| JREF Homepage | Swift Blog | Events Calendar | $1 Million Paranormal Challenge | The Amaz!ng Meeting | Useful Links | Support Us |
![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Anti-homeopathy illuminati member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Beyond redemption
Posts: 7,225
|
Another question for BA ("Death" stars)
I saw a documentary about neutron stars a week or so ago, (at least, that's what I think they were).
It was all about the strange radio signals being picked up randomly from what they assumed were some kind of exploding stars. They found out that those random radiosignals were a lot further away than first expected (and thus much more powerfull). Apparently what happens is that the star collapses as it reaches a critical point, and becomes a black hole. But at the moment of formation, a powerful stream of gamma radiation is ejected at both poles of the collapsing star. They also commented that if such a thing were to happen in our galaxy, the earth (if it should find itself in the path of such a stream) would most likely be sterilized, with the exception of some species deep in the ocean. One astronomer even suggested that this is why we don't find any alien life forms, they all get wiped out by such stars before they can contact us. He even called them natural life extinghuishers or something. Well, even really smart people can say stupid things sometimes ![]() Anyway, my question is, if those jets of radiation occur at the poles of the star, along its rotational axis, how likely is it that our solar system is in the path of such a "cosmic deathray"? In our solar system (with some exceptions) most planets rotate along an axis perpendicular to their plane of orbit around the sun, and they all orbit the sun along rather parallel planes, and the sun's rotational axis is also mostly perpendicular to those planes. I realize the reason there's a correlation there is probably due to the way the elements of our solar system (and their initial formation) are interconnected. Do all stars/planetary systems in our galaxy rotate along similar planes and axes, (i.e. somewhat perpendicular to the plane of the Milky Way, which itself rotates around its own center)? If so, this would mean that any neutron star collapsing would most likely not hit our planet since it's rotation is mostly perpendicular to that plane. Or is there no such correlation on that scale? |
|
__________________
Naturalhealth: Helios are one of the largest homeopathic pharmacies in England. They have their reputation to consider, so it is just not worth their while doing anything that would destroy that. Rest assured, all their remedies are exactly what they say they are. There are also ways of testing the remedies too, so that you could distinguish them from just pure tap water. QAman: How can this be done? I presume you mean testing of the lower dilution remedies? Naturalhealth: No. This can be done for all remedies. __________________ Luciana is perhaps one of the sweetest people I've ever met. I will stand behind her till I drop dead. If you want to **** with her, you better understand you have to go through me first -- MoeFaux |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|