This amuses me muchly.

[Gravy]

There's a guy who thinks I'm the same person who appears at about 3:15 in the video 911 Mysteries and describes the impact of flight 175 and the collapse of a tower. I've told this guy that I do not appear in that video, but he questioned me again about it. For comparison, it's the guy on the left he's talking about, and me below:

Now, I don't look like this guy. I'm probably much taller, 10 years older, I have a prominent nose, no lips to speak of, non-bushy eyebrows, and a distinctive birthmark on my right cheek, all qualities that the guy being interviewed doesn't share. So there's that.

I also sound nothing like this guy. Nothing at all.

This wouldn't be worthy of comment, except the person claiming that it's me or a lookalike is Rick Siegel, the creator of 9/11 Eyewitness, which is all about...video and audio analysis.

Quote:

Siegel: "Roberts, who is famous for allegedly being the agent in the beginning of the 911 Mysteries video compilation then took the stage and showed the kids how a real agent can take control.'

I told him I wasn't in that video.

"So, you are sure you are not the guy in the first interview on 911mysteries? Twin brother? You sure look and talk like him."

Here's the kicker: Siegel says he's seen me several times at Ground Zero and has even filmed me, so it's not as if he doesn't have anything to compare:

Quote:

I have seen you many times down at ground zero. We are watching you as carefully, or more so, than they watch me. I even have you on film. When I am ready I will take you aside. You have nothing to fear. You have already been played and it did not hurt a bit did it? In fact you did not even notice it and thought you were actually doing something. That is the beauty of it all.

Could these people possibly be any less competent, and any more paranoid?

Oh, and Rick invited me on a special outing!

Quote:

I was trying to get all the people in the 911scholars to take lie detector tests and do hypnosis. That is when Jones freaked out and tossed me out of their forum. This would at least whittle down those whose “works” have little mettle. How would you like to go along with me, and some of the others from both sides, for that outing? Even I want to see what I remember that is either blocked or forgotten from that day. Can you imagine how much trust you and others would gain? What better proof of truth? I have no fear of it.

ARE YOU KIDDING? I WOULDN'T MISS THAT FOR ALL THE TEA IN CHINA! AS LONG AS I GET TO FILM IT!

Rick Siegel has been asked to be on the Board of Directors of the new 911 Scholars for Truth corporation. He is entirely worthy of that honor.

Quote:

After some recent atrocities committed by a confused and befuddled Professor Jones over the weekend, the powers at the Scholars for 911 Truth have asked Rick Siegel to please join the board of directors for the newly formed Scholars for 911 Truth corporation.

This has not been done without controversy and the controversy will grow, as the kind professor Jones has demanded an Organization and forum without the "powerful and wily Siegel."

I encourage you to visit his 911 Researchers forum for a taste of his powerful arguments and wily ways. You won't be able to stop laughing. Oh, wait...that forum appears to be only about me and Ron Wieck. Do they have a team working on us?

[uk_dave]

Almost as good as landoverbaptist ......

http://www.ricksiegel.com/images/wanted.jpg

[Gravy]

Originally Posted by uk_dave

Almost as good as landoverbaptist ......

http://www.ricksiegel.com/images/wanted.jpg

That's hilarious. I Googled for images of Rick Siegel but didn't see a face I recognized. I wonder which one of the Saturday loons he is. He certainly hasn't been eager to debate me! What? A member of the Scholars' board who can't handle a few facts from this unscholarly tour guide? For shame!

[uk_dave]

doesn't he appear at the beginning of his mysteries video? Or am I mixing up woowoos?

[uk_dave]

Rick Siegel and his two brothers.

[The Doc]

I just find it really amusing how they call this guy an 'agent'.

For starters they know absolutely nothing about him. This guy may very well have experience in the field. He may be an engineer of some sort, ex-firefighter or similar.

I couldn't bring that up in "Screw 9/11 Mysteries" though because they don't make the direct assertion that this guy is an agent. Although they do seem to strongly hint at it.

But really... Gravy? It looks nothing like him and talks nothing like him. Gravy's voice is a lot more subtle and he's got less of an accent in my opinion.

Does anyone know where the original footage of this can be found? I've only seen it on Mysteries.

[Firestone]

Well, the genius Siegel noticed the secret giveaway:

it is mark roberts.jpg

[Architect]

Ah, that's cheered me right up!

Now, to go and pursue 28th wherever he is........

[TheChadd]

Is gravy comming to TAM?

[brodski]

Originally Posted by Firestone

Well, the genius Siegel noticed the secret giveaway:

Attachment 4757

That composite photo reveals more than you think. Look at the text you have captured in the picture you have inserted into the one of Gravy confronting Alex Jones. It clearly says "ME" (in note that the last vertical line of the M is also the vertical line of the E, an old Illuminti trick), which proves that not only is it Gravy in both images, but that you are Gravy too!
You get about a bit, don't you? :P

[chipmunk stew]

Originally Posted by Gravy

Now, I don't look like this guy. I'm probably much taller, 10 years older, I have a prominent nose, no lips to speak of, non-bushy eyebrows, and a distinctive birthmark on my right cheek, all qualities that the guy being interviewed doesn't share. So there's that.

I can prove that the birthmark is fake. Here's an almost-identical image of you:



What's wrong with this picture? Got your starboard confused with your port that day, did you?

Are those platform shoes comfortable, shill?

Typical. JREFers can't see an obvious agent in disguise any better than they can see an obvious fake Osama or an obvious controlled demolition designed to look like a natural collapse.

[NickUK]

None of these pictures look anything like the gravy in the Supa-Seekrit NWO UK/US webconferences we have.

Mind you, he's usually shifted to lizard by then.

Still has the birthmark tho. Not as visible through the green scales, but it's definitely there.

[afinemadness]

Originally Posted by chipmunk stew

I can prove that the birthmark is fake. Here's an almost-identical image of you:



What's wrong with this picture? Got your starboard confused with your port that day, did you?

Are those platform shoes comfortable, shill?

Typical. JREFers can't see an obvious agent in disguise any better than they can see an obvious fake Osama or an obvious controlled demolition designed to look like a natural collapse.

You took the picture from the top of he post and changed it's orientation in Photoshop. Can you really be that transparent????

[JimBenArm]

Originally Posted by afinemadness

You took the picture from the top of he post and changed it's orientation in Photoshop. Can you really be that transparent????

Yes, we knew that. It was posted as a joke. Obviously, you missed that.

[uk_dave]

isn't it "Hokey Cokey"?

[JimBenArm]

Originally Posted by uk_dave

isn't it "Hokey Cokey"?

Not around these here parts, pilgrim! We been hokey pokey-ing long as I can remember!

[bonavada]

also notice anything wrong with this?.....



you wanna get your continuity sorted fella.
proof of a sticky-birthmark swap time window for gravy........

BV

[chipmunk stew]

Originally Posted by afinemadness

You took the picture from the top of he post and changed it's orientation in Photoshop. Can you really be that transparent????

Wrong...I used The Gimp, not Photoshop.

Welcome to the forum, afinemadness!

I'm sorry this was the first post of mine that you read. My position on 9/11 CTs is well-established, so the [sarcasm] tags are redundant for most readers.

[chacal]

Originally Posted by uk_dave

http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting...3bb39f2d8b.jpghttp://forums.randi.org/imagehosting...3bb39f2d8b.jpghttp://forums.randi.org/imagehosting...3bb39f2d8b.jpg

Rick Siegel and his two brothers.

In addition to those dark glasses does Siegel also have a stick and a guide dog cos' that would explain hes photoanalyzing skills. (Notice the smiley indicating that I'm joking...duh)



rolleyes

[uk_dave]

Originally Posted by chacal

In addition to those dark glasses does Siegel also have a stick and a guide dog cos' that would explain hes photoanalyzing skills. (Notice the smiley indicating that I'm joking...duh)



rolleyes

The dog was just out of shot, which explains that leery grin he has.

[Horatius]

Originally Posted by brodski

That composite photo reveals more than you think. Look at the text you have captured in the picture you have inserted into the one of Gravy confronting Alex Jones. It clearly says "ME" (in note that the last vertical line of the M is also the vertical line of the E, an old Illuminti trick), which proves that not only is it Gravy in both images, but that you are Gravy too!
You get about a bit, don't you? :P

Damn! Now I'm convinced!

I just wonder how they made him taller in the Alex Jones video. We could make a killing with that technology!

Some kind of beam ray thingy, I assume.

[afinemadness]

Originally Posted by JimBenArm

Yes, we knew that. It was posted as a joke. Obviously, you missed that.

Actually I realized after i posted. Sorry I am new and not sure who the nut jobs are as of yet.

[brodski]

Originally Posted by uk_dave

isn't it "Hokey Cokey"?

No, the hokey cokey is when you put your left leg in, you take your left leg out, in out in out shake it all about.

The hokey pokie is similar in principle, but using a different appendage entirely, and is illegal to perform in public in 47 states.

[JimBenArm]

Originally Posted by afinemadness

Actually I realized after i posted. Sorry I am new and not sure who the nut jobs are as of yet.

No worries. Welcome to the forums!

[bonavada]

Originally Posted by brodski

The hokey pokie is similar in principle, but using a different appendage entirely, and is illegal to perform in public in 47 states.

it's mandatory at 11-37pm in swansea UK

BV

[brodski]

Originally Posted by bonavada

it's mandatory at 11-37pm in swansea UK

BV

I thought that the RSPCA, and the British Wool Board where cracking down on that?

[afinemadness]

Originally Posted by JimBenArm

No worries. Welcome to the forums!

Thank you for the greeting.

[Hellbound]

Hmmm.

For some reason, I read the title as "This amuses me mulchy".

I was wondering if we had video of Gravy finally losing it and going after a Troofer with a Garden Weasel.

[bonavada]

Originally Posted by brodski

I thought that the RSPCA, and the British Wool Board where cracking down on that?

we **** 'em you eat 'em

:-}

BV

[Bandersnatch]

Quote:

For some reason, I read the title as "This amuses me mulchy".

I was wondering if we had video of Gravy finally losing it and going after a Troofer with a Garden Weasel.

On the next edition of Loose Change...

[LashL]

Unbelievable.

Very amusing indeed, Gravy.

Here's another photo for comparison purposes on Saturday

[JamesB]

That is hilarious. I am on the mailing list for "Veterans for 9/11 Truth". For a group of veterans they seem to know absolutely nothing about the military. But then again both Lauro Chavez and Donn de Grand Pre are members...

Anyway, every once in a while, just for amusement I reply to their stupider e-mails. I replied yesterday regarding the no Arabs on the flight manifest thing, and immediately got strong rebukes and threatened with being banned. Their leader Alfons even called me an "enemy of the state". Explain that one.

They finally decided not to ban me, but that they would keep an eye on me. Oooh.

BTW Gravy, how did you get promoted to Pastor Mark Roberts in Kevin Ryan's eyes?

[Bell]

Why is it (to the nutters) so important wether it's Gravy in that video or not?

[valis]

Originally Posted by afinemadness

You took the picture from the top of he post and changed it's orientation in Photoshop. Can you really be that transparent????

That's just silly. Common sense tell me that if you flipped the orientation of the picture you would be seeing the backside of everything.

[Pardalis]

Is it just me, or is this video interview fake?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003=en#0h3m16s''

How can the guy know the NIST final conclusion before the investigation ever got started? Nobody knew on 9/11 exactly why the towers fell. Plus the tone of this guy is just wrong, kind of sarcastic. Who on earth was sarcastic on 9/11?

I don't want to sound like A CTist, but this video is just wrong.

[Gravy]

Originally Posted by LashL

Unbelievable.

Very amusing indeed, Gravy.

Here's another photo for comparison purposes on Saturday

http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting...43b0fddc3a.jpg

Thanks. He may know me, but I don't know him.

[Gravy]

Originally Posted by JamesB

That is hilarious. I am on the mailing list for "Veterans for 9/11 Truth". For a group of veterans they seem to know absolutely nothing about the military. But then again both Lauro Chavez and Donn de Grand Pre are members...

Anyway, every once in a while, just for amusement I reply to their stupider e-mails. I replied yesterday regarding the no Arabs on the flight manifest thing, and immediately got strong rebukes and threatened with being banned. Their leader Alfons even called me an "enemy of the state". Explain that one.

They finally decided not to ban me, but that they would keep an eye on me. Oooh.

BTW Gravy, how did you get promoted to Pastor Mark Roberts in Kevin Ryan's eyes?

I haven't heard anything about Lauro Chavez in ages. Any news? As for Ryan calling me Pastor, I seem to be missing my flock. Although I'm an atheist, I am a minister, so that must count for something.

Here, sheeplesheeplesheeple!

I need a sheepledog.

[Bell]

Thanks Pardalis, so that's the bit the nutters or on about? So what? Even if it was Gravy, which the guy clearly isn't, what gives? Is it the fact that 'the official story was born right then'? Makes more sense to me than a guy screaming in the Manhattan streets on 9/11 "OMFG!!1! They blew up teh towers with uhmplosives!!1!!one!! God damn Jews!!1!"

BTW, what an ANOYING voice the narrator has. If that was my girlfriend, I'd shoot myself the moment she opened her mouth.

[Gravy]

Originally Posted by Pardalis

Is it just me, or is this video interview fake?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003=en#0h3m16s''

How can the guy know the NIST final conclusion before the investigation ever got started? Nobody knew on 9/11 exactly why the towers fell. Plus the tone of this guy is just wrong, kind of sarcastic. Who on earth was sarcastic on 9/11?

I don't want to sound like A CTist, but this video is just wrong.

Didn't we have this discussion in a PRabbit thread? I see nothing wrong with the video. He's not stating NIST's conclusion, he's stating his opinion. And his adrenaline is churning.

[Gravy]

Originally Posted by Bell

Thanks Pardalis, so that's the bit the nutters or on about? So what? Even if it was Gravy, which the guy clearly isn't, what gives? Is it the fact that 'the official story was born right then'? Makes more sense to me than a guy screaming in the Manhattan streets on 9/11 "OMFG!!1! They blew up teh towers with uhmplosives!!1!!one!! God damn Jews!!1!"

BTW, what an ANOYING voice the narrator has. If that was my girlfriend, I'd shoot myself the moment she opened her mouth.

I agree, Bell. And remember that while it was a shock to almost everyone that the first tower fell, after that most people expected the second to come down.