Fake moonlanding proves 9/11 inside job.

Bell · 8th October 2006, 02:46 PM

So galls and guys, wassup?

Like, I heard that the Space Shuttle or whatever landed on the moon was faked?
Something about that there were no stars on the American flag or something?
And the rocks in the picture said something like "property of Paramount picture"?

Sorry if I don't get all the facts right, but I'm just too lazy to do a bit of researching myself.

So, I figured, if the Nasa/US gov (=NWO evil Jews) went to all this trouble and faked these moonlandings,
then I have no doubt 9/11 was an inside job and it all was filmed inside a hangar at area 51.

The fake moonlanding proves 9/11 was an inside job.

TobiasTheViking · 8th October 2006, 02:51 PM

It's True

twinstead · 8th October 2006, 03:01 PM

It all seems so clear now

c4ts · 8th October 2006, 03:03 PM

It all makes sense now!

convoluted.jpg

Bell · 8th October 2006, 03:08 PM

I'm curious at what that dombo shill Gravy has to say about this? He will try to debunk it with strawman arguments, just like he did with Alex Jones, who btw, I deeply admire and adore. Not that he debunked Alex, though, Alex pwned Gravy!!!11!!one!!!1!!

Bell · 8th October 2006, 03:12 PM

Originally Posted by c4ts

It all makes sense now!

Attachment 3426

c4ts, velcro is missing in those schematics!

Dazed · 8th October 2006, 03:21 PM

Velcro could fit in nicely between homosexuals and satan.

geni · 8th October 2006, 03:21 PM

Originally Posted by Bell

I'm curious at what that dombo shill Gravy has to say about this? He will try to debunk it with strawman arguments, just like he did with Alex Jones, who btw, I deeply admire and adore. Not that he debunked Alex, though, Alex pwned Gravy!!!11!!one!!!1!!

Nah these days those of who debunk the moon hoax idiots mothly throw things like:

http://www.clavius.org/

and

http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/

Mind you the moan hoax belivers have this anoying habit of produceing massive lists that take time to go through and debunk.

c4ts · 8th October 2006, 03:22 PM

Originally Posted by Bell

c4ts, velcro is missing in those schematics!

So's logic.

StoneWT · 8th October 2006, 03:23 PM

Moonman Fetzer is currently exposing this on the front page of his website:

Fake Moon Landing

Look in the upper-left corner of the website. Fearless Jim will stop at nothing to get the truth out!

Bell · 8th October 2006, 03:28 PM

Originally Posted by StoneWT

Moonman Fetzer is currently exposing this on the front page of his website:

Fake Moon Landing

Look in the upper-left corner of the website. Fearless Jim will stop at nothing to get the truth out!

But I will stop reading after seeing so much text which I know will add up to nothing. I'm pretty sure the conclusion of that piece is that the moonlandings were faked. Thank you, Fetzer.

uruk · 8th October 2006, 03:39 PM

All you have to do is ask them about the Russians. They have no answer to that.
the apollo program was at the hight of the cold war. Russians had spies in the space program. If we had faked the landing the russians would have known and would have plastered it all over the international press.

Look at what they did with Francis Powers.

Bell · 8th October 2006, 03:47 PM

Originally Posted by uruk

All you have to do is ask them about the Russians. They have no answer to that.
the apollo program was at the hight of the cold war. Russians had spies in the space program. If we had faked the landing the russians would have known and would have plastered it all over the international press.

Look at what they did with Francis Powers.

No no no no no!!

The Russians are in it too!! Yuri Gagarin knew, and wanted to break the story. That's why the NWO crashed his plane! Also, if the Russians would come out with this, the NWO said they wouldn't tear down the wall in 1989.

geni · 8th October 2006, 03:49 PM

Originally Posted by uruk

All you have to do is ask them about the Russians. They have no answer to that.
the apollo program was at the hight of the cold war. Russians had spies in the space program. If we had faked the landing the russians would have known and would have plastered it all over the international press.

Oh there is a whole list:

The russians lacked a deep space comunication ability (although zond 1 was launched in 1964)

For some reason they just did track the craft (well these guys did http://www.svengrahn.pp.se/trackind/...7/APOLLO17.htm)

Fake signals from satilites (the horizen to horizen times would be all wrong)

Various commonts that russia was bought of with grain (lack of evidence and there problem that there would be no reason for russia to stay brought)

the usual CTs about a single secret goverment ruleing the world

The soviets being guilty of fakeing some of their stuff and agreeing to keep quite on the moon thing if the US kept quite about that (while there were russian fakes there was nothing of significance).

uruk · 8th October 2006, 03:57 PM

Not to mention that untill the apollo program The russians were kicking our ass in space. That's alot of incentive for them to be in on the fakeout

Also, why did the russians give up on thier lunar program? see: N1 and LK

Bell · 8th October 2006, 03:58 PM

There is only one way to debunk the moon landing deniers (with thanks to Negativ who posted this link a while back).

c4ts · 8th October 2006, 04:04 PM

Originally Posted by Bell

There is only one way to debunk the moon landing deniers (with thanks to Negativ who posted this link a while back).

Needs "Eye of the Tiger."

geni · 8th October 2006, 04:11 PM

Originally Posted by uruk

Not to mention that untill the apollo program The russians were kicking our ass in space. That's alot of incentive for them to be in on the fakeout

Not really remeber the US largly caught up with the gemini program.

bonavada · 8th October 2006, 04:13 PM

Originally Posted by Bell

There is only one way to debunk the moon landing deniers.

nice one buzz, that is a lovely right hook you got fella..."You're a coward, a liar and a feeeuuughhhfff"

wots a "feeeuuughhhfff"?

BTW i'm not stalking you Bell. it's just destiny like :-}

BV
Swansea Wales UK

StoneWT · 8th October 2006, 04:19 PM

They'll reply that the Russians were keeping quiet in order to blackmail us.

Problem is, they would have had less proof than the CTers of today. If the current proof is so laughably bad that it is ignored except for the occasional mocking (Fox mockumentary) and the Russians would have had less proof back then... What in the heck were they going to blackmail us with?

uruk · 8th October 2006, 04:44 PM

Originally Posted by StoneWT

They'll reply that the Russians were keeping quiet in order to blackmail us.

Problem is, they would have had less proof than the CTers of today. If the current proof is so laughably bad that it is ignored except for the occasional mocking (Fox mockumentary) and the Russians would have had less proof back then... What in the heck were they going to blackmail us with?

Yea, just like the russians kept quiet about Francis Powers.
I wonder what the hoaxsters say about that

defaultdotxbe · 8th October 2006, 05:10 PM

Originally Posted by StoneWT

Moonman Fetzer is currently exposing this on the front page of his website:

Fake Moon Landing

Look in the upper-left corner of the website. Fearless Jim will stop at nothing to get the truth out!

of all the "evidence" ive seen for fake moon landings his "they took too many pictures" ang;e has got to be the lamest

Quote:

They'll reply that the Russians were keeping quiet in order to blackmail us.

Problem is, they would have had less proof than the CTers of today. If the current proof is so laughably bad that it is ignored except for the occasional mocking (Fox mockumentary) and the Russians would have had less proof back then... What in the heck were they going to blackmail us with?

the russians were the ones who REALLY went to the moon, and they didnt see us there

geni · 8th October 2006, 05:48 PM

Originally Posted by defaultdotxbe

of all the "evidence" ive seen for fake moon landings his "they took too many pictures" ang;e has got to be the lamest

It turns up from time to time. Problem with it is that most of the photos were taken in shot intense sections (photo take one step left photo or take photos while turning 360 degres).

The Bad Astronomer · 8th October 2006, 08:08 PM

Originally Posted by geni

Nah these days those of who debunk the moon hoax idiots mothly throw things like:

http://www.clavius.org/

and

http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/

Sigh.

Gord_in_Toronto · 8th October 2006, 08:56 PM

Originally Posted by geni

Originally Posted by defaultdotxbe View Post
of all the "evidence" ive seen for fake moon landings his "they took too many pictures" ang;e has got to be the lamest

Quote:

It turns up from time to time. Problem with it is that most of the photos were taken in shot intense sections (photo take one step left photo or take photos while turning 360 degres).

With a bit of Gooling(TM) I find that the Hasselblad cameras were modified to take film cartridges of 160 or 200 pictures and automaticly advance the film. All the Astronaut had to do was refocus which, given the brightness and the distance most things to photographed would be, was certainly not always necessary. The cameras were attached to the front of the space suits and thus took a picture in the direction the astronaut pointed. To take a picture all he had to do was press a button. This certainly could be overlapped with just about anything else he was doing -- so why assume a huge amount of time has to be dedicated to picture taking?

Zep · 8th October 2006, 09:05 PM

Originally Posted by The Bad Astronomer

Sigh.

Anyone would think that the logical person to debunk this would be an astronomer.

Do you happen to know of any, sir?

Polaris · 8th October 2006, 09:05 PM

Originally Posted by Bell

I'm curious at what that dombo shill Gravy has to say about this? He will try to debunk it with strawman arguments, just like he did with Alex Jones, who btw, I deeply admire and adore. Not that he debunked Alex, though, Alex pwned Gravy!!!11!!one!!!1!!

Bay-be!!!

I less than three logic · 8th October 2006, 09:38 PM

Originally Posted by Bell

The fake moonlanding proves 9/11 was an inside job.

Finally, one that makes sense!

LashL · 8th October 2006, 09:55 PM

Interesting timing, since it has recently been determined that Neil Armstrong didn't flub his famous line...

http://reports.discoverychannel.ca/s...iscoveryReport

http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/s...?storyid=66068

http://www.mlive.com/news/kzgazette/...040.xml&coll=7

bjb · 8th October 2006, 10:13 PM

The astronauts could have had their cameras set to the hyperfocal distance:

http://www.dofmaster.com/hyperfocal.html

Everything from 1/2 the hyperfocal distance to infinity will be in focus. The same idea is used in the fixed-focus cameras you get at the drugstore work. The hyperfocal distance becomes shorter as more light is available and the apature is closed down, which is how the cameras would be set for use on the moon.

c4ts · 8th October 2006, 10:26 PM

Originally Posted by The Bad Astronomer

Sigh.

Yes, your site has a whole section on the moon landing hoax. It's a great resource. Insert shameless plug to join forum.

Bell · 8th October 2006, 10:36 PM

Originally Posted by bonavada

nice one buzz, that is a lovely right hook you got fella..."You're a coward, a liar and a feeeuuughhhfff"

wots a "feeeuuughhhfff"?

BTW i'm not stalking you Bell. it's just destiny like :-}

BV
Swansea Wales UK

No, I'm stalking you. I knew you would post that, so I posted first.

Zygar · 9th October 2006, 01:34 AM

Originally Posted by Bell

So, I figured, if the Nasa/US gov (=NWO evil Jews) went to all this trouble and faked these moonlandings,
then I have no doubt 9/11 was an inside job and it all was filmed inside a hangar at area 51.

Obviously... I mean, if there was a conspiracy a few decades ago, then it proves that everything that has ever happened since is also a conspiracy.

Infact, the internet is faked. It's all a big conspiracy. None of this is real...

NWO forever!

G-K-4 · 9th October 2006, 07:18 AM

Of course it's all a hoax. They're actually way ahead of what they claim. Thirty years ago, a British investigative journalist reported the FACTS of the joint Soviet-American landing on Mars. It's all part of the plan for dealing with overpopulation.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...38544636366793

Hellbound · 9th October 2006, 10:12 AM

Originally Posted by Zygar

Obviously... I mean, if there was a conspiracy a few decades ago, then it proves that everything that has ever happened since is also a conspiracy.

Infact, the internet is faked. It's all a big conspiracy. None of this is real...

NWO forever!

You're right, I figured out a long time ago that there's no one else on this so-called "Internet". You're all just one government agent who'se creating websites and forum posts as I click on them.

I'm onto you!!!!!

And I'll be watching...

Bell · 9th October 2006, 11:01 AM

Originally Posted by Huntsman

You're right, I figured out a long time ago that there's no one else on this so-called "Internet". You're all just one government agent who'se creating websites and forum posts as I click on them.

I'm onto you!!!!!

And I'll be watching...

We'll be watching back

~~Zygar~~
damn, I mean
~~c4ts~~
shoot!!
~~Killtown~~
F*CK! I keep messing up.

Bell

There, done.

c4ts · 9th October 2006, 04:54 PM

Originally Posted by Huntsman

You're right, I figured out a long time ago that there's no one else on this so-called "Internet". You're all just one government agent who'se creating websites and forum posts as I click on them.

I'm onto you!!!!!

And I'll be watching...

Lifegazer? Is that you?

Hellbound · 10th October 2006, 05:46 AM

Originally Posted by c4ts

Lifegazer? Is that you?

Hey now!

I was just joking around, no need to get mean...

boloboffin · 10th October 2006, 09:39 PM

Originally Posted by Bell

There is only one way to debunk the moon landing deniers (with thanks to Negativ who posted this link a while back).

I knew that guy. Not Aldrin - the luney. He's all wrapped up in a cult, the ICC - that's why he goes around trying to make astronauts swear on a Bible that they've been to the Moon.

But before Jesus, he did a lot of 'shrooms. A lot of 'shrooms. I'm using the word "lot" here with 'shrooms. LOT.

8th October 2006, 02:46 PM	#1
Bell beautiful freak Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 20,486	Fake moonlanding proves 9/11 inside job. So galls and guys, wassup? Like, I heard that the Space Shuttle or whatever landed on the moon was faked? Something about that there were no stars on the American flag or something? And the rocks in the picture said something like "property of Paramount picture"? Sorry if I don't get all the facts right, but I'm just too lazy to do a bit of researching myself. So, I figured, if the Nasa/US gov (=NWO evil Jews) went to all this trouble and faked these moonlandings, then I have no doubt 9/11 was an inside job and it all was filmed inside a hangar at area 51. The fake moonlanding proves 9/11 was an inside job.
	__________________ Every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me, that's on the worst day of my life. I♥NY You gotta love cops.

8th October 2006, 02:51 PM	#2
TobiasTheViking Resident Viking Autist Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: With your mother Posts: 6,923	It's True
	__________________ He pricked me with his prick that prick - NobbyNobbs Endearingly Obnoxious - Rebecca Watson

8th October 2006, 03:03 PM	#4
c4ts Philosopher Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Your base Posts: 8,427	It all makes sense now! convoluted.jpg
	__________________ Ha ha ha ha.... Stupid signature size limit.

8th October 2006, 03:08 PM	#5
Bell beautiful freak Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 20,486	I'm curious at what that dombo shill Gravy has to say about this? He will try to debunk it with strawman arguments, just like he did with Alex Jones, who btw, I deeply admire and adore. Not that he debunked Alex, though, Alex pwned Gravy!!!11!!one!!!1!!
	__________________ Every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me, that's on the worst day of my life. I♥NY You gotta love cops.

8th October 2006, 03:12 PM	#6
Bell beautiful freak Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 20,486	Originally Posted by c4ts It all makes sense now! Attachment 3426 c4ts, velcro is missing in those schematics!
	__________________ Every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me, that's on the worst day of my life. I♥NY You gotta love cops.

8th October 2006, 03:01 PM	#3
twinstead Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Big corner office in NWO Towers Posts: 11,577	It all seems so clear now

8th October 2006, 03:21 PM	#7
Dazed Muse Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 586	Velcro could fit in nicely between homosexuals and satan.
Dazed Muse Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 586

8th October 2006, 03:21 PM	#8
geni Anti-homeopathy illuminati member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: UK Posts: 26,578	Originally Posted by Bell I'm curious at what that dombo shill Gravy has to say about this? He will try to debunk it with strawman arguments, just like he did with Alex Jones, who btw, I deeply admire and adore. Not that he debunked Alex, though, Alex pwned Gravy!!!11!!one!!!1!! Nah these days those of who debunk the moon hoax idiots mothly throw things like: http://www.clavius.org/ and http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/ Mind you the moan hoax belivers have this anoying habit of produceing massive lists that take time to go through and debunk.

8th October 2006, 03:22 PM	#9
c4ts Philosopher Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Your base Posts: 8,427	Originally Posted by Bell c4ts, velcro is missing in those schematics! So's logic.
	__________________ Ha ha ha ha.... Stupid signature size limit.

8th October 2006, 03:23 PM	#10
StoneWT Critical Thinker Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 401	Moonman Fetzer is currently exposing this on the front page of his website: Fake Moon Landing Look in the upper-left corner of the website. Fearless Jim will stop at nothing to get the truth out!
StoneWT Critical Thinker Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 401

8th October 2006, 03:28 PM	#11
Bell beautiful freak Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 20,486	Originally Posted by StoneWT Moonman Fetzer is currently exposing this on the front page of his website: Fake Moon Landing Look in the upper-left corner of the website. Fearless Jim will stop at nothing to get the truth out! But I will stop reading after seeing so much text which I know will add up to nothing. I'm pretty sure the conclusion of that piece is that the moonlandings were faked. Thank you, Fetzer.
	__________________ Every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me, that's on the worst day of my life. I♥NY You gotta love cops.

8th October 2006, 03:39 PM	#12
uruk Philosopher Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: In the land of the Shatner stealing Mexico touchers Posts: 5,313	All you have to do is ask them about the Russians. They have no answer to that. the apollo program was at the hight of the cold war. Russians had spies in the space program. If we had faked the landing the russians would have known and would have plastered it all over the international press. Look at what they did with Francis Powers.
	__________________ Fourscore and seven years ago I tapped yo mama in a log cabin! Abe Lincoln

8th October 2006, 03:47 PM	#13
Bell beautiful freak Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 20,486	Originally Posted by uruk All you have to do is ask them about the Russians. They have no answer to that. the apollo program was at the hight of the cold war. Russians had spies in the space program. If we had faked the landing the russians would have known and would have plastered it all over the international press. Look at what they did with Francis Powers. No no no no no!! The Russians are in it too!! Yuri Gagarin knew, and wanted to break the story. That's why the NWO crashed his plane! Also, if the Russians would come out with this, the NWO said they wouldn't tear down the wall in 1989.
	__________________ Every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me, that's on the worst day of my life. I♥NY You gotta love cops.

8th October 2006, 03:49 PM	#14
geni Anti-homeopathy illuminati member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: UK Posts: 26,578	Originally Posted by uruk All you have to do is ask them about the Russians. They have no answer to that. the apollo program was at the hight of the cold war. Russians had spies in the space program. If we had faked the landing the russians would have known and would have plastered it all over the international press. Oh there is a whole list: The russians lacked a deep space comunication ability (although zond 1 was launched in 1964) For some reason they just did track the craft (well these guys did http://www.svengrahn.pp.se/trackind/...7/APOLLO17.htm) Fake signals from satilites (the horizen to horizen times would be all wrong) Various commonts that russia was bought of with grain (lack of evidence and there problem that there would be no reason for russia to stay brought) the usual CTs about a single secret goverment ruleing the world The soviets being guilty of fakeing some of their stuff and agreeing to keep quite on the moon thing if the US kept quite about that (while there were russian fakes there was nothing of significance).

8th October 2006, 03:57 PM	#15
uruk Philosopher Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: In the land of the Shatner stealing Mexico touchers Posts: 5,313	Not to mention that untill the apollo program The russians were kicking our ass in space. That's alot of incentive for them to be in on the fakeout Also, why did the russians give up on thier lunar program? see: N1 and LK
	__________________ Fourscore and seven years ago I tapped yo mama in a log cabin! Abe Lincoln

8th October 2006, 03:58 PM	#16
Bell beautiful freak Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 20,486	There is only one way to debunk the moon landing deniers (with thanks to Negativ who posted this link a while back).
	__________________ Every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me, that's on the worst day of my life. I♥NY You gotta love cops.

8th October 2006, 04:04 PM	#17
c4ts Philosopher Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Your base Posts: 8,427	Originally Posted by Bell There is only one way to debunk the moon landing deniers (with thanks to Negativ who posted this link a while back). Needs "Eye of the Tiger."
	__________________ Ha ha ha ha.... Stupid signature size limit.

8th October 2006, 04:11 PM	#18
geni Anti-homeopathy illuminati member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: UK Posts: 26,578	Originally Posted by uruk Not to mention that untill the apollo program The russians were kicking our ass in space. That's alot of incentive for them to be in on the fakeout Not really remeber the US largly caught up with the gemini program.

8th October 2006, 04:13 PM	#19
bonavada Guest Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 1,079	Originally Posted by Bell There is only one way to debunk the moon landing deniers. nice one buzz, that is a lovely right hook you got fella..."You're a coward, a liar and a feeeuuughhhfff" wots a "feeeuuughhhfff"? BTW i'm not stalking you Bell. it's just destiny like :-} BV Swansea Wales UK
bonavada Guest Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 1,079

8th October 2006, 04:19 PM	#20
StoneWT Critical Thinker Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 401	They'll reply that the Russians were keeping quiet in order to blackmail us. Problem is, they would have had less proof than the CTers of today. If the current proof is so laughably bad that it is ignored except for the occasional mocking (Fox mockumentary) and the Russians would have had less proof back then... What in the heck were they going to blackmail us with?
StoneWT Critical Thinker Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 401

8th October 2006, 04:44 PM	#21
uruk Philosopher Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: In the land of the Shatner stealing Mexico touchers Posts: 5,313	Originally Posted by StoneWT They'll reply that the Russians were keeping quiet in order to blackmail us. Problem is, they would have had less proof than the CTers of today. If the current proof is so laughably bad that it is ignored except for the occasional mocking (Fox mockumentary) and the Russians would have had less proof back then... What in the heck were they going to blackmail us with? Yea, just like the russians kept quiet about Francis Powers. I wonder what the hoaxsters say about that
	__________________ Fourscore and seven years ago I tapped yo mama in a log cabin! Abe Lincoln

8th October 2006, 05:10 PM	#22
defaultdotxbe Drunken Shikigami Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The Dark Side of the Sun Posts: 7,482	Originally Posted by StoneWT Moonman Fetzer is currently exposing this on the front page of his website: Fake Moon Landing Look in the upper-left corner of the website. Fearless Jim will stop at nothing to get the truth out! of all the "evidence" ive seen for fake moon landings his "they took too many pictures" ang;e has got to be the lamest Quote: They'll reply that the Russians were keeping quiet in order to blackmail us. Problem is, they would have had less proof than the CTers of today. If the current proof is so laughably bad that it is ignored except for the occasional mocking (Fox mockumentary) and the Russians would have had less proof back then... What in the heck were they going to blackmail us with? the russians were the ones who REALLY went to the moon, and they didnt see us there
	__________________ I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. -Albert Einstein

8th October 2006, 05:48 PM	#23
geni Anti-homeopathy illuminati member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: UK Posts: 26,578	Originally Posted by defaultdotxbe of all the "evidence" ive seen for fake moon landings his "they took too many pictures" ang;e has got to be the lamest It turns up from time to time. Problem with it is that most of the photos were taken in shot intense sections (photo take one step left photo or take photos while turning 360 degres).

8th October 2006, 08:08 PM	#24
The Bad Astronomer Muse Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Boulder Posts: 835	Originally Posted by geni Nah these days those of who debunk the moon hoax idiots mothly throw things like: http://www.clavius.org/ and http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/ Sigh.

8th October 2006, 08:56 PM	#25
Gord_in_Toronto Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 13,418	Originally Posted by geni Originally Posted by defaultdotxbe View Post of all the "evidence" ive seen for fake moon landings his "they took too many pictures" ang;e has got to be the lamest Quote: It turns up from time to time. Problem with it is that most of the photos were taken in shot intense sections (photo take one step left photo or take photos while turning 360 degres). With a bit of Gooling(TM) I find that the Hasselblad cameras were modified to take film cartridges of 160 or 200 pictures and automaticly advance the film. All the Astronaut had to do was refocus which, given the brightness and the distance most things to photographed would be, was certainly not always necessary. The cameras were attached to the front of the space suits and thus took a picture in the direction the astronaut pointed. To take a picture all he had to do was press a button. This certainly could be overlapped with just about anything else he was doing -- so why assume a huge amount of time has to be dedicated to picture taking?
	__________________ "Reality is what's left when you cease to believe." Philip K. Dick

8th October 2006, 09:05 PM	#26
Zep Banned Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 26,985	Originally Posted by The Bad Astronomer Sigh. Anyone would think that the logical person to debunk this would be an astronomer. Do you happen to know of any, sir?
Zep Banned Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 26,985

8th October 2006, 09:05 PM	#27
Polaris Philosopher Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 5,171	Originally Posted by Bell I'm curious at what that dombo shill Gravy has to say about this? He will try to debunk it with strawman arguments, just like he did with Alex Jones, who btw, I deeply admire and adore. Not that he debunked Alex, though, Alex pwned Gravy!!!11!!one!!!1!! Bay-be!!!
Polaris Philosopher Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 5,171	__________________ "There's vastly more truth to be found in rocks than in holy books. Rocks are far superior, in fact, because you can DEMONSTRATE the truth found in rocks. Plus, they're pretty. Holy books are just heavy." - Dinwar "Roy Moore of Alabama. The world would absolutely benefit by him being run over by any vehicle." - Lowpro

8th October 2006, 09:38 PM	#28
I less than three logic Graduate Poster Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: St Cloud, MN, USA Posts: 1,464	Originally Posted by Bell The fake moonlanding proves 9/11 was an inside job. Finally, one that makes sense!
	__________________ “There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world.” - Carl Sagan “The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball ninety million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.” – Douglas Adams

8th October 2006, 09:55 PM	#29
LashL Goddess of Legaltainment™ Administrator Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 26,244	Interesting timing, since it has recently been determined that Neil Armstrong didn't flub his famous line... http://reports.discoverychannel.ca/s...iscoveryReport http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/s...?storyid=66068 http://www.mlive.com/news/kzgazette/...040.xml&coll=7

8th October 2006, 10:13 PM	#30
bjb Graduate Poster Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,079	The astronauts could have had their cameras set to the hyperfocal distance: http://www.dofmaster.com/hyperfocal.html Everything from 1/2 the hyperfocal distance to infinity will be in focus. The same idea is used in the fixed-focus cameras you get at the drugstore work. The hyperfocal distance becomes shorter as more light is available and the apature is closed down, which is how the cameras would be set for use on the moon.
bjb Graduate Poster Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,079

8th October 2006, 10:26 PM	#31
c4ts Philosopher Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Your base Posts: 8,427	Originally Posted by The Bad Astronomer Sigh. Yes, your site has a whole section on the moon landing hoax. It's a great resource. Insert shameless plug to join forum.
	__________________ Ha ha ha ha.... Stupid signature size limit.

8th October 2006, 10:36 PM	#32
Bell beautiful freak Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 20,486	Originally Posted by bonavada nice one buzz, that is a lovely right hook you got fella..."You're a coward, a liar and a feeeuuughhhfff" wots a "feeeuuughhhfff"? BTW i'm not stalking you Bell. it's just destiny like :-} BV Swansea Wales UK No, I'm stalking you. I knew you would post that, so I posted first.
	__________________ Every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me, that's on the worst day of my life. I♥NY You gotta love cops.

9th October 2006, 01:34 AM	#33
Zygar Lex Luthor's Evil Twin Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Salt Lake City Posts: 2,609	Originally Posted by Bell So, I figured, if the Nasa/US gov (=NWO evil Jews) went to all this trouble and faked these moonlandings, then I have no doubt 9/11 was an inside job and it all was filmed inside a hangar at area 51. Obviously... I mean, if there was a conspiracy a few decades ago, then it proves that everything that has ever happened since is also a conspiracy. Infact, the internet is faked. It's all a big conspiracy. None of this is real... NWO forever!

9th October 2006, 07:18 AM	#34
G-K-4 Critical Thinker Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 365	Of course it's all a hoax. They're actually way ahead of what they claim. Thirty years ago, a British investigative journalist reported the FACTS of the joint Soviet-American landing on Mars. It's all part of the plan for dealing with overpopulation. http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...38544636366793
G-K-4 Critical Thinker Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 365	__________________ -- This message has been brought to you by your local Gangster Computer God Containment Policy brain bank brain, a real brain in the brain bank cities on the far side of the moon we never see.

9th October 2006, 10:12 AM	#35
Hellbound Abiogenic Spongiform Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: In a handbasket Posts: 8,942	Originally Posted by Zygar Obviously... I mean, if there was a conspiracy a few decades ago, then it proves that everything that has ever happened since is also a conspiracy. Infact, the internet is faked. It's all a big conspiracy. None of this is real... NWO forever! You're right, I figured out a long time ago that there's no one else on this so-called "Internet". You're all just one government agent who'se creating websites and forum posts as I click on them. I'm onto you!!!!! And I'll be watching...