Sarah Palin e-mails

Monketey Ghost · 10th June 2011, 11:41 AM

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...51-503544.html

So, they'll find something interesting enough to make into a "story" about this "politician"... right?

Here's the thread for it, let the speculation begin!

Thunder · 10th June 2011, 11:42 AM

this is gonna be gooooooood.

Monketey Ghost · 10th June 2011, 11:44 AM

I dunno about that... I think it's gonna amount to some sizzle and no steak.

Cleon · 10th June 2011, 11:45 AM

I predict lots of "they're/their/there" and "your/you're" mistakes.

ZirconBlue · 10th June 2011, 11:47 AM

I'll be curious to see how many times she misspells "LOL".

Monketey Ghost · 10th June 2011, 11:47 AM

u btcha

A Laughing Baby · 10th June 2011, 11:48 AM

Calling it now: anything newsworthy in the least will either have already been deleted (not in the archive) or you'll see some sort of "private information redacted" flag with some frequency.

The Central Scrutinizer · 10th June 2011, 01:19 PM

Originally Posted by Cleon

I predict lots of "they're/their/there" and "your/you're" mistakes.

I'm surprised she could even use email.

Cleon · 10th June 2011, 01:24 PM

Originally Posted by The Central Scrutinizer

I'm surprised she could even use email.

I was online in the 90s, when AOL and WebTV were popular. I've long since stopped being surprised that there are people who can't count to 21 without dropping trou but still managed to figure out how to use email.

Grizzly Adams · 10th June 2011, 01:36 PM

Evidently the New York Times and the Washington Post think there's going to be something interesting in there. They've asked for the public's help in reading all 25,000 of them and reporting back on items of interest.

Did they do this when Obama ran for president?

Hmm...

A Laughing Baby · 10th June 2011, 01:41 PM

Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams

Evidently the New York Times and the Washington Post think there's going to be something interesting in there. They've asked for the public's help in reading all 25,000 of them and reporting back on items of interest.

Did they do this when Obama ran for president?

Hmm...

That's a general crowdsourcing technique when you have a document dump of this magnitude. Now I'm not sure (no sarcasm here), but I think that when Obama was a Senator, he actually used his .gov email address, meaning that emails could be FOIAed. I'll let the lawyer-types jump in here, but all I really know is that there is a point of distinction in that Palin purposely used the yahoo address.

johnny karate · 10th June 2011, 01:43 PM

Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams

Evidently the New York Times and the Washington Post think there's going to be something interesting in there. They've asked for the public's help in reading all 25,000 of them and reporting back on items of interest.

Did they do this when Obama ran for president?

Hmm...

Obama had to bend over backwards just prove he was an American citizen, and you're going to complain about unfair scrutiny of Sarah Palin?

The Central Scrutinizer · 10th June 2011, 01:48 PM

Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams

Evidently the New York Times and the Washington Post think there's going to be something interesting in there. They've asked for the public's help in reading all 25,000 of them and reporting back on items of interest.

Did they do this when Obama ran for president?

Yes.

daredelvis · 10th June 2011, 02:20 PM

Originally Posted by The Central Scrutinizer

Yes.

On your earth, but not on Earth-23 where most wingers live their reality. I think the Flash on that earth is just a really really fast guy.

Daredelvis

Grizzly Adams · 10th June 2011, 02:33 PM

Originally Posted by The Central Scrutinizer

Yes.

Really? I don't remember newspapers begging anyone to pour over Obama's emails in order to find dirt.

Could you link it?

Grizzly Adams · 10th June 2011, 02:35 PM

Originally Posted by daredelvis

On your earth, but not on Earth-23 where most wingers live their reality. I think the Flash on that earth is just a really really fast guy.

Daredelvis

Did it ever occur to you that someone might just not have heard a news story? (If it is even true, that is.)

Or does everyone who is on the opposite side of the spectrum as you have to be an idiot?

What's wrong with you?

The Central Scrutinizer · 10th June 2011, 02:44 PM

Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams

Really? I don't remember newspapers begging anyone to pour over Obama's emails in order to find dirt.

Could you link it?

I received an email. I've long since deleted it.

Grizzly Adams · 10th June 2011, 02:46 PM

Oh, then it must be true.

Taarkin · 10th June 2011, 03:20 PM

From a staffer:

Quote:

Pls consider resisting the urge to speak

Ice burn.

The Central Scrutinizer · 10th June 2011, 03:30 PM

Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams

Oh, then it must be true.

You asked a question and I answered it truthfully. It's your problem if you don't like the answer.

Foolmewunz · 10th June 2011, 04:38 PM

Originally Posted by A Laughing Baby

Calling it now: anything newsworthy in the least will either have already been deleted (not in the archive) or you'll see some sort of "private information redacted" flag with some frequency.

You mean, "as the headline states" ..... ?

MattusMaximus · 10th June 2011, 05:47 PM

Personally, I won't be interested in any of Quitter Palin's emails unless they have an image attached to them of some sexy body part bulging against the clothing covering it. Why should we let Rep. Weiner have all the fun?

JudeBrando · 10th June 2011, 05:56 PM

This is frightening. The Left so-hates Sarah Palin that they will do this without significant objection and, in fact, with delighted approval amongst themselves.

MattusMaximus · 10th June 2011, 06:00 PM

Originally Posted by JudeBrando

This is frightening. The Left so-hates Sarah Palin that they will do this without significant objection and, in fact, with delighted approval amongst themselves.

I think you're confusing "hates" with this...

No worries, I can see how you mix the two up

BenBurch · 10th June 2011, 06:00 PM

Originally Posted by JudeBrando

This is frightening. The Left so-hates Sarah Palin that they will do this without significant objection and, in fact, with delighted approval amongst themselves.

These are public records. They do not belong to Ms. Palin any more than the Watergate tapes belonged to Nixon.

JudeBrando · 10th June 2011, 06:02 PM

Originally Posted by BenBurch

These are public records. They do not belong to Ms. Palin any more than the Watergate tapes belonged to Nixon.

Approval noted.

Foolmewunz · 10th June 2011, 06:26 PM

Originally Posted by JudeBrando

This is frightening. The Left so-hates Sarah Palin that they will do this without significant objection and, in fact, with delighted approval amongst themselves.

This frightens you, Jude? Really? Three and a half years of birther nonsense, bought into by some of the leading lights of Teh New Right? That doesn't frighten you? But a scroll through recently released (and vetted and censored) communications of a public figure (on the public payroll at the time), that frightens you?

Hyperbole maybe have found a new standard bearer.

bikerdruid · 10th June 2011, 07:06 PM

Originally Posted by JudeBrando

This is frightening. The Left so-hates Sarah Palin that they will do this without significant objection and, in fact, with delighted approval amongst themselves.

....yes, the nebulous american 'left' that is really 'far right' to the rest of the world.
this just in from london......

"What [limbaugh] doesn't understand is that Palin's nutsiness is not a partisan matter in Britain, or anywhere else in the world. It is an obvious truth marvelled at by all. Palin's emergence as a serious figure in American politics has made the country a laughing stock across the world. The idea that a stateswoman like Thatcher, in advanced dementia, would be used by such a crackpot is simply unseemly."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011...-palin-meeting

johnny karate · 10th June 2011, 07:12 PM

Originally Posted by Foolmewunz

This frightens you, Jude? Really? Three and a half years of birther nonsense, bought into by some of the leading lights of Teh New Right? That doesn't frighten you? But a scroll through recently released (and vetted and censored) communications of a public figure (on the public payroll at the time), that frightens you?

Hyperbole maybe have found a new standard bearer.

I think you might be barking up the wrong tree in appealing to JudeBrando's sense of reason regarding birtherism.

Foolmewunz · 10th June 2011, 10:38 PM

Oh, I didn't know that (he says, trying to sound as sincere as one can with their tongue rooting around between their upper and lower left molars).

Dorian Gray · 11th June 2011, 07:35 AM

Preliminary results have really turned up nothing so far. But have they redacted all the embarrassing stuff?

TraneWreck · 11th June 2011, 08:10 AM

Originally Posted by JudeBrando

This is frightening. The Left so-hates Sarah Palin that they will do this without significant objection and, in fact, with delighted approval amongst themselves.

The State of Alaska released the e-mails. Any governor, anywhere is subject to the same public access.

What are you afraid of?

Newtons Bit · 11th June 2011, 08:34 AM

Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams

Oh, then it must be true.

You can see Obama's emails here.

JoeTheJuggler · 11th June 2011, 08:50 AM

Originally Posted by Cleon

I predict lots of "they're/their/there" and "your/you're" mistakes.

And "pour" for "pore"?

Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams

Really? I don't remember newspapers begging anyone to pour over Obama's emails in order to find dirt.

Taarkin · 11th June 2011, 08:53 AM

Why the hell is she using a yahoo account for governor stuff?

Thunder · 11th June 2011, 09:43 AM

Originally Posted by Taarkin

Why the hell is she using a yahoo account for governor stuff?

because she is an idiot. a babling...drooling....idiot.

Thunder · 11th June 2011, 09:47 AM

Originally Posted by JudeBrando

This is frightening. The Left so-hates Sarah Palin that they will do this without significant objection and, in fact, with delighted approval amongst themselves.

I thought Conservatives were all about government transparency.

I guess not when it affects one of their own.

bikerdruid · 11th June 2011, 09:59 AM

Originally Posted by Thunder

I thought Conservatives were all about government transparency.

I guess not when it affects one of their own.

conservatives are also supposed to be all about less government control, unless that control is exerted to control women's bodies, or forcing christian religion down everyone's throats.

JoeTheJuggler · 11th June 2011, 10:05 AM

Originally Posted by Taarkin

Why the hell is she using a yahoo account for governor stuff?

It's about that savin' the taxpayers' money dontcha know.

Remember, she was introduced to the national stage as an anti-pork non-partisan maverick who said no to the "Bridge to Nowhere" and who is the most knowledgeable person about energy in the country. Of course, we quickly learned those were all lies.

The Central Scrutinizer · 11th June 2011, 10:26 AM

Originally Posted by Taarkin

Why the hell is she using a yahoo account for governor stuff?

Because she's a......nah, too easy.

10th June 2011, 11:41 AM	#1
Monketey Ghost Body of Work Join Date: May 2003 Location: I'm on your screen! Posts: 14,807	Sarah Palin e-mails http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...51-503544.html So, they'll find something interesting enough to make into a "story" about this "politician"... right? Here's the thread for it, let the speculation begin!
	__________________ _{The membership of this forum is henceforth to refer to me as potato-headed Bobby} _{SSKCAS, member in long standing}

10th June 2011, 11:44 AM	#3
Monketey Ghost Body of Work Join Date: May 2003 Location: I'm on your screen! Posts: 14,807	I dunno about that... I think it's gonna amount to some sizzle and no steak.
	__________________ _{The membership of this forum is henceforth to refer to me as potato-headed Bobby} _{SSKCAS, member in long standing}

10th June 2011, 11:45 AM	#4
Cleon King of the Pod People Moderator Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 20,532	I predict lots of "they're/their/there" and "your/you're" mistakes.
	__________________ "People like me are what stand between us and Auschwitz." - Newt Gingrich

10th June 2011, 11:47 AM	#5
ZirconBlue Sole Survivor of L-Town Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Wilson, North Carolina, USA, Earth Posts: 11,323	I'll be curious to see how many times she misspells "LOL".
	__________________ Religion and sex are powerplays. Manipulate the people for the money they pay. Selling skin, selling God The numbers look the same on their credit cards.

10th June 2011, 11:47 AM	#6
Monketey Ghost Body of Work Join Date: May 2003 Location: I'm on your screen! Posts: 14,807	u btcha
	__________________ _{The membership of this forum is henceforth to refer to me as potato-headed Bobby} _{SSKCAS, member in long standing}

10th June 2011, 11:42 AM	#2
Thunder Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Queens Posts: 34,947	this is gonna be gooooooood.

10th June 2011, 11:48 AM	#7
A Laughing Baby A baby. Goo goo ga ga Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 2,992	Calling it now: anything newsworthy in the least will either have already been deleted (not in the archive) or you'll see some sort of "private information redacted" flag with some frequency.
	__________________ Plorate, omnes virgines!!

10th June 2011, 01:19 PM	#8
The Central Scrutinizer Penultimate Amazing Pither Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: The White Zone Posts: 42,277	Originally Posted by Cleon I predict lots of "they're/their/there" and "your/you're" mistakes. I'm surprised she could even use email.
	__________________ If I see somebody with a gun on a plane? I'll kill him.

10th June 2011, 01:24 PM	#9
Cleon King of the Pod People Moderator Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 20,532	Originally Posted by The Central Scrutinizer I'm surprised she could even use email. I was online in the 90s, when AOL and WebTV were popular. I've long since stopped being surprised that there are people who can't count to 21 without dropping trou but still managed to figure out how to use email.
	__________________ "People like me are what stand between us and Auschwitz." - Newt Gingrich

10th June 2011, 01:36 PM	#10
Grizzly Adams Muse Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 993	Evidently the New York Times and the Washington Post think there's going to be something interesting in there. They've asked for the public's help in reading all 25,000 of them and reporting back on items of interest. Did they do this when Obama ran for president? Hmm...
Grizzly Adams Muse Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 993

10th June 2011, 01:41 PM	#11
A Laughing Baby A baby. Goo goo ga ga Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 2,992	Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams Evidently the New York Times and the Washington Post think there's going to be something interesting in there. They've asked for the public's help in reading all 25,000 of them and reporting back on items of interest. Did they do this when Obama ran for president? Hmm... That's a general crowdsourcing technique when you have a document dump of this magnitude. Now I'm not sure (no sarcasm here), but I think that when Obama was a Senator, he actually used his .gov email address, meaning that emails could be FOIAed. I'll let the lawyer-types jump in here, but all I really know is that there is a point of distinction in that Palin purposely used the yahoo address.
	__________________ Plorate, omnes virgines!!

10th June 2011, 01:43 PM	#12
johnny karate ... and your little dog too. Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 7,828	Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams Evidently the New York Times and the Washington Post think there's going to be something interesting in there. They've asked for the public's help in reading all 25,000 of them and reporting back on items of interest. Did they do this when Obama ran for president? Hmm... Obama had to bend over backwards just prove he was an American citizen, and you're going to complain about unfair scrutiny of Sarah Palin?
	__________________ Lost your faith in humanity? Click here to have it restored. Or here.

10th June 2011, 01:48 PM	#13
The Central Scrutinizer Penultimate Amazing Pither Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: The White Zone Posts: 42,277	Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams Evidently the New York Times and the Washington Post think there's going to be something interesting in there. They've asked for the public's help in reading all 25,000 of them and reporting back on items of interest. Did they do this when Obama ran for president? Yes.
	__________________ If I see somebody with a gun on a plane? I'll kill him.

10th June 2011, 02:20 PM	#14
daredelvis Graduate Poster Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Houston Posts: 1,871	Originally Posted by The Central Scrutinizer Yes. On your earth, but not on Earth-23 where most wingers live their reality. I think the Flash on that earth is just a really really fast guy. Daredelvis
	__________________ People like Coldplay and voting for the Nazis. People can't be trusted. -Jez

10th June 2011, 02:33 PM	#15
Grizzly Adams Muse Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 993	Originally Posted by The Central Scrutinizer Yes. Really? I don't remember newspapers begging anyone to pour over Obama's emails in order to find dirt. Could you link it?
Grizzly Adams Muse Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 993

10th June 2011, 02:35 PM	#16
Grizzly Adams Muse Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 993	Originally Posted by daredelvis On your earth, but not on Earth-23 where most wingers live their reality. I think the Flash on that earth is just a really really fast guy. Daredelvis Did it ever occur to you that someone might just not have heard a news story? (If it is even true, that is.) Or does everyone who is on the opposite side of the spectrum as you have to be an idiot? What's wrong with you?
Grizzly Adams Muse Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 993

10th June 2011, 02:44 PM	#17
The Central Scrutinizer Penultimate Amazing Pither Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: The White Zone Posts: 42,277	Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams Really? I don't remember newspapers begging anyone to pour over Obama's emails in order to find dirt. Could you link it? I received an email. I've long since deleted it.
	__________________ If I see somebody with a gun on a plane? I'll kill him.

10th June 2011, 02:46 PM	#18
Grizzly Adams Muse Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 993	Oh, then it must be true.
Grizzly Adams Muse Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 993

10th June 2011, 03:20 PM	#19
Taarkin Strider Style Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Land of Heat and Clockwork Posts: 1,221	From a staffer: Quote: Pls consider resisting the urge to speak Ice burn.

10th June 2011, 03:30 PM	#20
The Central Scrutinizer Penultimate Amazing Pither Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: The White Zone Posts: 42,277	Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams Oh, then it must be true. You asked a question and I answered it truthfully. It's your problem if you don't like the answer.
	__________________ If I see somebody with a gun on a plane? I'll kill him.

10th June 2011, 04:38 PM	#21
Foolmewunz Grammar Resistance Leader Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Pattaya, Thailand Posts: 20,520	Originally Posted by A Laughing Baby Calling it now: anything newsworthy in the least will either have already been deleted (not in the archive) or you'll see some sort of "private information redacted" flag with some frequency. You mean, "as the headline states" ..... ?
	__________________ Ha! Foolmewunz has just been added to the list of people who aren't complete idiots. Hokulele Don't you wish someone had slapped baby Hitler really really hard? [i] Dr. Buzzo 02/13 [i]

10th June 2011, 05:47 PM	#22
MattusMaximus Intellectual Gladiator Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: In the midst of a vast, beautiful & uncaring universe Posts: 14,175	Personally, I won't be interested in any of Quitter Palin's emails unless they have an image attached to them of some sexy body part bulging against the clothing covering it. Why should we let Rep. Weiner have all the fun?
	__________________ Visit my blog: The Skeptical Teacher The Times They Are A-Changin'

10th June 2011, 05:56 PM	#23
JudeBrando Banned Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 1,701	This is frightening. The Left so-hates Sarah Palin that they will do this without significant objection and, in fact, with delighted approval amongst themselves.
JudeBrando Banned Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 1,701

10th June 2011, 06:00 PM	#24
MattusMaximus Intellectual Gladiator Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: In the midst of a vast, beautiful & uncaring universe Posts: 14,175	Originally Posted by JudeBrando This is frightening. The Left so-hates Sarah Palin that they will do this without significant objection and, in fact, with delighted approval amongst themselves. I think you're confusing "hates" with this... No worries, I can see how you mix the two up
	__________________ Visit my blog: The Skeptical Teacher The Times They Are A-Changin'

10th June 2011, 06:00 PM	#25
BenBurch Gatekeeper of The Left Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: The Universe 35.2 ms ahead of this one. Posts: 32,186	Originally Posted by JudeBrando This is frightening. The Left so-hates Sarah Palin that they will do this without significant objection and, in fact, with delighted approval amongst themselves. These are public records. They do not belong to Ms. Palin any more than the Watergate tapes belonged to Nixon.
	__________________ Are you IN? Join the IN crowd now!

10th June 2011, 06:02 PM	#26
JudeBrando Banned Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 1,701	Originally Posted by BenBurch These are public records. They do not belong to Ms. Palin any more than the Watergate tapes belonged to Nixon. Approval noted.
JudeBrando Banned Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 1,701

10th June 2011, 06:26 PM	#27
Foolmewunz Grammar Resistance Leader Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Pattaya, Thailand Posts: 20,520	Originally Posted by JudeBrando This is frightening. The Left so-hates Sarah Palin that they will do this without significant objection and, in fact, with delighted approval amongst themselves. This frightens you, Jude? Really? Three and a half years of birther nonsense, bought into by some of the leading lights of Teh New Right? That doesn't frighten you? But a scroll through recently released (and vetted and censored) communications of a public figure (on the public payroll at the time), that frightens you? Hyperbole maybe have found a new standard bearer.
	__________________ Ha! Foolmewunz has just been added to the list of people who aren't complete idiots. Hokulele Don't you wish someone had slapped baby Hitler really really hard? [i] Dr. Buzzo 02/13 [i]

10th June 2011, 07:06 PM	#28
bikerdruid hermit hippy weirdo Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: green island autonomous zone Posts: 7,369	Originally Posted by JudeBrando This is frightening. The Left so-hates Sarah Palin that they will do this without significant objection and, in fact, with delighted approval amongst themselves. ....yes, the nebulous american 'left' that is really 'far right' to the rest of the world. this just in from london...... "What [limbaugh] doesn't understand is that Palin's nutsiness is not a partisan matter in Britain, or anywhere else in the world. It is an obvious truth marvelled at by all. Palin's emergence as a serious figure in American politics has made the country a laughing stock across the world. The idea that a stateswoman like Thatcher, in advanced dementia, would be used by such a crackpot is simply unseemly." http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011...-palin-meeting
	__________________ Subvert the Dominant Paradigm!!

10th June 2011, 07:12 PM	#29
johnny karate ... and your little dog too. Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 7,828	Originally Posted by Foolmewunz This frightens you, Jude? Really? Three and a half years of birther nonsense, bought into by some of the leading lights of Teh New Right? That doesn't frighten you? But a scroll through recently released (and vetted and censored) communications of a public figure (on the public payroll at the time), that frightens you? Hyperbole maybe have found a new standard bearer. I think you might be barking up the wrong tree in appealing to JudeBrando's sense of reason regarding birtherism.
	__________________ Lost your faith in humanity? Click here to have it restored. Or here.

10th June 2011, 10:38 PM	#30
Foolmewunz Grammar Resistance Leader Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Pattaya, Thailand Posts: 20,520	Oh, I didn't know that (he says, trying to sound as sincere as one can with their tongue rooting around between their upper and lower left molars).
	__________________ Ha! Foolmewunz has just been added to the list of people who aren't complete idiots. Hokulele Don't you wish someone had slapped baby Hitler really really hard? [i] Dr. Buzzo 02/13 [i]

11th June 2011, 07:35 AM	#31
Dorian Gray Hypocrisy Detector Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Dayton, Ohio Posts: 20,195	Preliminary results have really turned up nothing so far. But have they redacted all the embarrassing stuff?
	__________________ "A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men." - Willy Wonka "Rational arguments don't work on religious people. If they did, there wouldn't be any religious people." - House Additionally to Carlin being funnier than Izzard, I think Dorian is funnier than the Marquis. - Ron Tomkins

11th June 2011, 08:10 AM	#32
TraneWreck Philosopher Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Chicago Posts: 6,414	Originally Posted by JudeBrando This is frightening. The Left so-hates Sarah Palin that they will do this without significant objection and, in fact, with delighted approval amongst themselves. The State of Alaska released the e-mails. Any governor, anywhere is subject to the same public access. What are you afraid of?

11th June 2011, 08:34 AM	#33
Newtons Bit Philosopher Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 6,899	Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams Oh, then it must be true. You can see Obama's emails here.
Newtons Bit Philosopher Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 6,899	__________________ "Structural Engineering is the art of molding materials we do not wholly understand into shapes we cannot precisely analyze so as to understand forces we cannot really assess in such a way that the community at large has no reason to suspect the extent of our own ignorance." James E Amrhein My website.

11th June 2011, 08:50 AM	#34
JoeTheJuggler Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: St. Louis Posts: 26,798	Originally Posted by Cleon I predict lots of "they're/their/there" and "your/you're" mistakes. And "pour" for "pore"? Originally Posted by Grizzly Adams Really? I don't remember newspapers begging anyone to pour over Obama's emails in order to find dirt.
	__________________ "That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way." —Ponder Stibbons

11th June 2011, 08:53 AM	#35
Taarkin Strider Style Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Land of Heat and Clockwork Posts: 1,221	Why the hell is she using a yahoo account for governor stuff?