August Stundie nominations - Page 4

jaydeehess · 19th August 2011, 10:10 AM

Originally Posted by PixyMisa

Those far rights and their bloodlust for balanced budgets:

Oddly enough I have read pretty much the exact same thing written with the words 'the far left' instead of 'the far right'.

ETA: Perhaps I should have begun reading this thread a few days earlier

jaydeehess · 19th August 2011, 10:31 AM

Originally Posted by timhau

Ah, so things are either certain, impossible, or have a 50% probability. Thanks, that clears up a lot of issues!

Now if I could only figure out these 6-sided dice I have...

Here I was thinking that conspiracy theorists were binary thinkers and you point out that they are actually trinary.

In an elecronic circuit this could be represented by the values
low voltage -current sink
hi voltage - current source
hi-z - no current

Which would be apropos if one assigns the idea that any probability at all equals 50/50 the electronic value of zero current.

As for your six sided dice, obviously there is a certainty that it will land on a flat side and an impossibility that it will settle upright on an edge or point. So what's the beef?

Travis · 19th August 2011, 02:09 PM

I can't believe we have a new Apollo mega thread.

sts60 · 19th August 2011, 02:33 PM

Oh, Patrick1000/fattydash/DoctorTea/BFischer/BSpassky/mvinson/Sicilian/piersquared/etc., etc., is a veritable fountain of Stundie-quality material. But this one is charming in its simplicity (bolding mine):

Originally Posted by Patrick1000

We can debate the rocks ApolloG, no big. i am not trying to get out of the rock debate. You'll come around to the fake poop=fraud view eventually. they all do in the end.

Originally Posted by Patrick1000

I honestly believe I have never convinced a single person under any circumstances of the bogusness of Apollo except my brother...

Welcome to "All". Population: his brother. Who's probably a sock-puppet too.

Horatius · 19th August 2011, 02:58 PM

Originally Posted by sts60

Welcome to "All". Population: his brother. Who's probably a sock-puppet too.

And, not just "all", but simultaneously, not "a single person"!

That's one Magic Brother he's got there!

Supermac · 19th August 2011, 11:16 PM

Medical advice on the DI forum:

"I remember hearing Alex Jones talking about how Hospitals often target the elderly who go in for treatment and then it struck me how ALMSOT EVERY ELDERLY PAITENT THAT GOES IN ENDS UP WITH NAMONYA!! (No matter what they go in for)"

Namonya? Do you know what it is yet? It took me a couple of minutes to work it out.

Brian1709 · 20th August 2011, 12:26 AM

Originally Posted by Supermac

Medical advice on the DI forum:

"I remember hearing Alex Jones talking about how Hospitals often target the elderly who go in for treatment and then it struck me how ALMSOT EVERY ELDERLY PAITENT THAT GOES IN ENDS UP WITH NAMONYA!! (No matter what they go in for)"

Namonya? Do you know what it is yet? It took me a couple of minutes to work it out.

Hmm. took me a while to work out. could it be newmoania?

timhau · 20th August 2011, 12:51 AM

Originally Posted by Supermac

Medical advice on the DI forum:

"I remember hearing Alex Jones talking about how Hospitals often target the elderly who go in for treatment and then it struck me how ALMSOT EVERY ELDERLY PAITENT THAT GOES IN ENDS UP WITH NAMONYA!! (No matter what they go in for)"

Namonya? Do you know what it is yet? It took me a couple of minutes to work it out.

Almsot a couple of minutes?

Funny that I've had namonya three times in my life, and at least the version I had when I was 8 would have killed me if it wasn't for Western medicine and Big Pharma.

muzungu100 · 20th August 2011, 04:18 AM

Originally Posted by Brian1709

Hmm. took me a while to work out. could it be newmoania?

Could be nymphomania. I'm keeping my granny away from those hospitals.

Steer clear of the geriatric wards people.

matt.tansy · 20th August 2011, 07:40 AM

Originally Posted by muzungu100

Could be nymphomania. I'm keeping my granny away from those hospitals.

Steer clear of the geriatric wards people.

No, no, no. "nymphomania" is spelled with a "p": pnymphomania.

Myron Proudfoot · 20th August 2011, 09:01 AM

Originally Posted by Supermac

Medical advice on the DI forum:

"I remember hearing Alex Jones talking about how Hospitals often target the elderly who go in for treatment and then it struck me how ALMSOT EVERY ELDERLY PAITENT THAT GOES IN ENDS UP WITH NAMONYA!! (No matter what they go in for)"

Namonya? Do you know what it is yet? It took me a couple of minutes to work it out.

I think it's a magic land you enter by passing through the back of a wardrobe full of coats...

Travis · 20th August 2011, 08:34 PM

Originally Posted by Supermac

Medical advice on the DI forum:

"I remember hearing Alex Jones talking about how Hospitals often target the elderly who go in for treatment and then it struck me how ALMSOT EVERY ELDERLY PAITENT THAT GOES IN ENDS UP WITH NAMONYA!! (No matter what they go in for)"

Namonya? Do you know what it is yet? It took me a couple of minutes to work it out.

Got a link for that bit of gold?

TjW · 20th August 2011, 08:41 PM

Originally Posted by Supermac

Medical advice on the DI forum:

"I remember hearing Alex Jones talking about how Hospitals often target the elderly who go in for treatment and then it struck me how ALMSOT EVERY ELDERLY PAITENT THAT GOES IN ENDS UP WITH NAMONYA!! (No matter what they go in for)"

Namonya? Do you know what it is yet? It took me a couple of minutes to work it out.

I Pneu what it was right away.

Supermac · 20th August 2011, 11:14 PM

Here's the link to the namonya thread in the Icke forum.

http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=180071

Horatius · 21st August 2011, 12:05 AM

Originally Posted by Supermac

Here's the link to the namonya thread in the Icke forum.

http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=180071

Ha! Someone there beat all y'all on the Pun Issue:

Quote:

Nemoneya is like No $?

This isn't a troll post, right? You DID hear this on AJ, right?

Travis · 21st August 2011, 06:52 PM

I think it's curious they didn't spell it Ammonia.

Sword_Of_Truth · 22nd August 2011, 01:14 AM

Clayton Moore going for gold with this hard hitting rebuttal to Mathew Ellards fully sourced fact barrage:

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore

Originally Posted by Matthew Ellard

No evidence?
1) We have the pits the bodies were first buried in
http://www.deathcamps.org/treblinka/pic/bigp51.jpg

2) We have the 2,000 square metres of human ash.....the surface is covered for about 2 hectares by a mixture of ashes and sand. In this mixture, one finds countless human bones, often still covered with tissue remains, which are in a condition of decomposition. During the inspection, which I made with the assistance of an expert in forensic medicine, it was determined that the ashes are without any doubt of human origin (Justice Lukaszkiewicz)

3) We have the actual "worker" eye witnesses talking about actually doing it(Oskar Strawczynski) The graves could never be emptied entirely, because blood mixed with water accumulated at the bottom. Motorized pumps were set up to draw it out. However, they could never manage to drain the bottom few meters, and so the graves were simply covered over

(Abraham Krzepicki) ....These ditches were 60 or 70 meters long. They were also very deep, but I could not tell how deep they were because the ditches to which we had been assigned were already filled with many layers of corpses. The graves remained open through the night and the next day more bodies were piled into them. While I was in Treblinka, only the small ditch to the left, where I had worked on the first day, was closed. By the time we came out there in the morning, the excavator was already in operation, and digging out new giant graves.

4) We have the SS C.O. of the camp talking about the burial pits. (Franz Stangl) "it was always a huge mass… they were naked, packed together, running, being driven with whips" & "I think it started the day I first saw the Totenlager in Treblinka. I remember Wirth standing there, next to the pits full of blue-black corpses.

You are simply denying evidence.

That's just crapola.

Brilliant work, Clayton... just awesome bro.

Seriously.

jhunter1163 · 22nd August 2011, 04:12 AM

I've had the rockin' namonya and the boogie-woogie pfleu.

carlitos · 22nd August 2011, 11:00 AM

Originally Posted by mrkinnies

Originally Posted by DC

it fell before the rest even started to collapse, so it did sure not fall as a single block as you falsly claimed.

Oh, I'm sorry, that's right, WTC7 split in two with one side falling over sideways and the other falling straight down. Silly me.

Words fail me.

Disbelief · 23rd August 2011, 06:44 AM

Originally Posted by Josh

The fact that the downward velocity continually increases tell us the destruction we see is not due to "crushing!" Something other than gravitation collapse is at work.

Over on FB, this is one of many.

Horatius · 23rd August 2011, 07:03 AM

Most of Patrick1000's posts are far too wordy to make good Stundie noms, but this one works well:

Originally Posted by Patrick1000

A final point before I conclude for the day. There is the famous visor down photograph of Armstrong "walking across the surface of the moon". We are all very familiar with this image. This cannot be an authentic moonscape shot. They would not allow Armstrong to do this and of course Armstrong would not do such a fool hardy thing in the context of genuine potential for exposure to laser light of that intensity. There must not be any authentic risk of exposure to ruby red light in the "context" of this famous photo, and so one may conclude Neil Armstrong is not on the surface of the moon on July 20 1969. Pat

...particularly when you consider how he completely ignored my earlier post.

In fact, this would make a great comic.....

Captain_Swoop · 23rd August 2011, 10:37 AM

Originally Posted by Horatius

In fact, this would make a great comic.....

Yes, you haven't done one for a long time.

carlitos · 23rd August 2011, 10:59 AM

It's not related to a conspiracy, but I thought the highlighted phrase might be enjoyed by Stundie readers.

Originally Posted by EzikeltheProphet

I will only address people with sense an respect.

You seem cool.
Yes it is true, people see stuff in the sky they cannot identify all the time but not when it comes to me. I have recorded the skies for years and i am ex-military . Working with the Air-force and Being stationed near Air bases helped and adds to my experience identifying ANYTHING in the sky.
You are incorrect about invisible UFO being unproven. I can sense when they are there and i can record them with the help of Infrared devices. UFO have multi-spectrum cloaking technology and there have been times when i was able to get them to display their cloaking to me.

To establish that UFO are there because i summoned them is easy.
The sky wont have any UFO visible before i summon but within seconds to a couple of minutes after my summons the sky will have objects that glow like a star but is not , flying above us. Now if the JREF wants to claim they are NOT what i say they are then they must prove it, because they will not appear before i summon. I proved my ability. Any claim to a hypothesized identity by either the tester or the JREF must be proven with data... if they say airplane- show me the wings and FAA safety lights...... if they say satellite then show me the data backing up that claim (SHOULD BE EASY SINCE ALL SAT. DATA IS ON THE WEB)
However, till this day I AM UNDEBUNKABLE . Not a soul on this planet can debunk my sightings.... just make guesses and theories.
For the 1st test i suggest the location be in NYC (anywhere in NYC) where i live and that it be a clear night that stars are visible. Anyone may attend and the location can be kept secret from me. I have FAITH in God and believe I cannot fail .

Its only mundane to the mundane.

twinstead · 23rd August 2011, 11:12 AM

Sounds like a new super hero.

Look, up in the sky. It's a bird! It's a plane! No, it's Captain Undebunkable!!!!!!

Horatius · 23rd August 2011, 11:39 AM

Originally Posted by Captain_Swoop

Yes, you haven't done one for a long time.

Yes, not since, oh, last night......I haven't done one inspired by "real" life in a while, though.

Axiom_Blade · 23rd August 2011, 11:52 AM

Originally Posted by carlitos

It's not related to a conspiracy, but I thought the highlighted phrase might be enjoyed by Stundie readers.

Okay, so let me see if I got this straight...he can make objects appear "that glow like a star, but is not", but will only demonstrate this power on "a clear night that stars are visible"...

Travis · 23rd August 2011, 12:21 PM

He clearly has a different idea of what "debunkable" means.

Horatius · 23rd August 2011, 02:07 PM

Originally Posted by Horatius

In fact, this would make a great comic.....

CompusMentus · 23rd August 2011, 03:53 PM

^ :=]

Compus

Dave Rogers · 24th August 2011, 01:38 AM

Here's tmd2_1 commenting on the "flash" seen on some videos of the WTC crashes, and suggesting that it must have an unusual explanation.

Originally Posted by tmd2_1

There's been millions of commercial flights in history right? As far as I could find these were the only two that exhibited anything like that.

Because, of all the millions of commercial airliners that were filmed crashing into high-rise buildings, only these two gave flashes.

Dave

carlitos · 24th August 2011, 07:50 AM

Whoa, that's a doozie.

twinstead · 24th August 2011, 08:10 AM

There must be thousands of high-resolution films of large jetliners crashing into huge skyscrapers at high speed. I want to know why only the two on 9-11 had those flashes!!!!!111!!1!

jaydeehess · 24th August 2011, 02:30 PM

Originally Posted by Dave Rogers

Here's tmd2_1 commenting on the "flash" seen on some videos of the WTC crashes, and suggesting that it must have an unusual explanation.

Because, of all the millions of commercial airliners that were filmed crashing into high-rise buildings, only these two gave flashes.

Dave

Of course,,, why didn't I think of that?
,,, and by 'that' I mean nominating tmd's quote for a Stundie

jaydeehess · 24th August 2011, 02:31 PM

Originally Posted by twinstead

There must be thousands of high-resolution films of large jetliners crashing into huge skyscrapers at high speed. I want to know why only the two on 9-11 had those flashes!!!!!111!!1!

Not to mention the number of zoomed in, low resolution, highly compressed and pixelated videos !eleventy!1!

jaydeehess · 24th August 2011, 02:42 PM

Because I am jealous that Dave niminated tmd for the above quote,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Here's tmd again;
http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php...&postcount=502

Quote:

Ah I have found something I think demonstrates the concept of what could (I emphasize could have been used). Missile fires 3 sub missiles are fired from that missile. Full description here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starstreak_%28missile%29

Please do not bombard me with questions, about how this weapon could not have been used. I am not saying it was...only that the concept would be similar, right down to the self detonation of the sub missiles. Which is something I'm sure the conspirators would have made sure happened. Technology was developed in the 80's way in advance of 2001.

Is this a Yosemite Sam "I don't know how they done it but I knows they done it arguement?

Somewhat circular reasoning. Its a missile that explodes on impact and that proves that 911 was an inside job. I know it because the perpetrators would have made sure to use such a weapon and therefore such a weapon would have been employed and therefore 911 was an inside job.

AnnoyingPony · 24th August 2011, 07:27 PM

From here...

Quote:

UNHOLY SPIRITS
Occultism and New Age Humanism
Dr. Gary North

Here is a simple, straightforward idea which has implications you probably never dreamed of. There are unexplained events in this world: UFOs, telepathy, demonic healing, accurate predictions of future happenings. These events really happen, and fm men can simply push them aside by attributing their origin to the random events in a change-created world. Science has tried to hide them for centuries, but these and other "irrational happenings are creeping out of the closet to challenge the sacred cows of rationalism. There may be future "logical" explanations, but the best one is probably the simplest: evil, supernatural, and highly personal powers are hard at work in today's world.

UNHOLY SPIRITS demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt the active existence of demonic forces in our rational, humanistic 20th century. What is even more unnerving, however, is Dr. Gary North's argument that the fundamentals of humanism are identical to the basics of Satanism. This is not to say that all humanists are demonists. But it does mean that a commitment to the philosophy of humanism is no longer a shield against the demonic. It does not prevent men from dabbling in the occult or even embracing it, nor does it prevent a radical new class of scientists from opening up a Pandora's box of satanic experimentation which could change the way you live. As C.S. Lewis' demon, Screwtape, wrote to his nephew Wormwood in The Screwtape Letters, when the materialists believe in demons but not in God, the battle is over.

By the way, the link is from an anti-D&D pamphlet that is still distributed among some fundamentalist Christians today.

Elizabeth I · 24th August 2011, 08:27 PM

Originally Posted by jaydeehess

Because I am jealous that Dave niminated tmd for the above quote,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Here's tmd again;
Which is something I'm sure the conspirators would have made sure happened. Technology was developed in the 80's way in advance of 2001.

Is this a Yosemite Sam "I don't know how they done it but I knows they done it arguement?

Somewhat circular reasoning. Its a missile that explodes on impact and that proves that 911 was an inside job. I know it because the perpetrators would have made sure to use such a weapon and therefore such a weapon would have been employed and therefore 911 was an inside job.

Hey, give him credit - he got one thing right: the 1980s were way in advance of 2001.

Dave Rogers · 25th August 2011, 05:51 AM

Patrick1000 seems to have stayed out of the running so far by never saying anything comprehensible. On the rare occasions when he does, we can see why he'd rather not.

Originally Posted by Patrick1000

Since the astronauts were not on the moon, they feared lasers. Not necessarily just "our own" ruby red laser at Lick Observatory, but any laser. You see, others could not take a picture of the landing site to prove or disporve the landing's authenticity, but they could shine light from the earth, and just like the argon laser filmed/photographed in 1968 by surveyor VII, it would be anticipated for a laser image to appear in astronaut filmings/photos, if they were shots that included the earth at a time when anybody's laser was fired.

This by the way is why Alan Bean purposely breaks the tv camera during the Apollo 12 mission. Because everyone including the Russians and French know those guys are supposed to be at the Surveyor 3 site. It can easily be targeted. If the Russians or French or whomever shoot a laser of any type, one at least as bright and visible as the 1968 Surveyor VII filmed argon laser, then the light should appear in video, photos of the earth.

They weren't worried about the Soviets being able to figure out they weren't on the moon by tracking radio signals and finding out there weren't any, but one single laser could have blown apart the whole conspiracy.

Lasers... is there anything they can't do?

Dave

Captain_Swoop · 25th August 2011, 06:32 AM

Originally Posted by Dave Rogers

Lasers... is there anything they can't do?

Dave

Are they attached to Sharks? is that too much to ask?

Myron Proudfoot · 25th August 2011, 10:12 AM

Originally Posted by AnnoyingPony

From here....

Wasn't North one of the main Y2K panic-mongers???

19th August 2011, 10:10 AM	#121
jaydeehess Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: I beedunk 40 miles from the border Posts: 10,822	Originally Posted by PixyMisa Those far rights and their bloodlust for balanced budgets: Oddly enough I have read pretty much the exact same thing written with the words 'the far left' instead of 'the far right'. ETA: Perhaps I should have begun reading this thread a few days earlier
	Last edited by jaydeehess; 19th August 2011 at 10:14 AM.

19th August 2011, 02:09 PM	#123
Travis Misanthrope of the Mountains Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Tuolumne City, CA Posts: 17,960	I can't believe we have a new Apollo mega thread.
	__________________ "Because WE ARE IGNORANT OF 911 FACTS, WE DEMAND PROOF" -- Douglas Herman on Rense.com Zingiber Officinale The Humor blog of some not crazy guy

19th August 2011, 02:33 PM	#124
sts60 Graduate Poster Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,518	Oh, Patrick1000/fattydash/DoctorTea/BFischer/BSpassky/mvinson/Sicilian/piersquared/etc., etc., is a veritable fountain of Stundie-quality material. But this one is charming in its simplicity (bolding mine): Originally Posted by Patrick1000 We can debate the rocks ApolloG, no big. i am not trying to get out of the rock debate. You'll come around to the fake poop=fraud view eventually. they all do in the end. Originally Posted by Patrick1000 I honestly believe I have never convinced a single person under any circumstances of the bogusness of Apollo except my brother... Welcome to "All". Population: his brother. Who's probably a sock-puppet too.
sts60 Graduate Poster Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,518

19th August 2011, 02:58 PM	#125
Horatius NWO Kitty Wrangler Join Date: May 2006 Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada Posts: 21,894	Originally Posted by sts60 Welcome to "All". Population: his brother. Who's probably a sock-puppet too. And, not just "all", but simultaneously, not "a single person"! That's one Magic Brother he's got there!
	__________________ Obviously, that means cats are indeed evil and that ownership or display of a feline is an overt declaration of one's affiliation with dark forces. - Cl1mh4224rd

20th August 2011, 12:26 AM	#127
Brian1709 New Blood Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 24	Originally Posted by Supermac Medical advice on the DI forum: "I remember hearing Alex Jones talking about how Hospitals often target the elderly who go in for treatment and then it struck me how ALMSOT EVERY ELDERLY PAITENT THAT GOES IN ENDS UP WITH NAMONYA!! (No matter what they go in for)" Namonya? Do you know what it is yet? It took me a couple of minutes to work it out. Hmm. took me a while to work out. could it be newmoania?
Brian1709 New Blood Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 24

19th August 2011, 10:31 AM	#122
jaydeehess Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: I beedunk 40 miles from the border Posts: 10,822	Originally Posted by timhau Ah, so things are either certain, impossible, or have a 50% probability. Thanks, that clears up a lot of issues! Now if I could only figure out these 6-sided dice I have... Here I was thinking that conspiracy theorists were binary thinkers and you point out that they are actually trinary. In an elecronic circuit this could be represented by the values low voltage -current sink hi voltage - current source hi-z - no current Which would be apropos if one assigns the idea that any probability at all equals 50/50 the electronic value of zero current. As for your six sided dice, obviously there is a certainty that it will land on a flat side and an impossibility that it will settle upright on an edge or point. So what's the beef?

19th August 2011, 11:16 PM	#126
Supermac Scholar Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North East England Posts: 93	Medical advice on the DI forum: "I remember hearing Alex Jones talking about how Hospitals often target the elderly who go in for treatment and then it struck me how ALMSOT EVERY ELDERLY PAITENT THAT GOES IN ENDS UP WITH NAMONYA!! (No matter what they go in for)" Namonya? Do you know what it is yet? It took me a couple of minutes to work it out.

20th August 2011, 12:51 AM	#128
timhau NWO Litter Technician Join Date: May 2004 Location: East of Sweeden Posts: 9,692	Originally Posted by Supermac Medical advice on the DI forum: "I remember hearing Alex Jones talking about how Hospitals often target the elderly who go in for treatment and then it struck me how ALMSOT EVERY ELDERLY PAITENT THAT GOES IN ENDS UP WITH NAMONYA!! (No matter what they go in for)" Namonya? Do you know what it is yet? It took me a couple of minutes to work it out. Almsot a couple of minutes? Funny that I've had namonya three times in my life, and at least the version I had when I was 8 would have killed me if it wasn't for Western medicine and Big Pharma.
	__________________ When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I realised that the Lord, in his wisdom, doesn't work that way. I just stole one and asked Him to forgive me. - Emo Philips

20th August 2011, 04:18 AM	#129
muzungu100 Student Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 30	Originally Posted by Brian1709 Hmm. took me a while to work out. could it be newmoania? Could be nymphomania. I'm keeping my granny away from those hospitals. Steer clear of the geriatric wards people.
muzungu100 Student Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 30	Last edited by muzungu100; 20th August 2011 at 04:23 AM.

20th August 2011, 07:40 AM	#130
matt.tansy Muse Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Groton, CT Posts: 802	Originally Posted by muzungu100 Could be nymphomania. I'm keeping my granny away from those hospitals. Steer clear of the geriatric wards people. No, no, no. "nymphomania" is spelled with a "p": pnymphomania.

20th August 2011, 09:01 AM	#131
Myron Proudfoot Muse Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Washington DC area. Posts: 957	Originally Posted by Supermac Medical advice on the DI forum: "I remember hearing Alex Jones talking about how Hospitals often target the elderly who go in for treatment and then it struck me how ALMSOT EVERY ELDERLY PAITENT THAT GOES IN ENDS UP WITH NAMONYA!! (No matter what they go in for)" Namonya? Do you know what it is yet? It took me a couple of minutes to work it out. I think it's a magic land you enter by passing through the back of a wardrobe full of coats...
	__________________ That's odd. That's very odd. Wouldn't you say that's very odd??

20th August 2011, 08:34 PM	#132
Travis Misanthrope of the Mountains Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Tuolumne City, CA Posts: 17,960	Originally Posted by Supermac Medical advice on the DI forum: "I remember hearing Alex Jones talking about how Hospitals often target the elderly who go in for treatment and then it struck me how ALMSOT EVERY ELDERLY PAITENT THAT GOES IN ENDS UP WITH NAMONYA!! (No matter what they go in for)" Namonya? Do you know what it is yet? It took me a couple of minutes to work it out. Got a link for that bit of gold?
	__________________ "Because WE ARE IGNORANT OF 911 FACTS, WE DEMAND PROOF" -- Douglas Herman on Rense.com Zingiber Officinale The Humor blog of some not crazy guy

20th August 2011, 08:41 PM	#133
TjW Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: up in the air Posts: 10,002	Originally Posted by Supermac Medical advice on the DI forum: "I remember hearing Alex Jones talking about how Hospitals often target the elderly who go in for treatment and then it struck me how ALMSOT EVERY ELDERLY PAITENT THAT GOES IN ENDS UP WITH NAMONYA!! (No matter what they go in for)" Namonya? Do you know what it is yet? It took me a couple of minutes to work it out. I Pneu what it was right away.
	__________________ TjW People like TjW -- Kelly

20th August 2011, 11:14 PM	#134
Supermac Scholar Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North East England Posts: 93	Here's the link to the namonya thread in the Icke forum. http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=180071
	Last edited by Supermac; 20th August 2011 at 11:18 PM.

21st August 2011, 12:05 AM	#135
Horatius NWO Kitty Wrangler Join Date: May 2006 Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada Posts: 21,894	Originally Posted by Supermac Here's the link to the namonya thread in the Icke forum. http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=180071 Ha! Someone there beat all y'all on the Pun Issue: Quote: Nemoneya is like No $? This isn't a troll post, right? You DID hear this on AJ, right?
	__________________ Obviously, that means cats are indeed evil and that ownership or display of a feline is an overt declaration of one's affiliation with dark forces. - Cl1mh4224rd

21st August 2011, 06:52 PM	#136
Travis Misanthrope of the Mountains Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Tuolumne City, CA Posts: 17,960	I think it's curious they didn't spell it Ammonia.
	__________________ "Because WE ARE IGNORANT OF 911 FACTS, WE DEMAND PROOF" -- Douglas Herman on Rense.com Zingiber Officinale The Humor blog of some not crazy guy

22nd August 2011, 01:14 AM	#137
Sword_Of_Truth Penultimate Amazing Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 11,497	Clayton Moore going for gold with this hard hitting rebuttal to Mathew Ellards fully sourced fact barrage: Originally Posted by Clayton Moore Originally Posted by Matthew Ellard No evidence? 1) We have the pits the bodies were first buried in http://www.deathcamps.org/treblinka/pic/bigp51.jpg 2) We have the 2,000 square metres of human ash.....the surface is covered for about 2 hectares by a mixture of ashes and sand. In this mixture, one finds countless human bones, often still covered with tissue remains, which are in a condition of decomposition. During the inspection, which I made with the assistance of an expert in forensic medicine, it was determined that the ashes are without any doubt of human origin (Justice Lukaszkiewicz) 3) We have the actual "worker" eye witnesses talking about actually doing it(Oskar Strawczynski) The graves could never be emptied entirely, because blood mixed with water accumulated at the bottom. Motorized pumps were set up to draw it out. However, they could never manage to drain the bottom few meters, and so the graves were simply covered over (Abraham Krzepicki) ....These ditches were 60 or 70 meters long. They were also very deep, but I could not tell how deep they were because the ditches to which we had been assigned were already filled with many layers of corpses. The graves remained open through the night and the next day more bodies were piled into them. While I was in Treblinka, only the small ditch to the left, where I had worked on the first day, was closed. By the time we came out there in the morning, the excavator was already in operation, and digging out new giant graves. 4) We have the SS C.O. of the camp talking about the burial pits. (Franz Stangl) "it was always a huge mass… they were naked, packed together, running, being driven with whips" & "I think it started the day I first saw the Totenlager in Treblinka. I remember Wirth standing there, next to the pits full of blue-black corpses. You are simply denying evidence. That's just crapola. Brilliant work, Clayton... just awesome bro. Seriously.

22nd August 2011, 04:12 AM	#138
jhunter1163 Beer-Swilling Semiliterate Moderator Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Room 118, Bohemian Grove Marriott Posts: 15,606	I've had the rockin' namonya and the boogie-woogie pfleu.

22nd August 2011, 11:00 AM	#139
carlitos "más divertido" Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 11,549	Originally Posted by mrkinnies Originally Posted by DC it fell before the rest even started to collapse, so it did sure not fall as a single block as you falsly claimed. Oh, I'm sorry, that's right, WTC7 split in two with one side falling over sideways and the other falling straight down. Silly me. Words fail me.

23rd August 2011, 06:44 AM	#140
Disbelief Master Poster Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,272	Originally Posted by Josh The fact that the downward velocity continually increases tell us the destruction we see is not due to "crushing!" Something other than gravitation collapse is at work. Over on FB, this is one of many.
Disbelief Master Poster Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,272	__________________ Zensmack (LastChild, Laughing Assassin, RazetheFlag, Wastrel, TruthbyDecree) - Working his way up the sock puppet chain, trying to overtake P'Doh. Or, are they the same? Quote me where I said conspiracists use evidence. - mchapman Last edited by Disbelief; 23rd August 2011 at 06:46 AM.

23rd August 2011, 07:03 AM	#141
Horatius NWO Kitty Wrangler Join Date: May 2006 Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada Posts: 21,894	Most of Patrick1000's posts are far too wordy to make good Stundie noms, but this one works well: Originally Posted by Patrick1000 A final point before I conclude for the day. There is the famous visor down photograph of Armstrong "walking across the surface of the moon". We are all very familiar with this image. This cannot be an authentic moonscape shot. They would not allow Armstrong to do this and of course Armstrong would not do such a fool hardy thing in the context of genuine potential for exposure to laser light of that intensity. There must not be any authentic risk of exposure to ruby red light in the "context" of this famous photo, and so one may conclude Neil Armstrong is not on the surface of the moon on July 20 1969. Pat ...particularly when you consider how he completely ignored my earlier post. In fact, this would make a great comic.....
	__________________ Obviously, that means cats are indeed evil and that ownership or display of a feline is an overt declaration of one's affiliation with dark forces. - Cl1mh4224rd

23rd August 2011, 10:37 AM	#142
Captain_Swoop Illuminator Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: North Yorkshire Posts: 3,953	Originally Posted by Horatius In fact, this would make a great comic..... Yes, you haven't done one for a long time.

23rd August 2011, 10:59 AM	#143
carlitos "más divertido" Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 11,549	It's not related to a conspiracy, but I thought the highlighted phrase might be enjoyed by Stundie readers. Originally Posted by EzikeltheProphet I will only address people with sense an respect. You seem cool. Yes it is true, people see stuff in the sky they cannot identify all the time but not when it comes to me. I have recorded the skies for years and i am ex-military . Working with the Air-force and Being stationed near Air bases helped and adds to my experience identifying ANYTHING in the sky. You are incorrect about invisible UFO being unproven. I can sense when they are there and i can record them with the help of Infrared devices. UFO have multi-spectrum cloaking technology and there have been times when i was able to get them to display their cloaking to me. To establish that UFO are there because i summoned them is easy. The sky wont have any UFO visible before i summon but within seconds to a couple of minutes after my summons the sky will have objects that glow like a star but is not , flying above us. Now if the JREF wants to claim they are NOT what i say they are then they must prove it, because they will not appear before i summon. I proved my ability. Any claim to a hypothesized identity by either the tester or the JREF must be proven with data... if they say airplane- show me the wings and FAA safety lights...... if they say satellite then show me the data backing up that claim (SHOULD BE EASY SINCE ALL SAT. DATA IS ON THE WEB) However, till this day I AM UNDEBUNKABLE . Not a soul on this planet can debunk my sightings.... just make guesses and theories. For the 1st test i suggest the location be in NYC (anywhere in NYC) where i live and that it be a clear night that stars are visible. Anyone may attend and the location can be kept secret from me. I have FAITH in God and believe I cannot fail . Its only mundane to the mundane.

23rd August 2011, 11:12 AM	#144
twinstead Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Big corner office in NWO Towers Posts: 11,578	Sounds like a new super hero. Look, up in the sky. It's a bird! It's a plane! No, it's Captain Undebunkable!!!!!!
	__________________ You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison

23rd August 2011, 11:39 AM	#145
Horatius NWO Kitty Wrangler Join Date: May 2006 Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada Posts: 21,894	Originally Posted by Captain_Swoop Yes, you haven't done one for a long time. Yes, not since, oh, last night......I haven't done one inspired by "real" life in a while, though.
	__________________ Obviously, that means cats are indeed evil and that ownership or display of a feline is an overt declaration of one's affiliation with dark forces. - Cl1mh4224rd

23rd August 2011, 11:52 AM	#146
Axiom_Blade Graduate Poster Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 1,748	Originally Posted by carlitos It's not related to a conspiracy, but I thought the highlighted phrase might be enjoyed by Stundie readers. Okay, so let me see if I got this straight...he can make objects appear "that glow like a star, but is not", but will only demonstrate this power on "a clear night that stars are visible"...

23rd August 2011, 12:21 PM	#147
Travis Misanthrope of the Mountains Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Tuolumne City, CA Posts: 17,960	He clearly has a different idea of what "debunkable" means.
	__________________ "Because WE ARE IGNORANT OF 911 FACTS, WE DEMAND PROOF" -- Douglas Herman on Rense.com Zingiber Officinale The Humor blog of some not crazy guy

23rd August 2011, 02:07 PM	#148
Horatius NWO Kitty Wrangler Join Date: May 2006 Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada Posts: 21,894	Originally Posted by Horatius In fact, this would make a great comic.....
	__________________ Obviously, that means cats are indeed evil and that ownership or display of a feline is an overt declaration of one's affiliation with dark forces. - Cl1mh4224rd

23rd August 2011, 03:53 PM	#149
CompusMentus Waiting for the Worms Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Wales UK Posts: 1,450	^ :=] Compus
	__________________ Tongue-tied and twisted just an earth-bound misfit

24th August 2011, 01:38 AM	#150
Dave Rogers Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through a scribbled morning waving necessary ankles Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: In a world lit only by fire. Posts: 17,894	Here's tmd2_1 commenting on the "flash" seen on some videos of the WTC crashes, and suggesting that it must have an unusual explanation. Originally Posted by tmd2_1 There's been millions of commercial flights in history right? As far as I could find these were the only two that exhibited anything like that. Because, of all the millions of commercial airliners that were filmed crashing into high-rise buildings, only these two gave flashes. Dave
	__________________ "We will punish the murderer together. Our punishment will be more generosity, more tolerance and more democracy." - Fabian Stang, Mayor of Oslo SSKCAS, covert member

24th August 2011, 07:50 AM	#151
carlitos "más divertido" Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 11,549	Whoa, that's a doozie.

24th August 2011, 08:10 AM	#152
twinstead Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Big corner office in NWO Towers Posts: 11,578	There must be thousands of high-resolution films of large jetliners crashing into huge skyscrapers at high speed. I want to know why only the two on 9-11 had those flashes!!!!!111!!1!
	__________________ You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -- Harlan Ellison Last edited by twinstead; 24th August 2011 at 08:13 AM.

24th August 2011, 02:30 PM	#153
jaydeehess Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: I beedunk 40 miles from the border Posts: 10,822	Originally Posted by Dave Rogers Here's tmd2_1 commenting on the "flash" seen on some videos of the WTC crashes, and suggesting that it must have an unusual explanation. Because, of all the millions of commercial airliners that were filmed crashing into high-rise buildings, only these two gave flashes. Dave Of course,,, why didn't I think of that? ,,, and by 'that' I mean nominating tmd's quote for a Stundie

24th August 2011, 02:31 PM	#154
jaydeehess Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: I beedunk 40 miles from the border Posts: 10,822	Originally Posted by twinstead There must be thousands of high-resolution films of large jetliners crashing into huge skyscrapers at high speed. I want to know why only the two on 9-11 had those flashes!!!!!111!!1! Not to mention the number of zoomed in, low resolution, highly compressed and pixelated videos !eleventy!1!

24th August 2011, 02:42 PM	#155
jaydeehess Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: I beedunk 40 miles from the border Posts: 10,822	Because I am jealous that Dave niminated tmd for the above quote,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Here's tmd again; http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php...&postcount=502 Quote: Ah I have found something I think demonstrates the concept of what could (I emphasize could have been used). Missile fires 3 sub missiles are fired from that missile. Full description here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starstreak_%28missile%29 Please do not bombard me with questions, about how this weapon could not have been used. I am not saying it was...only that the concept would be similar, right down to the self detonation of the sub missiles. Which is something I'm sure the conspirators would have made sure happened. Technology was developed in the 80's way in advance of 2001. Is this a Yosemite Sam "I don't know how they done it but I knows they done it arguement? Somewhat circular reasoning. Its a missile that explodes on impact and that proves that 911 was an inside job. I know it because the perpetrators would have made sure to use such a weapon and therefore such a weapon would have been employed and therefore 911 was an inside job.
	Last edited by jaydeehess; 24th August 2011 at 02:44 PM.