JREF Homepage Swift Blog Events Calendar $1 Million Paranormal Challenge The Amaz!ng Meeting Useful Links Support Us
James Randi Educational Foundation JREF Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   JREF Forum » General Topics » USA Politics
Click Here To Donate

Notices


Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.

Tags draft

Reply
Old 2nd July 2004, 06:19 PM   #1
varwoche
Philosopher
 
varwoche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 7,233
Draft? What draft?

The notion of a draft keeps coming up, recently from senator Chuck Hagel.
Quote:
Hagel ... said the United States is going to have to consider restarting the draft to maintain its many military commitments abroad. article
Given that people are already being drafted involuntarily, I suggest that, in the name of accuracy, it's about time that the words surrounding the debate shift from "should there be?" to "who else is elligible?"
Quote:
Amid Congressional concerns that the military is stretched too thin, the Army is preparing to take advantage of a rarely used wartime program that allows it to recall soldiers who have left the service and did not join the reserves. Pentagon officials said Tuesday that 5,600 former soldiers were going to be called up for yearlong tours, mostly assignments in Iraq and Afghanistan. article
__________________
To survive election season on a skeptics forum, one must understand Hymie-the-Robot (and/or Fat Jack)
varwoche is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd July 2004, 06:35 PM   #2
evildave
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well, so they're calling up the 'radioactive reserve'. They did so in the previous Iraq war.

When you're allowed to leave the military, they do keep their strings attached to you for a number of years. It's in the contract.
  Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th July 2004, 03:14 PM   #3
varwoche
Philosopher
 
varwoche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 7,233
Geezer Drafted

Quote:
Lexington psychiatrist Charles Ham thought he retired from the Army seven years ago. But, he recently got a call telling him to report to Fort Jackson for a physical examination.

Ham knew more than 5000 veterans who recently left the service were being called up, but he had been in the Army for 41 years and is now 67.
article
__________________
To survive election season on a skeptics forum, one must understand Hymie-the-Robot (and/or Fat Jack)
varwoche is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th July 2004, 03:58 PM   #4
LostAngeles
Anti-WM Jihadist
 
LostAngeles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Having a cup of tea.
Posts: 10,159
Funnily enough, I was just looking that bill up. (S 89, if you're interested.)

It's last action was the day it was introduced, over a year and a half ago. It's currently sitting in comittee, where I sincerely hope it will stay and subsequently die.
__________________
"There is also a likelihood that the settlement will fall between two biomes, potentially hazardous if the player expects a peaceful oceanside meadow, without realizing the ocean is full of amphibious zombie whales." - Dwarf Fortress Wik
LostAngeles is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th July 2004, 04:36 PM   #5
aerocontrols
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,445
Quote:
Originally posted by varwoche
Given that people are already being drafted involuntarily, I suggest that, in the name of accuracy, it's about time that the words surrounding the debate shift from "should there be?" to "who else is elligible?"
I think it's dishonest to refer to the IRR as a draft. If you want to refer to it as such, you shouldn't then act as if it's something new. It's been called up to support various missions since it was established.
__________________
Misunderestimated in 2000.
Unredefeated in 2004.

My dog does his tricks.

My roomate's dog tries to escape the kitchen.

We call you to be a people of manners, principles, honour, and purity; to reject the immoral acts of fornication, homosexuality, intoxicants, gambling's, and trading with interest. Source
aerocontrols is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th July 2004, 09:13 PM   #6
crimresearch
Alumbrado
 
crimresearch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,618
And IIRC, it is a misnomer to refer to many of those drawing a military pension as 'retirees'...they are on **retainer** for a number of years, again it is in the contract, and agreed to by all parties.
crimresearch is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th July 2004, 07:10 AM   #7
Agammamon
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,385
Which is why the 67 year old guy is being called up. "retirement" in the military is an obligation to potentially unlimited service in return for a guaranteed paycheck. It is usually a good risk to take.


Also, why are these guys always going on about a draft to fulfill our commitments and yet hardly anyone seems to ever consider trimming those commitments to meet the resources we have?
__________________
It will be a great day when the US Air Force has all the bombs it needs and the NEA has to hold a bake sale in order to pay its lobbyists.
Agammamon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

JREF Forum » General Topics » USA Politics

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:43 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2001-2012, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.