| JREF Homepage | Swift Blog | Events Calendar | $1 Million Paranormal Challenge | The Amaz!ng Meeting | Useful Links | Support Us |
![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
|
|
#241 |
|
Show me the monkey!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,512
|
No. MM had a clear view of the subject and you can bet that he would have seen swinging arms with no gun. As you close the distance with increasing certainty that it is a human you call out "Hey there" or "Hold on a second, let's talk". If you see them stop and raise a gun at you then hit the dirt and holler "Don't shoot".
|
|
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#242 |
|
Show me the monkey!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,512
|
Actually, the most likely option is that you are seeing a shill put there by the production crew, not a hunter.
|
|
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#243 |
|
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail
Posts: 12,695
|
What evidence do we have of MM saying what he claims to have said?
Is this intruder mentioned later in the show when they do the wrap up? How can we believe that when they did what they did with the candy bar recreation? No one cut that... They said themselves that it must be a juvenile squatch that took the candy, not the producers. MM said a sasquatch killled the deer, not the producers. MM said powerline cuts were sasquatch highways for deer hunting, not the producers. |
|
__________________
What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break? |
|
|
|
|
|
#244 |
|
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail
Posts: 12,695
|
Nope. You don't charge a human in the first place. You just yell "hello" or "hey you over there" etc.
You would only charge if you were crazy, or if you already knew what was going on, imo. It would be common to carry a handgun for protection in the woods. It would be common to be scared and shoot at something charging you in the woods in the dark. Much better to just yell "hey you on the hill, can I come up and talk" |
|
__________________
What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break? |
|
|
|
|
|
#245 |
|
Show me the monkey!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,512
|
But the context of this particular situation is different. First, I don't think that Moneymaker actually believes that Bigfoot exists in the first place. He knows that they are out in the middle of nowhere and the idea of a sudden curious bystander or hunter is absurd. The instant he sees the figure he knows it's a guy and three seconds later he deduces that it is a shill put there by the producers. He knows he is in no danger chasing after this guy and giving the producers what they want in the process. He breaks off his pursuit because he knows that he will only encounter the shill and therefore ruin the whole fantasy game that the producers and cast are playing with each other throughout all of the episodes.
He knows not to fully pull back the curtain that hides the Wizard. |
|
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#246 |
|
Show me the monkey!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,512
|
That shill was there to be seen on thermal cam, but would also be there to return any wood knocks or howls if that is what the cast chose to do.
|
|
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#247 |
|
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail
Posts: 12,695
|
|
|
__________________
What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break? |
|
|
|
|
|
#248 |
|
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail
Posts: 12,695
|
|
|
__________________
What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break? |
|
|
|
|
|
#249 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: California
Posts: 2,565
|
LOL the thermal/candy bar video is debunked. Bobo's clothing did not show up on the image like the footers said it would.
Green's subject could have been a man wearing clothes. If it was a man it wasnt some guy crawling around the forest at 3am without the knowledge of Green. Mike Green videoed himself IMHO. I imagine he did it as sort of a test and couldn't resist putting it out as real. |
|
__________________
Never let the data encumber the plausibility. ---paraphrased from David Paulides "It will be politically charged though, I am sure as anytime something like this happens, it will get interesting".---TheMelba |
|
|
|
|
|
#250 |
|
Illuminator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,592
|
|
|
__________________
SweatyYeti or Bill Munns would be my vote for looking at this - BFSleuth @ BFF I've got plenty of common sense! I just choose to ignore it. - Calvin; October 15, 1986 |
|
|
|
|
|
#251 |
|
Illuminator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,846
|
And the end of the show, they are talking with Mike Green at a roundtable, and they all agree that the creature on the hill could have been a squatch. Mike Green even chimes in something like "Out there where you were? Oh I have no doubt it was a squatch"
Which is an attempt to make his video more 'credible', but if MM knew that was a person on the hill, why is he saying it wasn't in the round table wrap up? |
|
__________________
"I dont call that evolution, I call that the survival of the fittest." - Bulletmaker "I thought skeptics would usually point towards a hoax rather than a group being duped." - makaya325 Kit is not a skeptic. He is a former Bigfoot believer that changed his position to that of non believer.- Crowlogic |
|
|
|
|
|
#252 |
|
Show me the monkey!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,512
|
More...
Originally Posted by Matt Moneymaker
|
|
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#253 |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 208
|
re: post #252
I am quite shocked that there is such shenanigans going on ![]() I'd rename the show "Anything You Can Do We Can Do (it up) Better" |
|
|
|
|
#254 |
|
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail
Posts: 12,695
|
Poor Matt...those evil producers keep making him look like he believes in bigfoot...
|
|
__________________
What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break? |
|
|
|
|
|
#255 |
|
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Behind the decks in Tokyo, Japan/Victoria, Canada
Posts: 9,461
|
|
|
__________________
Until better evidence is provided, the best solution to the PGF is that it is a man in a suit. -Astrophotographer. 2 prints, 1 trackway, same 'dermals'? 'Unfortunately no' says Meldrum. I want to see bigfoot throw a pig... Is that wrong? -LTC8K6 |
|
|
|
|
|
#256 |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 208
|
|
|
|
|
|
#257 |
|
Illuminator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,846
|
Here is the North Carolina episode
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3-Bx...layer_embedded |
|
__________________
"I dont call that evolution, I call that the survival of the fittest." - Bulletmaker "I thought skeptics would usually point towards a hoax rather than a group being duped." - makaya325 Kit is not a skeptic. He is a former Bigfoot believer that changed his position to that of non believer.- Crowlogic |
|
|
|
|
|
#258 |
|
Show me the monkey!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,512
|
Cliff Barackman is saying that the hillside thermal cam biped may have been a Bigfoot after all...
Originally Posted by Cliff Barackman
|
|
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#259 |
|
Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 127
|
A few years ago I made my first trip to Glacier National Park,MT. When you go there you are reminded by many people on how to behave and react in bear country and, as a result I think, I began to see bears behind every tree. Cliff Barackman reminds me of that time. He seems to be a complete believer seeing bigfoot everywhere and is enthusiastic about all things bigfoot. I have been to Glacier 10 times now and have learned there are not bears behind every tree but I think Cliff will never reach that point. He dicusses the thermal image saying that the figure probably was not clothed when the recreation of the candy bar incident shows Bobo looking just like the original image, clothes and all. Is it possible that he is that completely credulous and has been taken in, lock stock and barrel, by the BFRO show?
|
|
|
|
|
#260 |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 208
|
I think whatever or whoever Cliff is he is exactly what MM wanted for his show and that is why he is there. MM knew what he would get out of him during filming and he is what I call a BF (and here MM) cheerleader. "It's all good. It's all BF." Yay yay yay
And you get a look of shock and disbelief if you suggest otherwise (except for token comments used to "prove" some kind of objectivity). |
|
|
|
|
#261 |
|
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail
Posts: 12,695
|
So Cliff thought a bigfoot was only 50 yards away?
Did the BFRO decide to stay and find it? I mean, it was right there. Did Cliff himself make any further efforts at tracking or locating the bigfoot? The production company didn't control their free time. Why in the world would anyone abandon such a quest after getting within 50 yards of the prize? Of course, it just continues the everlasting pattern that goes back to Roger and Bob abandoning Bluff Creek right after a sasquatch strolled right by them. Get really close to bigfoot, then go home. |
|
__________________
What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break? |
|
|
|
|
|
#262 |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 208
|
|
|
|
|
|
#263 |
|
Show me the monkey!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,512
|
Now the Discovery Channel is going to have a program on the Florida Skunk Ape.
Reality TV goes in search of the skunk ape
Quote:
Shealy is the guy who says that skunk apes live in alligator burrows and stink because their hair absorbs methane.
Quote:
|
|
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#264 |
|
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail
Posts: 12,695
|
Isn't he also the guy who faked photos?
|
|
__________________
What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break? |
|
|
|
|
|
#265 |
|
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail
Posts: 12,695
|
A few more of these TV shows, and bigfooters may well be the laughingstock of the cryptid world.
|
|
__________________
What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break? |
|
|
|
|
|
#266 |
|
Illuminator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,846
|
I think most footers would rather endeavor under a cloak of anonymity than be lumped in with these guys. At least before if they broached the subject with a stranger, the stranger might relate them to Meldrum or Sarmiento, now they are all kooks like Moneymaker, Shealy and Barackman.
|
|
__________________
"I dont call that evolution, I call that the survival of the fittest." - Bulletmaker "I thought skeptics would usually point towards a hoax rather than a group being duped." - makaya325 Kit is not a skeptic. He is a former Bigfoot believer that changed his position to that of non believer.- Crowlogic |
|
|
|
|
|
#267 |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 208
|
Animal Planet's description of Cliff Barackman:
"Level-headed and analytical, Cliff has a keen interest in physical evidence." |
|
|
|
|
#268 |
|
Show me the monkey!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,512
|
The premiere episode of Finding Bigfoot was said to have 1.3 million viewers. Based on the estimated current US population (311 million), that is about 1 viewer per 240 people.
1 out of every 240 people watched it. |
|
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#269 |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 208
|
|
|
|
|
|
#270 |
|
Show me the monkey!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,512
|
I see when Ranae is captioned (titled) in the episodes she is "Ranae Holland - BFRO Field Biologist". This tells me that she is a BFRO member. She's probably a Bigfooter with a history in the organization. That would make a lot of sense. She isn't really skeptical of Bigfoot existence as far as I can tell, and Moneymaker would never work with a truly independent real skeptic anyway.
|
|
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#271 |
|
Show me the monkey!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,512
|
So I watched the new North Carolina episode that Drew linked. There is a scene with Ranae walking on a dirt road (or path) looking forwards with her thermal cam. Suddenly an airborne object zooms across the screen and audibly plops to the ground. She reacts instantly. It was a thrown rock. There is forest on either side of her so it couldn't have come from far (because of trees and branches). But she's never shown wheeling towards the source to reveal it with her thermal cam. She just stops and reviews the recording she got.
I'm pretty convinced that the cast is fully aware that at least one shill is always around to create the various encounters. I think there is a mutual comfort/trust between the cast and the producers on site that they will not pull back the curtain to reveal the Wizard. Matt probably never really wanted to catch up with that guy on the hillside. |
|
__________________
Bigfoot believers and Bigfoot skeptics are both plumb crazy. Each spends more than one minute per year thinking about Bigfoot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#272 |
|
Critical Thinker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 470
|
|
|
|
|
|
#273 |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 208
|
All this night vision equipment has sure worked out well for the nightly ghost and cryptid hunts. Get just the right image at just the right distance or angle and Voila!
If they all weren't so afraid of daylight and clarity they'd have changed up their tactics by now. Hundreds of episodes of the same images and methods and format and nothing to pique the curiosity of the scientific community. EPIC FAIL. If they can find these "things" and if they can attract these "things" the only thing stopping them from concrete scientific evidence is their own methods. We're not talking months but years of redundancy. Why do so many buy into these shows? It is scary. I wonder what the average viewer age is for the ghost, monster, and bf shows? |
|
|
|
|
#274 |
|
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail
Posts: 12,695
|
They are attracting bigfoot with an entire TV production cast and crew, loaded with electronics, standing around in the woods at night. It's amazing.
Yet, if you put a game cam in the woods, bigfoot can detect it, and avoid it. |
|
__________________
What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break? |
|
|
|
|
|
#275 |
|
Graduate Poster
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
#276 |
|
Master Poster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Somewhere in Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,326
|
Well yes, but that's because bigfoot has a fascination for people and their activities, but a morbid fear of the spooky electronics and irritating noises of game cams.
When you think about it, MM and his band of merry men and women, are verifying the very things that some proponents have been saying -- bigfoot is curious... bigfoot avoids cameras... bigfoot is nocturnal... etc. etc. Next thing you know someone will produce subjective probability stats, showing how bigfoot MUST exist because nearly every time MM and his band venture into the woods they have contact. And what are the chances of THAT? RayG |
|
__________________
Tell ya what. I'll hold my tongue as long as you stick to facts. -------------------- Scrutatio Et Quaestio |
|
|
|
|
|
#277 |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 208
|
I wonder how many are in the crew that actually follow them into the woods? And what equipment they have? Has MM ever mentioned it anywhere? If a crew noise lights and equipment follow them I would like to know why MM thought this was such a good idea for finding a bigfoot (not as I suspect for finding a paycheck)?
|
|
|
|
|
#278 |
|
Penultimate Amazing
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Directly under a deadly chemtrail
Posts: 12,695
|
For example, a deer might hear something like the lens motors at night when it's quiet, and be spooked and gone.
Of course, if you watch the show, they make little attempt at being quiet. Naturally, few critters are around the noisy bunch. Yet this is supposedly a sign that bigfoot is around... |
|
__________________
What a fool believes, no wise man has the power to reason away. What seems to be, is always better than nothing. 2 prints, same midtarsal crock..., I mean break? |
|
|
|
|
|
#279 |
|
Illuminator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,846
|
|
|
__________________
"I dont call that evolution, I call that the survival of the fittest." - Bulletmaker "I thought skeptics would usually point towards a hoax rather than a group being duped." - makaya325 Kit is not a skeptic. He is a former Bigfoot believer that changed his position to that of non believer.- Crowlogic |
|
|
|
|
|
#280 |
|
Muse
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: All up in your business
Posts: 707
|
And that's one of the wonderful things about Bigfoot, you can make up anything about it you want, even on the fly. In all seriousness, Moneymaker has simply figured out that, as a group, humans are quite gullible, especially ones that want to believe in something. It seems all he really has to do is point out Possible Bigfoot™ (sounds/prints/shadows/hallucinations) for it to become Real Live Bigfoot™.
The story is more sinister, Moneymaker Inc. top management apparently got all 'crossed up' as to who was playing Bigfoot at that hour so there ended up being some shift overlap and that's the real reason for the Bigfoot confusion. That particular bit wasn't even a Possible Bigfoot™, it was that swamp guy Bobo Fey. |
|
__________________
"The very existence of flame-throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, you know I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done." - George Carlin |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|