JREF Homepage Swift Blog Events Calendar $1 Million Paranormal Challenge The Amaz!ng Meeting Useful Links Support Us
James Randi Educational Foundation JREF Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   JREF Forum » General Topics » Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
Click Here To Donate

Notices


Tags job, inside, 911, reasons

Reply
Old 1st August 2006, 11:42 AM   #1
Doubt
Illuminator
 
Doubt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,706
16 reasons not to think 9/11 was an inside job.

The smoking gun has 16 plots that were to be used against Cuba.

Some of these are so bad you would think they were part of a Monty Python skit. None of these were ever tried........I hope.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...61castro1.html
__________________
Doubt world tour locations:
Tolyatti, Russia again. Oct. 21 to Nov. something-or-other.
Monterrey, Mexico?
Russia again? Maybe?

Disclaimer: Not a high energy scientist!
Doubt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st August 2006, 12:11 PM   #2
Dave1001
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,717
Sadly, US intelligence incompetence may be alive and well. Recently it was revealed that a part of the govt. (I think the Pentagon?) was secretly investigating a law school's gay student group for protesting that the military could recruit on campus even though they discriminate against gays. Part of the report noted the group's name, Outlaw. I think we all understand why a gay law student group would choose the name Outlaw. Yet spy report seriously mentioned that the group's name "Outlaw" possibly indicated an interest in breaking the law, perhaps to commit terrorist acts.
Dave1001 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st August 2006, 12:18 PM   #3
MarkyX
Master Poster
 
MarkyX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,016
I find it funny that Canadian secret service does not even has as much funding as the states but have been proven to be quite effective and don't make stupid mistakes

Americans are so funny sometimes
MarkyX is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st August 2006, 12:32 PM   #4
gfunkusarelius
Critical Thinker
 
gfunkusarelius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 436
i agree a lot of those ideas (i didnt even make it very far) seem really stupid, but anyone who has been in a thinktank (hate that term) situation where you are trying to solve a very difficult problem knows that you often write down every idea, however absurd, because it might spark an idea later. like i said, i didnt even read all of these, but from what i saw, it seems like the vast majority of these were just brainfarts. i think sometimes this stuff is declassified and possibly taken too seriously, as if it was given more consideration than it actually was.
i could be wrong
__________________
---------------------
"you can't argue with crazy" -not sure
http://annoyed-skeptic.blogspot.com/
(my blog)
gfunkusarelius is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st August 2006, 12:45 PM   #5
Cylinder
Graduate Poster
 
Cylinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,984
Originally Posted by gfunkusarelius View Post
i agree a lot of those ideas (i didnt even make it very far) seem really stupid, but anyone who has been in a thinktank (hate that term) situation where you are trying to solve a very difficult problem knows that you often write down every idea, however absurd, because it might spark an idea later. like i said, i didnt even read all of these, but from what i saw, it seems like the vast majority of these were just brainfarts. i think sometimes this stuff is declassified and possibly taken too seriously, as if it was given more consideration than it actually was.
i could be wrong
You're pretty close to the mark. The docs cited by TSG are study summaries. Studies are think-tank style reports. They are not vetted and are often submitted to be outside-the-box proposals.

Like you state, there is also a bit of observation bias at work as well. The useful actually programs are often re-classed and do not see the light of day where the useless ideas lose their value and end up in the public sphere.

The reason the Germans had ballistic missiles in WWII is that the US military planners treated Dr. Goddard as somewhat of a kook with a very strange hobby and German military planners treated him as a visionary.
__________________
If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed ; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than live as slaves. - Winston Churchill, The Gathering Storm
Cylinder is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st August 2006, 02:14 PM   #6
Sword_Of_Truth
Illuminator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,265
Originally Posted by MarkyX View Post
I find it funny that Canadian secret service does not even has as much funding as the states but have been proven to be quite effective and don't make stupid mistakes

Americans are so funny sometimes
They did run an infiltration of the leadership of the Reform party (roughly equivelant to your republicans) using a known holocaust denier/white nationalist as thier agent under orders from then Prime Minister Jean Cretin (leader of the Liberal party, roughly equivelant to the democrats).

CSIS has it's share of boners.
Sword_Of_Truth is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st August 2006, 02:21 PM   #7
Doubt
Illuminator
 
Doubt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,706
Originally Posted by gfunkusarelius View Post
i agree a lot of those ideas (i didnt even make it very far) seem really stupid, but anyone who has been in a thinktank (hate that term) situation where you are trying to solve a very difficult problem knows that you often write down every idea, however absurd, because it might spark an idea later. like i said, i didnt even read all of these, but from what i saw, it seems like the vast majority of these were just brainfarts. i think sometimes this stuff is declassified and possibly taken too seriously, as if it was given more consideration than it actually was.
i could be wrong
The thing is that somebody thought enough about them to create a name and write them down. More effort than they are worth.

And the CIA did consider trying to off Castro with an exploding sea shell. That was only one of many other dumb ideas.

Place this stuff in context with operation Northwoods and you see why such ideas should not be taken seriously even when somebody does work out the details.
__________________
Doubt world tour locations:
Tolyatti, Russia again. Oct. 21 to Nov. something-or-other.
Monterrey, Mexico?
Russia again? Maybe?

Disclaimer: Not a high energy scientist!
Doubt is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd August 2006, 06:54 AM   #8
Moose
Self-Propelled Road Hazard
 
Moose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 427
Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth View Post
CSIS has it's share of boners.
There was a story a few years back about the depressing number of CSIS laptops that were misplaced, swiped, and/or forgotten on public transit.
__________________

It becomes as such...
If you must kill the kitten
You have lost the war.
treble_head
Moose is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd August 2006, 06:59 AM   #9
Hamradioguy
Pyrrhonist
 
Hamradioguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Northern Vermont
Posts: 1,982
Originally Posted by Doubt View Post
The smoking gun has 16 plots that were to be used against Cuba.

Some of these are so bad you would think they were part of a Monty Python skit. None of these were ever tried........I hope.
The late humorist Jean Shephard (With tongue firmly in cheek) once devoted an entire show to how in WWII the Army built four 50ft high slingshots. They were to be placed on the front lines and used to launch giant boulders into the ranks of the German army. The idea was to make them think that God was angry with them and thus they'd throw down their guns and run away. I laughed at this back then. Given the current administration and thinking at the Pentagon I'd not be laughing if I heard this story today.
Hamradioguy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd August 2006, 07:51 AM   #10
gumboot
Norad Ninja
 
gumboot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,394
Originally Posted by Hamradioguy View Post
The late humorist Jean Shephard (With tongue firmly in cheek) once devoted an entire show to how in WWII the Army built four 50ft high slingshots.

The Monty Python skit about the funniest joke ever written is in the similar vein. What most people don't appreciate is these jokes are based on reality - some of the things tried in the history of warfare are simply ludicrous - and some of the most successful aspects of warfare stem from these strange experimentations.

The only difference is these days they conceptualise and "workshop" ideas instead of just trying them out on the battlefield.

Bear in mind a lot of technology that is now firmly established in modern warfare was initially dismissed as silly or ridiculous.

-Andrew
__________________

O xein', angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti têde
keimetha tois keinon rhémasi peithomenoi.


"My see-saw analogy renders any need for "calculations" moot." - Lyte Trip
gumboot is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd August 2006, 05:15 AM   #11
ranson
Scheme Monkey
 
ranson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 917
Of course, there's always the old canard that these secret agencies manage to keep many of their successes, well, secret, and make sure that some of the more spectacular failures are publicized in order to make opponents underestimate them.

I don't know if they are that smart or not, which I guess may be the point.
__________________
It's your contention that being sane is living a sheltered life? -- thaiboxerken

My blog.
ranson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd August 2006, 05:27 AM   #12
gumboot
Norad Ninja
 
gumboot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,394
Originally Posted by ranson View Post
Of course, there's always the old canard that these secret agencies manage to keep many of their successes, well, secret, and make sure that some of the more spectacular failures are publicized in order to make opponents underestimate them.

There's certainly that... It's a rather complicated world...

The other thing is of course, in recent years especially, failures tend to usually be grossly exaggerated... or often ops that were not failures are presented as failures...

Two high profile ops that spring to mind are Operation Eagle Claw (exaggerated failure) and the Battle of Mogadishu (successful mission presented as failure).

-Andrew
__________________

O xein', angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti têde
keimetha tois keinon rhémasi peithomenoi.


"My see-saw analogy renders any need for "calculations" moot." - Lyte Trip
gumboot is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd August 2006, 07:18 AM   #13
Gravy
Downsitting Citizen
 
Gravy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the argyle
Posts: 17,062
Originally Posted by ranson View Post
Of course, there's always the old canard that these secret agencies manage to keep many of their successes, well, secret, and make sure that some of the more spectacular failures are publicized in order to make opponents underestimate them.

I don't know if they are that smart or not, which I guess may be the point.
For instance, the Bay of Pigs fiasco got lots of publicity, but you hear nothing about the highly-successful Operation Glacial Creep, which has been in effect for 47 years and is an ingenious plot to force Castro to die of old age.
__________________
"Please, keep your chops cool and don’t overblow.” –Freddie Hubbard

What's the Harm?........Stop Sylvia Browne........My 9/11 links
Gravy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 3rd August 2006, 07:58 AM   #14
Cuddles
Decoy
Moderator
 
Cuddles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A magical land full of pink fluffy sheeps and bunnies
Posts: 9,624
Originally Posted by Gravy View Post
For instance, the Bay of Pigs fiasco got lots of publicity, but you hear nothing about the highly-successful Operation Glacial Creep, which has been in effect for 47 years and is an ingenious plot to force Castro to die of old age.
They've nearly got him now.
__________________
++Rationality Error++ :Unexpected BREAD in
C:\Bible\New\Matthew\14.mat line:15-21

Anyone who thinks the LHC will destroy the world is a ****. - Professor Brian Cox
Cuddles is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

JREF Forum » General Topics » Conspiracy Theories » 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:41 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.