Master Poster     Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina Posts: 2,853 Originally Posted by Mister Earl That and fifty cents might get you a bag of chips, I suppose. Not around here, you';d need 40 cents more.
 23rd November 2010, 11:39 AM #6 Giggywig Master Poster     Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina Posts: 2,853 Is this you? some blog
 23rd November 2010, 11:43 AM #7 Zanders Muse     Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 689 Why don't you prove that chakra centers exist first?
 23rd November 2010, 11:44 AM #8 Soapy Sam NLH   Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 25,885 Originally Posted by Zanders Why don't you prove that chakra centers exist first? The force grows strong in this one
 23rd November 2010, 11:45 AM #9 Vorticity Fluid Mechanic     Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Los Alamos, NM Posts: 2,644 Originally Posted by alfa1 I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality. The most important question: Who am I? I found the answer: I am a WAVE and the wave function is: |ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3> + c4|Φ4> + c5|Φ5> + c6|Φ6> + c7|Φ7> are 7 states |Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers. Are the 7 states |Φi > orthonormal? Are they complete? What Hilbert space do they span? Are the amplitudes ci fixed, or are they constrained by the observation of observables? Does the wave function |ψ> serve to completely specify the individual? If so, how can it be that a given human is constrained and characterized via the specification of a mere seven complex numbers? __________________ Free lunch. Final wisdom. Total coverage. http://stopsylvia.com
 23rd November 2010, 11:46 AM #10 alfa1 Banned   Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 331 Giggywig yes, is my blog...
 23rd November 2010, 11:48 AM #11 alfa1 Banned   Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 331 My theory is about chakras and can be extended to the acupuncture points. I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality. The most important question: Who am I?I found the answer: I am a WAVE and the wave function is: |ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3>+ ... + c(n-1)|Φ(n-1)> + cn|Φn> are n states |Φi > because are n acupuncture points or energy centers.
 23rd November 2010, 11:49 AM #12 AdMan Philosopher     Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 7,157
 23rd November 2010, 11:51 AM #13 Vorticity Fluid Mechanic     Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Los Alamos, NM Posts: 2,644 Originally Posted by alfa1 My theory is about chakras and can be extended to the acupuncture points. I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality. The most important question: Who am I?I found the answer: I am a WAVE and the wave function is: |ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3>+ ... + c(n-1)|Φ(n-1)> + cn|Φn> are n states |Φi > because are n acupuncture points or energy centers. Does there exist an analog of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients that describes the relationship between the coefficients {c1,..., c7} of an eigenstate of the Chakra operator and the coefficients {c1, ..., cn} of an eigenstate of the Acupuncture operator? __________________ Free lunch. Final wisdom. Total coverage. http://stopsylvia.com Last edited by Vorticity; 23rd November 2010 at 12:05 PM. Reason: Spelling! "Gordan" not "Gordon"!
 23rd November 2010, 11:57 AM #14 madurobob Philosopher     Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Blue Heaven, NC Posts: 5,518 Originally Posted by alfa1 My theory is about... Funky math aside, a theory is useless if it has no predictive power nor testable hypotheses. So what testable predictions does your theory give us and how is it useful? __________________ Insert witty phrase or out of context post by another member here.
 23rd November 2010, 12:00 PM #15 roger Penultimate Amazing     Join Date: May 2002 Location: Mountain View, CA Posts: 11,021 Originally Posted by Vorticity Does there exist an analog of Clebsch-Gordon coefficients that describes the relationship between the coefficients {c1,..., c7} of an eigenstate of the Chakra operator and the coefficients {c1, ..., cn} of an eigenstate of the Acupuncture operator? I see what you did there. __________________ May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view. May your mountains rise into and above the clouds. - Edward Abbey Climb the mountains and get their good tidings. Nature's peace will flow into you as sunshine flows into trees. The winds will blow their own freshness into you, and the storms their energy, while cares will drop off like autumn leaves. - John Muir
 23rd November 2010, 12:03 PM #16 alfa1 Banned   Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 331 madurobob Wow Funky math aside, a theory is useless ! Show me another theory Who am I? and I will delete my wave function!
 23rd November 2010, 12:06 PM #17 madurobob Philosopher     Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Blue Heaven, NC Posts: 5,518 Originally Posted by alfa1 madurobob Wow Funky math aside, a theory is useless ! Show me another theory Who am I? and I will delete my wave function! So, what you are saying is that you cannot explain your own theory in a way that provides any testable predictions or claims? Imagine my surprise. __________________ Insert witty phrase or out of context post by another member here.
 23rd November 2010, 12:06 PM #18 paiute Graduate Poster     Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Smack in the middle of a de Broglie wavelength. Posts: 1,138 Originally Posted by alfa1 I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality. The most important question: Who am I? I found the answer: I am a WAVE and the wave function is: |ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3> + c4|Φ4> + c5|Φ5> + c6|Φ6> + c7|Φ7> are 7 states |Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers. I thought the primary equation was b4I4q ru/18 qt(pi)? __________________ A Novel and Efficient Synthesis of Cadaverine Organic chemistry, vengeful ghosts, and high explosives. What could possibly go wrong? Now free for download! http://www.scribd.com/doc/36568510/A...-of-Cadaverine
 23rd November 2010, 12:07 PM #19 Vorticity Fluid Mechanic     Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Los Alamos, NM Posts: 2,644 Originally Posted by alfa1 madurobob Wow Funky math aside, a theory is useless ! Show me another theory Who am I? and I will delete my wave function! Better yet, tell us who you are and collapse your wave function. __________________ Free lunch. Final wisdom. Total coverage. http://stopsylvia.com
 23rd November 2010, 12:07 PM #20 ben m Illuminator   Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 4,637 Are the chakras a complete basis? Are they stationary states? I'd hate to start the day as |Φ5> and gradually evolve into |Φ7>---or worse, |Φ8> (the tau neutrino) or |Φ9> (chi) or |Φ10> (strontium). Maybe the Power Balance Bracelet can help prevent that.
 23rd November 2010, 12:10 PM #21 alfa1 Banned   Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 331 I worked 2 years to find a link between spirituality and science, for the wave function....
 23rd November 2010, 12:13 PM #22 Giggywig Master Poster     Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina Posts: 2,853 Sounds like time well spent.
 23rd November 2010, 12:19 PM #23 Zanders Muse     Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 689 Originally Posted by alfa1 I worked 2 years to find a link between spirituality and science, for the wave function.... Can you demonstrate any of this as more that just speculation? If not, nobody really cares. Sorry.
 23rd November 2010, 12:24 PM #24 ben m Illuminator   Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 4,637 Originally Posted by alfa1 I worked 2 years to find a link between spirituality and science, for the wave function.... It's not a "wave function" unless it's a solution to a wave equation. What's the wave equation?
 23rd November 2010, 12:29 PM #25 SumDood Muse     Join Date: May 2008 Location: Alabama Posts: 706 Originally Posted by Vorticity Does there exist an analog of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients that describes the relationship between the coefficients {c1,..., c7} of an eigenstate of the Chakra operator and the coefficients {c1, ..., cn} of an eigenstate of the Acupuncture operator? You are WAY off. Would one test the polarity of a Bogin-time reversal module with bare hands and a volt-meter? Only if you wanted to disrupt the existing continuum belt! Eigenstates only correspond to the innate differential between the first member of any set. To properly deduce the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, one must first lay forth the principles postulated by the great quantum philosopher Zeron Druthers, in which he configured the locations of the Chi lines via sub-protian scanning. This is basic theoretical quantum. Try cracking a book sometime. Last edited by SumDood; 23rd November 2010 at 12:32 PM. Reason: Mis-attrubuted source of the inventor of sub-protean scanning
 23rd November 2010, 01:08 PM #26 Swagomatic Homer Simpson Analogue     Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Arizona Posts: 1,848 Originally Posted by SumDood You are WAY off. Would one test the polarity of a Bogin-time reversal module with bare hands and a volt-meter? Only if you wanted to disrupt the existing continuum belt! Eigenstates only correspond to the innate differential between the first member of any set. To properly deduce the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, one must first lay forth the principles postulated by the great quantum philosopher Zeron Druthers, in which he configured the locations of the Chi lines via sub-protian scanning. This is basic theoretical quantum. Try cracking a book sometime. Well, I was going to mention that, but now I don't have to. Thanks. As old Zeron was fond of saying, "you can state your wave, but you can't wave your state" __________________ I do mind, the Dude minds. This will not stand, ya know, this aggression will not stand, man. - The Dude
 23rd November 2010, 01:13 PM #27 alfaniner Penultimate Amazing     Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Sorth Dakonsin Posts: 11,378 Please do not confuse the OP poster with me... __________________ Science doesn't lie.
 23rd November 2010, 01:15 PM #28 ZirconBlue Sole Survivor of L-Town     Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Wilson, North Carolina, USA, Earth Posts: 11,311 Originally Posted by alfa1 I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality. Somehow, I doubt it. __________________ Religion and sex are powerplays. Manipulate the people for the money they pay. Selling skin, selling God The numbers look the same on their credit cards.
 23rd November 2010, 01:15 PM #29 PiedPiper Scholar   Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 98 "tell us who you are and collapse your wave function" giggle I'm an organic chemist (10+ years post PhD)...sorry, I found that comment incredibly amusing!
 23rd November 2010, 01:18 PM #30 Giggywig Master Poster     Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina Posts: 2,853 Originally Posted by alfaniner Please do not confuse the OP poster with me... You are obviously 8 generations ahead of him, so your equation must account for like 27 chakras!
 23rd November 2010, 01:26 PM #31 dafydd Penultimate Amazing     Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Belgium (Flatland) Posts: 31,441 Originally Posted by Soapy Sam The force farce grows strong in this one ftfy
 23rd November 2010, 01:34 PM #32 Spindrift Enturbulator Extraordinaire     Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Right here! Posts: 8,445 I used to know what an eigenvalue was, but alas I fear that those neurons were destroyed shortly after graduation. Why is "Who am I?" the most important question? I always thought the most important question was "Any more beer?" __________________ I've always believed that cluelessness evolved as an adaptation to allow the truly appalling to live with themselves. - G. B. Trudeau A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it. - Kay, Men in Black.
 23rd November 2010, 01:46 PM #33 casebro Philosopher   Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 6,787 42 __________________ Please pardon me for having ideas, not facts. Some have called me cynical, but I don't believe them. It's not how many breaths you take. It's how many times you have been breathless that counts.
 23rd November 2010, 02:02 PM #34 Brainache Nasty Brutish and Tall     Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Knob Hill. Posts: 9,081 Originally Posted by Spindrift I used to know what an eigenvalue was, but alas I fear that those neurons were destroyed shortly after graduation. Why is "Who am I?" the most important question? I always thought the most important question was "Any more beer?" But if you keep asking the "Any more beer?" question you will eventually arrive at the "who am I?" question, also the "where are my pants?" question and most importantly, the "who peed on the floor?" question. __________________ Words cannot convey the vertiginous retching horror that enveloped me as I lost consciousness. - W. S. Burroughs Invert the prominent diaphragm!!!
 23rd November 2010, 02:04 PM #35 roger Penultimate Amazing     Join Date: May 2002 Location: Mountain View, CA Posts: 11,021 f(me) = sum (beer consumed) + sum (books read) + sum (assets-liabilities) - weight (ejaculate wasted on the ground) __________________ May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view. May your mountains rise into and above the clouds. - Edward Abbey Climb the mountains and get their good tidings. Nature's peace will flow into you as sunshine flows into trees. The winds will blow their own freshness into you, and the storms their energy, while cares will drop off like autumn leaves. - John Muir
 23rd November 2010, 02:04 PM #36 Halfcentaur Philosopher     Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 5,935 Time cube !
 23rd November 2010, 02:05 PM #37 Sledge Grammaton Cleric     Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Swingin' on a star Posts: 7,123 Originally Posted by alfa1 My theory is about chakras and can be extended to the acupuncture points. Miss Elk? Is that you? __________________ "The perfect haiku would have just two syllables: Airwolf" ~ Ernest Cline "Science knows it doesn't know everything, otherwise it would stop" ~ Dara O'Briain.
 23rd November 2010, 02:26 PM #38 JFrankA Illuminator     Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Hartford, CT Posts: 4,054 Originally Posted by alfa1 madurobob Wow Funky math aside, a theory is useless ! Show me another theory Who am I? and I will delete my wave function! René Descartes beat you to it, did it simpler and was more accurate. __________________ "How perverted you are.", "I will bite you like a serpent. The poison will slowly kill your sophism..." - SnakeTongue "More truth is in a single issue of Mad than a year of Time." - Gord in Toronto "Oh, and one more thing: For those who fight for it, life has a flavor the sheltered will never know." - Wise man in Sucker Punch
 23rd November 2010, 02:41 PM #39 catsmate1 Philosopher     Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Dublin (the one in Ireland) Posts: 7,095 Originally Posted by AdMan Not surprising. He's been spamming this nonsense, and his self proclaimed superiority to Einstein, Newton, Maxwell, Schrödinger and Planck around the 'net for the last couple of months. Even Usenet. What is it about electronic engineers that causes them to think they understand quantum mechanics better than physicists........
 23rd November 2010, 02:49 PM #40 bokonon Illuminator     Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 4,444 Originally Posted by alfa1 I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality. I'm pretty sure "The Tao of Physics" and "The Dancing Wu-Li Masters" has written of links between the two before. Their stuff seemed more comprehensible than this wave chancre. __________________ Laugh while you can, monkey boy.

JREF Forum

 Bookmarks Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google Reddit