JREF Homepage Swift Blog Events Calendar $1 Million Paranormal Challenge The Amaz!ng Meeting Useful Links Support Us
James Randi Educational Foundation JREF Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   JREF Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
Click Here To Donate

Notices


Welcome to the JREF Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.

Tags civilization , earth , type 1

Reply
Old 21st November 2007, 04:49 PM   #1
drzeus99
Hellmouth Beastie
 
drzeus99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wherever misfortune has me
Posts: 366
Earth/Humans reaching TYPE 1 status

Just tossing this out to hear what you all think.

Prof. Michio Kaku - www.mkaku.org - theoretical physicist at CUNY (I think), and co-founder
of string field theory (and overall VERY cool/nice guy)
has often spoken about, especially in his lectures and on the DVD of his book Parallel Worlds, about intelligent civilizations and how they can eventually reach higher status levels.

Currently, we are a Type 0 civilization.

The other 3 types are:
Type 1: Has the ability to control the power of a planet. Also has 1 world
language, music/fashion culture, can control the environment, etc.
Type 2: Can control the power of their whole solar system
Type 3: Can control the power of their entire galaxy (ala Star Trek's "The
Borg")

Question. When do you all think (if ever) that humans will become a Type 1
civilization.

(Note: Prof. Kaku thinks that we are close to reaching Type 1 status and
should be there within 100 years <if not even sooner>).

I think he's pretty close. I'm thinking more like 150-200 years (sadly)


Cheers,
DrZ

____________________ This space for rent _____________________

Last edited by drzeus99; 21st November 2007 at 05:20 PM.
drzeus99 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st November 2007, 05:01 PM   #2
Yoink
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,937
Could you explain what "having the ability to control the power of a planet" means? Is it the same thing as being "able to control the environment," or something else?
Yoink is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st November 2007, 05:16 PM   #3
Zep
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,985
I think it means: "Making the Earth spin backwards."
Zep is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st November 2007, 05:17 PM   #4
drzeus99
Hellmouth Beastie
 
drzeus99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wherever misfortune has me
Posts: 366
Originally Posted by Yoink View Post
Could you explain what "having the ability to control the power of a planet" means? Is it the same thing as being "able to control the environment," or something else?
Yes, complete control of the planet (environment, weather....)
The smarter any civilization gets, if it survives, it'll be able to harness and control the power of the planet. (Type 1)

If they keep getting more technological, they'll eventually be able to control the power of their star and their star system. (Type 2)

and finally, when they become probably the smartest things in the universe, they woupd be able to harness the power of their galaxy (create rips in the space/time fabric and use as they wish..etc) (Type 3)

Basically:
Type 1: Harness/Control power of a planet
Type 2: " " " " " solar system (the sun, basically)
Type 3: " " " " " galaxy

But Prof. Kaku seems to believe we're on the verge of becoming a Type 1 civilization. He believe that if we don't kill ourselves off, that within 100 years, we'll have advanced to Type 1 status.

I personally believe that's a little kind. I don't think that'll happen for at least 150 years (but within 200 years, I definitely think that will happen)


Cheers,
DrZ
drzeus99 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st November 2007, 05:23 PM   #5
casebro
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,887
Why should we want to?

The Soviet Union proved that central control does NOT work. The random climate has worked fine for billions of years, why mess it up now?
__________________
Please pardon me for having ideas, not facts.

Some have called me cynical, but I don't believe them.

It's not how many breaths you take. It's how many times you have been breathless that counts.
casebro is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st November 2007, 05:33 PM   #6
drzeus99
Hellmouth Beastie
 
drzeus99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wherever misfortune has me
Posts: 366
Originally Posted by casebro View Post
Why should we want to?

The Soviet Union proved that central control does NOT work. The random climate has worked fine for billions of years, why mess it up now?
It actually implies that we work together, as ONE HUMAN RACE, and with future scientific/technological knowledge, will figure out how to control the power of the planet (and hopefully use that power wisely and productively).


Cheers,
DrZ
drzeus99 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st November 2007, 05:37 PM   #7
GT/CS
Illuminator
 
GT/CS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,630
I don't see it ever happening.

We will never be able to control the environment. For example, we will not be able to stop Yellowstone from belching, nor will we be able to prevent tornadoes.

People are too distrustful of each other, and too independent, for there to ever be one government. Plus, in the U.S., there are too many rednecks with guns.
__________________
SweatyYeti or Bill Munns would be my vote for looking at this - BFSleuth @ BFF
I've got plenty of common sense! I just choose to ignore it. - Calvin; October 15, 1986
GT/CS is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st November 2007, 05:37 PM   #8
Zep
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 26,985
Power of the planet...by combining our rings??
Zep is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st November 2007, 06:44 PM   #9
Dr. Trintignant
Muse
 
Dr. Trintignant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 745
Originally Posted by drzeus99 View Post
Just tossing this out to hear what you all think.
A more objective scale to use when determining type status (and the one used by the original Kardashev scale) is energy use.

According to Wikipedia:
Type 1: 10^16 W
Type 2: 10^26 W
Type 3: 10^36 W

Roughly speaking, this corresponds to the energy available on a planet, solar system, and galaxy, respectively. Though obviously these are not perfect matches since they vary in size.

You can come up with a fractional number by using logarithms, according to this equation:
K=(log10(W) - 6)/10

We are at about 1.6x10^13 watts, which would make us a Type 0.72 civilization. However, it's important to note that getting to Type 1 still involves a 600-fold increase in power use.

- Dr. Trintignant
Dr. Trintignant is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st November 2007, 06:49 PM   #10
drzeus99
Hellmouth Beastie
 
drzeus99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wherever misfortune has me
Posts: 366
Originally Posted by Dr. Trintignant View Post
A more objective scale to use when determining type status (and the one used by the original Kardashev scale) is energy use.

According to Wikipedia:
Type 1: 10^16 W
Type 2: 10^26 W
Type 3: 10^36 W

Roughly speaking, this corresponds to the energy available on a planet, solar system, and galaxy, respectively. Though obviously these are not perfect matches since they vary in size.

You can come up with a fractional number by using logarithms, according to this equation:
K=(log10(W) - 6)/10

We are at about 1.6x10^13 watts, which would make us a Type 0.72 civilization. However, it's important to note that getting to Type 1 still involves a 600-fold increase in power use.

- Dr. Trintignant

Yeah...what he said.

That's what I meant to say. But Dr Trintignant said is so succinctly.


Cheers,
DrZ
drzeus99 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st November 2007, 07:23 PM   #11
dogjones
Graduate Poster
 
dogjones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bermuda
Posts: 1,286
If type 1 by definition has one world language... assuming here you mean (one, and ONLY one) then a lot of people are going to have to die in order to get there.
__________________
It's great being ideologically flexible.
dogjones is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st November 2007, 08:15 PM   #12
drzeus99
Hellmouth Beastie
 
drzeus99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wherever misfortune has me
Posts: 366
Originally Posted by dogjones View Post
If type 1 by definition has one world language... assuming here you mean (one, and ONLY one) then a lot of people are going to have to die in order to get there.
By World language, I mean a language that can be used throughout the world.
All experts agree that English seems to be that language. You can walk down practically any street in any major world city and conduct an interview with a local who speaks English. No other language comes close to that.

In order to compete in the global market place, English is taught around the world to students. Not French or any other language. Educators and countries know that in order to advance yourself in life, if people knew English, out of any language in the world, they would have the best advantages. I'm not saying this happens in EVERY country, but watch any TV show where cameras are in a foreign land. Most of the kids know some English and they say they are learning it in school. Most, if not all of Europe has English classed for their students. Much of South America and Africa has them too, mainly do to outsourcing jobs like telemarketing. We all know they speak English in India. All our Tech Support calls are routed there!

But local languages...they will probably be around for thousands of years.

Cheers,
Alex
drzeus99 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st November 2007, 08:44 PM   #13
The Man
Scourge, of the supernatural
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 7,579
So what about a Type 4 civilization: Can control the power of an entire universe.

Personally I would find a type 1 civilization awful damn boring.
__________________
"Not a seat but a springboard” (1942 Winston Churchill) "As he who, seeking asses, found a kingdom" (1671 Milton "Paradise Regained") "for it seem'd A void was made in nature, all her bonds Crack'd; and I saw the flaring atom-streams And torrents of her myriad universe, Ruining along the illimitable inane, Fly on to clash together again, and make Another and another frame of things For ever." (1868 Tennyson "Lucretius")
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st November 2007, 08:58 PM   #14
drzeus99
Hellmouth Beastie
 
drzeus99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wherever misfortune has me
Posts: 366
Originally Posted by The Man View Post
So what about a Type 4 civilization: Can control the power of an entire universe.

Personally I would find a type 1 civilization awful damn boring.
Ahhh.....in that case, I suspect they be indistinguishable from "god"


Cheers,
DrZ
drzeus99 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd November 2007, 11:13 AM   #15
Yoink
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,937
Well, it's all speculation, but I can't imagine any technological advance in the next 100-150 years that would make us able to "control" the planet in the sense you mean. The Yellowstone caldera is a great example. What possible mechanism could you imagine by which we would be able to turn forces of that magnitude on and off at will?
Yoink is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd November 2007, 11:35 AM   #16
The Man
Scourge, of the supernatural
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 7,579
So where does the extra power come from? In order to control a planet, make it do something other then what it is already doing, you would basically need the energy of another planet. So what other planet should a type 1 civilization sacrifice to enable them to “play” with their planet? What universe would a type 4 civilization sacrifice in order to “play GOD”?
__________________
"Not a seat but a springboard” (1942 Winston Churchill) "As he who, seeking asses, found a kingdom" (1671 Milton "Paradise Regained") "for it seem'd A void was made in nature, all her bonds Crack'd; and I saw the flaring atom-streams And torrents of her myriad universe, Ruining along the illimitable inane, Fly on to clash together again, and make Another and another frame of things For ever." (1868 Tennyson "Lucretius")
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 22nd November 2007, 11:23 PM   #17
Roboramma
Philosopher
 
Roboramma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 7,131
I've always understood a Type 1 civilization to be one that harnesses all of the energy available on it's home planet - though I've thought of it more specifically as all of the solar energy.

It's the most high energy civilization capable without venturing into space. Similarly a type 2 civilization is the most high energy civilization possible without venturing to other stars. A type 3 is the most high energy civilization possible without venturing to other galaxies.

The definition might be more useful if it took into account resources other than energy, but it also makes it more complicated, so for the sake of this conversation I'll leave it there.

There is something interesting there, and it's the transition from one to the other. For instance imagine a world where our only power source were solar power (just to make things simple). As terrestrial space was filled with solar power collectors, we would come to a point where collecting power in space was less expensive than doing so on earth. At that point we begin the transition from type 1 to type 2, even though, of course, there may still be some potential for growth planet-side. Something similar might happen in respect to the transition from type 2 to type 3.

As to how soon it will happen, I agree that it's not that far away, unless we fail to manage our resources well and have some sort of environmental or economic collapse (which I don't think is all that unlikely). We're already using a considerable percentage of the total energy available to the biosphere, for instance. Admittedly there is a great room for improvement in efficiency but that's another issue.
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together."
Isaac Asimov
Roboramma is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd November 2007, 12:20 AM   #18
HghrSymmetry
View clearer from above.
 
HghrSymmetry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,510
Deleted.

Last edited by HghrSymmetry; 23rd November 2007 at 12:22 AM. Reason: Already addressed in thread.
HghrSymmetry is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd November 2007, 12:21 AM   #19
my_wan
Graduate Poster
 
my_wan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,077
Personally I don't think the type scheme used is not very relevant. I find it unlikely that a civilization much advanced beyond ours would much care about planets at all, except for possibly a supply depot for raw material. Fundamental physical limits likely exist that prevent direct control by a given government over an unlimited region of space. For the same reason the technical ability to gain power assets totaling that of a galaxy is probably pointless. It is sufficient that power needs of any physically conceivable project can be met.
__________________
Peace to all people of the world. The evidence indicates that this is best accomplished through a skeptical approach.
my_wan is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 23rd November 2007, 11:22 AM   #20
The Man
Scourge, of the supernatural
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 7,579
Originally Posted by Roboramma View Post
I've always understood a Type 1 civilization to be one that harnesses all of the energy available on it's home planet - though I've thought of it more specifically as all of the solar energy.

It's the most high energy civilization capable without venturing into space. Similarly a type 2 civilization is the most high energy civilization possible without venturing to other stars. A type 3 is the most high energy civilization possible without venturing to other galaxies.

The definition might be more useful if it took into account resources other than energy, but it also makes it more complicated, so for the sake of this conversation I'll leave it there.

There is something interesting there, and it's the transition from one to the other. For instance imagine a world where our only power source were solar power (just to make things simple). As terrestrial space was filled with solar power collectors, we would come to a point where collecting power in space was less expensive than doing so on earth. At that point we begin the transition from type 1 to type 2, even though, of course, there may still be some potential for growth planet-side. Something similar might happen in respect to the transition from type 2 to type 3.

As to how soon it will happen, I agree that it's not that far away, unless we fail to manage our resources well and have some sort of environmental or economic collapse (which I don't think is all that unlikely). We're already using a considerable percentage of the total energy available to the biosphere, for instance. Admittedly there is a great room for improvement in efficiency but that's another issue.

OK, this sounds more reasonable to me, the type classifications merely refers to the magnitude of power under the control of the civilization. Not that the planet, solar system or galaxy is directly under their control. Is that what Professor Kaku meant?
__________________
"Not a seat but a springboard” (1942 Winston Churchill) "As he who, seeking asses, found a kingdom" (1671 Milton "Paradise Regained") "for it seem'd A void was made in nature, all her bonds Crack'd; and I saw the flaring atom-streams And torrents of her myriad universe, Ruining along the illimitable inane, Fly on to clash together again, and make Another and another frame of things For ever." (1868 Tennyson "Lucretius")
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

JREF Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:46 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2001-2012, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.