Another Conspiracy Nut Tantrum in 3... 2... 1...

Sword_Of_Truth · 23rd June 2006, 08:26 AM

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=500+WMD+Iraq

I'm going to miss being able to ask the loosers "If the MIBs are so clever, why didn't they plant WMDs in Iraq to be found by the marines?".

gfunkusarelius · 23rd June 2006, 12:41 PM

ha, the wmds will never be the right ones anyway. those silly boys never get it right. the truth is they were clever enough to plant the real ultimate wmds, but intelligence lost the map and no one knows where they are.
or do they?

Gravy · 23rd June 2006, 12:57 PM

Aha! We found the weapons that could have been used against us in the event that we invaded their country to find the weapons that could have been used against us!

Oh, wait....

gumboot · 24th June 2006, 03:43 AM

This doesn't really seem to be that special, does it?

I mean, Iraq was required to destroy all illegal weapons, and provide evidence and documentation for all destroyals.

Had they destroyed them all, really there was no logical reason to defy the UN, risk invasion, cause trade imbagos, purely by refusing to provide the evidence for those destroyals.

That would make the entire Iraqi government completely suicidal.

It was painfully obvious for over a decade that Iraq hadn't followed its end of the bargain - whether that was because they hid weapons, or simply lost them is really beside the point.

So troops in Iraq have been finding weapons that were either hidden or lost (or both). Big whoopie. Is anyone really surprised?

-Andrew

Kage · 24th June 2006, 05:46 AM

The funny thing is, if you read the NYTs article about the WMD hunters, they sound exactly like LCers from the other end of the political spectrum.

23rd June 2006, 08:26 AM	#1
Sword_Of_Truth Illuminator Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 4,265	Another Conspiracy Nut Tantrum in 3... 2... 1... http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=500+WMD+Iraq I'm going to miss being able to ask the loosers "If the MIBs are so clever, why didn't they plant WMDs in Iraq to be found by the marines?".

23rd June 2006, 12:57 PM	#3
Gravy Downsitting Citizen Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: In the argyle Posts: 17,062	Aha! We found the weapons that could have been used against us in the event that we invaded their country to find the weapons that could have been used against us! Oh, wait....
	__________________ "Please, keep your chops cool and don’t overblow.” –Freddie Hubbard What's the Harm?........Stop Sylvia Browne........My 9/11 links

24th June 2006, 03:43 AM	#4
gumboot Norad Ninja Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 16,387	This doesn't really seem to be that special, does it? I mean, Iraq was required to destroy all illegal weapons, and provide evidence and documentation for all destroyals. Had they destroyed them all, really there was no logical reason to defy the UN, risk invasion, cause trade imbagos, purely by refusing to provide the evidence for those destroyals. That would make the entire Iraqi government completely suicidal. It was painfully obvious for over a decade that Iraq hadn't followed its end of the bargain - whether that was because they hid weapons, or simply lost them is really beside the point. So troops in Iraq have been finding weapons that were either hidden or lost (or both). Big whoopie. Is anyone really surprised? -Andrew
gumboot Norad Ninja Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 16,387

24th June 2006, 05:46 AM	#5
Kage Critical Thinker Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 415	The funny thing is, if you read the NYTs article about the WMD hunters, they sound exactly like LCers from the other end of the political spectrum.
Kage Critical Thinker Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 415

23rd June 2006, 12:41 PM	#2
gfunkusarelius Critical Thinker Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 436	ha, the wmds will never be the right ones anyway. those silly boys never get it right. the truth is they were clever enough to plant the real ultimate wmds, but intelligence lost the map and no one knows where they are. or do they?