JREF Homepage Swift Blog Events Calendar $1 Million Paranormal Challenge The Amaz!ng Meeting Useful Links Support Us
James Randi Educational Foundation JREF Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   JREF Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
Click Here To Donate

Notices


Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.

Tags acupuncture , shows , promise , flashes

Reply
Old 1st October 2006, 05:28 AM   #1
T'ai Chi
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 11,235
"Acupuncture shows promise for hot flashes"

Here is an interesting article on a exploratory study on acupuncture and hot flashes.

What do people think of the study design?
__________________
http://www.statisticool.com
T'ai Chi is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st October 2006, 05:50 AM   #2
CFLarsen
Penultimate Amazing
 
CFLarsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 42,804
What do you think?
__________________
SkepticReport.com
CFLarsen is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st October 2006, 02:38 PM   #3
T'ai Chi
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 11,235
It is nice that rational, skeptical, trained scientists are studying this stuff.
__________________
http://www.statisticool.com
T'ai Chi is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st October 2006, 03:04 PM   #4
casebro
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,799
"The sleep improvements were seen in both groups, and acupuncture itself did not seem to have a special effect on sleep. However, Manber pointed out, the acupuncture points used in the study were chosen because they target hot flash symptoms, according to traditional* medicine."

I don't see any challenge winner here.

No numbers listed in the CNN article- acupunctuation may be lots better (doubt it) or barely better. Or, since menopause hot flashs do subside, how did they divide the subjects into two groups? Those recieving concomittant HRT get needles? Or by existinig length of menopause? Those who were estimated to be due to subside, real needles? Once again, we have a placebo treatment that relieves subjective items... at least as well as the placebo!

Just what "traditional" medicine did the Dr mean? Traditional pseudo-Sino-mystic traditions?
__________________
Please pardon me for having ideas, not facts.

Some have called me cynical, but I don't believe them.

It's not how many breaths you take. It's how many times you have been breathless that counts.

Last edited by casebro; 1st October 2006 at 03:07 PM. Reason: proofing
casebro is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st October 2006, 03:54 PM   #5
Jeff Corey
New York Skeptic
 
Jeff Corey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 13,794
There is not enough detail to evaluate the design. What journal published this?
Jeff Corey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st October 2006, 04:36 PM   #6
CriticalThanking
Designated Hitter
 
CriticalThanking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the queue to Williamsport
Posts: 2,159
Originally Posted by Jeff Corey View Post
There is not enough detail to evaluate the design. What journal published this?
From Tai's link: "...the journal Fertility & Sterility". From their website:
Official publication of the:

American Society for Reproductive Medicine
The Society of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility
Society of Reproductive Surgeons
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
Society for Male Reproduction and Urology
Pacific Coast Reproductive Society
Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society


Editor:
Alan H. DeCherney, M.D.

Associate Editors:
Edward E. Wallach, M.D.
Paul G. McDonough, M.D.

Fertility and Sterility, known as "the red journal," has world-wide circulation and is highly regarded in the United States and abroad. Now in its sixth decade, Fertility and Sterility publishes juried original articles of scientific excellence in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, physiology, immunology, genetics and menopause. Citation analysis indicates that it is among the most frequently referenced scientific journals and has the highest immediacy and impact factors in the field of reproductive medicine. The journal is an indispensable resource to reproductive endocrinologists, obstetricians, gynecologists, urologists, and basic scientists who treat and investigate the problems of fertility, sterility and the physiology of reproduction.
CT
__________________
T-Mobile customer service sucks.
Happiness should not be a zero sum game.
Did I mention T-Mobile customer service sucks?
CriticalThanking is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st October 2006, 08:05 PM   #7
casebro
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,799
Is that the journal that stepped on it's dingbat with the prayer vs fertility, er somethin? some Korean scientist creating cold fertlility in the lab? acupunctuation treatments for mulitple fallopian tubes? C'mon, help me out here....
__________________
Please pardon me for having ideas, not facts.

Some have called me cynical, but I don't believe them.

It's not how many breaths you take. It's how many times you have been breathless that counts.
casebro is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st October 2006, 09:23 PM   #8
Goshawk
Graduate Poster
 
Goshawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Decatur, Illinois, USA
Posts: 1,453
Twenty-nine women is a very tiny, not statistically useful study group.
Goshawk is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st October 2006, 10:39 PM   #9
CFLarsen
Penultimate Amazing
 
CFLarsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 42,804
Originally Posted by T'ai Chi View Post
It is nice that rational, skeptical, trained scientists are studying this stuff.
What do you think of the study design?
__________________
SkepticReport.com
CFLarsen is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd October 2006, 01:45 AM   #10
Deetee
Illuminator
 
Deetee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,790
I have not been able to see the original paper as yet - is it available on line anywhere?
From here. Emphasis mine.
Quote:
For their study, she and her colleagues randomly assigned 29 women to receive seven weeks of acupuncture or a “sham” version of the procedure. In the latter case, acupuncturists used flat-tipped needles that did not pierce the skin, placing them on areas of the skin not considered to be acupuncture points. The patients could not see that the needles weren’t piercing their skin.
By the end of treatment, women who’d been getting the real acupuncture sessions reported a greater reduction in the severity of their nighttime hot flashes than those in the comparison group.
Both groups said their hot flashes had become less frequent, the researchers found, and as hot flash symptoms improved, so did the women’s sleep quality.
The sleep improvements were seen in both groups, and acupuncture itself did not seem to have a special effect on sleep. However, Manber pointed out, the acupuncture points used in the study were chosen because they target hot flash symptoms, according to traditional medicine. So the therapy was not designed to directly address sleep problems, she said.
From here.
Quote:
The results showed that nighttime hot flash severity decreased significantly (28%) among the women who received acupuncture vs. a 6% drop among the women who got the sham treatment. However, they did not see a similar finding in the frequency of nighttime hot flashes between the two groups.
One really needs to see the trial design in detail, but it seems above board with appropriate placebo-controls. Small study sample - presumably 14 in one group and 15 in the other? With these small numbers, would a qualitative, non-dichotomous outcome such as a severity score reach appropriate statistical significance?
Also it is impossible to say what other factors may have influenced the outcomes without knowing more about the study.

ETA the CNN report states
Quote:
In a study of 29 women with frequent, daily hot flashes, researchers found that those who received acupuncture began to have fewer and less severe symptoms during the night.
This is a misrepresentation of the study, even as they actually report it. There was an equivalent reduction in frequency for those on sham acupuncture, so CNN's comment is misleading in that it attributes both reduction in severity AND frequency to acupuncture.
__________________
"Reci bobu bob a popu pop." - Tanja
"Everything is physics. This does not mean that physics is everything." - Cuddles
"The entire practice of homeopathy can be substituted with the advice to "take two aspirins and call me in the morning." - Linda
"Homeopathy: I never knew there was so little in it." - BSM

Last edited by Deetee; 2nd October 2006 at 01:55 AM.
Deetee is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd October 2006, 02:21 AM   #11
Zep
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,985
Originally Posted by CriticalThanking View Post
From Tai's link: "...the journal Fertility & Sterility". From their website:
Official publication of the:

American Society for Reproductive Medicine
The Society of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility
Society of Reproductive Surgeons
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
Society for Male Reproduction and Urology
Pacific Coast Reproductive Society
Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society


Editor:
Alan H. DeCherney, M.D.

Associate Editors:
Edward E. Wallach, M.D.
Paul G. McDonough, M.D.

Fertility and Sterility, known as "the red journal," has world-wide circulation and is highly regarded in the United States and abroad. Now in its sixth decade, Fertility and Sterility publishes juried original articles of scientific excellence in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, physiology, immunology, genetics and menopause. Citation analysis indicates that it is among the most frequently referenced scientific journals and has the highest immediacy and impact factors in the field of reproductive medicine. The journal is an indispensable resource to reproductive endocrinologists, obstetricians, gynecologists, urologists, and basic scientists who treat and investigate the problems of fertility, sterility and the physiology of reproduction.
CT
This name rings some bells that DO chime in my head (tks, pillory), w.r.t. proponents of woo theories. Anyone care to provide more detail?
Zep is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd October 2006, 02:33 AM   #12
CFLarsen
Penultimate Amazing
 
CFLarsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 42,804
Originally Posted by Zep View Post
Anyone care to provide more detail?
Isn't that T'ai's job?
__________________
SkepticReport.com
CFLarsen is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 2nd October 2006, 05:29 AM   #13
Asolepius
Graduate Poster
 
Asolepius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,166
Originally Posted by T'ai Chi View Post
Here is an interesting article on a exploratory study on acupuncture and hot flashes.

What do people think of the study design?
I am puzzled by the `placebo'. Why did they choose to place fake needles on fake acupuncture points? We now can't separate the effect of needling from the importance of the points used. I have not seen this done before - normally one does one or the other.

Otherwise I can't really comment without seeing the full text paper. It does look like a rather small study, and the newspaper is quite circumspect about the conclusions - rightly so.
__________________
No one could make a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little. Edmund Burke (1729 - 1797)

Blog - Majikthyse
Asolepius is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

JREF Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:06 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2001-2012, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.