FREE TAPATALK APP

Dcdrac · 25th May 2012, 02:43 AM

As it apppears that rightist and leftist groups have attached their own agendas to this case I ask is it possible to have a nuetral facts only discussion free of any agenda about this case?

I think probably not.

Dancing David · 25th May 2012, 03:20 AM

Yes, I have to ignore a lot of hyperbole in that thread.

OnlyTellsTruths · 25th May 2012, 03:53 AM

I believe we already discussed this in this thread:

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=233858

crimresearch · 25th May 2012, 05:51 AM

Originally Posted by Dcdrac

As it apppears that rightist and leftist groups have attached their own agendas to this case I ask is it possible to have a nuetral facts only discussion free of any agenda about this case?

I think probably not.

Are you simply assuming that anyone who posts something which doesn't accept your opinions as fact must be 'one of them'?

Or do you have some definitive proof? Say in the form that was already asked for in that thread?

Dcdrac · 25th May 2012, 06:11 AM

No I just noticed right across the net after reading the various sites linkted to that several people are using it as vehicle to push an agenda regardless of the facts.

it was mostly following the links from the original thread to sites on both sides of the spectrium no assumptions at all.

An also reading the acocunts in the US papers my partner gets them on subscription.

Washington Post and the New York Times

25th May 2012, 02:43 AM	#1
Dcdrac Illuminator Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 3,889	Is a Nuetral Discussion of the Traynor Martin George Zimmerman Case Possible? As it apppears that rightist and leftist groups have attached their own agendas to this case I ask is it possible to have a nuetral facts only discussion free of any agenda about this case? I think probably not.
Dcdrac Illuminator Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 3,889

25th May 2012, 03:20 AM	#2
Dancing David Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Central Illinois Posts: 34,919	Yes, I have to ignore a lot of hyperbole in that thread.
	__________________ Hell, dynamiting fish in a barrel is more challenging. - Ladewig I suspect you are a sandwich, metaphorically speaking. -Donn And a shot rang out. Now Space is doing time... -Ben Burch You built the toilet - don't complain when people crap in it. _Kid Eager

25th May 2012, 03:53 AM	#3
OnlyTellsTruths Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 5,921	I believe we already discussed this in this thread: http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=233858
OnlyTellsTruths Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 5,921	__________________ ________________________

25th May 2012, 05:51 AM	#4
crimresearch Alumbrado Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 10,618	Originally Posted by Dcdrac As it apppears that rightist and leftist groups have attached their own agendas to this case I ask is it possible to have a nuetral facts only discussion free of any agenda about this case? I think probably not. Are you simply assuming that anyone who posts something which doesn't accept your opinions as fact must be 'one of them'? Or do you have some definitive proof? Say in the form that was already asked for in that thread?
crimresearch Alumbrado Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 10,618

25th May 2012, 06:11 AM	#5
Dcdrac Illuminator Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 3,889	No I just noticed right across the net after reading the various sites linkted to that several people are using it as vehicle to push an agenda regardless of the facts. it was mostly following the links from the original thread to sites on both sides of the spectrium no assumptions at all. An also reading the acocunts in the US papers my partner gets them on subscription. Washington Post and the New York Times
Dcdrac Illuminator Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 3,889