LC Forum back up

Mince · 19th October 2006, 07:35 PM

And everything was cleared, so previously banned IP addresses are gone.

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...rum/index.php?

This is an interesting early thread:

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...p?showtopic=44

Class · 19th October 2006, 07:36 PM

You have to register to view the forum.

Lame.

Bell · 19th October 2006, 07:49 PM

Originally Posted by Class

You have to register to view the forum.

Lame.

All old users are deleted?

The_Fire · 19th October 2006, 10:42 PM

Avery stole that background image from the Naudet DVD.........

LashL · 19th October 2006, 11:56 PM

Originally Posted by The_Fire

Avery stole that background image from the Naudet DVD.........

No surprise. I haven't seen any evidence that he's ever had an original thought or idea in his life thusfar.

sivazh · 20th October 2006, 01:33 AM

That's one thing I wasn't ever able to understand about LC.

Avery didn't ask for permission for any graphics, footage, pictures, anything when he first made the "documentary." He basically just put it all together and put it online, right? He received numerous cease and decist letters from organizations and individuals, but somehow it survived. That sounds like the conspiracy to me.

Even with his little disclaimer he has now.

sivazh · 20th October 2006, 01:35 AM

Oh, and about having to register to view the forum, sounds like a numbers ploy to me.

Avery can go around bragging, "Oh, we have X number of people registered at the forum." But, how many are hardcore posters and believers in the "troof?" And how many just registered because they want to read the wackiness first hand?

Mojo · 20th October 2006, 01:42 AM

Originally Posted by sivazh

Oh, and about having to register to view the forum, sounds like a numbers ploy to me.

Avery can go around bragging, "Oh, we have X number of people registered at the forum." But, how many are hardcore posters and believers in the "troof?" And how many just registered because they want to read the wackiness first hand?

On the plus side, how many "undecideds" are going to bother registering? I suspect this means that the forum will mostly only be read by skeptics and true believers.

Matthew Best · 20th October 2006, 01:49 AM

Is there any chance that the resurrection of the LC forum means that we will lose some of our more annoying conspiraloons here?

I only ask because I'm starting to find this forum too depressing to visit. For months after I started coming here I found it interesting, educational, occasionally very funny, and full of intelligent points well-argued and well-written.

Recently it seems like we're just constantly fighting back a tide of idiocy put forward by the likes of Killtown and Puberty. Their sort of gibberish and nonsense was quite amusing when posted elsewhere - as long as I could come here and feel cleansed by reading some comparative common sense, but now it seems the waters here have been polluted also.

I'm not usually in favour of banning, but I sure wish they'd go away.

LeFevre · 20th October 2006, 01:58 AM

Originally Posted by Matthew Best

Is there any chance that the resurrection of the LC forum means that we will lose some of our more annoying conspiraloons here?

I only ask because I'm starting to find this forum too depressing to visit. For months after I started coming here I found it interesting, educational, occasionally very funny, and full of intelligent points well-argued and well-written.

Recently it seems like we're just constantly fighting back a tide of idiocy put forward by the likes of Killtown and Puberty. Their sort of gibberish and nonsense was quite amusing when posted elsewhere - as long as I could come here and feel cleansed by reading some comparative common sense, but now it seems the waters here have been polluted also.

I'm not usually in favour of banning, but I sure wish they'd go away.

When they do eventually leave or do something stupid to get banned you'll miss them in the end

I miss reading Stimpy and UpChurch (and horde) pimp Franko

qarnos · 20th October 2006, 02:34 AM

Originally Posted by sivazh

That's one thing I wasn't ever able to understand about LC.

Avery didn't ask for permission for any graphics, footage, pictures, anything when he first made the "documentary." He basically just put it all together and put it online, right? He received numerous cease and decist letters from organizations and individuals, but somehow it survived. That sounds like the conspiracy to me.

Even with his little disclaimer he has now.

Hmmm... I am aware the Naudet Brothers took the cease and desist approach, but I haven't heard about any of the others taking similar action.

I could be wrong, of course. I haven't really looked into it.

I recently added a "citation needed" tag to the Wikipedia entry on LC, because the introduction states that the next version of LC has been delayed because of copyright concerns. Copyright has never bothered these guys before, and Dylan is on record as stating that LC3 is nowhere near being finished. Doesn't sound like copyright problems to me...

stateofgrace · 20th October 2006, 03:50 AM

It looks awful in there, a real eye sore.And as for Dylans avator, what a joke.

I have registered to have a look but can't see me posting on the new super duper forum.

Oliver · 20th October 2006, 03:57 AM

No problem here

qarnos · 20th October 2006, 04:01 AM

Originally Posted by stateofgrace

It looks awful in there, a real eye sore.And as for Dylans avator, what a joke.

I have registered to have a look but can't see me posting on the new super duper forum.

Worst. Colours. Ever.

Calcas · 20th October 2006, 06:51 AM

"Popeholden" started an interesting thread asking if skeptics will automatically be banned.

Re: The New Forums, will people be banned for opinions?

Popeholden Posted: Oct 19 2006, 05:29 PM

For instance, if i happen to not believe in the conspiracy, and post evidence toward this end, but i do it respectfully and nicely, am i going to be banned?

i'm sure you know this forum has a pretty bad track record of stifling dissent, and i'd like to think a community of truth seekers wouldn't mind the presentation of a different opinion, as long as it's presented in a respectful manner.

if i am banned, i would very much appreciate an e-mail message explaining exactly what i've done wrong.

will people who insult me or accuse me of being a government agent be punished accordingly?

Some replies...

"...the point I'm simply trying to make is this. People who already have their mind made up about their views on 9/11 have no real place in a 9/11 Truth Forum. What legitimate purpose do you serve the members of this board if you provide nothing but the opposite."

"Maybe you could ask yourselve, if it is not also a 'conspiracy theory' when one claimes,
that 19 amateurs with boxcutters manage to highjack 4 jetliners and cruise around in the
best protected airspace of all times and also manage then to hit 3/4 of their targets,
including the nerve-center of the mightiest miltary force of the planet whithout even
ONE F-16 appearing at the horizon? Hello? I mean: Boxcutters!
As Prof. Fetzer said: Americans are fairly agressive. Imagine 4 Arabs with boxcutters in a
plane full of Americans... They would have beaten them to death with their luggage."

This last poster, "Victoria" pretty much sums it up.

"I think you shouldn't put anything that has to do with skeptics here.I think this is all about the TRUTH, we shouldn't be talking about something else than that."

Sheesh.

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...p?showtopic=72

rikzilla · 20th October 2006, 07:14 AM

Originally Posted by Calcas

"Popeholden" started an interesting thread asking if skeptics will automatically be banned.

Re: The New Forums, will people be banned for opinions?

Popeholden Posted: Oct 19 2006, 05:29 PM

For instance, if i happen to not believe in the conspiracy, and post evidence toward this end, but i do it respectfully and nicely, am i going to be banned?

i'm sure you know this forum has a pretty bad track record of stifling dissent, and i'd like to think a community of truth seekers wouldn't mind the presentation of a different opinion, as long as it's presented in a respectful manner.

if i am banned, i would very much appreciate an e-mail message explaining exactly what i've done wrong.

will people who insult me or accuse me of being a government agent be punished accordingly?

Some replies...

"...the point I'm simply trying to make is this. People who already have their mind made up about their views on 9/11 have no real place in a 9/11 Truth Forum. What legitimate purpose do you serve the members of this board if you provide nothing but the opposite."

"Maybe you could ask yourselve, if it is not also a 'conspiracy theory' when one claimes,
that 19 amateurs with boxcutters manage to highjack 4 jetliners and cruise around in the
best protected airspace of all times and also manage then to hit 3/4 of their targets,
including the nerve-center of the mightiest miltary force of the planet whithout even
ONE F-16 appearing at the horizon? Hello? I mean: Boxcutters!
As Prof. Fetzer said: Americans are fairly agressive. Imagine 4 Arabs with boxcutters in a
plane full of Americans... They would have beaten them to death with their luggage."

This last poster, "Victoria" pretty much sums it up.

"I think you shouldn't put anything that has to do with skeptics here.I think this is all about the TRUTH, we shouldn't be talking about something else than that."

Sheesh.

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...p?showtopic=72

Ahh but what if the TRUTH is that the Truth Movement is FALSE??

Really, this house of cards that Dylan et al have built has already been "pulled" by Mr. Realitystein. But they still have their delusional mindset to keep them warm.

-z

jhunter1163 · 20th October 2006, 11:51 AM

If I were Dylan, I wouldn't get too proud of the registration numbers. Half of them are probably JREFers.

rearnakedchoke · 20th October 2006, 11:55 AM

nope, us mods watch all the boards and see whos who, and posting there...oooops wait....nevermind.

The_Fire · 20th October 2006, 11:55 AM

If I were Dylan I wouldn't be proud of anything. Period.

beachnut · 20th October 2006, 01:21 PM

Quote:

"I think you shouldn't put anything that has to do with skeptics here.I think this is all about the TRUTH, we shouldn't be talking about something else than that."

This one statement if made in to LC forum rules, will essecially ban all those who believe the LC video from posting on the LC forum?

LC forum shut down today after all posting was suspended for lack of truth. Do we need to wait until Dylan finally tells everyone his work of fiction is still a work of fiction or does he think he can sell another 100,000 DVDs?

Who buys his DVDs?

Thanks for the post on the insides of a not so first admentment run site!

now I need to read how to post quotes and cite the proper poster

rearnakedchoke · 20th October 2006, 01:32 PM

what if LC released a movie of JUST footage from 9/11? riddled with first hand interviews from people covered in pulverized concrete, could that footage and first hand accounts be "debunked"?

Mancman · 22nd October 2006, 12:58 PM

I've re joined the LC forum, but as a conspiracy theorist.

It's shockingly easy to make up rubbish.

I feel dirty though.

tsig · 22nd October 2006, 01:53 PM

Originally Posted by Mancman

I've re joined the LC forum, but as a conspiracy theorist.

It's shockingly easy to make up rubbish.

I feel dirty though.

It's easy to make it up, just don't start believing it.

T.A.M. · 22nd October 2006, 03:12 PM

Matthew:

Part of the problem is that I "dared" a wise ass truther to come over here, as I felt it would be a good place for him to argue his points on 9/11. Little did I know his only reason for coming here was to antagonize and causes shaite. I will not make the mistake again. He has been suspened, and when he returns, he says he is going to be on best behaviour, but says he will report anyone who is not.

TAM

Bell · 22nd October 2006, 03:17 PM

Originally Posted by T.A.M.

Matthew:

Part of the problem is that I "dared" a wise ass truther to come over here, as I felt it would be a good place for him to argue his points on 9/11. Little did I know his only reason for coming here was to antagonize and causes shaite. I will not make the mistake again. He has been suspened, and when he returns, he says he is going to be on best behaviour, but says he will report anyone who is not.

TAM

If you're talking about poverty101, he won't be back, he's banned.

CptColumbo · 23rd October 2006, 12:36 AM

Originally Posted by Mancman

I've re joined the LC forum, but as a conspiracy theorist.

It's shockingly easy to make up rubbish.

I feel dirty though.

Send them our numbers.

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=66469

To us it's comedy, to them a goldmine of information, and then comedy for us again.

LashL · 23rd October 2006, 12:56 AM

My guess is that Do Over will soon find out how few followers LC has and will resort to the artificial numbers from the old forum rather than rely upon the current figures which will only show that - oops - only a few dozen, maybe a few hundred eventually, can even be bothered to look at the LC forums. That's pretty poor considering that the LC crew likes to cite the "millions" of downloads of their farcical video (in all of its pathetic recreations).

Sure, it got some semi-impressive numbers in the old days before their tripe was debunked so thoroughly, (and if you ignore the fact that every time someone clicks on a youtube link, even inadvertently, it counts as a download, and if you ignore the fact that every troofer has clicked on said links at least a hundred times each) but a careful look at their "membership" included a huge proportion that never posted a single post and a huge proportion that were probably debunkers who were banned.

Now that LC has shot its wad, I don't think that it will ever attract anywhere near the number of "signups" that it did in the past.

That's why I think they'll revert to and try to use their "old" numbers once they realize how ineffective, how marginalized and how lame they really are to the vast majority of the population of the planet. Reality is just too damned painful to them.

Foolmewunz · 23rd October 2006, 07:09 AM

Lash, are those acre-size slabs in your avatar? (Love the sig line from Troofy!)

That board's going to scare away the kidz! Too much b.s. security! They'll be lucky if they get many who'll go past the first screen. There's nothing there to attract a newbie except a bunch of notices that you need to register. How many paranoid pimply pre-pubescents are going to want to let the NWO get all their details, dude?

Foolmewunz · 23rd October 2006, 07:12 AM

ETA: So it's what, 72 hours.... No bannings, yet?

Oliver! You're getting nice in your old age?????
And who's going to design the "Banned From The New Improved Cholesterol Free Loose Change" badge.

Oliver · 23rd October 2006, 07:18 AM

Originally Posted by Foolmewunz

ETA: So it's what, 72 hours.... No bannings, yet?

Oliver! You're getting nice in your old age?????
And who's going to design the "Banned From The New Improved Cholesterol Free Loose Change" badge.

No no, i am a full sceptic over there but there are no admins, i guess.

Donal · 23rd October 2006, 08:15 AM

is there a special prize for the first government agent/shill to be banned for spreading disinformation?

Oliver · 23rd October 2006, 11:20 AM

Did you guys in here looked into the new board?
There are at least 50% JREFers, i guess. Even
Gravy is highly defended over there.

Donal · 23rd October 2006, 11:30 AM

And no bannings? Is Dylan too busy watching South Park?

Bell · 23rd October 2006, 11:31 AM

I really should join up. And pretend to be a troofer!
& ur all blind not 2 c teh troof

Oliver · 23rd October 2006, 11:34 AM

Seems that no admins are there... No fun at all to say whatever i want to say.

Jdoherty or what his name was gets a lot of kicks in his ass right now about his alex jones agenda...

LashL · 23rd October 2006, 11:36 AM

Originally Posted by Foolmewunz

Lash, are those acre-size slabs in your avatar? (Love the sig line from Troofy!)

Muckar-duva · 23rd October 2006, 11:43 AM

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...?showtopic=102

Ahh, the blissful silence of avoidance.

Bell · 23rd October 2006, 11:47 AM

Should I play along? Or stomp them all over the place?

And oh... from the LC forum:

Today's Birthdays
1 member is celebrating his/her birthday today
pdoherty76(30)

Wasn't it poverty79? Allthough poverty97 seems more plausible.

Oliver · 23rd October 2006, 11:57 AM

Originally Posted by Bell

Should I play along? Or stomp them all over the place?

And oh... from the LC forum:

Today's Birthdays
1 member is celebrating his/her birthday today
pdoherty76(30)

Wasn't it poverty79? Allthough poverty97 seems more plausible.

Well, it wouldn´t be a hard job to stomp the lousy remains over there. Really sad...

Oliver · 23rd October 2006, 12:10 PM

Quote:

9-11 is connected to the Illuminati Because The Illuminti is simply another term for pure Evil, it is just the word for the people on the physical reality that carry out and cause the evil. 911 was pure evil, and it got the illuminati further in their plan to massively prevent humanity from evolving and becoming spiritual and become one, instead it kept/keeps us in a constant state of fear and prevents us from becoming what humanity has the ability to become. Their entire goal is to stop us from evolving IMO.

Chris is posting over there?

19th October 2006, 07:35 PM	#1
Mince Master Poster Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 2,019	LC Forum back up And everything was cleared, so previously banned IP addresses are gone. http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...rum/index.php? This is an interesting early thread: http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...p?showtopic=44
Mince Master Poster Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 2,019

19th October 2006, 07:36 PM	#2
Class Meatball Skeptic Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: A few miles south of the 38th parallel, sipping on a dry martini Posts: 257	You have to register to view the forum. Lame.
	__________________ "If you beleive that PBS was no infiltrated before 9-11 and the video I saw removed from their records, you are also capable of believing in Santa." - Christophera

19th October 2006, 07:49 PM	#3
Bell beautiful freak Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 20,465	Originally Posted by Class You have to register to view the forum. Lame. All old users are deleted?
	__________________ Every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me, that's on the worst day of my life. I♥NY You gotta love cops.

19th October 2006, 10:42 PM	#4
The_Fire Unimpressed Female Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: 8th level of Hell - Maleborgia Posts: 3,037	Avery stole that background image from the Naudet DVD.........
	__________________ If anyone told you that I'm a nice person, they were either from a different level of existance, lying through their teeth or mentally instable. "We? That better be you and that invisible aardwarck in your pocket you are talking about, because I KNOW you are not stupid enough to open a giant can of whoop ass by claiming you know what I think." Stop Sylvia Browne

20th October 2006, 01:33 AM	#6
sivazh Scholar Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 61	That's one thing I wasn't ever able to understand about LC. Avery didn't ask for permission for any graphics, footage, pictures, anything when he first made the "documentary." He basically just put it all together and put it online, right? He received numerous cease and decist letters from organizations and individuals, but somehow it survived. That sounds like the conspiracy to me. Even with his little disclaimer he has now.
sivazh Scholar Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 61

19th October 2006, 11:56 PM	#5
LashL Goddess of Legaltainment™ Administrator Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 26,204	Originally Posted by The_Fire Avery stole that background image from the Naudet DVD......... No surprise. I haven't seen any evidence that he's ever had an original thought or idea in his life thusfar.

20th October 2006, 01:35 AM	#7
sivazh Scholar Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 61	Oh, and about having to register to view the forum, sounds like a numbers ploy to me. Avery can go around bragging, "Oh, we have X number of people registered at the forum." But, how many are hardcore posters and believers in the "troof?" And how many just registered because they want to read the wackiness first hand?
sivazh Scholar Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 61

20th October 2006, 01:42 AM	#8
Mojo Mostly harmless Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Nor Flanden Posts: 22,087	Originally Posted by sivazh Oh, and about having to register to view the forum, sounds like a numbers ploy to me. Avery can go around bragging, "Oh, we have X number of people registered at the forum." But, how many are hardcore posters and believers in the "troof?" And how many just registered because they want to read the wackiness first hand? On the plus side, how many "undecideds" are going to bother registering? I suspect this means that the forum will mostly only be read by skeptics and true believers.
	__________________ "You got to use your brain." - McKinley Morganfield "The poor mystic homeopaths feel like petted house-cats thrown at high flood on the breaking ice." - Leon Trotsky

20th October 2006, 01:49 AM	#9
Matthew Best Illuminator Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Leicester Square, London Posts: 4,113	Is there any chance that the resurrection of the LC forum means that we will lose some of our more annoying conspiraloons here? I only ask because I'm starting to find this forum too depressing to visit. For months after I started coming here I found it interesting, educational, occasionally very funny, and full of intelligent points well-argued and well-written. Recently it seems like we're just constantly fighting back a tide of idiocy put forward by the likes of Killtown and Puberty. Their sort of gibberish and nonsense was quite amusing when posted elsewhere - as long as I could come here and feel cleansed by reading some comparative common sense, but now it seems the waters here have been polluted also. I'm not usually in favour of banning, but I sure wish they'd go away.

20th October 2006, 01:58 AM	#10
LeFevre Graduate Poster Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: JREF knows and I drink kool-aid Posts: 1,719	Originally Posted by Matthew Best Is there any chance that the resurrection of the LC forum means that we will lose some of our more annoying conspiraloons here? I only ask because I'm starting to find this forum too depressing to visit. For months after I started coming here I found it interesting, educational, occasionally very funny, and full of intelligent points well-argued and well-written. Recently it seems like we're just constantly fighting back a tide of idiocy put forward by the likes of Killtown and Puberty. Their sort of gibberish and nonsense was quite amusing when posted elsewhere - as long as I could come here and feel cleansed by reading some comparative common sense, but now it seems the waters here have been polluted also. I'm not usually in favour of banning, but I sure wish they'd go away. When they do eventually leave or do something stupid to get banned you'll miss them in the end I miss reading Stimpy and UpChurch (and horde) pimp Franko
	__________________ U.S.L.S. (1997-2009) Ask me about Skinnematics! I won't participate, but I'll eat copporn, and watch. - TobiasTheCommie Taisetsu na mono protect my balls!

20th October 2006, 02:34 AM	#11
qarnos Cold-hearted skeptic Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Melbourne, Austrylia Posts: 1,985	Originally Posted by sivazh That's one thing I wasn't ever able to understand about LC. Avery didn't ask for permission for any graphics, footage, pictures, anything when he first made the "documentary." He basically just put it all together and put it online, right? He received numerous cease and decist letters from organizations and individuals, but somehow it survived. That sounds like the conspiracy to me. Even with his little disclaimer he has now. Hmmm... I am aware the Naudet Brothers took the cease and desist approach, but I haven't heard about any of the others taking similar action. I could be wrong, of course. I haven't really looked into it. I recently added a "citation needed" tag to the Wikipedia entry on LC, because the introduction states that the next version of LC has been delayed because of copyright concerns. Copyright has never bothered these guys before, and Dylan is on record as stating that LC3 is nowhere near being finished. Doesn't sound like copyright problems to me...
	__________________ "In the twenty years since the Chernobyl tragedy, the world's worst nuclear accident, there have been nearly [FILL IN ALARMIST AND ARMAGEDDONIST FACTOID HERE]" - Greenpeace press release.

20th October 2006, 03:50 AM	#12
stateofgrace Guest Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Scotland Posts: 3,847	It looks awful in there, a real eye sore.And as for Dylans avator, what a joke. I have registered to have a look but can't see me posting on the new super duper forum.

20th October 2006, 03:57 AM	#13
Oliver ~The Rascal~ Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Cologne Posts: 17,369	No problem here

20th October 2006, 04:01 AM	#14
qarnos Cold-hearted skeptic Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Melbourne, Austrylia Posts: 1,985	Originally Posted by stateofgrace It looks awful in there, a real eye sore.And as for Dylans avator, what a joke. I have registered to have a look but can't see me posting on the new super duper forum. Worst. Colours. Ever.
	__________________ "In the twenty years since the Chernobyl tragedy, the world's worst nuclear accident, there have been nearly [FILL IN ALARMIST AND ARMAGEDDONIST FACTOID HERE]" - Greenpeace press release.

20th October 2006, 06:51 AM	#15
Calcas Master of my Domain Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 1,472	Interesting thread at the new LC "Popeholden" started an interesting thread asking if skeptics will automatically be banned. Re: The New Forums, will people be banned for opinions? Popeholden Posted: Oct 19 2006, 05:29 PM For instance, if i happen to not believe in the conspiracy, and post evidence toward this end, but i do it respectfully and nicely, am i going to be banned? i'm sure you know this forum has a pretty bad track record of stifling dissent, and i'd like to think a community of truth seekers wouldn't mind the presentation of a different opinion, as long as it's presented in a respectful manner. if i am banned, i would very much appreciate an e-mail message explaining exactly what i've done wrong. will people who insult me or accuse me of being a government agent be punished accordingly? Some replies... "...the point I'm simply trying to make is this. People who already have their mind made up about their views on 9/11 have no real place in a 9/11 Truth Forum. What legitimate purpose do you serve the members of this board if you provide nothing but the opposite." "Maybe you could ask yourselve, if it is not also a 'conspiracy theory' when one claimes, that 19 amateurs with boxcutters manage to highjack 4 jetliners and cruise around in the best protected airspace of all times and also manage then to hit 3/4 of their targets, including the nerve-center of the mightiest miltary force of the planet whithout even ONE F-16 appearing at the horizon? Hello? I mean: Boxcutters! As Prof. Fetzer said: Americans are fairly agressive. Imagine 4 Arabs with boxcutters in a plane full of Americans... They would have beaten them to death with their luggage." This last poster, "Victoria" pretty much sums it up. "I think you shouldn't put anything that has to do with skeptics here.I think this is all about the TRUTH, we shouldn't be talking about something else than that." Sheesh. http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...p?showtopic=72

20th October 2006, 07:14 AM	#16
rikzilla Ninja wave: Atomic fire-breath ninja Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 5,001	Originally Posted by Calcas "Popeholden" started an interesting thread asking if skeptics will automatically be banned. Re: The New Forums, will people be banned for opinions? Popeholden Posted: Oct 19 2006, 05:29 PM For instance, if i happen to not believe in the conspiracy, and post evidence toward this end, but i do it respectfully and nicely, am i going to be banned? i'm sure you know this forum has a pretty bad track record of stifling dissent, and i'd like to think a community of truth seekers wouldn't mind the presentation of a different opinion, as long as it's presented in a respectful manner. if i am banned, i would very much appreciate an e-mail message explaining exactly what i've done wrong. will people who insult me or accuse me of being a government agent be punished accordingly? Some replies... "...the point I'm simply trying to make is this. People who already have their mind made up about their views on 9/11 have no real place in a 9/11 Truth Forum. What legitimate purpose do you serve the members of this board if you provide nothing but the opposite." "Maybe you could ask yourselve, if it is not also a 'conspiracy theory' when one claimes, that 19 amateurs with boxcutters manage to highjack 4 jetliners and cruise around in the best protected airspace of all times and also manage then to hit 3/4 of their targets, including the nerve-center of the mightiest miltary force of the planet whithout even ONE F-16 appearing at the horizon? Hello? I mean: Boxcutters! As Prof. Fetzer said: Americans are fairly agressive. Imagine 4 Arabs with boxcutters in a plane full of Americans... They would have beaten them to death with their luggage." This last poster, "Victoria" pretty much sums it up. "I think you shouldn't put anything that has to do with skeptics here.I think this is all about the TRUTH, we shouldn't be talking about something else than that." Sheesh. http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...p?showtopic=72 Ahh but what if the TRUTH is that the Truth Movement is FALSE?? Really, this house of cards that Dylan et al have built has already been "pulled" by Mr. Realitystein. But they still have their delusional mindset to keep them warm. -z
	__________________ "You have not experienced Shakespeare until you have read him in the original Klingon." -Chancellor Gorkon "inside Mr .Skinny lives a big man" -pillory (18 Jan 2007)

20th October 2006, 11:51 AM	#17
jhunter1163 Beer-Swilling Semiliterate Moderator Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Room 118, Bohemian Grove Marriott Posts: 15,569	If I were Dylan, I wouldn't get too proud of the registration numbers. Half of them are probably JREFers.

20th October 2006, 11:55 AM	#18
rearnakedchoke Banned Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: THE DECIDER Posts: 150	nope, us mods watch all the boards and see whos who, and posting there...oooops wait....nevermind.

20th October 2006, 01:21 PM	#20
beachnut Penultimate Amazing Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Dog House Posts: 19,902	LC freedom from truth policy Quote: "I think you shouldn't put anything that has to do with skeptics here.I think this is all about the TRUTH, we shouldn't be talking about something else than that." This one statement if made in to LC forum rules, will essecially ban all those who believe the LC video from posting on the LC forum? LC forum shut down today after all posting was suspended for lack of truth. Do we need to wait until Dylan finally tells everyone his work of fiction is still a work of fiction or does he think he can sell another 100,000 DVDs? Who buys his DVDs? Thanks for the post on the insides of a not so first admentment run site! now I need to read how to post quotes and cite the proper poster

20th October 2006, 01:32 PM	#21
rearnakedchoke Banned Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: THE DECIDER Posts: 150	what if LC released a movie of JUST footage from 9/11? riddled with first hand interviews from people covered in pulverized concrete, could that footage and first hand accounts be "debunked"?

22nd October 2006, 12:58 PM	#22
Mancman Graduate Poster Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Manchester, UK Posts: 1,010	I've re joined the LC forum, but as a conspiracy theorist. It's shockingly easy to make up rubbish. I feel dirty though.
	__________________ R.I.P Dr. Adequate

22nd October 2006, 01:53 PM	#23
tsig a carbon based life-form Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 26,718	Originally Posted by Mancman I've re joined the LC forum, but as a conspiracy theorist. It's shockingly easy to make up rubbish. I feel dirty though. It's easy to make it up, just don't start believing it.

22nd October 2006, 03:12 PM	#24
T.A.M. Keeper of the Kool-Vax Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The Far East...of Canada Posts: 20,816	Matthew: Part of the problem is that I "dared" a wise ass truther to come over here, as I felt it would be a good place for him to argue his points on 9/11. Little did I know his only reason for coming here was to antagonize and causes shaite. I will not make the mistake again. He has been suspened, and when he returns, he says he is going to be on best behaviour, but says he will report anyone who is not. TAM

22nd October 2006, 03:17 PM	#25
Bell beautiful freak Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 20,465	Originally Posted by T.A.M. Matthew: Part of the problem is that I "dared" a wise ass truther to come over here, as I felt it would be a good place for him to argue his points on 9/11. Little did I know his only reason for coming here was to antagonize and causes shaite. I will not make the mistake again. He has been suspened, and when he returns, he says he is going to be on best behaviour, but says he will report anyone who is not. TAM If you're talking about poverty101, he won't be back, he's banned.
	__________________ Every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me, that's on the worst day of my life. I♥NY You gotta love cops.

23rd October 2006, 12:36 AM	#26
CptColumbo Just One More Question Join Date: May 2004 Location: Minneapolis, MN Posts: 9,130	Originally Posted by Mancman I've re joined the LC forum, but as a conspiracy theorist. It's shockingly easy to make up rubbish. I feel dirty though. Send them our numbers. http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=66469 To us it's comedy, to them a goldmine of information, and then comedy for us again.
	__________________ I've been involved in a lot of cults, both as a leader and a follower. You have more fun as a follower, but you make more money as a leader.--Creed, "The Office" The tools of conquest do not necessarily come with bombs and explosions and fallout. There are weapons that are simply thoughts, attitudes, prejudices to be only found in the minds of men. Prejudices and suspicion can destroy, and a thoughtless frightened search for a scapegoat has a fallout all its own.--Rod Serling

23rd October 2006, 12:56 AM	#27
LashL Goddess of Legaltainment™ Administrator Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 26,204	My guess is that Do Over will soon find out how few followers LC has and will resort to the artificial numbers from the old forum rather than rely upon the current figures which will only show that - oops - only a few dozen, maybe a few hundred eventually, can even be bothered to look at the LC forums. That's pretty poor considering that the LC crew likes to cite the "millions" of downloads of their farcical video (in all of its pathetic recreations). Sure, it got some semi-impressive numbers in the old days before their tripe was debunked so thoroughly, (and if you ignore the fact that every time someone clicks on a youtube link, even inadvertently, it counts as a download, and if you ignore the fact that every troofer has clicked on said links at least a hundred times each) but a careful look at their "membership" included a huge proportion that never posted a single post and a huge proportion that were probably debunkers who were banned. Now that LC has shot its wad, I don't think that it will ever attract anywhere near the number of "signups" that it did in the past. That's why I think they'll revert to and try to use their "old" numbers once they realize how ineffective, how marginalized and how lame they really are to the vast majority of the population of the planet. Reality is just too damned painful to them.

23rd October 2006, 07:09 AM	#28
Foolmewunz Grammar Resistance Leader Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Pattaya, Thailand Posts: 20,513	Lash, are those acre-size slabs in your avatar? (Love the sig line from Troofy!) That board's going to scare away the kidz! Too much b.s. security! They'll be lucky if they get many who'll go past the first screen. There's nothing there to attract a newbie except a bunch of notices that you need to register. How many paranoid pimply pre-pubescents are going to want to let the NWO get all their details, dude?
	__________________ Ha! Foolmewunz has just been added to the list of people who aren't complete idiots. Hokulele Don't you wish someone had slapped baby Hitler really really hard? [i] Dr. Buzzo 02/13 [i]

23rd October 2006, 07:12 AM	#29
Foolmewunz Grammar Resistance Leader Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Pattaya, Thailand Posts: 20,513	ETA: So it's what, 72 hours.... No bannings, yet? Oliver! You're getting nice in your old age????? And who's going to design the "Banned From The New Improved Cholesterol Free Loose Change" badge.
	__________________ Ha! Foolmewunz has just been added to the list of people who aren't complete idiots. Hokulele Don't you wish someone had slapped baby Hitler really really hard? [i] Dr. Buzzo 02/13 [i]

23rd October 2006, 07:18 AM	#30
Oliver ~The Rascal~ Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Cologne Posts: 17,369	Originally Posted by Foolmewunz ETA: So it's what, 72 hours.... No bannings, yet? Oliver! You're getting nice in your old age????? And who's going to design the "Banned From The New Improved Cholesterol Free Loose Change" badge. No no, i am a full sceptic over there but there are no admins, i guess.

23rd October 2006, 08:15 AM	#31
Donal Master Poster Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: NYC Posts: 2,128	is there a special prize for the first government agent/shill to be banned for spreading disinformation?

23rd October 2006, 11:20 AM	#32
Oliver ~The Rascal~ Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Cologne Posts: 17,369	Did you guys in here looked into the new board? There are at least 50% JREFers, i guess. Even Gravy is highly defended over there.

23rd October 2006, 11:30 AM	#33
Donal Master Poster Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: NYC Posts: 2,128	And no bannings? Is Dylan too busy watching South Park?

23rd October 2006, 11:31 AM	#34
Bell beautiful freak Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 20,465	I really should join up. And pretend to be a troofer! & ur all blind not 2 c teh troof
	__________________ Every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me, that's on the worst day of my life. I♥NY You gotta love cops.

23rd October 2006, 11:34 AM	#35
Oliver ~The Rascal~ Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Cologne Posts: 17,369	Seems that no admins are there... No fun at all to say whatever i want to say. Jdoherty or what his name was gets a lot of kicks in his ass right now about his alex jones agenda...

23rd October 2006, 11:36 AM	#36
LashL Goddess of Legaltainment™ Administrator Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 26,204	Originally Posted by Foolmewunz Lash, are those acre-size slabs in your avatar? (Love the sig line from Troofy!)