Bigfoot - serious, not follies

erikbeckjord · 15th June 2005, 12:55 PM

Erik is here and it is a new ball game.

I said this in 1995 on Henry Franzoni's IVBC list, and all hell broke loose. I introduced the paranormal/supernatural/tulpa/alien concept, and was immediately attacked most viciously
by all the non-researcher newbies there. (This has continued on most all boards ever since). However
Henry himself was a secret supernaturalist, and I had many
beer-soaked phone talks with him, and after he speciously
attacked me to his list to "preserve his cred" (ho) and stay in with
Dahinden etc, I then OUTED him and posted some of his
para experiences.

He caved in and went para in public, and in a few months turned over the board to others (Matt M -- ugh) to run so as to preserve
not his cred, but his job. ($$$$$$$talks).

Well, here, I note that LAL is busy "quoting Meldrum"
all over as if this makes any difference. Ditto Dr Swindler.
I know both, had Darris over for dinner, and talk often to Jeff.

Nothing either says makes an f&b bf exist. Not proven.

BUT we have tracks that end in snow and mud, for no good reason

and which also start from nowhere and this royally bugs
non-researcher newbies like LAL and his buddies on
bigfootforumsbuffoons-com.

Now they ban me there because I once cussed out someone who
cussed me out first, but also because i offer good, hard, reasoning and events and evidence that shows their F&B
idea is totally "so 1900s".

Now, send your brickbats, bad logic, and so on to me here or
visit http://www.bigfoot.org and get the real truth, as far as we know it.

Also I am at rudy@stealthaccess.net

I also note that most posters lack the basic cojones to say
who they are

unless this is in their profiles, and I doubt most are.

Iam -- Jon-Erik Beckjord, MBA, director, the Bigfoot Investigation Project and yes, I once thought like you do
but I encountered evidence, and I am no fool, that made me
change. 29 years at this. I am a "semi-expert" snce nobody except abductees is an actualy expert, but I did interview two of those. (Will be in my book).

So --- have at it -- I can take your very worst. And then convert you.

Erik

jmercer · 15th June 2005, 01:00 PM

Odd. It's not a full moon tonight.

SpaceFluffer · 15th June 2005, 01:02 PM

I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about

Oregon_Skeptic · 15th June 2005, 01:17 PM

SpaceFluffer, that made me laugh out loud. Thanks.

Ipecac · 15th June 2005, 01:30 PM

So were you serious in the other thread when you said this:

Quote:

yes, cameras may get good photos of a FUZZY BEING..

as shapeshifters, they may shift at 100,000/sec
and so appear fuzzy
to us

If so, the popular reaction seems to be this:

Ripley Twenty-Nine · 15th June 2005, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by erikbeckjord
Erik is here and it is a new ball game.

Iam -- Jon-Erik Beckjord, MBA, director, the Bigfoot Investigation Project and yes, I once thought like you do
but I encountered evidence, and I am no fool, that made me
change. 29 years at this. I am a "semi-expert" snce nobody except abductees is an actualy expert, but I did interview two of those. (Will be in my book).

Quote:

From Bigfoot.org
The Bigfoot Investigation Project - Directed & curated by Jon-Erik Beckjord, a UC Berkeley MBA who was arrested and jailed for his beliefs (like Galileo) on what Bigfoot really is, and after 29 years of research, has some answers.

Let me just say that for starters, I find your website incredibly offensive. Not for the content, but for the terrible, terrible design. It's quite possibly one of the worst sites I've ever seen.

And then there's the content.. A guy comparing himself to Gallileo claiming that Bigfeet are aliens dropped off by UFOs.

I'm afraid you have a bit of a hard sell here, my friend.

erikbeckjord · 15th June 2005, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ipecac
So were you serious in the other thread when you said this:

If so, the popular reaction seems to be this:

Reply:

what the majority (popular) thinks is flat-a** wrong.

I have 29 years in the field that show this.

Now, how about some mature, adult, reasoning?

Is this forum full of 13 year olds? If so, go back to your
X-Box games.

erikbeckjord · 15th June 2005, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ripley Twenty-Nine
Let me just say that for starters, I find your website incredibly offensive. Not for the content, but for the terrible, terrible design. It's quite possibly one of the worst sites I've ever seen.

And then there's the content.. A guy comparing himself to Gallileo claiming that Bigfeet are aliens dropped off by UFOs.

I'm afraid you have a bit of a hard sell here, my friend.

reply: who cares about the design of a website?

Is this realllllllllllllly important?

What are YOUR priorities?

I'd rather do field work and have a rough website, than
have a great website like BFRO and do fraud in their expeditions.

LOOK FOR CONTENT, NOT STYLE.

Get real, dude///!!!!!!!!

Cleon · 15th June 2005, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by erikbeckjord
reply: who cares about the design of a website?

Is this realllllllllllllly important?

Yes. And I have years of experience in that field.

Ripley Twenty-Nine · 15th June 2005, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by erikbeckjord
reply: who cares about the design of a website?

Is this realllllllllllllly important?

What are YOUR priorities?

I'd rather do field work and have a rough website, than
have a great website like BFRO and do fraud in their expeditions.

LOOK FOR CONTENT, NOT STYLE.

Get real, dude///!!!!!!!!

http://www.beckjord.com/

Ladies and gentleman, it gives me great pleasure to introduce to you:

Erik Beckjord, the King of Woos

Paul C. Anagnostopoulos · 15th June 2005, 02:07 PM

Yellow background . . . many exclamation points . . . must avert eyes . . .

~~ Paul

erikbeckjord · 15th June 2005, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cleon
Yes. And I have years of experience in that field.

Let's get positive.

If you are good at web design, tell me how to keep a
stack or column of titles from moving left and right
after it was saved and moved to the main server?

I use wysiwyg editing and do not use html directly.

BUt I can access the html in an html editor,

so what can I do to make the columns stay in line?

[emal]rudy@stealthaccess.ne[/email]

erikbeckjord · 15th June 2005, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ripley Twenty-Nine
http://www.beckjord.com/

Ladies and gentleman, it gives me great pleasure to introduce to you:

Erik Beckjord, the King of Woos

Ripley -- Believe it or Not

this has influenced your life.

Admit it.

It has ruined you.

erikbeckjord · 15th June 2005, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Paul C. Anagnostopoulos
Yellow background . . . many exclamation points . . . must avert eyes . . .

~~ Paul

Cute avatar.

EB

SpaceFluffer · 15th June 2005, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by erikbeckjord
what the majority (popular) thinks is flat-a** wrong.

Is it really? Well, I'm prepared to be shown the error of my ways, so please provide some hard evidence to back up your case.

Note: Incomprehensible gibberish and blurry photos are most definately not hard evidence.

grega · 15th June 2005, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by erikbeckjord

tell me how to keep a
stack or column of titles from moving left and right
after it was saved and moved to the main server?

Remove that break tags from the code, also all the nbsp tags.

Cleon · 15th June 2005, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by erikbeckjord
Let's get positive.

If you are good at web design, tell me how to keep a
stack or column of titles from moving left and right
after it was saved and moved to the main server?

It shouldn't matter whether it was moved to the server or not.

Long story short--use a table. http://www.jalfrezi.com

erikbeckjord · 15th June 2005, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SpaceFluffer
Is it really? Well, I'm prepared to be shown the error of my ways, so please provide some hard evidence to back up your case.

Note: Incomprehensible gibberish and blurry photos are most definately not hard evidence.

You understand that Bigfoot is not proven by science to be an f&b animal. It is also not proven by science (nor me) to be
a supernatural being. On the other hand, if it were, I would not
bother being on this board, but would be in Stockholm getting the Nobel Prize. Right?

All I can do is show supernatural ACTIVITY such as tracks that disappear, and for you to believe, you need to be in the woods
with me and you ain't.

BUT on my website there are photos of such tracks
from Brian Smith's video.

Many of you will sluff this off and call me a liar.

(I tell no lies... Eagle Scout and USAF Academy cadet.)

Now if this is not enuff, and stills never are, I will not lose sleep if
you do not accept it. (as if I care...)

My respect is for field researchers who GO OUT and share and witness this stuff...

Brian Smith, Henry Franzoni, Shelly Binkley, Peter Guttilla,
StanGordon and others.

(but not anonymoist posters)

Many of you will live in denial, a place in Egypt.

Ripley Twenty-Nine · 15th June 2005, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by erikbeckjord
Ripley -- Believe it or Not

this has influenced your life.

Admit it.

It has ruined you.

I assure you, I have no idea what you're talking about.

If you're talking about your website, I choose 'Not', thank you very much.

Red Siegfried · 15th June 2005, 03:00 PM

Whiskey tango foxtrot?!?!?!??

Well, at least he started a new thread so the troll-zotting can remain contained.

When you think about it all footprint trails have to start and end somewhere. I suppose now every trail of footprints someone can't find the beginning or end of is proof that someone is phasing in and out of another dimension.

Somehow I find that your statement, whatever it is that you're trying to state (bigfoot is an alien abductee? he's an alien? he's from another dimension? he's a ghost of some sort? What is it you're trying to say here?) stretches the bounds of credibility, Mr. Beckford. I suggest you refrain from ingesting DMT before posting.

And driveby posts suggesting that people check out your website are a poor way to generate hits. I suggest spamming by email instead.

Have a nice day, good luck with ... all that.

jmercer · 15th June 2005, 03:02 PM

Mr. Beckjord - why, exactly, are you here? What has caused to you to inflict yourself upon us?

Bronze Dog · 15th June 2005, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by erikbeckjord
You understand that Bigfoot is not proven by science to be an f&b animal. It is also not proven by science (nor me) to be
a supernatural being.

It hasn't been proven to even exist by science.

Quote:

All I can do is show supernatural ACTIVITY such as tracks that disappear, and for you to believe, you need to be in the woods with me and you ain't.

Show us a DNA sample, or better yet, a specimen. Then we'll believe that Bigfoot exists. From what you're showing us, however, there doesn't seem to be anything going on.

Quote:

BUT on my website there are photos of such tracks from Brian Smith's video.

Very unimpressive photos that could be just about anything.

Quote:

Many of you will sluff this off and call me a liar.
(I tell no lies... Eagle Scout and USAF Academy cadet.)

I won't. I suspect you're in the category of delusional.

Quote:

Now if this is not enuff, and stills never are, I will not lose sleep if you do not accept it. (as if I care...)

Photos never are enough. DNA, specimens, or equally extraordinary evidence, please.

Quote:

My respect is for field researchers who GO OUT and share and witness this stuff...

Brian Smith, Henry Franzoni, Shelly Binkley, Peter Guttilla,
StanGordon and others.

(but not anonymoist posters)

I also respect field researchers. Too bad I've never heard of a Bigfoot field researcher coming back with anything worthwhile. Like DNA or specimens.

SpaceFluffer · 15th June 2005, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by erikbeckjord
All I can do is show supernatural ACTIVITY such as tracks that disappear, and for you to believe, you need to be in the woods
with me and you ain't.

Sir, I would not be in the woods with you were everything else on fire.

Quote:

Brian Smith, Henry Franzoni, Shelly Binkley, Peter Guttilla,
StanGordon and others.
(but not anonymoist posters)

Yeah I hate those anonymoist posters.

Quote:

Many of you will live in denial, a place in Egypt.

Denial of non-existent evidence you mean? And as opposed to you, who seems to live in a sparkly dream world populated by magical elves and pixies?

Starrman · 15th June 2005, 03:05 PM

From Web-Site

Quote:

SPIRIT PHOTOS OF NICOLE B. SIMPSON & RON GOLDMAN - they tell us OJ DID IT !

You should write for the 'Weekly World News'. You don't seriously believe this, do you?

jmercer · 15th June 2005, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SpaceFluffer
Sir, I would not be in the woods with you were everything else on fire.

Yeah I hate those anonymoist posters.

Dammit, SF, that's the SECOND time you've made me crack up in the same thread!!

erikbeckjord · 15th June 2005, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jmercer
Mr. Beckjord - why, exactly, are you here? What has caused to you to inflict yourself upon us?

I am here to save you from the error(s) of your ways.

erikbeckjord · 15th June 2005, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jmercer
Dammit, SF, that's the SECOND time you've made me crack up in the same thread!!

Youse do unnerstan a deliberate malaprop,

don't youse?

Or are skeptics too dense for puns?

CurtC · 15th June 2005, 03:28 PM

Mr. Beckjord -

Here's an HTML trick that you might not know about - the "blink" tag. You can use it anywhere on the page that you want to draw attention to a certain set of words. Put those words between "blink" an"/blink" tags. It's even more effective when it's used a lot on a page.

Quote:

Originally posted by erikbeckjord
(I tell no lies... Eagle Scout and USAF Academy cadet.)

When does schizophrenia usually strike - the early 20s?

erikbeckjord · 15th June 2005, 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Starrman
From Web-Site

You should write for the 'Weekly World News'. You don't seriously believe this, do you?

Why should you doubt me? (Go see the books of ghost photos at
Gettysburgh civil war field.)

I don;t put lies on websites.

Besides, Nicole got her revenge...

OJ has lost his hair.

WHEN DO I MEET SOME INTELLECTUAL SKEPTIX??? I'VE DEBATED THE MAJOR ONES OFF THE NET.

Most of you guys think name-calling is actual debate.

erikbeckjord · 15th June 2005, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CurtC
Mr. Beckjord -

Here's an HTML trick that you might not know about - the "blink" tag. You can use it anywhere on the page that you want to draw attention to a certain set of words. Put those words between "blink" an"/blink" tags. It's even more effective when it's used a lot on a page.

When does schizophrenia usually strike - the early 20s?

Thanks for html blink info.

Now, why is my signature website address not right?

Ought to be http://www.beckjord.com/bigfoottribephotos

but did did something wrong in html in the profile.

Hmmmm??? Please assist.

erikbeckjord · 15th June 2005, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jmercer
Dammit, SF, that's the SECOND time you've made me crack up in the same thread!!

As I had planned .....

after all, I am in Mensa.

EB

Ladewig · 15th June 2005, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by erikbeckjord
Youse do unnerstan a deliberate malaprop,

I want to make sure I understand your position. Correct me if I am wrong. You come to skeptic board to present a theory so revolutionary that it would irrevocably change science and the world as we know it and you decide the best way to do that is by deliberately misspelling words for humorous effect?

erikbeckjord · 15th June 2005, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SpaceFluffer
Sir, I would not be in the woods with you were everything else on fire.

Yeah I hate those anonymoist posters.

Denial of non-existent evidence you mean? And as opposed to you, who seems to live in a sparkly dream world populated by magical elves and pixies? [/b]

Fluffer -- describes you well,

but there is another definition, used in the porn industry,

for a lady who , uh, "prepares" the male actor......

if you get my drift....

erikbeckjord · 15th June 2005, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ladewig
I want to make sure I understand your position. Correct me if I am wrong. You come to skeptic board to present a theory so revolutionary that it would irrevocably change science and the world as we know it and you decide the best way to do that is by deliberately misspelling words for humorous effect?

You have to disguise the cod liver oil with sugar and cream...

GET IT?

Besides, lots of trivial folks here....

who play for the laffs.

COMPRENDO?

but credit for seeing this is a major, revolutionary idea. AND IT IS!

Bronze Dog · 15th June 2005, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by erikbeckjord
Why should you doubt me? (Go see the books of ghost photos at Gettysburgh civil war field.)

I'm doubting you because you say fuzzy blobs that could be anything are proof of bigfoot. Give me DNA or a specimen.

I've seen a large number of "ghost" photos. They only feature dust, hairs, .jpeg compression artifacts, or nothing at all. Ask mayday about them. Maybe you can show me some of those photos you're talking about. I need a good laugh.

Quote:

I don;t put lies on websites.

No one's accused you of lying (at least no one I've seen). I think you're just plain wrong.

Quote:

WHEN DO I MEET SOME INTELLECTUAL SKEPTIX??? I'VE DEBATED THE MAJOR ONES OFF THE NET.

Most of you guys think name-calling is actual debate.

You're the one with the most ad hominems going on, and no evidence. You only have a handful of photos that you haven't even attempted to show aren't the result of pareidolia.

erikbeckjord · 15th June 2005, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BronzeDog
I'm doubting you because you say fuzzy blobs that could be anything are proof of bigfoot. Give me DNA or a specimen.

I've seen a large number of "ghost" photos. They only feature dust, hairs, .jpeg compression artifacts, or nothing at all. Ask mayday about them. Maybe you can show me some of those photos you're talking about. I need a good laugh.

No one's accused you of lying (at least no one I've seen). I think you're just plain wrong.

You're the one with the most ad hominems going on, and no evidence. You only have a handful of photos that you haven't even attempted to show aren't the result of pareidolia.

nOW,NOW,NOW, where did I ever say the photos are proof of Bigfoot, ??? Where?
I presume you can read, so did you NOT read my disclaimers???? Tsk! I expect more from skeptix.
The photos are indicators that something alien or weird might exist in some form or another.And I never,never,never said this is proof. TSK,TSK!

Ad hominems? Count them.....all by others, I just reply and then people cry.

Bronze Dog · 15th June 2005, 03:57 PM

My apologies, then... So, what are you doing here?

Mr. Skinny · 15th June 2005, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by erikbeckjord

Now if this is not enuff, and stills never are, I will not lose sleep if
you do not accept it. (as if I care...)

If you already know stills are not enough, and never are, and you also don't care if we accept your evidence, why, exactly, have you come here?

Just curious.

Also, didn't someone admit that he faked that "famous" bigfoot video?

erikbeckjord · 15th June 2005, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr. Skinny
If you already know stills are not enough, and never are, and you also don't care if we accept your evidence, why, exactly, have you come here?

Just curious.

Also, didn't someone admit that he faked that "famous" bigfoot video?

1) so you believe any statement as long it implies a hoax.

2) you believe anything you read in the papers?

3) bonk!

4) I am here to fish for the 2% intelligent ones to bring to our side. MOST OF YOU DO NOT QUALIFY

BUT it is worth it.

Already have 6 favorable PMs --- complimenting me for having the guts to post here. The lions den, the BELLY OF THE BEAST.

Bronze Dog · 15th June 2005, 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by erikbeckjord
1) so you believe any statement as long it implies a hoax.

Nope. I don't believe the moon landings were hoaxed. It'd be a lot easier to go to the moon than to construct such a huge conspiracy.

Quote:

2) you believe anything you read in the papers?

Yes. I believe a sizable piece of what's in there. I also disbelieve a sizable piece.

Quote:

3) bonk!

Ow.

Quote:

4) I am here to fish for the 2% intelligent ones to bring to our side. MOST OF YOU DO NOT QUALIFY

How do you intend to fish without bait? Skeptics respond to evidence. You've already admitted you don't have proof.

Quote:

BUT it is worth it.

Already have 6 favorable PMs --- complimenting me for having the guts to post here. The lions den, the BELLY OF THE BEAST.

They're probably trolls. Trolls are only interested in supporting their closeminded ideological agenda. Skeptics are only interested in evidence.

15th June 2005, 12:55 PM	#1
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325	Bigfoot - serious, not follies Erik is here and it is a new ball game. I said this in 1995 on Henry Franzoni's IVBC list, and all hell broke loose. I introduced the paranormal/supernatural/tulpa/alien concept, and was immediately attacked most viciously by all the non-researcher newbies there. (This has continued on most all boards ever since). However Henry himself was a secret supernaturalist, and I had many beer-soaked phone talks with him, and after he speciously attacked me to his list to "preserve his cred" (ho) and stay in with Dahinden etc, I then OUTED him and posted some of his para experiences. He caved in and went para in public, and in a few months turned over the board to others (Matt M -- ugh) to run so as to preserve not his cred, but his job. ($$$$$$$talks). Well, here, I note that LAL is busy "quoting Meldrum" all over as if this makes any difference. Ditto Dr Swindler. I know both, had Darris over for dinner, and talk often to Jeff. Nothing either says makes an f&b bf exist. Not proven. BUT we have tracks that end in snow and mud, for no good reason and which also start from nowhere and this royally bugs non-researcher newbies like LAL and his buddies on bigfootforumsbuffoons-com. Now they ban me there because I once cussed out someone who cussed me out first, but also because i offer good, hard, reasoning and events and evidence that shows their F&B idea is totally "so 1900s". Now, send your brickbats, bad logic, and so on to me here or visit http://www.bigfoot.org and get the real truth, as far as we know it. Also I am at rudy@stealthaccess.net I also note that most posters lack the basic cojones to say who they are unless this is in their profiles, and I doubt most are. Iam -- Jon-Erik Beckjord, MBA, director, the Bigfoot Investigation Project and yes, I once thought like you do but I encountered evidence, and I am no fool, that made me change. 29 years at this. I am a "semi-expert" snce nobody except abductees is an actualy expert, but I did interview two of those. (Will be in my book). So --- have at it -- I can take your very worst. And then convert you. Erik
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325

15th June 2005, 01:00 PM	#2
jmercer Question Everything Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Facing the unfaceable Posts: 12,030	Odd. It's not a full moon tonight.
	__________________ "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke, British Statesman and Philosopher, 1729-1797 "Cheeky Monkey!" - Chillzero "Daft Sausage!" - Tkingdoll "Context is everything, and sophistry will not protect you." - chillzero

15th June 2005, 01:02 PM	#3
SpaceFluffer Muse Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 595	I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about
SpaceFluffer Muse Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 595

15th June 2005, 01:17 PM	#4
Oregon_Skeptic Thinker Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 133	SpaceFluffer, that made me laugh out loud. Thanks.
Oregon_Skeptic Thinker Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 133

15th June 2005, 01:30 PM	#5
Ipecac Graduate Poster Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 1,855	So were you serious in the other thread when you said this: Quote: yes, cameras may get good photos of a FUZZY BEING.. as shapeshifters, they may shift at 100,000/sec and so appear fuzzy to us If so, the popular reaction seems to be this:
Ipecac Graduate Poster Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 1,855

15th June 2005, 01:30 PM	#6
Ripley Twenty-Nine Muse Join Date: May 2005 Location: London, Ontario Posts: 863	Re: Bigfoot - serious, not follies Quote: Originally posted by erikbeckjord Erik is here and it is a new ball game. Iam -- Jon-Erik Beckjord, MBA, director, the Bigfoot Investigation Project and yes, I once thought like you do but I encountered evidence, and I am no fool, that made me change. 29 years at this. I am a "semi-expert" snce nobody except abductees is an actualy expert, but I did interview two of those. (Will be in my book). Quote: From Bigfoot.org The Bigfoot Investigation Project - Directed & curated by Jon-Erik Beckjord, a UC Berkeley MBA who was arrested and jailed for his beliefs (like Galileo) on what Bigfoot really is, and after 29 years of research, has some answers. Let me just say that for starters, I find your website incredibly offensive. Not for the content, but for the terrible, terrible design. It's quite possibly one of the worst sites I've ever seen. And then there's the content.. A guy comparing himself to Gallileo claiming that Bigfeet are aliens dropped off by UFOs. I'm afraid you have a bit of a hard sell here, my friend.
	__________________ Ripley 29 "Professor, without knowing precisely what the danger is, would you say it's time for our viewers to crack each other's heads open and feast on the goo inside?" "Yes I would, Kent."

15th June 2005, 01:40 PM	#7
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325	Reply to absurd post Quote: Originally posted by Ipecac So were you serious in the other thread when you said this: If so, the popular reaction seems to be this: Reply: what the majority (popular) thinks is flat-a wrong.** I have 29 years in the field that show this. Now, how about some mature, adult, reasoning? Is this forum full of 13 year olds? If so, go back to your X-Box games.
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325

15th June 2005, 01:44 PM	#8
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325	Re: Re: Bigfoot - serious, not follies Quote: Originally posted by Ripley Twenty-Nine Let me just say that for starters, I find your website incredibly offensive. Not for the content, but for the terrible, terrible design. It's quite possibly one of the worst sites I've ever seen. And then there's the content.. A guy comparing himself to Gallileo claiming that Bigfeet are aliens dropped off by UFOs. I'm afraid you have a bit of a hard sell here, my friend. reply: who cares about the design of a website? Is this realllllllllllllly important? What are YOUR priorities? I'd rather do field work and have a rough website, than have a great website like BFRO and do fraud in their expeditions. LOOK FOR CONTENT, NOT STYLE. Get real, dude///!!!!!!!!
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325

15th June 2005, 01:48 PM	#9
Cleon King of the Pod People Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 13,914	Re: Re: Re: Bigfoot - serious, not follies Quote: Originally posted by erikbeckjord reply: who cares about the design of a website? Is this realllllllllllllly important? Yes. And I have years of experience in that field.
	__________________ "Intolerance does not flourish without ignorance to feed it." - kittynh "A jerk who is right is still a jerk." - Ducky **** cancer! My blog

15th June 2005, 02:02 PM	#10
Ripley Twenty-Nine Muse Join Date: May 2005 Location: London, Ontario Posts: 863	Re: Re: Re: Bigfoot - serious, not follies Quote: Originally posted by erikbeckjord reply: who cares about the design of a website? Is this realllllllllllllly important? What are YOUR priorities? I'd rather do field work and have a rough website, than have a great website like BFRO and do fraud in their expeditions. LOOK FOR CONTENT, NOT STYLE. Get real, dude///!!!!!!!! http://www.beckjord.com/ Ladies and gentleman, it gives me great pleasure to introduce to you: Erik Beckjord, the King of Woos
	__________________ Ripley 29 "Professor, without knowing precisely what the danger is, would you say it's time for our viewers to crack each other's heads open and feast on the goo inside?" "Yes I would, Kent."

15th June 2005, 02:07 PM	#11
Paul C. Anagnostopoulos Looking for Fountain of Smart Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: a little toolshed Posts: 16,757	Yellow background . . . many exclamation points . . . must avert eyes . . . ~~ Paul
	__________________ Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. ---Susan Ertz

15th June 2005, 02:19 PM	#12
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325	Re: Re: Re: Re: Bigfoot - serious, not follies Quote: Originally posted by Cleon *Yes. And I have years of experience in that* field.** Let's get positive. If you are good at web design, tell me how to keep a stack or column of titles from moving left and right after it was saved and moved to the main server? I use wysiwyg editing and do not use html directly. BUt I can access the html in an html editor, so what can I do to make the columns stay in line? [emal]rudy@stealthaccess.ne[/email]
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325

15th June 2005, 02:21 PM	#13
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325	Re: Re: Re: Re: Bigfoot - serious, not follies Quote: Originally posted by Ripley Twenty-Nine http://www.beckjord.com/ Ladies and gentleman, it gives me great pleasure to introduce to you: Erik Beckjord, the King of Woos Ripley -- Believe it or Not this has influenced your life. Admit it. It has ruined you.
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325

15th June 2005, 02:23 PM	#14
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325	Quote: Originally posted by Paul C. Anagnostopoulos Yellow background . . . many exclamation points . . . must avert eyes . . . ~~ Paul Cute avatar. EB
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325

15th June 2005, 02:41 PM	#15
SpaceFluffer Muse Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 595	Re: Reply to absurd post Quote: Originally posted by erikbeckjord what the majority (popular) thinks is flat-a wrong.** Is it really? Well, I'm prepared to be shown the error of my ways, so please provide some hard evidence to back up your case. Note: Incomprehensible gibberish and blurry photos are most definately not hard evidence.
SpaceFluffer Muse Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 595

15th June 2005, 02:42 PM	#16
grega New Blood Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 19	Re: Bigfoot - serious, not follies Quote: Originally posted by erikbeckjord tell me how to keep a stack or column of titles from moving left and right after it was saved and moved to the main server? Remove that break tags from the code, also all the nbsp tags.
grega New Blood Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 19

15th June 2005, 02:48 PM	#17
Cleon King of the Pod People Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 13,914	Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bigfoot - serious, not follies Quote: Originally posted by erikbeckjord Let's get positive. If you are good at web design, tell me how to keep a stack or column of titles from moving left and right after it was saved and moved to the main server? It shouldn't matter whether it was moved to the server or not. Long story short--use a table. http://www.jalfrezi.com
	__________________ "Intolerance does not flourish without ignorance to feed it." - kittynh "A jerk who is right is still a jerk." - Ducky **** cancer! My blog

15th June 2005, 02:49 PM	#18
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325	Re: Re: Reply to absurd post Quote: Originally posted by SpaceFluffer Is it really? Well, I'm prepared to be shown the error of my ways, so please provide some hard evidence to back up your case. Note: Incomprehensible gibberish and blurry photos are most definately not hard evidence. You understand that Bigfoot is not proven by science to be an f&b animal. It is also not proven by science (nor me) to be a supernatural being. On the other hand, if it were, I would not bother being on this board, but would be in Stockholm getting the Nobel Prize. Right? All I can do is show supernatural ACTIVITY such as tracks that disappear, and for you to believe, you need to be in the woods with me and you ain't. BUT on my website there are photos of such tracks from Brian Smith's video. Many of you will sluff this off and call me a liar. (I tell no lies... Eagle Scout and USAF Academy cadet.) Now if this is not enuff, and stills never are, I will not lose sleep if you do not accept it. (as if I care...) My respect is for field researchers who GO OUT and share and witness this stuff... Brian Smith, Henry Franzoni, Shelly Binkley, Peter Guttilla, StanGordon and others. (but not anonymoist posters) Many of you will live in denial, a place in Egypt.
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325

15th June 2005, 02:53 PM	#19
Ripley Twenty-Nine Muse Join Date: May 2005 Location: London, Ontario Posts: 863	Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bigfoot - serious, not follies Quote: Originally posted by erikbeckjord Ripley -- Believe it or Not this has influenced your life. Admit it. It has ruined you. I assure you, I have no idea what you're talking about. If you're talking about your website, I choose 'Not', thank you very much.
	__________________ Ripley 29 "Professor, without knowing precisely what the danger is, would you say it's time for our viewers to crack each other's heads open and feast on the goo inside?" "Yes I would, Kent."

15th June 2005, 03:00 PM	#20
Red Siegfried Muse Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 585	Whiskey tango foxtrot?!?!?!?? Well, at least he started a new thread so the troll-zotting can remain contained. When you think about it all footprint trails have to start and end somewhere. I suppose now every trail of footprints someone can't find the beginning or end of is proof that someone is phasing in and out of another dimension. Somehow I find that your statement, whatever it is that you're trying to state (bigfoot is an alien abductee? he's an alien? he's from another dimension? he's a ghost of some sort? What is it you're trying to say here?) stretches the bounds of credibility, Mr. Beckford. I suggest you refrain from ingesting DMT before posting. And driveby posts suggesting that people check out your website are a poor way to generate hits. I suggest spamming by email instead. Have a nice day, good luck with ... all that.
Red Siegfried Muse Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 585	__________________ Books are from the Devil and TV is twice as fast. -Master Shake

15th June 2005, 03:02 PM	#21
jmercer Question Everything Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Facing the unfaceable Posts: 12,030	Mr. Beckjord - why, exactly, are you here? What has caused to you to inflict yourself upon us?
	__________________ "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke, British Statesman and Philosopher, 1729-1797 "Cheeky Monkey!" - Chillzero "Daft Sausage!" - Tkingdoll "Context is everything, and sophistry will not protect you." - chillzero

15th June 2005, 03:02 PM	#22
Bronze Dog Copper Alloy Canid Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Homebrew D&D Campaign Setting Posts: 5,007	Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post Quote: Originally posted by erikbeckjord You understand that Bigfoot is not proven by science to be an f&b animal. It is also not proven by science (nor me) to be a supernatural being. It hasn't been proven to even exist by science. Quote: All I can do is show supernatural ACTIVITY such as tracks that disappear, and for you to believe, you need to be in the woods with me and you ain't. Show us a DNA sample, or better yet, a specimen. Then we'll believe that Bigfoot exists. From what you're showing us, however, there doesn't seem to be anything going on. Quote: BUT on my website there are photos of such tracks from Brian Smith's video. Very unimpressive photos that could be just about anything. Quote: Many of you will sluff this off and call me a liar. (I tell no lies... Eagle Scout and USAF Academy cadet.) I won't. I suspect you're in the category of delusional. Quote: Now if this is not enuff, and stills never are, I will not lose sleep if you do not accept it. (as if I care...) Photos never are enough. DNA, specimens, or equally extraordinary evidence, please. Quote: My respect is for field researchers who GO OUT and share and witness this stuff... Brian Smith, Henry Franzoni, Shelly Binkley, Peter Guttilla, StanGordon and others. (but not anonymoist posters) I also respect field researchers. Too bad I've never heard of a Bigfoot field researcher coming back with anything worthwhile. Like DNA or specimens.
	__________________ Stop Sylvia Browne Warning: Beware of contaminated water supplies! Suspected source of contamination: Sarah-I A non-Rockstar Rambler and dissector of Doggerel

15th June 2005, 03:03 PM	#23
SpaceFluffer Muse Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 595	Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post Quote: Originally posted by erikbeckjord All I can do is show supernatural ACTIVITY such as tracks that disappear, and for you to believe, you need to be in the woods with me and you ain't. Sir, I would not be in the woods with you were everything else on fire. Quote: Brian Smith, Henry Franzoni, Shelly Binkley, Peter Guttilla, StanGordon and others. (but not anonymoist posters) Yeah I hate those anonymoist posters. Quote: Many of you will live in denial, a place in Egypt. Denial of non-existent evidence you mean? And as opposed to you, who seems to live in a sparkly dream world populated by magical elves and pixies?
SpaceFluffer Muse Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 595

15th June 2005, 03:05 PM	#24
Starrman Graduate Poster Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 1,173	From Web-Site Quote: SPIRIT PHOTOS OF NICOLE B. SIMPSON & RON GOLDMAN - they tell us OJ DID IT ! You should write for the 'Weekly World News'. You don't seriously believe this, do you?
	__________________ --------------------------------------------- Prayer has no place in the public schools, just like facts have no place in organized religion. --Superintendent Chalmers

15th June 2005, 03:15 PM	#25
jmercer Question Everything Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Facing the unfaceable Posts: 12,030	Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post Quote: Originally posted by SpaceFluffer Sir, I would not be in the woods with you were everything else on fire. Yeah I hate those anonymoist posters. Dammit, SF, that's the SECOND time you've made me crack up in the same thread!!
	__________________ "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke, British Statesman and Philosopher, 1729-1797 "Cheeky Monkey!" - Chillzero "Daft Sausage!" - Tkingdoll "Context is everything, and sophistry will not protect you." - chillzero

15th June 2005, 03:19 PM	#26
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325	Quote: Originally posted by jmercer Mr. Beckjord - why, exactly, are you here? What has caused to you to inflict yourself upon us? I am here to save you from the error(s) of your ways.
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325

15th June 2005, 03:22 PM	#27
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325	Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post Quote: Originally posted by jmercer Dammit, SF, that's the SECOND time you've made me crack up in the same thread!! Youse do unnerstan a deliberate malaprop, don't youse? Or are skeptics too dense for puns?
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325

15th June 2005, 03:28 PM	#28
CurtC Illuminator Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Dallas, TX Posts: 4,095	Mr. Beckjord - Here's an HTML trick that you might not know about - the "blink" tag. You can use it anywhere on the page that you want to draw attention to a certain set of words. Put those words between "blink" an"/blink" tags. It's even more effective when it's used a lot on a page. Quote: Originally posted by erikbeckjord (I tell no lies... Eagle Scout and USAF Academy cadet.) When does schizophrenia usually strike - the early 20s?

15th June 2005, 03:29 PM	#29
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325	Quote: Originally posted by Starrman From Web-Site You should write for the 'Weekly World News'. You don't seriously believe this, do you? Why should you doubt me? (Go see the books of ghost photos at Gettysburgh civil war field.) I don;t put lies on websites. Besides, Nicole got her revenge... OJ has lost his hair. WHEN DO I MEET SOME INTELLECTUAL SKEPTIX??? I'VE DEBATED THE MAJOR ONES OFF THE NET. Most of you guys think name-calling is actual debate.
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325

15th June 2005, 03:33 PM	#30
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325	Quote: Originally posted by CurtC Mr. Beckjord - Here's an HTML trick that you might not know about - the "blink" tag. You can use it anywhere on the page that you want to draw attention to a certain set of words. Put those words between "blink" an"/blink" tags. It's even more effective when it's used a lot on a page. When does schizophrenia usually strike - the early 20s? Thanks for html blink info. Now, why is my signature website address not right? Ought to be http://www.beckjord.com/bigfoottribephotos but did did something wrong in html in the profile. Hmmmm??? Please assist.
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325

15th June 2005, 03:36 PM	#31
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325	Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post Quote: Originally posted by jmercer Dammit, SF, that's the SECOND time you've made me crack up in the same thread!! As I had planned ..... after all, I am in Mensa. EB
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325

15th June 2005, 03:41 PM	#32
Ladewig Philosopher Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Gulf Coast Posts: 8,553	Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post Quote: Originally posted by erikbeckjord Youse do unnerstan a deliberate malaprop, I want to make sure I understand your position. Correct me if I am wrong. You come to skeptic board to present a theory so revolutionary that it would irrevocably change science and the world as we know it and you decide the best way to do that is by deliberately misspelling words for humorous effect?
	__________________ When I see all the kooky things posted on the JREF forums, I can't help but think of Max Bialystock's lament: "They come here, they all come here, how do they find us?"

15th June 2005, 03:45 PM	#33
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325	Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post Quote: Originally posted by SpaceFluffer Sir, I would not be in the woods with you were everything else on fire. Yeah I hate those anonymoist posters. Denial of non-existent evidence you mean? And as opposed to you, who seems to live in a sparkly dream world populated by magical elves and pixies? [/b] Fluffer -- describes you well, but there is another definition, used in the porn industry, for a lady who , uh, "prepares" the male actor...... if you get my drift....
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325

15th June 2005, 03:48 PM	#34
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325	Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to absurd post Quote: Originally posted by Ladewig I want to make sure I understand your position. Correct me if I am wrong. You come to skeptic board to present a theory so revolutionary that it would irrevocably change science and the world as we know it and you decide the best way to do that is by deliberately misspelling words for humorous effect? You have to disguise the cod liver oil with sugar and cream... GET IT? Besides, lots of trivial folks here.... who play for the laffs. COMPRENDO? but credit for seeing this is a major, revolutionary idea. AND IT IS!
erikbeckjord Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 325

15th June 2005, 03:48 PM	#35
Bronze Dog Copper Alloy Canid Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Homebrew D&D Campaign Setting Posts: 5,007	Quote: Originally posted by erikbeckjord Why should you doubt me? (Go see the books of ghost photos at Gettysburgh civil war field.) I'm doubting you because you say fuzzy blobs that could be anything are proof of bigfoot. Give me DNA or a specimen. I've seen a large number of "ghost" photos. They only feature dust, hairs, .jpeg compression artifacts, or nothing at all. Ask mayday about them. Maybe you can show me some of those photos you're talking about. I need a good laugh. Quote: I don;t put lies on websites. No one's accused you of lying (at least no one I've seen). I think you're just plain wrong. Quote: WHEN DO I MEET SOME INTELLECTUAL SKEPTIX??? I'VE DEBATED THE MAJOR ONES OFF THE NET. Most of you guys think name-calling is actual debate. You're the one with the most ad hominems going on, and no evidence. You only have a handful of photos that you haven't even attempted to show aren't the result of pareidolia.
	__________________ Stop Sylvia Browne Warning: Beware of contaminated water supplies! Suspected source of contamination: Sarah-I A non-Rockstar Rambler and dissector of Doggerel