JREF Homepage Swift Blog Events Calendar $1 Million Paranormal Challenge The Amaz!ng Meeting Useful Links Support Us
James Randi Educational Foundation JREF Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   JREF Forum » Reference » Book Reviews
Click Here To Donate

Notices


Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.

Comment
Chaos
Chaos
Submitted by Hokulele
9th July 2007
Chaos

“Where chaos begins, classical science stops.” Chaos is a history of science written for the general public about the theory and methods used when dealing with chaotic, or non-linear systems. It opens in the 1970’s with Edward Lorenz, his experiments with creating weather simulations, and the now-famous Butterfly Effect, and takes the reader through the ongoing development and application of chaos as it applies to meteorology, astrophysics, fluid dynamics, ecology, and chemistry, among other fields.

Although chaos theory is primarily mathematical in nature, the book is written with a fine balance between a focus on the scientists and the science. There are a few equations presented in context, but the math is at a fairly basic level and you do not need to have taken a college-level calculus course to understand and appreciate this book. There are plenty of illustrations included to help illuminate the concepts presented. In addition, there is a section of color plates halfway through the book, including several images taken from the Mandelbrot set that could qualify as art as much as science.

On the negative side, this book was written in 1987, and many theories have been further refined in the mean time. Particularly the sections on chaos and biology are dated and several of the philosophical implications of chaos theory discussed in the book have been discarded. However, its value as an introduction to the field remains undiminished.

If you have always wondered how the Great Red Spot on Jupiter could form, why the tentacles of a jellyfish resemble drops of ink settling in a glass of water, or the origins of information theory, Chaos can provide some answers.


James Gleick
  #1  
By rjh01 on 21st July 2007, 05:29 PM
I read the book many years ago. It inspired me to write a Microsoft Excel macro that will produce the Mandelbrot set. This proves that you can have a simple input to produce a complex output.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
By Mrs. Hmmphries on 28th August 2007, 04:48 PM
I read this during my senior year of High School, for my senior paper which I'd decided to do on Chaos Theory. I enjoyed it so much that I continued to read this type of book throughout the years since.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
By homer on 2nd October 2007, 05:20 AM
I read this book some time ago before I owned a PC . The pictures later inspired me to examine the mandelbrot set on my first PC. I found a program called Fractint which was so much faster than my ' home made ' programs .
The book , of course , goes into a lot more than this and is pretty good . Unless you go to more technical publications this one is as good as any in introducing you to this subject .
This author also wrote a biography of Richard Feynman called 'Genius ' which I enjoyed .
Reply With Quote
Comment

JREF Forum » Reference » Book Reviews

Bookmarks

Book Review Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:36 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2001-2012, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.