Giuliani Indicted! - Page 2

JonnyFive · 18th May 2007, 08:22 AM

Originally Posted by T.A.M.

who were seen eating mock chicken sandwich meat.

You mean that stuff made out of tofu?

nicepants · 18th May 2007, 09:36 AM

Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth

All these idiots did was round up a couple dozen of their idiot friends, spend a couple hours in a closed room agreeing with each other and then announce their idiocy to the world in a press release.

You hit the nail right on the head. I wonder, if they proceed with a trial and then find them guilty, would that mean they can't be tried for real since it would be Double Jeopardy?

haha

Originally Posted by Brainster

I had the misfortune to listen to a bit of the testimony and it is excruciating.

Has this been archived somewhere? Part of me is curious and wants to see......like staring at a smashed opossum on the road.

fuelair · 19th May 2007, 08:56 AM

Originally Posted by JonnyFive

You mean that stuff made out of tofu?

There's no fu like a tofu!!!

JonnyFive · 21st May 2007, 08:13 AM

Originally Posted by fuelair

There's no fu like a tofu!!!

True though that may be, it still doesn't taste a thing like meat.

Really, I don't know why they ever bother.

Brainster · 30th May 2007, 08:24 PM

The historic result turns out to be a fraud:

Quote:

More than half the original volunteers dissociated themselves from the event on or shortly after April 14. Even so, at least eleven out of eleven of them have expressed in writing their very strong desire to publicly correct false reports that a citizens’ grand jury in San Diego indicted or charged people with 9/11 crimes.

They state: “Contrary to reports in April and May of 2007, and possibly thereafter, an April 14, 2007, citizens’ grand jury in San Diego never made any indictments of any individuals regarding the September 11 attacks. Unfortunately, an incorrect report posted to the internet and now circulating around it, titled ‘Historic Result From San Diego Citizens' Grand Jury On The Crimes Of September 11, 2001 In New York City,’ spawned hundreds of replications of that false announcement, and threatens to interfere with future efforts for 9/11 truth and justice by means of the grand jury system.”

Is this hilarious or what? Even with a bunch of Troofers on the Grand Jury, with James Hoffman doing the investigation, with "expert" testimony by Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan and Richard Gage (AIA), this Grand Jury didn't even indict a ham sandwich!

Brainster · 31st May 2007, 02:21 AM

Kick. Come on, guys this is a pretty cool story. The Troofers put together a grand jury and can't get an indictment out of it so they decide to announce one anyway? I'll admit it's par for the course but it's still worth talking about, mmmkay?

timhau · 31st May 2007, 02:35 AM

Heh. That's as if they scheduled a soccer game, the other team didn't show up but they decided to play anyway... and lost by an own goal.

WildCat · 31st May 2007, 05:58 AM

Originally Posted by Brainster

The historic result turns out to be a fraud:

Is this hilarious or what? Even with a bunch of Troofers on the Grand Jury, with James Hoffman doing the investigation, with "expert" testimony by Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan and Richard Gage (AIA), this Grand Jury didn't even indict a ham sandwich!

Gravy · 31st May 2007, 06:42 AM

Damn that's funny.

...And the troof goes marching on.

Ove · 31st May 2007, 07:03 AM

Actually they're all wrong, i know who did it. This Guy: (He mumbled something about the WTC blocking his wiew of the Statue of Liberty).....

nicepants · 31st May 2007, 02:44 PM

In case anyone wants to...
Digg It

R.Mackey · 31st May 2007, 02:47 PM

"At least eleven out of eleven?"

Multiple personalities? Idiot Movement math? Both?

Brainster · 31st May 2007, 03:52 PM

More information here; check out the first comment (from Nico):

Quote:

1. When John McCarthy stood up and asked about mini-nukes, Don Paul asked John what his credentials were! He was a jury member and had a right to ask questions without undergoing a background check.

Sort of demonstrates the drawbacks of an all-kook jury.

18th May 2007, 08:22 AM	#41
JonnyFive Insurance Underwriter of Doom Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,473	Originally Posted by T.A.M. who were seen eating mock chicken sandwich meat. You mean that stuff made out of tofu?
	__________________ "If you drink virus water ,i must say ‘don't drink it,it is trap’." -Emre_1974tr Ex-defendant in Simpson v. Randi, et al.

19th May 2007, 08:56 AM	#43
fuelair Cythraul Enfys Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 16,733	Originally Posted by JonnyFive You mean that stuff made out of tofu? There's no fu like a tofu!!!
fuelair Cythraul Enfys Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 16,733

21st May 2007, 08:13 AM	#44
JonnyFive Insurance Underwriter of Doom Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 4,473	Originally Posted by fuelair There's no fu like a tofu!!! True though that may be, it still doesn't taste a thing like meat. Really, I don't know why they ever bother.
	__________________ "If you drink virus water ,i must say ‘don't drink it,it is trap’." -Emre_1974tr Ex-defendant in Simpson v. Randi, et al.

30th May 2007, 08:24 PM	#45
Brainster Philosopher Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 7,062	The historic result turns out to be a fraud: Quote: More than half the original volunteers dissociated themselves from the event on or shortly after April 14. Even so, at least eleven out of eleven of them have expressed in writing their very strong desire to publicly correct false reports that a citizens’ grand jury in San Diego indicted or charged people with 9/11 crimes. They state: “Contrary to reports in April and May of 2007, and possibly thereafter, an April 14, 2007, citizens’ grand jury in San Diego never made any indictments of any individuals regarding the September 11 attacks. Unfortunately, an incorrect report posted to the internet and now circulating around it, titled ‘Historic Result From San Diego Citizens' Grand Jury On The Crimes Of September 11, 2001 In New York City,’ spawned hundreds of replications of that false announcement, and threatens to interfere with future efforts for 9/11 truth and justice by means of the grand jury system.” Is this hilarious or what? Even with a bunch of Troofers on the Grand Jury, with James Hoffman doing the investigation, with "expert" testimony by Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan and Richard Gage (AIA), this Grand Jury didn't even indict a ham sandwich!
Brainster Philosopher Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 7,062	__________________ 1960s Comic Book Nostalgia Check out my (Republican-oriented) Political Blog. Visit the Screw Loose Change blog.

31st May 2007, 02:21 AM	#46
Brainster Philosopher Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 7,062	Kick. Come on, guys this is a pretty cool story. The Troofers put together a grand jury and can't get an indictment out of it so they decide to announce one anyway? I'll admit it's par for the course but it's still worth talking about, mmmkay?
Brainster Philosopher Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 7,062	__________________ 1960s Comic Book Nostalgia Check out my (Republican-oriented) Political Blog. Visit the Screw Loose Change blog.

18th May 2007, 09:36 AM	#42
nicepants Graduate Poster Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 1,702	Originally Posted by Sword_Of_Truth All these idiots did was round up a couple dozen of their idiot friends, spend a couple hours in a closed room agreeing with each other and then announce their idiocy to the world in a press release. You hit the nail right on the head. I wonder, if they proceed with a trial and then find them guilty, would that mean they can't be tried for real since it would be Double Jeopardy? haha Originally Posted by Brainster I had the misfortune to listen to a bit of the testimony and it is excruciating. Has this been archived somewhere? Part of me is curious and wants to see......like staring at a smashed opossum on the road.

31st May 2007, 02:35 AM	#47
timhau NWO Litter Technician Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: East of Sweeden Posts: 3,479	Heh. That's as if they scheduled a soccer game, the other team didn't show up but they decided to play anyway... and lost by an own goal.

31st May 2007, 05:58 AM	#48
WildCat NWO Master Conspirator Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Albany Park, Chicago Posts: 24,974	Originally Posted by Brainster The historic result turns out to be a fraud: Is this hilarious or what? Even with a bunch of Troofers on the Grand Jury, with James Hoffman doing the investigation, with "expert" testimony by Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan and Richard Gage (AIA), this Grand Jury didn't even indict a ham sandwich!
	__________________ "My opinion is not uninformed there are just many things I have no clue about." -atavisms "Iran DOES have the right and good reason to attack Israel." -parky76

31st May 2007, 06:42 AM	#49
Gravy Downsitting Citizen Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: In the argyle Posts: 17,063	Damn that's funny. ...And the troof goes marching on.
	__________________ "Please, keep your chops cool and don’t overblow.” –Freddie Hubbard What's the Harm?........Stop Sylvia Browne........My 9/11 links

31st May 2007, 02:44 PM	#51
nicepants Graduate Poster Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 1,702	In case anyone wants to... Digg It

31st May 2007, 02:47 PM	#52
R.Mackey Philosopher Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: The armpit of L.A. Posts: 5,906	"At least eleven out of eleven?" Multiple personalities? Idiot Movement math? Both?
	__________________ "Nothing real can defeat us. Nothing unreal exists." -B. Banzai VT VENIANT OMNES

31st May 2007, 03:52 PM	#53
Brainster Philosopher Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 7,062	More information here; check out the first comment (from Nico): Quote: 1. When John McCarthy stood up and asked about mini-nukes, Don Paul asked John what his credentials were! He was a jury member and had a right to ask questions without undergoing a background check. Sort of demonstrates the drawbacks of an all-kook jury.
Brainster Philosopher Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 7,062	__________________ 1960s Comic Book Nostalgia Check out my (Republican-oriented) Political Blog. Visit the Screw Loose Change blog.