JREF Homepage Swift Blog Events Calendar $1 Million Paranormal Challenge The Amaz!ng Meeting Useful Links Support Us
James Randi Educational Foundation JREF Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   JREF Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
Click Here To Donate

Notices


Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.

Reply
Old 19th September 2007, 09:30 AM   #1
buka001
Thinker
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sunny South Africa
Posts: 205
Quantum Physics to find missing people?

A few months back a major story aired on an investigative tv journalism show here in South Africa. The transcript of the episode can be viewed here - http://www.carteblanche.co.za/Displa...ay.asp?Id=3362

An ex police officer, who now works at a university as a security official, has "invented" a device that uses Quantum Physics to locate any object be it a person living or dead, or a bucket of oil.

He claims his machine can take a sample from the source, eg a single strand of hair, place it in his device, and then using quantum physics this machine will indicate on a map on his laptop (connected to this small black box analysing machine) a directional vector indicating the direction to the source (the body or person). He then moves to two alternate lcations to triangulate the directional vectors to pinpoint the location of the source material.

Apperntly he has located people before. He also was able to locate a tin of oil and a sample of bacteria.

I firmly believe that there is something seriously suspicious with these claims. Since teh episode, there has been a public outcry, requesting proper vigorous tests, but nothing has happened.

Has anyone heard of this supposed marvel technology?
buka001 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2007, 09:53 AM   #2
Muppet
Student
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 43
I'd like to see some non-tv research...

I don't see how quantum physics are going to do this at least (but I'm no physicist).
Muppet is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2007, 10:04 AM   #3
Crossbow
Seeking Honesty and Sanity
 
Crossbow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,294
Well now, if his work is genuine, then I expect that he will be richer than Bill Gates in less than four years.

On the other hand, if his work is based on the usual "woo" ideas about quantum physics (which deals with systems of very small and very energetic particles, and not at all with large discrete things like humans and buckets of oil), then I expect that his work is just another pile of junk.
__________________
A man's best friend is his dogma.
Crossbow is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2007, 10:07 AM   #4
tsg
Philosopher
 
tsg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 6,771
It sounds an awful lot like this.
__________________
Being offended by someone questioning your beliefs is a sign that you should be questioning them.

In the beginning there was nothing. And the Lord said "Let There Be Light!" And still there was nothing, but at least now you could see it.
tsg is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2007, 10:32 AM   #5
Yiab
Thinker
 
Yiab's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 191
"A bucket of oil", huh?

Okay, give him a sample of oil from the bucket then toss it into the middle of the pacific ocean.

Essentially finding that isn't any harder than finding a person, from a quantum mechanical perspective.
Yiab is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2007, 10:58 AM   #6
buka001
Thinker
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sunny South Africa
Posts: 205
What I don't understand, is if this device can do what it claims, why does it not point to other sources of the DNA? People leave fragments of DNA all the place. Why does it not point to those sources.

Why with the oil did it not point to the primary source of oil, from where the bucket was drawn?
buka001 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2007, 03:02 PM   #7
The Sopwith Turtle
Thinker
 
The Sopwith Turtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 129
Going by all the quantum physics I know, this sounds like absolute garbage.
__________________
"Mountains rise and fall, and under them the Turtle swims onward. Men live and die, and the Turtle Moves. Empires grow and crumble, and the Turtle Moves. Gods come and go, and still the Turtle Moves. The Turtle Moves. "
The Sopwith Turtle is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2007, 03:07 PM   #8
scotth
Atheist Political Candidate
 
scotth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: DFW, TX area
Posts: 1,801
It is completely non-sense.

There is nothing in ANY branch of conventional physics that would permit such a device.
__________________
"This is one of things that I find so dangerous about religion. It actually allows people who are perfectly healthy psychologically, and quite intelligent even, to believe things that only a lunatic or an idiot could believe on his own." - Sam Harris in an internet radio interview with www.rationalresponders.com
Hurst Photography
scotth is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2007, 03:24 PM   #9
tsg
Philosopher
 
tsg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 6,771
Originally Posted by theturtlemoves View Post
Going by all the quantum physics I know, this sounds like absolute garbage.
I know squadoosh about quantum physics and it sounds like garbage to me.
__________________
Being offended by someone questioning your beliefs is a sign that you should be questioning them.

In the beginning there was nothing. And the Lord said "Let There Be Light!" And still there was nothing, but at least now you could see it.
tsg is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2007, 03:37 PM   #10
Fnord
Metasyntactic Variable
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,633
This sounds suspiciously like a Hieronymous Machine, or some variation of it.

Anything that someone can invent that exploits "Quantum" principles is either engaged in particle physics, nth-generation computer chip design, or blatant quackery.

And the fact that South Africa has one of the worst anti-AIDS policies (Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, South Africa's Minister of Health, advocates a diet of garlic, beetroot, and lemon to cure the disease, rather than proven anti-viral drugs), thus showing a lack of scientific thinking, leads me to seriously doubt that this South African's "Quantum" device has any merit beyond its value as scrap metal.
__________________
Belief is the subjective acceptance of a (valid or invalid) concept, opinion, or theory;
Faith is the unreasoned belief in improvable things;
and Knowledge is the reasoned belief in provable things.
Belief itself proves nothing.
Fnord is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 19th September 2007, 11:58 PM   #11
DRBUZZ0
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Command Bunker
Posts: 3,320
I once tried to find someone using quantum physics. I was able to determine what sort of state they were in (turns out they were okay except for a stubbed toe) and their velocity (moving away from me at 30 mph south south west). But damnit... then I realized I'd never be able to know where the hell they are located!

(rimshot)

No this is not only bogus it's "Not even wrong"

Quatum physics governs the behavior of subatomic particles and there is some truth to the idea that you could infer the location or state based on another "linked" particle or co-particle. But this has absolutely nothing to do with finding something like a person.

Quantum effects are generally not observable at a macroscopic level, with the exception of a few weird things that happen with lasers and particle detectors and such. But the particles in a hair from your head are not in any way related on a "quantum" level to the rest of your body than they are to your car or your sweater. They're all just independent particles which are not necessarly "entangled" or "Aligned."

Even if they were somehow, that definately would not allow a simple box to find you. The quantum world is weird and it's hard to observe it directly without a lot of infering or indirect indicators.

This is bull on so many levels I don't even know how to start with it. And I don't even know all that much about quantum physics (although I know plenty to know this is BS)
DRBUZZ0 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

JREF Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:16 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2001-2012, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.