| JREF Homepage | Swift Blog | Events Calendar | $1 Million Paranormal Challenge | The Amaz!ng Meeting | Useful Links | Support Us |
![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
|
|
#1 |
|
NLH
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 25,885
|
What do the USB ports on monitors do?
There are 2 USB ports on my HP monitor. It dawns that I have no idea what they are for.
I tried plugging various things in, but Windows doesn't notice. A kindle doesn't charge from them, so they are not even power supplies. So , at the risk of seeming extremely dim... what are they for? ETA- I just looked underneath. There's what I think of as a USB printer connection. Does this have to be connected to the PC to activate the ports? *Sam goes grubbing in cable box* Well. Dang me. That's exactly what it does. OK. Nothing to see here. Move along... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Illuminator
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 3,940
|
What you have is a built in USB Hub
Somewhere on the monitor will be one of the square Peripheral usb sockets as seen on peripherals. Plug a cable from your PC to the Monitor then you can plug your mouse and keyboard into it |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
NLH
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 25,885
|
Yep. I figured that out, after turning the monitor upside down and knocking a heap of stuff on the floor.
The mouse & keyboard are wifi and plugged in at the back, where I rarely need to go. I guess it's a handy idea, but I already stuck a USB3 card in , for a 1TB external drive , so there's no port shortage. I do wonder why they put them so close together. There's LOADS of space. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mazes of Menace
Posts: 5,904
|
If it's an old monitor it's very likely USB 1.1, so you'd be better off using the ports on the PC directly.
|
|
__________________
He bade me take any rug in the house. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Self Employed
Remittance Man Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 1,766
|
They make handy charging ports since they are usually more easily accessed then ports on the computer itself.
|
|
__________________
- Opinions require evidence and no before you ask defining something as "Something doesn't require evidence" doesn't count. - In extreme cases continuing to be wrong when you've been repeatedly proven to be wrong is a form of rudeness. - Major in philosophy. That way you can also ask people "why" they would like fries would that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
BOFH
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 8,247
|
And they can be used with products like Matrox Dual Heads to tell the Matrox box what they are.
|
|
__________________
Aphorism: Subjects most likely to be declared inappropriate for humor are the ones most in need of it. -epepke |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Elf Wino
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: 3rd Rock from the Sun
Posts: 1,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Gatekeeper of The Left
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Universe 35.2 ms ahead of this one.
Posts: 32,193
|
|
|
__________________
Are you IN? Join the IN crowd now! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Gatekeeper of The Left
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Universe 35.2 ms ahead of this one.
Posts: 32,193
|
|
|
__________________
Are you IN? Join the IN crowd now! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Illuminator
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hunting Moose and Squirrel
Posts: 4,154
|
The only thing is that 1.X is very slow compared to 2.0 or 3.0. Data rates in megabytes per second:
USB 1.0 = 0.192 MBs USB 1.1 = 1.5 MBs USB 2.0 = 60 MBs USB 3.0 = 625 MBs Just to compare: CD (1X) = 0.176 MBs DVD (1x) = 1.32 MBs 802.11b wireless = 1.375 MBs 802.11g wireless = 6.75 MBs 802.11n wireless = 37.5 MBs 1.x is all well and good for things like mice and keyboards and so on where the data is in the form of a very short burst of information that's only a few bits in size at a time, the bandwidth is rarely in use and spends 99.9% of it's time waiting for input. For moving large amounts of data it's not great (it's doable but you really don't need to move more than a few hundred megs at a time (tops) over 1.x unless you really have to and you have no other option). 3.0 came about because of the increased popularity of very large USB portable hard drives. |
|
__________________
"Swift, silent and deadly" was a part of my job description Upon hearing me say that my friend asked me "So you're a fart?"... About my avatar. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
NLH
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 25,885
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|