I am the first in the world - Page 2

Halfcentaur · 23rd November 2010, 03:00 PM

Actually Alfa, all fun aside. I was the first person in the world to realize the link between science and spirituality, and here's the proof with a time stamp. ( this is me )

alfa1 · 23rd November 2010, 03:23 PM

No wave function here: "The Tao of Physics" and "The Dancing Wu-Li Masters"

Fnord · 23rd November 2010, 03:24 PM

Originally Posted by alfa1

I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality.

FALSE. Refer please to Genesis, chapter 1, verse 3, to wit...

"And God said,

... and there was light."

Originally Posted by alfa1

The most important question: Who am I?

FALSE.

The most important question is, "Where will I spend my eternity?" It was appointed unto man once to die after which is the judgement; this means that man cannot receive a second chance after death, to repent and to strengthen up his ways. Such an opportunity will pass forever after death. Do not loose it; especially because God has prepared for you an eternal salvation.

Originally Posted by alfa1

I found the answer:
I am a WAVE

FALSE.

For it is written: "... I am the resurrection and the life. Whoever believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live, and everyone who lives and believes in me shall never die..." -- John 11:25-26 (NIV)

Originally Posted by alfa1

... and the wave function is:
|ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3> + c4|Φ4> + c5|Φ5> + c6|Φ6> + c7|Φ7>

FALSE.

Vorticity has addressed the mathematical shortcomings of your claim. To wit:

Originally Posted by Vorticity

Are the 7 states |Φi > orthonormal? Are they complete? What Hilbert space do they span? Are the amplitudes ci fixed, or are they constrained by the observation of observables? Does the wave function |ψ> serve to completely specify the individual? If so, how can it be that a given human is constrained and characterized via the specification of a mere seven complex numbers?

The flaws of your claim are glaringly obvious to anyone with even a modicum of knowledge in theoretical physics, higher-order maths and theology.

Originally Posted by alfa1

are 7 states |Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers.

Evidence, please? First prove that chakras exist, as this seems to be the basis for your entire claim.

The Man · 23rd November 2010, 03:33 PM

Originally Posted by catsmate1

What is it about electronic engineers that causes them to think they understand quantum mechanics better than physicists........

Overestimation of their current potential by distorting the applied field.

Zanders · 23rd November 2010, 03:35 PM

Seconding what Fnord said. First prove to us that chakras exist.

You completely ignored it when I asked earlier.

quadraginta · 23rd November 2010, 04:00 PM

Originally Posted by Swagomatic

Well, I was going to mention that, but now I don't have to. Thanks. As old Zeron was fond of saying, "you can state your wave, but you can't wave your state"

To be fair, it depends on whether or not someone presses charges ... in most jurisdictions, at any rate.

This is why the observer is so important to the quantum state.

quarky · 23rd November 2010, 04:21 PM

I farted and burped simultaneously. For all i know, I am the first.
If you think its irrelevant, or easy, try to do it.
You can read about the experience on my blog, or buy the book and the t-shirt.

My ego swells with every moment I revel in this achievement, yet I remain humble and accessible.

How cool is that?

marplots · 23rd November 2010, 04:25 PM

Originally Posted by paiute

I thought the primary equation was b4I4q ru/18 qt(pi)?

Quit posting my JREF password.

marplots · 23rd November 2010, 04:26 PM

Originally Posted by alfa1

I worked 2 years to find a link between spirituality and science, for the wave function....

And I took 2 minutes to dismiss the whole enterprise.

That, my friend, is just good ol' American efficiency there.

ynot · 23rd November 2010, 04:34 PM

Originally Posted by alfa1

I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality.
The most important question: Who am I?
I found the answer:
I am a WAVE and the wave function is:
|ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3> + c4|Φ4> + c5|Φ5> + c6|Φ6> + c7|Φ7>
are 7 states |Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers.

WOW! You are a special and unique person! (just like everyone else).

Methinks someone forgot to take their medication today.

alfaniner · 23rd November 2010, 04:36 PM

Originally Posted by Giggywig

You are obviously 8 generations ahead of him, so your equation must account for like 27 chakras!

I like to think of it as "eight louder".

The Kilted Yaksman · 23rd November 2010, 04:58 PM

Originally Posted by alfa1

I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality.
The most important question: Who am I?
I found the answer:
I am a WAVE and the wave function is:
|ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3> + c4|Φ4> + c5|Φ5> + c6|Φ6> + c7|Φ7>
are 7 states |Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers.

Nope.

Apathia · 23rd November 2010, 05:05 PM

No! I am the first!
This very day I answered the ultimate question of poetry.

So what say you rhymes with the word 'orange?'
The answer I say is too great a challenge!

LordoftheLeftHand · 23rd November 2010, 05:35 PM

This thread is a thinly veiled advertisement for a couple of books:
http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/who-am-i/2294872
http://www.lulu.com/product/paperbac...ing-god/238736

afslav · 23rd November 2010, 05:43 PM

And I bought four copies because I'm really interested in his ideas and I think they're just too advanced for me to understand with only one reading.

alfa, do your books address the wave equation this wave function is a solution for?

TjW · 23rd November 2010, 06:30 PM

Originally Posted by Apathia

No! I am the first!
This very day I answered the ultimate question of poetry.

So what say you rhymes with the word 'orange?'
The answer I say is too great a challenge!

Trivial:

I'll paint this door a lovely orange
then hang the door upon the door hinge.

Fnord · 23rd November 2010, 06:39 PM

Originally Posted by The Man

Overestimation of their current potential by distorting the applied field.

Watt? With great power comes great current squared times resistance.

Fnord · 23rd November 2010, 06:47 PM

Originally Posted by Zanders

Seconding what Fnord said. First prove to us that chakras exist. You completely ignored it when I asked earlier.

It is in the nature of wooists to ignore requests for proof of their first assumptions, for they would rather be believed than ever actually prove their claims.

Apathia · 23rd November 2010, 07:08 PM

Originally Posted by TjW

Trivial:

I'll paint this door a lovely orange
then hang the door upon the door hinge.

You are The First!

Gilmar · 23rd November 2010, 07:16 PM

Originally Posted by SumDood

Would one test the polarity of a Bogin-time reversal module with bare hands and a volt-meter? Only if you wanted to disrupt the existing continuum belt!

YES, that's why they say i'm MAD, but i will SHOW THEM ALL!!!!

The Man · 23rd November 2010, 07:22 PM

Originally Posted by Fnord

Watt? With great power comes great current squared times resistance.

Are you charging me with inducing an impedance to the conduction of a less reactive attenuation of insulated potentials? What The Farad? I’m phased by your capacitance for the permittivity of your own ohmnipotence.

Loss Leader · 23rd November 2010, 07:36 PM

I AM THE FIRST TO WRITE THIS FUNCTION!

f(x) = [something completely made up] + [some complex math]

where x = the set of all nonsense that needs to look true

MattusMaximus · 23rd November 2010, 08:06 PM

Oh goody, another physics crank

alfa1 · 23rd November 2010, 09:13 PM

Read at least a book about chakras...

AdMan · 23rd November 2010, 09:16 PM

Originally Posted by alfa1

Read at least a book about chakras...

Read at least a few threads in this forum about what most skeptics think of chakras.

ETA- Hint: try the search function.

ben m · 23rd November 2010, 09:23 PM

Originally Posted by alfa1

Read at least a book about chakras...

Read this one! I just wrote it. It is more accurate than Alfa1's books.

A FREE EBOOK ABOUT CHAKRAS

Chapter 1: Chakras

Chakras do not exist.

Chapter 2: The Importance of Chakras

Some people once thought chakras existed. Some probably still do. They are wrong, chakras don't exist.

Chapter 3: A History of Chakra-Related Beliefs, for Historico-Cultural Interest Only

(Chapter 3 appears to be cut-and-pasted from Wikipedia and can be found there in its entirety. -Eds.)

THE END.

alfa1 · 23rd November 2010, 09:26 PM

How many bodies do you have?

AdMan · 23rd November 2010, 09:29 PM

Originally Posted by alfa1

How many bodies do you have?

In my basement? Who told you that?? It's a vile lie!

The Man · 23rd November 2010, 09:35 PM

Originally Posted by alfa1

How many bodies do you have?

Have now or have I had?

When working, at least one other than myself. Up to four or five on weekdays. Why, do you need us to help you move or something like that?

dio · 23rd November 2010, 09:44 PM

Originally Posted by alfa1

How many bodies do you have?

You mean, like, the whole forum?

quixotecoyote · 23rd November 2010, 09:47 PM

Originally Posted by alfa1

How many bodies do you have?

With deeds, or just de facto?

The Man · 23rd November 2010, 10:11 PM

Alfa1, as a “wave” with a “wave function” what happens to you or your ‘functionality’ when you encounter someone else 180 degrees out of phase with you? This thread should give you a clue.

Wrathernaut · 24th November 2010, 12:36 AM

Originally Posted by alfa1

I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality.
The most important question: Who am I?
I found the answer:
I am a WAVE and the wave function is:
|ψ> = c1|Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3> + c4|Φ4> + c5|Φ5> + c6|Φ6> + c7|Φ7>
are 7 states |Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers.

I have solved your equation of who you are.

By subsituting the following symbols for each of the 7 chakras:
U, R, I, D, 1, 0, T the solution is obvious.

arthwollipot · 24th November 2010, 01:00 AM

Just a quick note to let you know that I'm watching this thread. Some responses so far have been approaching uncivil or offtopic. Please remember your Membership Agreement while continuing to enjoy the extremely interesting and challenging discussion.

Posted By:arthwollipot

DevilsAdvocate · 24th November 2010, 01:27 AM

Originally Posted by alfa1

I am a WAVE and the wave function is:

OK. That is actually the Wave2 (W2) function.

alfa1 · 24th November 2010, 02:16 AM

When you will die for sure you will realize that you have another body!
Read about OBE!

Jack by the hedge · 24th November 2010, 02:18 AM

Originally Posted by alfa1

When you will die for sure you will realize that you have another body!

Always handy to keep a spare.

DevilsAdvocate · 24th November 2010, 02:32 AM

Originally Posted by alfa1

When you will die for sure you will realize that you have another body!

I'm not going to die for sure. My will requires that my body be placed in a box before death and continue to perpetuate in a quantum dead/non-dead state forever! I'll have two bodies: dead and non-dead!

Originally Posted by alfa1

Read about OBE!

I’ve already read about OBE! Read about OBE!

Rincewind · 24th November 2010, 04:27 AM

well I for one am disappointed.

I saw the word "quantum" in the tag and though it must be true.

Apparently not...

Giggywig · 24th November 2010, 04:32 AM

Originally Posted by alfa1

When you will die for sure you will realize that you have another body!

Talk about untestable claims.

Originally Posted by alfa1

Read about OBE!

Order of the British Empire?

23rd November 2010, 03:00 PM	#41
Halfcentaur Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 5,946	Actually Alfa, all fun aside. I was the first person in the world to realize the link between science and spirituality, and here's the proof with a time stamp. ( this is me )
Halfcentaur Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 5,946	Last edited by Halfcentaur; 23rd November 2010 at 03:10 PM.

23rd November 2010, 03:23 PM	#42
alfa1 Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 331	No wave function here: "The Tao of Physics" and "The Dancing Wu-Li Masters"
alfa1 Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 331

23rd November 2010, 03:24 PM	#43
Fnord Metasyntactic Variable Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 6,633	Originally Posted by alfa1 I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality. FALSE. Refer please to Genesis, chapter 1, verse 3, to wit... *"And God said,* *... and there was light."* Originally Posted by alfa1 The most important question: Who am I? FALSE. The most important question is, "Where will I spend my eternity?" It was appointed unto man once to die after which is the judgement; this means that man cannot receive a second chance after death, to repent and to strengthen up his ways. Such an opportunity will pass forever after death. Do not loose it; especially because God has prepared for you an eternal salvation. Originally Posted by alfa1 I found the answer: I am a WAVE FALSE. For it is written: "... I am the resurrection and the life. Whoever believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live, and everyone who lives and believes in me shall never die..." -- John 11:25-26 (NIV) Originally Posted by alfa1 ... and the wave function is: \|ψ> = c1\|Φ1> + c2\|Φ2> + c3\|Φ3> + c4\|Φ4> + c5\|Φ5> + c6\|Φ6> + c7\|Φ7> FALSE. Vorticity has addressed the mathematical shortcomings of your claim. To wit: Originally Posted by Vorticity Are the 7 states \|Φi > orthonormal? Are they complete? What Hilbert space do they span? Are the amplitudes ci fixed, or are they constrained by the observation of observables? Does the wave function \|ψ> serve to completely specify the individual? If so, how can it be that a given human is constrained and characterized via the specification of a mere seven complex numbers? The flaws of your claim are glaringly obvious to anyone with even a modicum of knowledge in theoretical physics, higher-order maths and theology. Originally Posted by alfa1 are 7 states \|Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers. Evidence, please? First prove that chakras exist, as this seems to be the basis for your entire claim.
	__________________ Belief is the subjective acceptance of a (valid or invalid) concept, opinion, or theory; Faith is the unreasoned belief in improvable things; *and Knowledge* is the reasoned belief in provable things. Belief itself proves nothing.** Last edited by Fnord; 23rd November 2010 at 03:29 PM.

23rd November 2010, 03:33 PM	#44
The Man Scourge, of the supernatural Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Poughkeepsie, NY Posts: 7,518	Originally Posted by catsmate1 What is it about electronic engineers that causes them to think they understand quantum mechanics better than physicists........ Overestimation of their current potential by distorting the applied field.
	__________________ "Not a seat but a springboard” (1942 Winston Churchill) "As he who, seeking asses, found a kingdom" (1671 Milton "Paradise Regained") "for it seem'd A void was made in nature, all her bonds Crack'd; and I saw the flaring atom-streams And torrents of her myriad universe, Ruining along the illimitable inane, Fly on to clash together again, and make Another and another frame of things For ever." (1868 Tennyson "Lucretius")

23rd November 2010, 03:35 PM	#45
Zanders Muse Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 689	Seconding what Fnord said. First prove to us that chakras exist. You completely ignored it when I asked earlier.
Zanders Muse Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 689

23rd November 2010, 04:00 PM	#46
quadraginta What was the question? Join Date: May 2009 Location: Central Vale of Humility Posts: 7,907	Originally Posted by Swagomatic Well, I was going to mention that, but now I don't have to. Thanks. As old Zeron was fond of saying, "you can state your wave, but you can't wave your state" To be fair, it depends on whether or not someone presses charges ... in most jurisdictions, at any rate. This is why the observer is so important to the quantum state.
	__________________ "It never does just what I want, but only what I tell it."

23rd November 2010, 04:21 PM	#47
quarky Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 20,454	I farted and burped simultaneously. For all i know, I am the first. If you think its irrelevant, or easy, try to do it. You can read about the experience on my blog, or buy the book and the t-shirt. My ego swells with every moment I revel in this achievement, yet I remain humble and accessible. How cool is that?
quarky Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 20,454

23rd November 2010, 04:25 PM	#48
marplots Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 5,383	Originally Posted by paiute I thought the primary equation was b4I4q ru/18 qt(pi)? Quit posting my JREF password.
marplots Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 5,383

23rd November 2010, 04:26 PM	#49
marplots Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 5,383	Originally Posted by alfa1 I worked 2 years to find a link between spirituality and science, for the wave function.... And I took 2 minutes to dismiss the whole enterprise. That, my friend, is just good ol' American efficiency there.
marplots Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 5,383

23rd November 2010, 04:34 PM	#50
ynot Illuminator Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: New Zealand Posts: 4,646	Originally Posted by alfa1 I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality. The most important question: Who am I? I found the answer: I am a WAVE and the wave function is: \|ψ> = c1\|Φ1> + c2\|Φ2> + c3\|Φ3> + c4\|Φ4> + c5\|Φ5> + c6\|Φ6> + c7\|Φ7> are 7 states \|Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers. WOW! You are a special and unique person! (just like everyone else). Methinks someone forgot to take their medication today.
	__________________ Rumours of a god’s existence have been greatly exaggerated. My post are all (IMO) unless stated otherwise.

23rd November 2010, 04:36 PM	#51
alfaniner Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Sorth Dakonsin Posts: 11,382	Originally Posted by Giggywig You are obviously 8 generations ahead of him, so your equation must account for like 27 chakras! I like to think of it as "eight louder".
	__________________ Science doesn't lie.

23rd November 2010, 04:58 PM	#52
The Kilted Yaksman Sense Offender Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 549	Originally Posted by alfa1 I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality. The most important question: Who am I? I found the answer: I am a WAVE and the wave function is: \|ψ> = c1\|Φ1> + c2\|Φ2> + c3\|Φ3> + c4\|Φ4> + c5\|Φ5> + c6\|Φ6> + c7\|Φ7> are 7 states \|Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers. Nope.
	__________________ "Reality" is the only word in the language that should always be used in quotes. "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."-Voltaire

23rd November 2010, 05:05 PM	#53
Apathia Master Poster Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Tempe, AZ Posts: 2,936	No! I am the first! This very day I answered the ultimate question of poetry. So what say you rhymes with the word 'orange?' The answer I say is too great a challenge!
	__________________ "At the Supreme Court level where we work, 90 percent of any decision is emotional. The rational part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections." Justice William O. Douglas "Humans aren't rational creatures but rationalizing creatures." Author Unknown

23rd November 2010, 05:35 PM	#54
LordoftheLeftHand Dominus Sinistrae Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 1,186	This thread is a thinly veiled advertisement for a couple of books: http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/who-am-i/2294872 http://www.lulu.com/product/paperbac...ing-god/238736
	__________________ What though the field be lost? All is not lost—the unconquerable will, And study of revenge, immortal hate, And courage never to submit or yield - Milton, Paradise Lost

23rd November 2010, 05:43 PM	#55
afslav New Blood Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 4	And I bought four copies because I'm really interested in his ideas and I think they're just too advanced for me to understand with only one reading. alfa, do your books address the wave equation this wave function is a solution for?
afslav New Blood Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 4	Last edited by afslav; 23rd November 2010 at 05:44 PM.

23rd November 2010, 06:30 PM	#56
TjW Philosopher Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: up in the air Posts: 9,980	Originally Posted by Apathia No! I am the first! This very day I answered the ultimate question of poetry. So what say you rhymes with the word 'orange?' The answer I say is too great a challenge! Trivial: I'll paint this door a lovely orange then hang the door upon the door hinge.
	__________________ TjW People like TjW -- Kelly

23rd November 2010, 06:39 PM	#57
Fnord Metasyntactic Variable Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 6,633	Originally Posted by The Man Overestimation of their current potential by distorting the applied field. Watt? With great power comes great current squared times resistance.
	__________________ Belief is the subjective acceptance of a (valid or invalid) concept, opinion, or theory; Faith is the unreasoned belief in improvable things; *and Knowledge* is the reasoned belief in provable things. Belief itself proves nothing.**

23rd November 2010, 06:47 PM	#58
Fnord Metasyntactic Variable Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 6,633	Originally Posted by Zanders Seconding what Fnord said. First prove to us that chakras exist. You completely ignored it when I asked earlier. It is in the nature of wooists to ignore requests for proof of their first assumptions, for they would rather be believed than ever actually prove their claims.
	__________________ Belief is the subjective acceptance of a (valid or invalid) concept, opinion, or theory; Faith is the unreasoned belief in improvable things; *and Knowledge* is the reasoned belief in provable things. Belief itself proves nothing.**

23rd November 2010, 07:08 PM	#59
Apathia Master Poster Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Tempe, AZ Posts: 2,936	Originally Posted by TjW Trivial: I'll paint this door a lovely orange then hang the door upon the door hinge. You are The First!
	__________________ "At the Supreme Court level where we work, 90 percent of any decision is emotional. The rational part of us supplies the reasons for supporting our predilections." Justice William O. Douglas "Humans aren't rational creatures but rationalizing creatures." Author Unknown

23rd November 2010, 07:16 PM	#60
Gilmar Muse Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: From the desert to the sea. Posts: 564	Originally Posted by SumDood Would one test the polarity of a Bogin-time reversal module with bare hands and a volt-meter? Only if you wanted to disrupt the existing continuum belt! YES, that's why they say i'm MAD, but i will SHOW THEM ALL!!!!
	__________________ Woo, woo, woo, woo, woo, I'm pulling over the side of the road to let the ambulance drive by. - Senex "World domination is such an ugly phrase. I prefer to call it world optimization." - Less Wrong You can't make Frodo a Jedi without giving Sauron the Death Star. - Less Wrong

23rd November 2010, 07:22 PM	#61
The Man Scourge, of the supernatural Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Poughkeepsie, NY Posts: 7,518	Originally Posted by Fnord Watt? With great power comes great current squared times resistance. Are you charging me with inducing an impedance to the conduction of a less reactive attenuation of insulated potentials? What The Farad? I’m phased by your capacitance for the permittivity of your own ohmnipotence.
	__________________ "Not a seat but a springboard” (1942 Winston Churchill) "As he who, seeking asses, found a kingdom" (1671 Milton "Paradise Regained") "for it seem'd A void was made in nature, all her bonds Crack'd; and I saw the flaring atom-streams And torrents of her myriad universe, Ruining along the illimitable inane, Fly on to clash together again, and make Another and another frame of things For ever." (1868 Tennyson "Lucretius")

23rd November 2010, 07:36 PM	#62
Loss Leader Opinionated Jerk Moderator Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: New York Posts: 11,885	I AM THE FIRST TO WRITE THIS FUNCTION! f(x) = [something completely made up] + [some complex math] where x = the set of all nonsense that needs to look true
	__________________ Follow me on Twitter! @LossLeader This force is receiving all the right to vote through the use of magic. - Miernik Wieslaw <NEW> VOTE FOR ME JUST BECAUSE <NEW>

23rd November 2010, 08:06 PM	#63
MattusMaximus Intellectual Gladiator Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: In the midst of a vast, beautiful & uncaring universe Posts: 14,175	Oh goody, another physics crank
	__________________ Visit my blog: The Skeptical Teacher The Times They Are A-Changin'

23rd November 2010, 09:13 PM	#64
alfa1 Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 331	Read at least a book about chakras...
alfa1 Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 331

23rd November 2010, 09:16 PM	#65
AdMan Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 7,168	Originally Posted by alfa1 Read at least a book about chakras... Read at least a few threads in this forum about what most skeptics think of chakras. ETA- Hint: try the search function.
AdMan Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 7,168	Last edited by AdMan; 23rd November 2010 at 09:18 PM.

23rd November 2010, 09:23 PM	#66
ben m Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 4,648	Originally Posted by alfa1 Read at least a book about chakras... Read this one! I just wrote it. It is more accurate than Alfa1's books. A FREE EBOOK ABOUT CHAKRAS Chapter 1: Chakras Chakras do not exist. Chapter 2: The Importance of Chakras Some people once thought chakras existed. Some probably still do. They are wrong, chakras don't exist. Chapter 3: A History of Chakra-Related Beliefs, for Historico-Cultural Interest Only (Chapter 3 appears to be cut-and-pasted from Wikipedia and can be found there in its entirety. -Eds.) THE END.
ben m Illuminator Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 4,648

23rd November 2010, 09:26 PM	#67
alfa1 Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 331	How many bodies do you have?
alfa1 Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 331

23rd November 2010, 09:29 PM	#68
AdMan Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 7,168	Originally Posted by alfa1 How many bodies do you have? In my basement? Who told you that?? It's a vile lie!
AdMan Philosopher Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 7,168

23rd November 2010, 09:35 PM	#69
The Man Scourge, of the supernatural Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Poughkeepsie, NY Posts: 7,518	Originally Posted by alfa1 How many bodies do you have? Have now or have I had? When working, at least one other than myself. Up to four or five on weekdays. Why, do you need us to help you move or something like that?
	__________________ "Not a seat but a springboard” (1942 Winston Churchill) "As he who, seeking asses, found a kingdom" (1671 Milton "Paradise Regained") "for it seem'd A void was made in nature, all her bonds Crack'd; and I saw the flaring atom-streams And torrents of her myriad universe, Ruining along the illimitable inane, Fly on to clash together again, and make Another and another frame of things For ever." (1868 Tennyson "Lucretius") Last edited by The Man; 23rd November 2010 at 09:37 PM. Reason: added quote

23rd November 2010, 09:44 PM	#70
dio Thinker Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 233	Originally Posted by alfa1 How many bodies do you have? You mean, like, the whole forum?
dio Thinker Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 233	__________________ "The atheist's decision to toss out the whole concept of god is pleasing to the type of god that would have to exist for an atheist to believe." - quarky "Screw it, Evolution is a myth. Prove to me that Evolution is a fact!! Show me something evolving on camera, film something evolving. Then I will accept it as fact." - Squidgy

23rd November 2010, 09:47 PM	#71
quixotecoyote Howling to glory I go Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 9,621	Originally Posted by alfa1 How many bodies do you have? With deeds, or just de facto?
	__________________ If people needed video games to live, a national single payer plan to fund those purchases would be a great idea.

23rd November 2010, 10:11 PM	#72
The Man Scourge, of the supernatural Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Poughkeepsie, NY Posts: 7,518	Alfa1, as a “wave” with a “wave function” what happens to you or your ‘functionality’ when you encounter someone else 180 degrees out of phase with you? This thread should give you a clue.
	__________________ "Not a seat but a springboard” (1942 Winston Churchill) "As he who, seeking asses, found a kingdom" (1671 Milton "Paradise Regained") "for it seem'd A void was made in nature, all her bonds Crack'd; and I saw the flaring atom-streams And torrents of her myriad universe, Ruining along the illimitable inane, Fly on to clash together again, and make Another and another frame of things For ever." (1868 Tennyson "Lucretius")

24th November 2010, 12:36 AM	#73
Wrathernaut Thinker Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 243	Originally Posted by alfa1 I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality. The most important question: Who am I? I found the answer: I am a WAVE and the wave function is: \|ψ> = c1\|Φ1> + c2\|Φ2> + c3\|Φ3> + c4\|Φ4> + c5\|Φ5> + c6\|Φ6> + c7\|Φ7> are 7 states \|Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers. I have solved your equation of who you are. By subsituting the following symbols for each of the 7 chakras: U, R, I, D, 1, 0, T the solution is obvious.
Wrathernaut Thinker Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 243

24th November 2010, 01:27 AM	#75
DevilsAdvocate Illuminator Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 3,643	Originally Posted by alfa1 I am a WAVE and the wave function is: OK. That is actually the Wave2 (W2) function.
	__________________ Heaven forbid someone reads these words and claims to be adversely affected by them, thus ensuring a barrage of lawsuits filed under the guise of protecting the unknowing victims who were stupid enough to read this and believe it! - Kevin Trudeau

24th November 2010, 02:16 AM	#76
alfa1 Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 331	When you will die for sure you will realize that you have another body! Read about OBE!
alfa1 Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 331