JREF Homepage Swift Blog Events Calendar $1 Million Paranormal Challenge The Amaz!ng Meeting Useful Links Support Us
James Randi Educational Foundation JREF Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   JREF Forum » General Topics » USA Politics
Click Here To Donate

Notices


Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.

Tags roads , pays

Reply
Old 2nd June 2004, 12:10 PM   #1
Tmy
Philosopher
 
Tmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Republic of Massachusetts
Posts: 6,489
Who pays for the roads?

Once in a while I run into the "what do we get from income taxes" debate and I bring up roads and infrastructer. I am sometimes met with a "no we dont" reply. That the roads are funded from gas taxes, tolls, auto excise, and other non income tax sources.

Methinks that is bunk!!! From what Ive run across gas taxes arent enough to cover infrastructre. And I know of nothing that says income taxes DONT go to infrastructer.

How many taxes are specifically earmaked for certain purposes anyway?? THere seems to be a point were they all end up into a general pot of govt money. Which then funds all sorts of stuff.
__________________
"Common sense is something that skeptics can and should do without." -shanek
Tmy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd June 2004, 12:13 PM   #2
Nasarius
Muse
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 672
Re: Who pays for the roads?

Quote:
Originally posted by Tmy
How many taxes are specifically earmaked for certain purposes anyway??
I think that's illegal, or at least highly restricted. Most taxes must go to the "general pot".
Argh. Someone here knows what I'm thinking of, and can clarify
__________________
"Did you understand the music...or was it all in vain?" ~ Roger Waters
Nasarius is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd June 2004, 12:17 PM   #3
Tmy
Philosopher
 
Tmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Republic of Massachusetts
Posts: 6,489
I think theres a Supreme CT case saying that a taxpayer cant sue over his taxes going to a program that offends him (ie the military) cause you can actually follow your tax dollar to that destination. You cant prove your money went to the military.
__________________
"Common sense is something that skeptics can and should do without." -shanek
Tmy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd June 2004, 12:29 PM   #4
Nyarlathotep
Philosopher
 
Nyarlathotep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,514
Re: Who pays for the roads?

Quote:
Originally posted by Tmy

How many taxes are specifically earmaked for certain purposes anyway?? THere seems to be a point were they all end up into a general pot of govt money. Which then funds all sorts of stuff.
Well, most of my work deals with governmental accounting systems, so I have had to learn about governmental accounting practices. Many types of taxes and fees are specifically put into certain funds and those funds can often only be used for specific purposes. Likewise, specific expenditures can often only be paid out of cerain funds. What expenses are paid out of what funds are going to vary from locality to locality, but it is often the case that gas taxes, auto excises etc. go into a fund that can only be used for roads, road equipment etc.

So no, there isn't a big pot of governemnt money tht is divvied up. There is often a general fund that can be used to make up shortfalls in other funds (among other things) but it would not be permitted to take money that had been raised, for example, to fund the library and use it to fund roads, even if the library was running a surplus and the roads were running a deficit.

Government accounting can be a complicated beast.
__________________
Why stay sane in a sick world?
Nyarlathotep is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd June 2004, 12:31 PM   #5
Nyarlathotep
Philosopher
 
Nyarlathotep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,514
Re: Re: Who pays for the roads?

Quote:
Originally posted by Nasarius


I think that's illegal, or at least highly restricted. Most taxes must go to the "general pot".
Argh. Someone here knows what I'm thinking of, and can clarify
Nope, it's quite common. At least on the local level. That's the way it is in Nevada anyway, and the governmental accounting courses I had to take made it sound like that is common practice everywhere.

I don't know where you live, that may be an exception to the rule, I don't know.
__________________
Why stay sane in a sick world?
Nyarlathotep is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd June 2004, 12:47 PM   #6
Tmy
Philosopher
 
Tmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Republic of Massachusetts
Posts: 6,489
I know there are money pools like Superfund and stuff like that. But when a budget is drawn they tag money they already have.

Like your library example. I dont ever recall a "library tax". But they'll be a library fund.


Back to the question: Are the roads built with income tax monies.?
__________________
"Common sense is something that skeptics can and should do without." -shanek
Tmy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd June 2004, 12:55 PM   #7
Number Six
JREF Kid
 
Number Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,017
While strictly speaking lots of times Pot X is used to pay for Item Y, practically speaking I think it's effectively one big pot. They want to spend more on Item Y and rather than increase the General Pot they create a tax that fills Pot X.

It's like if you need a new shirt and someone gives you $20 to buy one. That just means you have the $20 you would have spent on the shirt free to spend on something else.

One example of this is state lotteries. They always go to Cause X (education or senior citizens or whatever) and as a result Cause X eventually ends up getting loss money from the General Pot.

It may not be practical in this day and age but I'd like to see all moneys go to the General Pot and then have the government have to figure out where to spend it.
Number Six is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd June 2004, 01:05 PM   #8
Tony
Penultimate Amazing
 
Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,768
Quote:
Originally posted by Tmy
Are the roads built with income tax monies.?
There is no income tax in Texas, so no, roads do not get build with income tax monies.
__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. - Aristotle

Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company. - Mark Twain
Tony is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd June 2004, 01:09 PM   #9
Tmy
Philosopher
 
Tmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Republic of Massachusetts
Posts: 6,489
Quote:
Originally posted by Tony


There is no income tax in Texas, so no, roads do not get build with income tax monies.
But theres Fed incoem tax. Alot ofthat gets shotback to the states in block or "highway funds" form. Which in turn goes to infrastructer projects. Projects like roads.

The states drool over fed money like there methadone addicts waiting for the fix.
__________________
"Common sense is something that skeptics can and should do without." -shanek
Tmy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd June 2004, 01:10 PM   #10
hgc
Penultimate Amazing
 
hgc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,028
Quote:
Originally posted by Tony


There is no income tax in Texas, so no, roads do not get build with income tax monies.
You don't think Texas pays for all their own roads do you? Plenty of federal income tax dollars go for this purpose.
__________________
Bowel-shaking earthquakes of doubt and remorse assail him and wail him with monster truck force. - Cake, The Distance

Was there a second singer on the grassy Knowles? - Stephen Colbert
hgc is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd June 2004, 01:13 PM   #11
Nyarlathotep
Philosopher
 
Nyarlathotep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,514
Quote:
Originally posted by Tmy
I know there are money pools like Superfund and stuff like that. But when a budget is drawn they tag money they already have.
Nope it's drawn on money they expect to receive. And some sources of money (and their expenses) are accounted for seperately.

Quote:
Like your library example. I dont ever recall a "library tax". But they'll be a library fund.
There doesn't have to be a "library tax" they could be paid with grants, or it oculd be a specific assessment on your property tax. It will vary depending on where you live.


Quote:
Back to the question: Are the roads built with income tax monies.?
I don't know at the federal level. Anywhere else, the answer is "it depends". In Nevada, since we don't even HAVE a state income tax, the answer is no. Local governments sometimes receive federal grants for road construction which might come (in part) from income taxes, I don't know. But most of the money comes from other sources. I can't speak for any other state.
__________________
Why stay sane in a sick world?
Nyarlathotep is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd June 2004, 01:19 PM   #12
Rob Lister
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 8,523
Simple answer: Yes. Anyone that has ever worked in or with government contracts knows that most of the money is washed, one way or another, time and time again, that the big-pot analogy is the best fit. If you're curious about your particular state, your state IRS probably has a breakdown of the laws particular to the state as well as a rough pie chart as to how each dollar is allocated. Just don't confuse allocated with 'spent' because the washing takes all if not most allocation color off the money.
Rob Lister is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

JREF Forum » General Topics » USA Politics

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:53 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2001-2012, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.