Teh Umpteenth Annual June Stundie Nominations

Alareth · 1st June 2012, 10:40 PM

It's that time again kids and it looks like Travis isn't around to get things going so somebody else has to.

The rules are simple:

All nominations require a link or a screenshot
Try to keep it short. Overly long paragraphs of text or elaborate setups and explainations detract for the purity of the humor.

Nominate away.

Childlike Empress · 1st June 2012, 10:51 PM

I nominate this nomination.

TSR · 2nd June 2012, 01:08 AM

Originally Posted by Childlike Empress

I nominate this nomination.

Perhaps you don't understand what a Stundie is?

Childlike Empress · 2nd June 2012, 04:47 AM

Originally Posted by TSR

Perhaps you don't understand what a Stundie is?

Most likely better than you.

000063 · 2nd June 2012, 05:12 AM

Originally Posted by dafydd

I see. No wonder no arrests have been made. Which of the Bilderberg's plans have come to fruition?

Originally Posted by Childlike Empress

No idea. I have no access to that data. Duh. What a dull question.

Originally Posted by dafydd

It's a very pertinent question. How do you know that this data exists?

Originally Posted by Childlike Empress

Because they are meeting. There is data about what they do, and which consequences that has. Both is not available to me. You confuse me with a "New World Order" believer. This was directed at you, as you well understood. Read it. kthxbye.

Originally Posted by dafydd

Where can I find this data?

Originally Posted by dafydd

Read it. If it's not a global cabal, then what are you talking about?

CE, you gave "Because they are meeting." as the justification. You are claiming data exists, and you know it exists because of these meetings. You claim there's data about the Bilderberg plans, yet admit you don't actually have it.

Childlike Empress · 2nd June 2012, 05:42 AM

Originally Posted by 000063

You claim there's data about the Bilderberg plans

Where?

Mojo · 2nd June 2012, 05:49 AM

Originally Posted by Childlike Empress

Where?

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.p...35#post8335835

Childlike Empress · 2nd June 2012, 06:23 AM

Originally Posted by Mojo

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.p...35#post8335835

Quote?

TSR · 2nd June 2012, 06:26 AM

Originally Posted by Childlike Empress

Quote?

Originally Posted by Childlike Empress

There is data about what they do

Do you need me to jump on your chest and start you breathing, too?

Childlike Empress · 2nd June 2012, 06:45 AM

Originally Posted by TSR

Do you need me to jump on your chest and start you breathing, too?

I don't see anything about "plans" there. I see "do". If you want to continue this petty argument, go read where the "conversation" starts (click the "This" link in the quote).

I for one am happy that after all those years I was finally nominated for a Stundie.

TSR · 2nd June 2012, 08:10 AM

So a chest jump is required.

Your initial response in that subthread was to a request for information about the plans. Your response(s) indicated that you *believe* that such data exists, and that you believe such data exists because the group was meeting, which is apparently what they do, even though you had no access to that data.

Had you written, for example "I have no idea whether such data exists" there likely would have been no continuation of that subthread, and thus no nom.

But you didn't.

There is no stundie in pointing out your own leap of "logic" that because they were meeting, there must be data on which of their plans had actually been realized.

Yours was a self-nom this time.

Just to make it official, I nominate CE's "contribution" to this thread.

dafydd · 2nd June 2012, 08:28 AM

Originally Posted by Childlike Empress

Where?

You said that there were data. We will take it that you have no idea if such data exists, or what the data is, if it does exist.

Childlike Empress · 2nd June 2012, 08:36 AM

Originally Posted by TSR

Your initial response in that subthread was to a request for information about the plans.

That "subthread" started much earlier with a preemptive self-quote by me to avoid petty straw man arguments i'm not interested in. Followed by a series of empty little quips by dafydd mistaking me (and Jon Ronson) for Alex Jones fans who think that inside that meeting the decimation of world-population and the latest chemicals to put in the trails are planned. At the time when dafydd repeated his clueless question, I was already making fun of him. I neither know if they are making specific plans of any kind, nor if any of those plans have been successful, and that's what I was telling him before closing the loop.

Hope you at least enjoyed my educational link about Stundie.

Have fun, folks.

Sword_Of_Truth · 2nd June 2012, 09:10 AM

Originally Posted by Childlike Empress

Originally Posted by TSR

Perhaps you don't understand what a Stundie is?

Most likely better than you.

Empress is right, she's been nominated for more of them than you have.

Robrob · 2nd June 2012, 11:59 AM

In addition to CE's entire tap dance above ("I'm only pretending to believe in the things in which I believe!"), I would like to submit this one from FaceBook.

When asked why there are no peer reviewed 911 Truther papers:

Quote:

Michael Fullerton: Hmm...basic science vs some science-illiterate guy posting appeal to authority logical fallacies on the Internet...which to chose?

Quote:

Bill Nada: A peer reviewed study isn't an appeal to authority. Keep swinging for the fences.

Quote:

Michael Fullerton: Bill, claiming a study is a fact simply because it has been "peer reviewed" definitely is an appeal to authority. Peer review merely helps uncover errors it does not completely validate the work. This simple fact is something science illiterates consistently have trouble with.

000063 · 2nd June 2012, 12:36 PM

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore

You could probably drop the the upper 1/3 [of one of the Twin Towers] from 50 feet and you wouldn't get a like result.

Clay Moore, everyone.

thedopefishlives · 2nd June 2012, 01:26 PM

Originally Posted by 000063

Clay Moore, everyone.

Going right along with ergo's "moon-sized field of rubble" that has become so infamous around these parts. Birds of a feather, etc., etc.

uke2se · 2nd June 2012, 01:30 PM

Originally Posted by TSR

So a chest jump is required.

Your initial response in that subthread was to a request for information about the plans. Your response(s) indicated that you *believe* that such data exists, and that you believe such data exists because the group was meeting, which is apparently what they do, even though you had no access to that data.

Had you written, for example "I have no idea whether such data exists" there likely would have been no continuation of that subthread, and thus no nom.

But you didn't.

There is no stundie in pointing out your own leap of "logic" that because they were meeting, there must be data on which of their plans had actually been realized.

Yours was a self-nom this time.

Just to make it official, I nominate CE's "contribution" to this thread.

I don't think it's a requirement that the nominee understands why he/she has been nominated, so I wouldn't bother trying to explain it.

jaydeehess · 2nd June 2012, 02:26 PM

Originally Posted by 000063

CE, you gave "Because they are meeting." as the justification. You are claiming data exists, and you know it exists because of these meetings. You claim there's data about the Bilderberg plans, yet admit you don't actually have it.

I'll take a shot at outlining the nature of CE's logic problem

Asked what BG plans had come to pass , the response was that the data on that was unavailabe.
Follow up query is to question how it was deduced that such data exists, to which the response was essentially that since the BG exists and meets then the data must exist even though CE, and by extension, no one outside of the BG can have that data on plans or their consequences/outcome.

CE's logic problem therefore is that there is nothing more than bald speculation to back a claim of nefarious intent by this group. I have the same amount of evidence to back a claim that the BG gather as they do for a backgammon tournament

Travis · 2nd June 2012, 10:17 PM

I'd like to thank Alareth for getting this going while I was absent.

I will try to get the May finals up tomorrow.

Alareth · 3rd June 2012, 03:06 AM

Possibly not a Stundie, just unfathomably callous

http://whitewhine.com/post/232378889...agree-with-you

Tomtomkent · 3rd June 2012, 08:39 AM

Originally Posted by Gaetan

You should know that money is the basic of all crimes directly or indirectly and when you live the devil way you take the devil habits.

Yep... get rid of money and you get rid of all crime. Bullying, vandalism, child abuse... all of them because of money.

timhau · 3rd June 2012, 08:54 AM

Originally Posted by Tomtomkent

Yep... get rid of money and you get rid of all crime.

It worked wonders in Democratic Kampuchea.

thedopefishlives · 3rd June 2012, 04:17 PM

Originally Posted by Christopher7

No they were not! The "average" refers to the dots, not the acceleration. The dots, taken from a video, are not exact so an average of the dots is taken. The result is FFA.

I'm honestly at a loss for words. The more Chris7 tries to explain his understanding of "average" and "instantaneous", the stupider he looks.

Travis · 4th June 2012, 05:26 AM

Sorry folks but a date with the girlfriend too precedence over the May finals yesterday.

Today looks somewhat better though.

000063 · 4th June 2012, 06:10 AM

Originally Posted by Alareth

Possibly not a Stundie, just unfathomably callous

http://whitewhine.com/post/232378889...agree-with-you

I sure do love the idea of a website dedicated to shaming people because of their race. And the implication that white problems = first world problems.

Originally Posted by thedopefishlives

I'm honestly at a loss for words. The more Chris7 tries to explain his understanding of "average" and "instantaneous", the stupider he looks.

Or anything, really.

Oystein · 5th June 2012, 06:35 AM

Christopher7 is flexing his Stundie-muscles:

Originally Posted by Christopher7

for the military, blowing things up is priority #1.

(Defending the homeland, and supporting US interests abroad, come in a distant second and third place)

and

Originally Posted by Christopher7

I have established the possibility that nano-thermite devices could have been used to bring down the three towers and that is enough.

(Yep, and if I show that midgets with saws can cut steel, that's it then, folks! Midgets dunnit!)

Yep, that's 2 separate nominations from the same post. Chapeau!

Travis · 5th June 2012, 07:23 AM

Well the good news is that I was able to work on the May finals for a few hours and they are now getting closer to being done. Hope to finish them later today or tonight.

fourtoe · 5th June 2012, 02:24 PM

Again, not necessarily a nom but I think this would be appreciated by y'all:

Sorry ladies!
Source.

dafydd · 5th June 2012, 02:53 PM

Originally Posted by Childlike Empress

That "subthread" started much earlier with a preemptive self-quote by me to avoid petty straw man arguments i'm not interested in. Followed by a series of empty little quips by dafydd mistaking me (and Jon Ronson) for Alex Jones fans who think that inside that meeting the decimation of world-population and the latest chemicals to put in the trails are planned. At the time when dafydd repeated his clueless question, I was already making fun of him. I neither know if they are making specific plans of any kind, nor if any of those plans have been successful, and that's what I was telling him before closing the loop.

Hope you at least enjoyed my educational link about Stundie.

Have fun, folks.

You hid that very well.

CompusMentus · 5th June 2012, 03:03 PM

From HERE Our old friends at TFES (scroll down about a dozen posts)

Originally Posted by Irushwithscvs

Obviously there is. If the Earth was round, everyone on this southern hemisphere of yours would either fall off the Earth or at the very least, the blood would rush to their head. It is basic logic.

If stupid was flammable this site would set your brain, your cat, wife, dog, everything, on fire.

Compus

frenat · 5th June 2012, 03:20 PM

Originally Posted by CompusMentus

From HERE Our old friends at TFES (scroll down about a dozen posts)

If stupid was flammable this site would set your brain, your cat, wife, dog, everything, on fire.

Compus

From the same thread

Quote:

Electromagnetism, unlike gravity, has been experimentally verified. The only experiment that "verifies" gravity involves putting large balls in a wooden box. Yeah, totally believable. Gravity is so silly that science had to put it in its own force category, like an ugly step child.

Are we sure they don't just troll their own forum?

grandmastershek · 5th June 2012, 03:42 PM

Well...Cmatrix has reared his ugly head over on Facebook.

Quote:

Stop embarrassing yourself with your primitive grasp of elementary logic.

[...]

You have video showing the building (not parts of it) does not start falling at the base? Didn't think so."

Newtons Bit · 5th June 2012, 07:13 PM

Originally Posted by fourtoe

Again, not necessarily a nom but I think this would be appreciated by y'all:
http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enha...38840926-8.jpg
Sorry ladies!
Source.

I thought that was parody at first

BaaBaa · 6th June 2012, 05:31 AM

Originally Posted by fourtoe

Again, not necessarily a nom but I think this would be appreciated by y'all:
http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enha...38840926-8.jpg
Sorry ladies!
Source.

Cheetos dude just won honours as my FB profile pic.....

thedopefishlives · 6th June 2012, 05:36 AM

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore

You have it backwards. I see three huge buildings, each damaged differently, all three ending up completely demolished in less that 20 seconds of collapse time for each. I don't need no facts or stats to know the score.

Clayton Moore drives in another run with his astonishingly honest admission that he don't need no STINKIN' facts.

garethdjb · 7th June 2012, 06:57 AM

A chemtrail-watcher on Facebook finds the idea of transatlantic flight suspicious:

LINK

Oystein · 7th June 2012, 12:09 PM

Originally Posted by atavisms

... wtc 1 2 & 7 could ONLY have been brought down through the use of pre-planted explosives. This is determined by the facts no one disputes because they are so well documented. (they get ignored and dismissed but there they remain)

Uhm... what now?

CompusMentus · 8th June 2012, 10:46 AM

No further comment necessary......

Originally Posted by Gaetan

Let's say, they can make a flying saucer with their thought and use it to go on saturn and all commands on the space craft obeys to their thought. They are very quick, i saw an extraterrestrial to knit a dress in less than 5 second.

Compus

000063 · 8th June 2012, 03:06 PM

Quote:

i saw an extraterrestrial to knit a dress in less than 5 second.

What does that even mean?

1st June 2012, 10:40 PM	#1
Alareth Expert Expertologist Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Florida Posts: 6,681	Teh Umpteenth Annual June Stundie Nominations It's that time again kids and it looks like Travis isn't around to get things going so somebody else has to. The rules are simple: All nominations require a link or a screenshot Try to keep it short. Overly long paragraphs of text or elaborate setups and explainations detract for the purity of the humor. Nominate away.
	__________________ Pixelated Reality \| Alareth Does Art! Light travels faster than sound, which is why some people appear bright, until you hear them speak

1st June 2012, 10:51 PM	#2
Childlike Empress Ewige Blumenkraft Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Ivory Tower Posts: 7,843	I nominate this nomination.
	__________________ Breaking The Set Last edited by Childlike Empress; 1st June 2012 at 10:53 PM.

2nd June 2012, 01:08 AM	#3
TSR Do you know what this notorious criminal did? Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 4,788	Originally Posted by Childlike Empress I nominate this nomination. Perhaps you don't understand what a Stundie is?
	__________________ My apologies once again for not being allowed to use the obvious shorthand term for a person who knowingly posts untruths. Apparently someone finds that term uncivil, demonstrated and deserved as it is. . "My family is not my weakness, Max. It's my strength." Vince Faraday aka The Cape

2nd June 2012, 04:47 AM	#4
Childlike Empress Ewige Blumenkraft Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Ivory Tower Posts: 7,843	Originally Posted by TSR Perhaps you don't understand what a Stundie is? Most likely better than you.
	__________________ Breaking The Set

2nd June 2012, 05:12 AM	#5
000063 Illuminator Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Not America. Posts: 4,736	Originally Posted by dafydd I see. No wonder no arrests have been made. Which of the Bilderberg's plans have come to fruition? Originally Posted by Childlike Empress No idea. I have no access to that data. Duh. What a dull question. Originally Posted by dafydd It's a very pertinent question. How do you know that this data exists? Originally Posted by Childlike Empress Because they are meeting. There is data about what they do, and which consequences that has. Both is not available to me. You confuse me with a "New World Order" believer. This was directed at you, as you well understood. Read it. kthxbye. Originally Posted by dafydd Where can I find this data? Originally Posted by dafydd Read it. If it's not a global cabal, then what are you talking about? CE, you gave "Because they are meeting." as the justification. You are claiming data exists, and you know it exists because of these meetings. You claim there's data about the Bilderberg plans, yet admit you don't actually have it.
	__________________ No, I'd like you to answer the question in two, simple, coherent sentences. ... That's how you present credible arguments in written form. -ergo, on me giving him a 2 digit number I can think of two reasons why bedunkers are often so loathe to explain their theories using plain, concise language--words even. - ergo Last edited by 000063; 2nd June 2012 at 05:14 AM.

2nd June 2012, 05:42 AM	#6
Childlike Empress Ewige Blumenkraft Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Ivory Tower Posts: 7,843	Originally Posted by 000063 You claim there's data about the Bilderberg plans Where?
	__________________ Breaking The Set

2nd June 2012, 05:49 AM	#7
Mojo Mostly harmless Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Nor Flanden Posts: 22,094	Originally Posted by Childlike Empress Where? http://forums.randi.org/showthread.p...35#post8335835
	__________________ "You got to use your brain." - McKinley Morganfield "The poor mystic homeopaths feel like petted house-cats thrown at high flood on the breaking ice." - Leon Trotsky

2nd June 2012, 06:23 AM	#8
Childlike Empress Ewige Blumenkraft Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Ivory Tower Posts: 7,843	Originally Posted by Mojo http://forums.randi.org/showthread.p...35#post8335835 Quote?
	__________________ Breaking The Set

2nd June 2012, 06:26 AM	#9
TSR Do you know what this notorious criminal did? Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 4,788	Originally Posted by Childlike Empress Quote? Originally Posted by Childlike Empress There is data about what they do Do you need me to jump on your chest and start you breathing, too?
	__________________ My apologies once again for not being allowed to use the obvious shorthand term for a person who knowingly posts untruths. Apparently someone finds that term uncivil, demonstrated and deserved as it is. . "My family is not my weakness, Max. It's my strength." Vince Faraday aka The Cape

2nd June 2012, 06:45 AM	#10
Childlike Empress Ewige Blumenkraft Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Ivory Tower Posts: 7,843	Originally Posted by TSR Do you need me to jump on your chest and start you breathing, too? I don't see anything about "plans" there. I see "do". If you want to continue this petty argument, go read where the "conversation" starts (click the "This" link in the quote). I for one am happy that after all those years I was finally nominated for a Stundie.
	__________________ Breaking The Set

2nd June 2012, 08:10 AM	#11
TSR Do you know what this notorious criminal did? Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 4,788	So a chest jump is required. Your initial response in that subthread was to a request for information about the plans. Your response(s) indicated that you believe that such data exists, and that you believe such data exists because the group was meeting, which is apparently what they do, even though you had no access to that data. Had you written, for example "I have no idea whether such data exists" there likely would have been no continuation of that subthread, and thus no nom. But you didn't. There is no stundie in pointing out your own leap of "logic" that because they were meeting, there must be data on which of their plans had actually been realized. Yours was a self-nom this time. Just to make it official, I nominate CE's "contribution" to this thread.
	__________________ My apologies once again for not being allowed to use the obvious shorthand term for a person who knowingly posts untruths. Apparently someone finds that term uncivil, demonstrated and deserved as it is. . "My family is not my weakness, Max. It's my strength." Vince Faraday aka The Cape Last edited by TSR; 2nd June 2012 at 08:15 AM.

2nd June 2012, 08:28 AM	#12
dafydd Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Belgium (Flatland) Posts: 31,480	Originally Posted by Childlike Empress Where? You said that there were data. We will take it that you have no idea if such data exists, or what the data is, if it does exist.
	__________________ Yesterday upon the stairs I met a man who wasn't there He wasn't there again today I wish that he would go away. Last edited by dafydd; 2nd June 2012 at 08:37 AM.

2nd June 2012, 08:36 AM	#13
Childlike Empress Ewige Blumenkraft Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Ivory Tower Posts: 7,843	Originally Posted by TSR Your initial response in that subthread was to a request for information about the plans. That "subthread" started much earlier with a preemptive self-quote by me to avoid petty straw man arguments i'm not interested in. Followed by a series of empty little quips by dafydd mistaking me (and Jon Ronson) for Alex Jones fans who think that inside that meeting the decimation of world-population and the latest chemicals to put in the trails are planned. At the time when dafydd repeated his clueless question, I was already making fun of him. I neither know if they are making specific plans of any kind, nor if any of those plans have been successful, and that's what I was telling him before closing the loop. Hope you at least enjoyed my educational link about Stundie. Have fun, folks.
	__________________ Breaking The Set

2nd June 2012, 09:10 AM	#14
Sword_Of_Truth Penultimate Amazing Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 11,497	Originally Posted by Childlike Empress Originally Posted by TSR Perhaps you don't understand what a Stundie is? Most likely better than you. Empress is right, she's been nominated for more of them than you have.
	Last edited by Sword_Of_Truth; 2nd June 2012 at 09:12 AM.

2nd June 2012, 11:59 AM	#15
Robrob Illuminator Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 3,660	In addition to CE's entire tap dance above ("I'm only pretending to believe in the things in which I believe!"), I would like to submit this one from FaceBook. When asked why there are no peer reviewed 911 Truther papers: Quote: Michael Fullerton: Hmm...basic science vs some science-illiterate guy posting appeal to authority logical fallacies on the Internet...which to chose? Quote: Bill Nada: A peer reviewed study isn't an appeal to authority. Keep swinging for the fences. Quote: Michael Fullerton: Bill, claiming a study is a fact simply because it has been "peer reviewed" definitely is an appeal to authority. Peer review merely helps uncover errors it does not completely validate the work. This simple fact is something science illiterates consistently have trouble with.
Robrob Illuminator Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 3,660	Last edited by Robrob; 2nd June 2012 at 12:01 PM.

2nd June 2012, 12:36 PM	#16
000063 Illuminator Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Not America. Posts: 4,736	Originally Posted by Clayton Moore You could probably drop the the upper 1/3 [of one of the Twin Towers] from 50 feet and you wouldn't get a like result. Clay Moore, everyone.
	__________________ No, I'd like you to answer the question in two, simple, coherent sentences. ... That's how you present credible arguments in written form. -ergo, on me giving him a 2 digit number I can think of two reasons why bedunkers are often so loathe to explain their theories using plain, concise language--words even. - ergo Last edited by 000063; 2nd June 2012 at 12:39 PM.

2nd June 2012, 01:26 PM	#17
thedopefishlives Muse Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 763	Originally Posted by 000063 Clay Moore, everyone. Going right along with ergo's "moon-sized field of rubble" that has become so infamous around these parts. Birds of a feather, etc., etc.
thedopefishlives Muse Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 763

2nd June 2012, 01:30 PM	#18
uke2se Philosopher Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 5,134	Originally Posted by TSR So a chest jump is required. Your initial response in that subthread was to a request for information about the plans. Your response(s) indicated that you believe that such data exists, and that you believe such data exists because the group was meeting, which is apparently what they do, even though you had no access to that data. Had you written, for example "I have no idea whether such data exists" there likely would have been no continuation of that subthread, and thus no nom. But you didn't. There is no stundie in pointing out your own leap of "logic" that because they were meeting, there must be data on which of their plans had actually been realized. Yours was a self-nom this time. Just to make it official, I nominate CE's "contribution" to this thread. I don't think it's a requirement that the nominee understands why he/she has been nominated, so I wouldn't bother trying to explain it.
uke2se Philosopher Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 5,134

2nd June 2012, 02:26 PM	#19
jaydeehess Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: I beedunk 40 miles from the border Posts: 10,822	Originally Posted by 000063 CE, you gave "Because they are meeting." as the justification. You are claiming data exists, and you know it exists because of these meetings. You claim there's data about the Bilderberg plans, yet admit you don't actually have it. I'll take a shot at outlining the nature of CE's logic problem Asked what BG plans had come to pass , the response was that the data on that was unavailabe. Follow up query is to question how it was deduced that such data exists, to which the response was essentially that since the BG exists and meets then the data must exist even though CE, and by extension, no one outside of the BG can have that data on plans or their consequences/outcome. CE's logic problem therefore is that there is nothing more than bald speculation to back a claim of nefarious intent by this group. I have the same amount of evidence to back a claim that the BG gather as they do for a backgammon tournament

2nd June 2012, 10:17 PM	#20
Travis Misanthrope of the Mountains Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Tuolumne City, CA Posts: 17,954	I'd like to thank Alareth for getting this going while I was absent. I will try to get the May finals up tomorrow.
	__________________ "Because WE ARE IGNORANT OF 911 FACTS, WE DEMAND PROOF" -- Douglas Herman on Rense.com Zingiber Officinale The Humor blog of some not crazy guy

3rd June 2012, 03:06 AM	#21
Alareth Expert Expertologist Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Florida Posts: 6,681	Possibly not a Stundie, just unfathomably callous http://whitewhine.com/post/232378889...agree-with-you
	__________________ Pixelated Reality \| Alareth Does Art! Light travels faster than sound, which is why some people appear bright, until you hear them speak

3rd June 2012, 08:39 AM	#22
Tomtomkent Philosopher Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Kent, United Kingdom Posts: 5,219	Originally Posted by Gaetan You should know that money is the basic of all crimes directly or indirectly and when you live the devil way you take the devil habits. Yep... get rid of money and you get rid of all crime. Bullying, vandalism, child abuse... all of them because of money.
	__________________ @tomhodden No animals were harmed in the making of this post.

3rd June 2012, 08:54 AM	#23
timhau NWO Litter Technician Join Date: May 2004 Location: East of Sweeden Posts: 9,694	Originally Posted by Tomtomkent Yep... get rid of money and you get rid of all crime. It worked wonders in Democratic Kampuchea.
	__________________ When I was a kid I used to pray every night for a new bicycle. Then I realised that the Lord, in his wisdom, doesn't work that way. I just stole one and asked Him to forgive me. - Emo Philips

3rd June 2012, 04:17 PM	#24
thedopefishlives Muse Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 763	Originally Posted by Christopher7 No they were not! The "average" refers to the dots, not the acceleration. The dots, taken from a video, are not exact so an average of the dots is taken. The result is FFA. I'm honestly at a loss for words. The more Chris7 tries to explain his understanding of "average" and "instantaneous", the stupider he looks.
thedopefishlives Muse Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 763

4th June 2012, 05:26 AM	#25
Travis Misanthrope of the Mountains Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Tuolumne City, CA Posts: 17,954	Sorry folks but a date with the girlfriend too precedence over the May finals yesterday. Today looks somewhat better though.
	__________________ "Because WE ARE IGNORANT OF 911 FACTS, WE DEMAND PROOF" -- Douglas Herman on Rense.com Zingiber Officinale The Humor blog of some not crazy guy

4th June 2012, 06:10 AM	#26
000063 Illuminator Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Not America. Posts: 4,736	Originally Posted by Alareth Possibly not a Stundie, just unfathomably callous http://whitewhine.com/post/232378889...agree-with-you I sure do love the idea of a website dedicated to shaming people because of their race. And the implication that white problems = first world problems. Originally Posted by thedopefishlives I'm honestly at a loss for words. The more Chris7 tries to explain his understanding of "average" and "instantaneous", the stupider he looks. Or anything, really.
	__________________ No, I'd like you to answer the question in two, simple, coherent sentences. ... That's how you present credible arguments in written form. -ergo, on me giving him a 2 digit number I can think of two reasons why bedunkers are often so loathe to explain their theories using plain, concise language--words even. - ergo

5th June 2012, 06:35 AM	#27
Oystein Philosopher Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Germany Posts: 9,807	Christopher7 is flexing his Stundie-muscles: Originally Posted by Christopher7 for the military, blowing things up is priority #1. (Defending the homeland, and supporting US interests abroad, come in a distant second and third place) and Originally Posted by Christopher7 I have established the possibility that nano-thermite devices could have been used to bring down the three towers and that is enough. (Yep, and if I show that midgets with saws can cut steel, that's it then, folks! Midgets dunnit!) Yep, that's 2 separate nominations from the same post. Chapeau!

5th June 2012, 07:23 AM	#28
Travis Misanthrope of the Mountains Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Tuolumne City, CA Posts: 17,954	Well the good news is that I was able to work on the May finals for a few hours and they are now getting closer to being done. Hope to finish them later today or tonight.
	__________________ "Because WE ARE IGNORANT OF 911 FACTS, WE DEMAND PROOF" -- Douglas Herman on Rense.com Zingiber Officinale The Humor blog of some not crazy guy

5th June 2012, 02:24 PM	#29
fourtoe Graduate Poster Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Northridge, Ca Posts: 1,015	Again, not necessarily a nom but I think this would be appreciated by y'all: Sorry ladies! Source.
	__________________ *My old username used to be knife fight colobus, but it was totally too long.* -Here's my YouTube Channel where I either debate crazies (Kirk Cameron, Westboro Baptist Church, Truthers etc.) or play Zelda -I sooo have a blog. -The thread for discussing/reviewing and posting any 911 related debates one can find!

5th June 2012, 02:53 PM	#30
dafydd Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Belgium (Flatland) Posts: 31,480	Originally Posted by Childlike Empress That "subthread" started much earlier with a preemptive self-quote by me to avoid petty straw man arguments i'm not interested in. Followed by a series of empty little quips by dafydd mistaking me (and Jon Ronson) for Alex Jones fans who think that inside that meeting the decimation of world-population and the latest chemicals to put in the trails are planned. At the time when dafydd repeated his clueless question, I was already making fun of him. I neither know if they are making specific plans of any kind, nor if any of those plans have been successful, and that's what I was telling him before closing the loop. Hope you at least enjoyed my educational link about Stundie. Have fun, folks. You hid that very well.
	__________________ Yesterday upon the stairs I met a man who wasn't there He wasn't there again today I wish that he would go away.

5th June 2012, 03:03 PM	#31
CompusMentus Waiting for the Worms Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Wales UK Posts: 1,450	From HERE Our old friends at TFES (scroll down about a dozen posts) Originally Posted by Irushwithscvs Obviously there is. If the Earth was round, everyone on this southern hemisphere of yours would either fall off the Earth or at the very least, the blood would rush to their head. It is basic logic. If stupid was flammable this site would set your brain, your cat, wife, dog, everything, on fire. Compus
	__________________ Tongue-tied and twisted just an earth-bound misfit

5th June 2012, 03:20 PM	#32
frenat Critical Thinker Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 258	Originally Posted by CompusMentus From HERE Our old friends at TFES (scroll down about a dozen posts) If stupid was flammable this site would set your brain, your cat, wife, dog, everything, on fire. Compus From the same thread Quote: Electromagnetism, unlike gravity, has been experimentally verified. The only experiment that "verifies" gravity involves putting large balls in a wooden box. Yeah, totally believable. Gravity is so silly that science had to put it in its own force category, like an ugly step child. Are we sure they don't just troll their own forum?
frenat Critical Thinker Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 258

5th June 2012, 03:42 PM	#33
grandmastershek Graduate Poster Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Where you look at a thigh, and blacken an eye... Posts: 1,324	Well...Cmatrix has reared his ugly head over on Facebook. Quote: Stop embarrassing yourself with your primitive grasp of elementary logic. [...] You have video showing the building (not parts of it) does not start falling at the base? Didn't think so."
	__________________ For as the NWO are higher than the people, so are their ways higher than your ways, and their thoughts than your thoughts. (A amalgam of Isaiah 55:9 & truther logic)

5th June 2012, 07:13 PM	#34
Newtons Bit Philosopher Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 6,900	Originally Posted by fourtoe Again, not necessarily a nom but I think this would be appreciated by y'all: http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enha...38840926-8.jpg Sorry ladies! Source. I thought that was parody at first
Newtons Bit Philosopher Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 6,900	__________________ "Structural Engineering is the art of molding materials we do not wholly understand into shapes we cannot precisely analyze so as to understand forces we cannot really assess in such a way that the community at large has no reason to suspect the extent of our own ignorance." James E Amrhein My website.

6th June 2012, 05:31 AM	#35
BaaBaa Semi-literate hench-person Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 1,419	Originally Posted by fourtoe Again, not necessarily a nom but I think this would be appreciated by y'all: http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enha...38840926-8.jpg Sorry ladies! Source. Cheetos dude just won honours as my FB profile pic.....
	__________________ "Damn, i think you are illeterate"